Bold, daring plan to Fix the Clips
First, I'd like to echo the compliments for Clipper Steve.
I spend way too much time on the site. Thanks for breaking up my day and providing an outlet for my social dysfunction/obsession.
Here is my whack at fixing our broken Clippers.
This is somewhat dramatic and potentially excessive, but it is a time for bold moves. We need to move while Sterling is in the "win at all costs" mode, Baylor is struggling to save his job and Dunleavy wants to prove the naysayers wrong.
We call up Houston and trade for Tracy McGrady.
We offer them Cassell, Maggette and Mobley. Heck, they can have Minnesota's pick if they want, and our 2nd round this year.
The Clippers get:
McGrady
Mike James
Kirk Snyder
Why Houston would do it:
They are unhappy with McGrady. He is not a proven winner and is fragile. They have their box-office breaker in Yao. Now they need to win. And they need to make a push this year before their franchise center starts saying things like: "We just did the usual Houston thing and found a way to loose."
So they get Cassell, who as we have seen is a burst of short-term can-win leadership. His contract is also only for one year, so if it works, great, sign him for one more and have him help guide the kids at PG. Plus he loves Houston.
They get Maggette, who is kind of a poor man's version of McGrady. Slightly more durable and probably has more fire in him then McGrady does. Especially if he is traded and needs to prove Dunleavy wrong. Plus, his slashing and foul-drawing will help Yao.
They get Mobley, a Houston hero. He spreads the floor, is level headed and a good leader. Does Houston have a good leader? Plus, maybe he sparks a mini-resurgence in Steve Francis, so that his signing isn't a complete waste.
And a couple of draft picks. We haven't used them too well anyway.
Why Clippers do it:
With McGrady, we are taking a risk, for sure. He is fragile, emotional and not a proven winner. However, I think Brand can wake him up. And Brand is going to have a fire under him.
Plus, well, he is Tracy McGrady. He can score. He can take over at the end of games. And whom do you double: Kaman, Brand or McGrady?
Having Brand and Kaman should help keep some of the pounding and scoring load off of him, and if he does go down, we have the always-exciting Thorton.
Hopefully, he would be happier in LA. He can battle it out with Kobe. He can endorse whatever he wants.
We get Mike James, a serviceable point guard with on-again, off-again years. Hopefully we get him on a good year. A great Plan B if Livingston is shot.
We rent Kirk Snyder for a year and say thank you.
We have what's left of the year to figure out how McGrady, Brand, Kaman and Livingston can play together.
For the 2008/9 and the remainder of folks:
Brand exercises the final year and then we give him what he wants.
We break up our mid-level exception between Powell, Davis and Ross. I think we can do this. If not, thanks but no thanks Powell and Davis.
We bring over MBFGC and see if we can't get him in to shape for 2010.
Livingston accepts the min. offer and everyone hopes he make sit.
We give Diaz a min. one-year deal.
We draft Budinger or whoever the best SG (that, um, can shoot) is available.
So our depth chart is thus:
PG Livingston (5.8)James (6)/Knight (2)
SG Ross (2)/Diaz (800k)/Budinger (2.4)
SF McGrady (21.1)/Thorton (1.8) Ross
PF Brand (16.4)Thomas (6) Powell (900k)/ Thorton
C Kaman (9.5)/Davis (800k)/MBFGC (800k)
A mobile line-up with lots of interchangeable parts. Fun for the whole family!
We go over the Luxury tax, so Sterling isn't happy. But we have a real shot at winning, which make shim happy. He is so mercurial! We also listen real close for any deals that would bring us under.
Are salary situation in 2009/10 is thus:
McGrady $21.0 mil, 3 years
Brand 16.4 mil, last year (sign him up boys!)
Kaman 9.5 mil, 4 years
James 6 mil 2 years
Thomas 6 mil, 2 years
Livingston 5.8 mil, last year
Budinger 2.4 mil, 3 years
Knight 2 mil, last year
Ross 2 mil, 3 years, mid-level exception
Thorton 1.8, 4 years
Powell .9 mil, 2 years, mid-level exception
Diaz, .8 mil, 1 year
MBFGC, .8 mil, 1 year (get in shape, buddy)
Davis, .8 mil, 2 year, mid-level exception.
So that is that. We come in at a total payroll of 76.4 million (yikes!), but the mid-level brings us down to 72.7 million. Still yikes, but it is a heck of a team.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
Huh
McGrady for Mobley and Cassell.
It is not without precedent. Very interesting.
Huh Yea
by Citizen Roy G Biv on Jan 25, 2008 11:20 AM PST reply actions
Congratulations!
Maggette, Cassell, and Mobley is a good package of experience and expiring deals. I'm not sure that they get Houston over the top, however, and my guess is that they're going to try to make Yao-McGrady work for one more season, try to get into the playoffs and hope for the best. It's hard to say how Maggette and Shane Battier would coexist, but they were on the same team at Duke, for whatever that's worth. Unless I'm wrong and have missed something, it seems like Steve Francis is done, and bringing Mobley and Cassell in isn't going to start a resurgence--the Clips dodged a bullet on that one.
I also love the idea of trading for an all-star who would force Sterling, who says he's willing to pay for star players, into the luxury tax. Brand-Kaman-McGrady would be just awesome, and Thornton is still there too. If you're Houston, do you ask for Thornton in this deal, trying to set up McGrady as a star who merits an extra young player kicker? I would be tempted to throw Thornton in, if it weren't for McGrady's injury history.
There's still a question of whether McGrady is really a winner, as well as the injury issues. The only way the deal could happen is if Houston really believes it's never going to work with McGrady, that they're completely off the boil on him. The Clips could take their chances on the "winning" issue, but I'd need to know more about the longterm health outlook, and try to figure out the worst case scenario--since that often happens with the Clips.
But why not go for this and make it work? Congrats again on a nice idea and the winning entry.
by zhivclip on Jan 28, 2008 9:01 AM PST reply actions
Worst Case Scenario
Worst Case:
Clippers role to a 4th seed finish, then 2 weeks before the play-offs in one game Kaman and Brand wrestle over a rebound, knock other to the ground and get concussions. 3 plays later Livingston is coming back after a steal for a fast-break and slips on a wet spot on Staples Center floor (probably workers up on the catwalk wringing out their wet clothes...again) and he blows out his other knee.
Leaving McGrady, Thomas and Thorton to plummet to 8th and get wrecked by Phoenix. Wait, for it to be worst, it'd have to be the Lakers. With Isiah Thomas as coach (in a very rare coaching trade with the Knicks.)
by Citizen Roy G Biv on Jan 28, 2008 9:40 AM PST up reply actions
Not even close
Are you suggesting that if the trade happens the Clippers make the playoffs this year? Not a chance. They already have 27 losses.
Let's see, worst case/Clipper scenario: McGrady trade happens, Liv is healthy, Kaman-Brand-McGrady trio is dominant and Clips go 28-14, finish at .500, and just miss the playoffs. But that was expected, and team/fans/owner are all geeked up about 08-09.
You can write your Clipaster from there, but I think it would be a McGrady injury issue that would mean the team is paying him a fortune and he plays rarely, if at all. Kind of a Grant Hill/Orlando type of thing. Livingston would play just well enough to get a sizable deal, and then his body would break down again. With these injuries and frustration, EB signs with another team.
Something like that.
by zhivclip on Jan 28, 2008 10:29 AM PST up reply actions
no play offs
I don't even think the Clippers will e able to finish playing this year, let alone the play-offs.
by Citizen Roy G Biv on Jan 28, 2008 11:12 AM PST reply actions

by 










