Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Fine - Lets talk about Kaman - once and for all.

I don’t care for Kaman and do not think he is a good fit for our team. I wanted to trade him in the offseason and I still want to trade him today. Unlike some of the blog-bashers on this site, I like to backup my assertions with logical evidence. So let’s look at some of his faults:

 

  1. He misses lay-ups that any journeyman NBA player can make consistently.
  2. He has no idea how to pass the ball. 95% of the time he touches the ball he shoots.
  3. He cannot handle the double team effectively. How many years do we have to suffer with his inability to understand this strategy?
  4. He gets lazy of defense regularly. He fails to box out, rebound or switch in a timely manner on defensive sets. Sometimes he rebounds, but generally only when our next big man is Tim Thomas or Al Thornton.
  5. He is not a vocal leader – yet he is a veteran presence making millions per year.
  6. He cannot pull off a well timed screen - ever. Brian Skinner and Puld Davis are way better at screening for Baron. How can a true center not understand how to deliver an effective screen?
  7. He is injured no less than 75% of the time and plays hurt another 25%.
  8. He is not the defender of the paint that most of the other centers in the league are capable of doing. He gets some blocks, but also gets caught out of position far more often.
  9. He is dominated by almost every legitimate center in league – see Bynum, Ming, Howard, Brad Miller, Dalemburt… I can’t think of a legitimate center that gets dominated by Kaman.
  10. He is not consistent. Some days he is Kaman 1.0 others he is Kaman 2.0 and others he is Kaman 0.5. Think about this naming convention – we gave it to Kaman because we wanted to know which Kaman we would be watching on any given night. How many other players have been given this kind of moniker?

 

The list could go on and on and on. He has potential, but ultimately he is a disaster for the Clippers. For those that disagree, please refer to the Clippers record since he arrived.

 

I do not understand the ridiculous love affair some Clippers fans have with this journeyman center. Maybe it’s his potential, maybe its your pride. Right now we need a change and Kaman’s potential is the only thing that we are willing to sacrifice as a team. Camby is a better player in every aspect of the game except for scoring. Randolph is so much better than Kaman it is not even funny. I consider that Randolph has some of the very best hands in the business while Kaman has some of the very worst.

 

Regarding Eric Gordon, an article on ESPN today lists the top 20 rookies for this year. Guess what? Gordon does not make the list and he is a starter on a team that is desperate for scoring. He may become great, but right now he is a major liability at the SG position. We need to address this much more urgently than our backup C position – even if it means getting less than top dollar for Kaman. By the way, can any of the great Clipper minds remember a single offer we have received for Kaman that was not junk? I didn’t think so. His value is not even high with teams that know nothing other than mediocrity. No decent teams ever make trade offers for him that does not involve junk players. The market has determined the value and we need to accept this. Yes – even the most stubborn Clips fans need to accept this.

 

For those of you without the brain capacity to understand this concept – I think your strategy of waiting for Cleveland to offer Lebron for Kaman is incredibly short sighted. Nobody will ever offer an elite player for Kaman. EVER!! Now that his numbers are destined to spiral downwards, we are going to be offered even less in the future. If we had other players to trade, I would love to have such a big front court, but we don’t. So if we are going to compete next year, we need a final team now. Then by next year, we may have some chemistry.

 

I will happily take some quasi Clipper fan attacks because the stats prove my points. We suck and have sucked every year since Kaman arrived. Outside of one lucky appearance to the post-season (due to Cassell and Brand – not Kaman) we have not had the ability to execute on offense or defense. I blame that on Kaman and the facts back me up. One stupid starting player can destroy a coach’s strategy. Guess what guys – Kaman is that stupid player. Now, from what I have read by some people (CS, JR, Jax, Zhiv and CTOAGN excluded) on this blog site, I am starting to think that birds of a feather flock together.

 

 

 

Comment 48 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

You raise some good points

which are similar to and expand on some points I recently raised in response to a CS post where he indicated that the team was building around Kaman or something to that effect. I do think that Kaman’s more than a journeyman center – he’s a legit 7 footer with good skills. However, he doesn’t have the termperment to be a centerpiece of any NBA team in my opinion. And he’s injury prone. And he’s not consistent. Some of these problems may not be solely his fault. You don’t build successful teams around such players.

Despite that, the question in my mind is whether the team should trade Kaman or Camby. We do need a center. How long can we realistically keep Camby?

by Jax on Dec 12, 2008 1:32 PM PST reply actions  

Once and for all?

Would that it were true, Citizen Bob. But you know and I know that you’ll bring it up again.

I could nitpick on your list. The guy has been top 5 in rebounding and blocked shots (when he’s been healthy, yeah, yeah, I know, he’s injury prone) for two seasons now. Exactly how much better do you want him to be in those categories? And to say that he has bad hands is simply not correct. Kwame Brown has bad hands. Chris Kaman has very good hands. He has lapses in intensity and focus that cause him to lose balls, but he has good hands.

But even if we all accepted your premise as gospel, I still think your conclusion is flawed. If Kaman is a tradeable asset being overvalued by this community (you may very well be correct about that), and if shooting guard / wing is a major weakness on the team right now (no question about that), then trading Kaman for help on the wing is an OK idea. But this team is going nowhere this season – what’s your hurry? If Eric Gordon starts 70 games this year, and sucks in 55 of them, it’s all good if that means he’ll be better next year. There’s just no urgency to solving this problem.

But propose a trade that gets the Clippers YOUNGER on the wing (at least younger than Raja Bell), and you may be on to something. Get me some draft picks for Kaman. Get me something that at least has the potential to be good in the future.

By the way, did you see the FanPost from the Bulls fan? He proposed Luol Deng for Kaman (after we told him he wasn’t getting Kaman for Nocioni). And I said, yeah, I’d do that trade.

No one’s holding out for LeBron. But there’s a lot of other options between Bell/Diaw and LeBron.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Dec 12, 2008 1:49 PM PST reply actions  

Deng AND Thomas

At minimum.

Deng crossed over from underrated to overrated and overpaid very quickly last year.

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Dec 12, 2008 1:55 PM PST up reply actions  

his numbers still going down

Deng for Kaman is interesting, because both of them have shown all-star like performances, but it’s possible that one or both is fool’s gold and not the real deal.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Dec 12, 2008 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Would love to get AI2 (Iggy)

Damelbert sucks and Kaman can reunite with EB

Iggy might be too expensive though.

by Jax on Dec 12, 2008 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

It's a problem, for sure...

Can he defend the 2?

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Dec 12, 2008 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Good points

I wouldn’t do Luol b/c he plays the 3 like Thornton. They need a 2 who can drain threes. Now, what teams have legit young up and coming 2 guards who could somewhat match Kaman’s salary?

Nick Young? Too cheap (predicting he’ll be pretty good though).

Raja? Washed up. He’d be ok in a D’Antoni system which this isn’t.

One player that I like is Anthony Parker of Toronto. Again, probably too cheap.

I love Fernandez in Portland but they obviously don’t need a center (or really much of anything else). They are doing pretty good as I thought they would before the season began.

by Jax on Dec 12, 2008 2:08 PM PST up reply actions  

So you mean

Replace Thornton with Deng and trade Thornton for someone else?

That could be done, I suppose, but is it realistic?

by Jax on Dec 12, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Its an easier trade

Kaman’s contract is in some ways TOO good. Its realtively low for his talent bracket so you cant reach up and trade him straight up for someone in the 12M range and up. So you get Deng who is an upgrade over Thornton, then with Thornton on his rookie contract you have lots and lots of choices of guys on their rookie contract as well.

Look around the league. Trading Kaman straight up for the solution at the 2 isn’t easy just making it work under the cap.

Iguodala is an obvious place to look, but why would Philly agree? This would put them in the 3 bigs making big bucks situation that some folks insist is a problem. And there is no reasonable way for the Clippers to take both of the 76’ers back.

Now if you want to trade Kaman for a SG straight up, there is one obvious choice out there.

MDJr.

Salary works nicely. Foster’s contract ends this year. They have Granger and Daniels.

Heh.

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Dec 12, 2008 3:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Good points, but

DTS would never go for that and MDJr may be finished

by Jax on Dec 12, 2008 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Wait a minute...

Did you two just have a civil conversation about basketball? Holy mother. Well done gentleman. I’m feeling the love right now. Well done indeed.

Oh me, oh my!!!! The Red Baron has come home!!

by Clipper T on Dec 12, 2008 10:43 PM PST up reply actions  

And

it just happened to be on the same night that the Clips manage to CLOSE OUT A GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh wait, full moon here in AZ (on vacation). That explains everything.

Oh me, oh my!!!! The Red Baron has come home!!

by Clipper T on Dec 12, 2008 10:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Didn't I propose this exact trade recently?

From my recollection – you bashed me on that one as well.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 4:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Link?

If its MDJr, I’m obviously joking.

I see you wanted to trade Kaman for Iverson. We see that Iverson has made Detroit worse.

Kaman for Harrington.

Kaman for Marbury. Well we would give away Kaman, have to pay Marbury and the bounty would be Crawford.

And that brings us to this week with Kaman for Bell.

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Dec 12, 2008 5:28 PM PST up reply actions  

CS - You are right as always

I am a passionate person and can get caught up in a theory without having a solid backup plan. Kaman is one such example. I don’t hate the guy (I used to love him), but like Jax said – he is not the cornerstone of a successful franchise. I would never have comtemplated trading him until we got Camby and Randolph. Personally, I think Kaman is inferior to these two. As such, he is going to be underutilized while they are here. That makes him tradeable. Unfortunately, with Thomas and Mobley going to NY, we have no other commodities that we are realistically going to trade.

So the question remains – Should we make a move or maintain the status quo? I think we should do the former, but I see the logic on the latter. Bell is a great 3 point shooter and perimeter defender. This is the type of player we need in a starting SG role. EG is not there yet. Maybe Bell is not the answer (I would love a couple of picks to boost our tem in the future), but realistically what are our options? We need smart defenders well versed in complex defensive strategies. We desperately need offensive firepower from deep. There are not many players that fit this model – I believe Bell is one of those. Getting two players for one also shores up our weak bench. If we trade Kaman and get a starting SG and backup forward, I believe we will be set for the future.

PS. I will try and avoid bringing Kaman up again but I can’t make any promises. How bout this – If we start winning 50% of our games, I will lay off Kaman and trade ideas.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Kaman, Gordon, and draft picks for D. Wade?

Is this possible if Miami is going to lose Wade in 18 months?

by Jerdog on Dec 12, 2008 2:19 PM PST reply actions  

For Wade I would give up 4 draft picks

He would never stay with the Clips over the long run. We need a stable player but not a superstar. It would be nice, but superstars want to win now and we dont have that reputation at this point. Maybe we should be looking at Dallas for a trade. Nowitski loves Kaman – I love Jason Terry. Terry plus a Brandon Bass plus a draft pick for Kaman and Hart?

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 2:30 PM PST up reply actions  

They look like they are in rebuilding mode right now

I’ll bet Cuban is very worried Nowitski will bolt at the end of next year. They already have Josh Howard in the starting position. Cuban is likely to ask Dirk and I think Dirk will value Kaman greater than Terry.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Wade is in a different category at this point

No way Miami trades the guy unless he flat out tells them he’s leaving, which is unlikely. He won a ring there, the weather is good, it’s the only team he’s ever played for. I’m thinking that unless he says otherwise Miami is assuming they can keep him. Might be a bad assumption, but he’s the bird in the hand right now. And if you’re looking for a guy to build a team around and win a championship… um… he’s that guy. So Miami doesn’t trade him…

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Dec 12, 2008 2:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Question about minutes

If we play Randolph, Kaman and Camby how do we split the minutes? We have not had to address this issue as Kaman has been injured for so long. When he comes back, we are going to be in very real dilemma.

Randolph is far better than both Camby and Kaman. He is in a totally different league. From what i can tell, he is a volatile person. I doubt he will be happy going from 42 minutes per game to 30 minutes per game. It will affect his stats and his morale and it would be a terrible move.

That leaves Camby and Kaman sharing the Center minutes. 24 minutes each will also not be good for morale when these two are accustomed to 38 -42 minutes each. Chemistry has been the primary problem for the Clippers this year and Kaman has been injured. When he is back, I think the chemistry problems will really begin.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 3:18 PM PST reply actions  

all three could play Center or PF

so they would be splitting the 96 min of the 2 positions.

by bestclipfan on Dec 12, 2008 3:28 PM PST reply actions  

You can't make him see

If he doesn’t want to see.

Career average minutes
Kaman – 34, ignoring his first years
Camby – 31, very consistent
Randolph – 35, ignoring his first two years

That’s 100 minutes, of which there are 96 each night. Some times one guy will be hurt, or in foul trouble, or just cold, etc. Camby probably doesn’t mind losing a minute or two at this point.

There is no inherent minutes controversy. And if that ornery Paul Davis starts bitchin about PT again…

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Dec 12, 2008 3:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I disagree with John R

ESPN states that this year (forget career – its irrelavent for Camby and Randolph as it was not with the Clips):

Randolph = 39mins
Kaman = 36mins
Camby = 32mins

Total = 107 mins averaging

Just ion case you were unaware, there are only 96mins to share and Randolph is likely to account for 38-42 of them.

Since Randolph will not be on reduced minutes that means that there are currently 68 mins averaged for Camby and Kaman that will need to be reduced to 48mins. Camby can play some PF, but that means neither Paul Davis nor Brian Skinner will ever see the court unless there are injuries. That does not bode well for team chemistry. Plus, Paul Davis is playing great. Why do you want to punish him for his hard work?

As you so often mention on this site, please check your facts before making statements about them.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/teams/stats?team=lac

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 4:03 PM PST reply actions  

Wow man, wow, so much for being nice

I did check the facts. I’m not interested in one year. 20 games is a blip. To say “forget career” is pretty silly. We should ignore the hundreds and hundreds of games Camby played up until now and focus on the few games the Clippers played so far?

The point of Paul Davis and Brian Skinner IS to only see the floor when someone gets hurt.

The fact that you defend Paul Davis at the expense of Kaman marginalizes youself more than I ever could.

I mean, you said:
24 minutes each will also not be good for morale when these two are accustomed to 38 -42 minutes each.

Then you criticize my fact check when in fact, even at career highs, only Randolph has ever scratched that range, and the bottom end at that.

So first you make up numbers out of thin air to suit you point, then you discount evidence that doesn’t suit your point, then you criticize others for not checking the facts?

k

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Dec 12, 2008 5:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I love you John

You are just so much fun to F with. I think Jax will agree.

Sorry for the critism – you are definately one of the smartest guys on this site (or any).
I am just happy you are taking a side instead of sitting on the fence.

Ultimately I am sure your wisdom will prevail more than my brashness. I just bragged a little too much to my Laker friends before the season and I have been on the recieving end ever since.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 5:27 PM PST up reply actions  

So tell us the truth then

Did Kaman crossbow your dog? Did he hit on your wife?

What happened to you?

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Dec 12, 2008 5:32 PM PST up reply actions  

He just failed to meet expectations

It’s not really Kaman that is to blame – it is the entire team. I have actually met and spoken to Chris twice in Vegas and he was very nice to me. I just don’t believe that he improves the team. With a different coach, Kaman would be awesome. With Dunleavy, he is just too unreliable to handle the overly complex plays.

Since Camby and Randolph arrived, I have had a chance to see others in his position. I believe that these two are simply better than Kaman in Dunleavy’s system. I also don’t see the need for 3 starting big men when there are major gaps in our starting lineup. It not just Kaman, it is what we have to give up in order to retain him.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 5:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh yeah...

He did actually hit on my wife when I was at the Venetian during summer league this year. So did Al Thornton (Al tried much harder). I can’t blame them though, my wife gets hit on by almost everybody.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 5:42 PM PST up reply actions  

My 2 cents

I think standing pat is the prudent course at this time. I too really like Davis3, but he is nowhere near as good as Kamen, also Camby at age 34(35 in march) is probably only ours through his current contract.

The World Series would be a lot better if the Angels were in it.

by Andyman on Dec 12, 2008 4:19 PM PST reply actions  

Camby still ranks number 2 in Blocks

Why does everybody think that Camby will be over the hill the year after next? He is not a scorer or a major athlete. He is getting better every year. He will still be effective in 4 years – just significantly cheaper.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 4:24 PM PST reply actions  

I don't think he will be "over the hill"

but, just my opinion, at age 36, might take a discount “to get a ring” and sign with a contending team

The World Series would be a lot better if the Angels were in it.

by Andyman on Dec 12, 2008 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

That is a serious possibility but

If I have learned anything about the NBA in my years, it is that players generally value cash in hand over the possibility of rings. The Clips can offer him the most of any team and arn’t held back by the salary cap. If we want him and are prepared to pay the most, he will remain a Clipper.

F-Elton.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 4:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Camby was always just stopgap for us

He’ll end up getting a MLE type deal for a few years once his current deal runs out. Unless we want to overpay he’ll go to the team that needs a good backup big. He’ll be very coveted at the trade deadline is which is why we sit pat for now and wait for teams to break from the pack. A few teams on the cusp of contention will make a play for him to either block him from going to another contender or to boost their own chances. I think Kaman and ZBo can play together effectively and given their respective ages give us a solid 4 and 5 for the next few years.

Terry has a long contract that last 4 more years. It might make us a mediocre team for a year or two but starting two shoot first pg-types doesn’t lead us in any direction.

I still think Josh Howard for Kaman is a smart move for both teams. Howard is young (28), signed to a solid contract (like Kaman) and fits a need. The only real caveat is we are too far out to make the playoffs this year so this deal is already too late. Probably better off moving out Camby, stockpile some talent and make alot of moves again during the offseason, hopefully with a new front office in place.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities. -Christian Nestell Bovee

by ClipperChuck on Dec 12, 2008 5:02 PM PST reply actions  

Maybe you are right

Howard would be a better fit, but Terry is more available. Either way, I still believe that the Clips have the highest chance of signing Camby when his contract expires. The MLE is all most other teams can pay Camby. We can pay him more and it still won’t be restricted by the cap. $1M per year over the MLE and he should be ours for as long as we want. Thats still a bargain at $6.8M per year.

Lets face reality – we are never going to get great value for Kaman. The best we can hope for is a player that fits Dunleavy’s model and will play hard every night. Indiana would give us an unrestricted pick if we took MDJr off their hands. Maybe that is the way to go.

by citizen bob on Dec 12, 2008 5:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Just a few thoughts:

I feel like we shouldn’t be so quick to make a move. We’ve already made one and we should let that pan out. I think another move is our tar baby; it’s just going to get us deeper in the hole we are already in. If we do make a move, I agree completely with CS that it needs to get us younger. Making moves for veterans would only help us in the near future, and we don’t have much hope for this year. We’ve got some good pieces, and if we get more they need to fit into our future plans.

Also, I’ve completely stopped trusting ESPN. They don’t know what they’re talking about because I doubt any of the people who created that list have ever taken the time to watch a Clipper game (not that I blame them). I think that it’s pretty obvious that EJ is AT LEAST in the top 20, if not much higher. This year is a chance for him to get better, and we’ve already seen some good flashes from the kid. So, I wouldn’t quite call that a liability.

And yes, I did just make a Brer Rabbit reference on CN.

by WestsideBrandon on Dec 13, 2008 12:33 AM PST reply actions  

ok so IF we were going to trade Kaman...

we need a legit starting guy, and a draft pick or young talented wing.

So I’ve come up with a 3 team trade…

The clippers get Josh Howard and Azubuike
The mavs get Kaman and Maggette
The warriors get Steve Novak, jerry stackhouse and a pick.

The clippers do it to get Josh Howard and Azubuike who can share minutes at the 2 with gordon

The mavs get Kaman and maggette!!!! a real 7 footer with a 20ppg scorer who can get to the line. With a starting linup featuring kaman, dirk, maggette and kidd could be pretty good.

The warriors get out of Maggette’s contract by replacing it with stackhouse who only has 2 years left and the W’s get a sharpshooter in steve novak, maybe include a late dallas pick too. idk, what do you think?

by cantthinkofagoodname on Dec 13, 2008 4:19 PM PST reply actions  

this would make the clippers

then I’d trade mardy for q ross!

davis / taylor… hart…
gordon / Azubuike / Rdavis
howard / thornton / ross
randolph / pdavis
camby / skinner / jordan

by cantthinkofagoodname on Dec 13, 2008 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I like this trade

After Paul Davis’s performance last night, I cannot imagine him not on the court for at least 20mins per game. That makes Kaman expendable. This trade would work for all involved except GS. They may need a little extra sweetener (like a Skinner only from Dallas). Even so, it makes us younger, faster and more athletic. It also shores up our bench – last night they did not even score 10 points as a group). Good trade idea CTOAGN.

by citizen bob on Dec 13, 2008 5:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I thought golden state would just be happy to get out of corey's contract...

Corey isn’t overpaid, but he’s on the outs in golden state. If i were the warriors, I would try to unload that contract 5yr 50 million contract and take on a 2 year 14.2 million in it’s place. They also get another 3 point shooter. That’s why I said a pick too in this years draft (this years draft is’;t that good). dallas will probably have one around 16-20 or so so it would be a good pickup for the W’s.

I think dallas would do it because they get 2 nba starters for their 1. I dont think there’s a better deal out there for Howard that would return a lesser sf in maggette but a clear upgrade at the C. Also, it’s not as though dallas would have trouble with kaman and dirk because dirk can spread the floor.

Thus leaves the clippers getting not only howard, but a good backup they tried to sign in Kelena. The goal though for the clippers would be to have DeAndre Jordan be prepared to be a legit C in 3 years in the marcus camby type mold. If that doesn’t work, the clippers would be kinda screwed at C

I would still be concerned about injuries though…

by cantthinkofagoodname on Dec 13, 2008 6:45 PM PST up reply actions  

not bad...

not bad at all. But do the numbers work? I checked the “trade machine” and I can’t get it to run. Az has a trade restriction. But the money looks close enough. I think I’d pull the trigger as long as we don’t have to give up the pick. BUT, counting on Jordan to be a starting C at this point is folly. We really have no idea. Not sure I’m okay with being “screwed at C” if he doen’t pan out. What if we swapped Camby instead of Kaman and WE throw in the pick?? Then I’m all about it.

Oh me, oh my!!!! The Red Baron has come home!!

by Clipper T on Dec 13, 2008 10:35 PM PST reply actions  

I dont see them taking camby

I think they want a piece they can build around, and camby is 34. He doesn’t have a bad contract, but neither does Josh howard who has a team option for 2010/2111 so essentially they run the same length so there wouldn’t be really that much of a reason for them to trade the second best player on their team for camby, Also, typically winning teams aren’t that interested in picks, they’re looking for pieces to make them keep winning and not having to train rookies… That’s why picks are more valuable to rebuilding teams.

Kaman wont be back until probably January anyway, so it’s all irrelevant.

by cantthinkofagoodname on Dec 13, 2008 10:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Double Teams

I personally do agree that Kaman is really bad at taking double teams, but if we look at this roster right now we will have a stronger inside scorer which is Zbo and if anyone were to double team someone it would be to double team him other than Kaman giving him a better look and probably less turnovers

by civicdude590 on Dec 13, 2008 11:53 PM PST reply actions  

It's a dumb argument

How many legit seven footer centers are out there with Kaman’s skills? He’s nifty around the basket with both hands, seriously big, a good defender, a great rebounder. Guys like him are as scarce as hen’s teeth. And his contract is very decent for what he brings. I mean, there’s only a few guys in the whole league who come close to what he can do. Yao, Bynum, Howard, maybe Oden some day, Brad Miller? Jermaine? Kaman’s certainly better than the last two … and you’d never casually consider trading the other guys, so why trade Kaman? I really don’t get it. And it’s not because you’ve got Camby… he’s great, but pretty old, and not as big or strong with none of Kaman’s interior power. Injuries… okay, yeah, he spends too much time off the court, but he’s not as bad as Yao, and Bynum lost half a season last year, Oden the entire season. This is dumb.

by John Raffo on Dec 14, 2008 9:16 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Clips Nation!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Letter from Elton Brand to Clip Nation

Recent FanPosts

Blake_griffin_cropped_small
It was a good day
Small
Poll: April 27th where do you see the Clippers?
Small
40-26 and getting there
Small
Are we showing Mo enough love?
Blake-griffin-dunk_small
JR Smith. Yay or Nay?
Small
Moving past Feb 7, 2012
Small
New Member-Trade Suggestion
34008_1531733776948_1342861896_3019627_1265958_n_small
Who Else is Going to the 76ers Game?
Small
Farewell Note to King Solomon
Small
Should we go after Eremy Lin?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Clipsnation_small Steve Perrin

Editors

Joc_01_small John Raffo

Authors

Blake-griffin-dunk_small Lawler's Law