Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The End Of Sabanball: Details, Barbarians, And Precision

The Strange Tale of Dr. Kaman 2.0 and Mr. Flippy

Chris Kaman can drive a blogger crazy.

As recently as the Spurs preview, I singled him out as "the biggest culprit in the last two games."  That criticism was I believe justified in the case of the Sacramento game - he was not good, and for his efforts (or lack thereof) he earned a place on the bench in the fourth quarter.  As bad as the Clippers reserves have been this season, you know he's not playing well when MDsr sits him down the stretch.  The Warriors game is a little trickier.  In the score sheet, he looks great.  15 points, 13 rebounds.  Who could ask for more?  Well, I guess I could.  He was outplayed by Biedrins in that game, and he missed several opportunities where he didn't grab a rebound, or didn't finish a shot.  You know - Mr. Flippy stuff.

But in the big picture, if we were wondering which Kaman we were going to get this season, there are signs that we are version 2.0 or better.  He started poorly - there's no denying that.  As it happens, one of the areas where he's shown marked improvement this season is avoiding silly fouls.  The two exceptions are the two games with the Lakers, in which he was limited to 30 minutes each because of foul trouble.  But after three average to poor games to start the season, the guy has been very, very good (Kings game notwithstanding). 

It's dangerous to write a paean to the guy directly after the strong game he played against the Thunder.  No doubt he'll come out tomorrow and lay an egg.  It's particularly risky considering how badly he played against the Sixers last season, when he averaged 7 points and 8 rebounds in 2 games and was completely outplayed by Sam Dalembert.  Inconsistency has been a problem throughout his career so who knows what we'll get from game to game.

Still, something feels different this time.

Kevin at ClipperBlog noticed also.

What’s the difference?  Chris is doing a better job of passing out when he knows he’s liable to get into trouble.  It’s a great life skill — knowing one’s limitations. It’s a particularly good life skill when you’re an NBA center.  Tonight, it’s as if Chris is able to say to himself, “this isn’t going to end well” in those instances when it’s apparent to everyone he’s going to cough up the ball or overwork his shot.

It's worth noting that in the two really painful losses to the Kings and Warriors, the ones I hung on Chris, he had zero assists and seven turnovers.  Last night in OKC?  Six assists and one turnover.

He's probably not going to get six assists a night for the rest of his career.  But if he has indeed developed a new life skill, this is how it would manifest itself.  He'll get more assists, and he'll turn the ball over less.  And the difference for the team is huge. Chris is quite self-aware, particularly as compared to the typical NBA player.  Still, he's not been particularly good at recognizing his limitations.  If indeed he's developing that ability, it would be a major step forward.

The Clippers first basket last night was a perfect illustration of how good Chris Kaman can be.  A simple center screen and roll with Baron and Kaman - Chris slips past Robert Swift, catches the pass in the lane, and drops it off immediately to Marcus Camby for the layup as Nick Collison tries to rotate.  Although he made it look easy, it's anything but.  First of all, it's a tough catch, with the ball coming from the top, rolling to the hoop.  You basically have to turn your head completely away from the direction you're moving.  You have to make the catch, get your bearings, avoid running over the help defender, and make a decision with the ball, all in a split second.  When it works, it's a layup.  When it doesn't, it's an offensive foul or some other type of turnover.  In year's past, Chris would have tried to put the ball on the floor and take it himself, and it would not have 'ended well'.

Six assists is one off Chris' career high of seven - a number he's only achieved once.  This is the second time he's gotten six in a game, ranking last night among the three highest assist totals of his career.  And there was only one cheap one in there - the kick out to Jason Hart was a bail out.  Other than that, his assists were all legit in the true sense of the stat; they were instrumental in leading to the basket.  Three were on kick outs to open shooters at the right time and in the right spot, and the other two were to Camby for layups. 

And although the evidence is anecdotal at best, I think a big part of Chris' improved efficiency is the presence of more creative players around him.  Obviously, the Clippers offense has been less than stellar this season, as measured by any number of statistics.  BUT, it would seem that Kaman has nonetheless benefited from the threat of other players on the court, as well as improved passing from the likes of Baron and Camby.  Where were the 11 for 13 games for Kaman last season?  When the offense consisted of 'post-up Chris and let him make a move', the result was 48% shooting from the field.  Last night's game featured none of the all-too-typical six dribble Kaman moves.  In most cases, he caught the ball in position to score.  So whereas he has the ability to convert that jump hook or that spin move starting from the left block, it's nonetheless a whole lot more efficient for him to catch the ball and finish.  Six of his first seven baskets were assisted last night - that will tend to get a guy going.  Furthermore, 10 of his 11 field goals were at the rim, and at least three were dunks. 

It remains to be seen if these are permanent improvements in his game or simply a handful of good nights strung together.  But if you could wave a magic wand and make transform Chris Kaman, you'd want him to make good decisions when he catches the ball, to make good passes out of the post, and you'd expect those things to improve his shooting percentage, increase his assists, and limit his turnovers. 

Keep a close eye on his assists and turnovers in Philly.

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great post CS

I agree that the presence of a veteran PG such as BD is really going to pay dividends with Kaman as the two learn to play together (and was going to get into that in a lengthy (for me) post until I saw your paragraph on that. “six of his first seven baskets were assisted . . .” Yep. Hopefully that will continue as MDSr allows the team to quicken the pace. His effectiveness in the post should also help the shooters.

by Jax on Nov 20, 2008 3:02 PM PST reply actions  

Don't forget Camby

Camby doesn’t have the offensive repertoire of FElton, but he is actually a better passer.

It was a little contagious last night also. Mike Taylor and Al Thornton each had nice assists to Kaman. Too bad Baron hit the rim with that one pass – that was another assist waiting to happen.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Nov 20, 2008 3:17 PM PST up reply actions  

To continue with Camby,,,

I would argue that Camby’s presence helps Kaman in the foul department as well, picking up fewer of them of course. Kaman knows Camby is behind him and Chris then doesn’t feel the pressure of the being that last guy to protect the rim. Subsequently he can contest more shots, but doesn’t feel compelled to foul, since Camby will be there to back him up. This is one thing FElton couldn’t do. This also probably falls into the self-awareness category as well. A more mature and self-aware Kaman is good for everyone.

One observation from last night. I absolutely LOVED seeing Camby and Kaman scrapping for rebounds. A couple times they both were there and had their hands on the rebound at the same time, almost like an impenetrable wall of arms sort of thing. Once these 2 guys get into a groove, I see nothing but great things for them and the team. You can see the defense rounding into form these last couple of games. Lets just hope they can do it against some of the better teams now.

by Clip Show on Nov 20, 2008 3:25 PM PST up reply actions  

To add to your point

while EB is one of the best shot blockers the game has ever seen, especially given his height, most of his blocks came against his man, rather than from the weak side, where Camby is just a terror.

Brand rarely if ever collected a block in this manner.

F-Elton!

by mikey p on Nov 21, 2008 5:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Dunking

How is nobody talking about the fact that “Mr. Flippy” is dunking the ball more now than ever before? Even when he goes under the bucket to the reverse side, he’s trying to dunk it.

I’d love for someone to put together a stat about how often he’s been dunking the ball this season compared to seasons past.

I definitely see him making a more concerted effort to dunk, which is GREAT!

by madglove on Nov 20, 2008 3:31 PM PST reply actions  

Not nobody

“and at least three were dunks” I pointed out his dunks last night.

Does any site track dunks? Parsing the play by play data is too hard.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Nov 20, 2008 3:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Kaman's dunks

Interesting to track how many of his dunks are left-handed, versus right-handed. About 80% with the left hand, or more. And we should just be used to it by now—I think we are, more or less. He wants to go up with the left hand, and he’ll dunk left-handed if he has a clear path to the basket. He also has a very soft touch around the basket with his left hand. But he fumbles a bit with his right hand near the basket and isn’t comfortable at all jamming with it. We just have to look at Kaman dunking with his right hand as we would with a “true” left-handed player. How often does Chris Bosh dunk right-handed? How often did Artis Gilmore? Who are the other left-handed big men—besides Bill Russell—and how adept are/were they with their right hands? (Raef Lafrentz?)

It’s a wiring issue. I actually get it because I have the same thing going on (scary, I know). I’m right-handed, shoot right-handed, throw right-handed, bat and golf right-handed. All the strength stuff. But I was always infinitely more comfortable shooting lay-ups left-handed, and made a decent high school living off the crossover and finishing with the left hand. I write and draw left-handed, play ping pong left handed.

And jumping is also a wiring issue. Some people naturally jump better off one foot, some naturally go off two. And either way, most people have one foot or another that they’re more comfortable jumping off of. Kaman is presumably more comfortable jumping off of his right foot.

It’s worth noting that he’s very different from a pure lefty, like Bosh or Cat Mobley. I’m not sure how, but he’s different. He might not be very comfortable dribbling with his left hand. He probably doesn’t have the strength or the focus to fall away with his left hand, unlike Cat, who is earning his money at this point by doing it.

Strength right, skill/thought left: a bodyworker (!—actually just a very good chiropractor) recently said to me “oh, you’re using more of your brain than most people.” We know this is true of Kaman—his brain was going so fast that they put him on medication as a teenager. I love CS’ comment about Kaman as “quite self-aware, particularly as compared to the typical NBA player.” Part of the fun of having Kaman on the Clippers and rooting for him is that it’s an ongoing psychology tutorial. We know about him watching movies and playing with his man-toys, but I’m really curious about what might happen if he starts reading books. As for whatever extra brain power I’m sure I don’t myself possess, a big portion of it is here in the annals of ClipsNation, and right now there’s a bright burning oil fire trying to figure out how to get Tim Thomas on the bench and keep him there.

by citizen zhiv on Nov 20, 2008 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

This should be a Clippers commerical

Kaman buckets in slow motion on a television.

Camera pans out to a fan sitting on his couch, studiously taking notes as Kaman moves the ball.

Left hand. Right hand. Layup. Dunk. Layup. Hook. Jumper.

He’s tallying something, but he is also…sketching?

Alley-oop from BD. The fan destroys his creation, scratching over the whole thing.

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Nov 20, 2008 9:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Mark West

Some may recall that one of my favorite teams of all time was Kevin Johnson/Tom Chambers Suns. The center on that team was Mark West. He only dunked left handed, despite ostensibly being right-handed. He didn’t have anywhere near the offensive repertoire of Kaman, but as I recall, he did everything else (including layups and jump hooks) right handed. But the dunk was always with the left. So it happens.

The strangest part about Kaman is (and I certainly could be mis-remembering this) in his first few years in the league, I would have said he was 60-40, left versus right around the basket. Now, it’s 80-20, or maybe 90-10. Anyone else have a similar memory? I mean, in his first few years, it was ‘Huh, that’s interesting. It’s almost like he’s more comfortable with his left hand around the basket." Now, there’s no question, no doubt. To the point where he shoots the wrong shot (a layup from the right with his left hand, for instance).

But if he’ll just go strong, I’ll be happy. He can do it with whichever hand. Of course, he does get himself into trouble when he eschews the right side of the basket to go under and reverse to the left – it happens far too often.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Nov 20, 2008 9:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Seems true

He was stumbling around and didn’t seem to know where he was or what he was doing. Remember, too, when he was kind of skinny and not very strong? He’s certainly done a lot of hard work—it hasn’t come easy. It has taken quite a while. Kind of amusing for him to play such a nice game against Wilcox—I remember, back before the Nation days, some major disputes about Wilcox vs. Kaman, kind of a precursor to the Maggettifesto.

There’s the physical side and the hard work, and then there’s the psychological saga, which is even more interesting. Seems like we’re due for an update. Good question for Ramona.

I’m serious about the reading. If you could recommend 3 books to Kaman—or more—what would they be? And don’t forget that, as far as we know, he was unable to sit and read books until a couple of years ago.

And no one has said anything about the black socks. They are awesome.

by citizen zhiv on Nov 20, 2008 9:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Black socks

Totally agree. Awesome. Funny that I haven’t mentioned it. He started wearing them when things were very funky around here, and I guess I couldn’t focus on something like that. But he’s like some old jewish guy on vacation (no offense, Zhiv). He needs a camera around his neck, a straw hat and zinc oxide on his nose.

Books for Kaman. Hmmm.

- Skinny Legs and All (or something by Tom Robbins, but I’d go with Skinny Legs)
- Cannery Row – because hey, it’s Steinbeck
- A Short History of Almost Everything by Bill Bryson.

Feel free to substitute Vonnegut or John Irving for the Robbins book.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Nov 20, 2008 10:46 PM PST up reply actions  

We should probably start Kaman off simple

Tom Sawyer
Huck Finn
Catcher in the Rye

Great stories, and would seem to fit Kaman’s personality, too. (He may have read them in HS or at CMU, but he wasn’t Kaman 2.5 yet, either).

F-Elton!

by mikey p on Nov 21, 2008 6:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Two Twain?

I don’t mind the US Lit 101 approach, but surely we can get by with just Huck Finn. Not sure what Tom Sawyer adds.

Given the way this season is going, maybe Lord of the Flies.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Nov 21, 2008 9:23 AM PST up reply actions  

I actually prefer Tom Sawyer

it’s lighter and more fun. Huck is obviously the masterpiece, though.

Lit 101 works for me. These writers are less prone to needless overthinking, which also happens to be Kaman’s bugaboo.

F-Elton!

by mikey p on Nov 21, 2008 12:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Kaman Books

Stranger in a Strange Land
Doom Patrol
Sacred Hoops

by Citizen Roy G Biv on Nov 21, 2008 8:20 AM PST up reply actions  

I sign off on the black socks

I’ve been rocking that look since at least ’93. Argyle preferably. Oh man if they made some NBA logo argyle socks…

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Nov 21, 2008 9:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Nice one, Zhiv

Talk about saving the punch line for the last possible moment… nice one on TT…. and oh so true…

"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted" – Albert Einstein

by Another son of Mike Smith on Nov 20, 2008 7:24 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Clips Nation!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Clippers All Time Leaders in Wins Above (Below) Average
Small
Adjusted Point Differential and Pythagorean Wins
Small
A look at efficiency and point differential
Small
Anyone have a video of DJ's jumper?
Blake_griffin_cropped_small
It was a good day
Small
Poll: April 27th where do you see the Clippers?
Small
40-26 and getting there
Small
Are we showing Mo enough love?
Blake-griffin-dunk_small
JR Smith. Yay or Nay?
Small
Moving past Feb 7, 2012

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Clipsnation_small Steve Perrin

Editors

Joc_01_small John Raffo

Authors

Blake-griffin-dunk_small Lawler's Law