Clips Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: 21 Days Later, Wolves win. Bar-right-arrows



Here's What You Need to Know About DeAndre Jordan

Since the 1999 draft, the Orlando pre-draft camp has conducted a combine in which they measure prospects 27 different ways.  In those 10 years, here is the complete list of current NBA players who have been through their doors who have a longer reach than DeAndre Jordan (9'5.5"):


There aren't any.  Pavel Podkolzine measured out at 9'8", which by iteslf was enough to get him drafted in the first round, 21st overall in 2004.  DeAndre Jordan may not yet be a particularly skilled basketball player, but I think we can safely assume that he's better than Pavel Podkolzine.

To be fair, not everyone goes through Orlando.  Yao didn't go there.  Andrew Bynum isn't in the database either, which surprised me.  But most of the big names of recent history are in there.  Here are some names of players who don't have Jordan's standing reach:

  • Dwight Howard - 9'3.5"
  • Desagana Diop - 9'5"
  • Greg Oden - 9'4"
  • Darko Milicic - 9'3.5"
  • Eddy Curry - 9'3"
  • Emeka Okafor - 9'2.5"
  • Andrew Bogut - 9'2.5"
  • Chris Kaman - 9'2.5"
  • Elton Brand - 9'2"

A 9'5.5" standing reach and $3.65 will get you a triple grande non-fat latte at the Starbucks.  But still, you can't teach reach.  It just so happens that this guy is also incredibly athletic for someone his size.  He posted respectable scores in both the lane agility test and the 3/4 court sprint - in fact, he's as fast as Oden, who amazed everyone with his speed last year.  And still, none of this has much to do with playing basketball.  But athletic 19 year olds this size don't grow on trees.  If he has any will at all to become a good professional basketball player (a big if, no question), he certainly has all the physical gifts to get there.

My fervent hope is that MDsr puts him in a situation where he gets to play significant minutes this season.  If he's ready in the estimation of the coaching staff to get the backup center minutes right away, great.  If not, send him to the D-League and let him play for the Arsenal.  The last thing DeAndre Jordan needs is to be sitting on the bench, getting yelled at in practice for missing defensive rotations.  The kid needs to play basketball.  MDsr has yet to send a single Clipper player to the D-League, completing ignoring its potential as a training ground for players.  Yaroslav Korolev rotted on the bench when he should have been playing.  Meanwhile, the Spurs, the best run team in basketball, utilizes their D-League team extensively.  Let's hope that MDsr is ready to try something new if indeed Jordan is not yet ready for prime time.

The good news is that Kim Hughes has been a very successful big man mentor for Chris Kaman.  Hopefully he can have a similar impact on Jordan.  Kaman of course has been an incredibly willing student.  It remains to be seen if the same can be said of DeAndre.

Much has been made of his lack of productivity and diminishing playing time at Texas A&M.  And sure, it's not a good sign when the number 8 recruit in the nation can only manage to average 20 minutes per game for the Aggies.  There are a couple of things worth noting about that.  He joined a team that returned three players 6'9" and over.  Joseph Jones averaged 15.3 points in 29 minutes per game as a sophomore for the Aggies, and only 10.3 points in 24.5 minutes as a senior last season.  This was a big and deep A&M team, and there just weren't a ton of minutes for all of their big people.  They had the luxury of bringing Jordan along slowly.  It should also be stated that the Aggies were pretty darn good - 25 and 11 overall, with their last two losses being in the Big 12 semis to eventual national champion Kansas by 6 points, and in the second round of the NCAA's to Final Four participant UCLA by 2 points.

It certainly looks ugly when you see that string of low minute games during tournament time.  A DNP on March 13th, followed by games of 5, 4, 5 and 15 minutes.  It looks like the coaching staff totally gave up on the guy when the games counted most.  But on closer inspection, it turns out that the kid was sick on March 13th, and the next two games came on consecutive days as part of the Big 12 tournament, and he was still in a weakened condition.  So I think the 20+ minutes per game he got the rest of the time is a better indication of his contributions.  Was he dominant in college?  No, not by a long shot, at 8 points and 6 rebounds per game.  But bear in mind that those numbers were in 20 minutes per, and that he shot almost 62% from the field.  If Justin from the SoCalSportsHub tells us that he only took dunks and that he missed a lot of them, I guess we'll have to take his word for it, because none of us watched a lot of Aggies hoops this season.  But he still made more 113 of 183 shots in his college career.  That's a fact, and it ain't bad.  (The free throw shooting, on the other hand....)

When all is said and done, the Clippers drafted an athletic, 19 year old, 7 footer with the 35th pick in the draft.  Considering that we're used to getting the likes of Daniel Ewing (32nd) or Lionel Chalmers (33rd) drafting in that position, I gotta say I'm good with the reservations that many people have with DeAndre Jordan.

UPDATE:  I meant to include this thought in the original post, but neglected to do so in my haste to press the publish button.  Clipper fans don't have to work too hard to understand the worst case scenario for DeAndre Jordan.  Although they did not measure standing reach in 1998, Michael Olowokandi measured out as 2 inches taller than Jordan with a 2 inch greater wingspan.  An NBA body does not an NBA player make.  For my part, I'll be watching him in Summer League to see how his hands are, and how motivated he looks.  You can't teach reach, but you also can't teach good hands, and you can't teach anything if the pupil doesn't want to learn.  Without good hands, the best NBA body is just Kwame Brown.  And without the proper motivation and desire (the ubiquitous 'motor' in prospect parlance), the best NBA body is Michael Olowokandi.  But here's the thing: those two guys were drafted number 1 overall.  The Clippers got Jordan at 35.  That's a big difference.

0 recs | Comment 16 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

defense

How were his defensive numbers last year? Are we looking at a guy that can play defense and rebound? Ben wallace without the massive contract?

by cantthinkofagoodname on Jun 28, 2008 12:13 AM PDT   0 recs

He's a long way from Ben Wallace now...

He blocked some shots… about 1.5 per game. But all indications are he’s something of a knucklehead – rarely in the right place on defense.

At this point, he’s a body. An amazing, NBA body. But Michael Olowokandi and Kwame Brown are also amazing NBA bodies. He is not, at this point, a basketball player.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by ClipperSteve on Jun 28, 2008 12:52 AM PDT   0 recs

Great pick

I love this pick. You need to swing at the fences in the early second round, and not draft Daniel Ewing over Monte Ellis. I’m so glad Jordan and CDR dropped, it made it impossible for the clips to draft someone like Demarcus Nelson (aka the next jared jordan, chalmers, ewing, whoever else the clips drafted in the 2nd round). This kid would have been a top 10 next year and is an athletic freak. I completely agree with the NBDL analysis, send him to anaheim. I’m so glad the Clips are starting to emulate the more successful franchises in the league (Detroit is doing the same thing with Amir Johnson, and it looks like he’s gonna at least be a solid role player). Do any of you think we should have drafted CDR instead? I personally think this is the right pick over CDR.

I’m not as pumped on the Mike Taylor pick. Though I agree he has a much better chance to make a roster than an average pick in the 50s, giving up a future 2nd rounder is too much. If the clips go lottery again, they gave up a pick in the 30s. A 30ish pick can usually make an nba roster and sometimes even be productive (see landry, baby davis last year). A pick in the 50s rarely makes it in the nba. Couldn’t the clips just have called him up last year from the Dleague and then had his rights anyway?

by BtheKUTA on Jun 28, 2008 1:23 AM PDT   0 recs

I don't understand this pick at all

The Clippers do not have the luxury to waste their picks on players who may or may not develop in areas where they do not have needs. Stated another way, they really aren’t in a position to benefit by emulating good teams in this fashion. Particularly where, as here, the draft is fairly deep, and there were players on the board that they could actually use (and that would be equally acceptable risks). CDR is a player they could use and that could develop into a good NBA player. Jordan, not so much.

We already have and are developing Baby Shaq, Josh Powell, Davis, et al. Why not start developing some SG/PG talent?

by Jax on Jun 28, 2008 7:12 AM PDT   0 recs

So CDR is your new Stuckey then

Kinda predictable.

If CDR was a slam dunk, why did he fall so far?

by John R on Jun 28, 2008 11:21 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Its unclear

You don’t know what else is in the works any more than I do.

As long as Sterling isn’t vetoing Maggette trades, it seems like there is always a plan.

When both the Spurs and Pistons pass on a guy, its something far less than a disaster to make the same “mistake”.

by John R on Jun 29, 2008 9:14 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yawn

Who used the word “disaster”

by Jax on Jun 29, 2008 7:01 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

About Jordan

I love this pick. The Clips have enough big men that they can take on a project like this.

The D-league point is well-taken, and the Korolev example is exactly right. A big part of the frustration with YK is that he never ever got on the court—if he had been mediocre in the D-league we might have a different feeling about the whole debacle, and MD himself might have been educated. Part of the issue is transparency and accountability, which isn’t a Dunleavy strength. Let the kid play, somewhere. And for all the skeptics out there, don’t expect that Jordan is going to get big minutes in Summer League or the preseason. Instead, MD has a nasty habit of giving minutes to cusp guys who aren’t going to make the team (Lamond Murray).

But I digress and don’t want to dwell on the negative (where’s Stuckey?! what’s he doing today? does he want to go to the beach? to yoga?).

I’m hoping that Kim Hughes is the key man. The development of Kaman has been long and painful, but it seems at this point to have worked out very well. (Another quick aside: isn’t Kaman hurting a little bit with rising gas prices? I mean, the guy has a yacht and a trucking company, right? Not to mention various other big boy toys. Is there any way to green up Kaman, just a little? We know he’s working on yoga and mindfulness, and he has started reading books…) With Jordan, I think it’s not just Hughes but Kaman himself, who has a lot to pass on to a young guy at this point.

It will probably come down to personality. Let’s not forget that he’s a 2nd round pick, so his contract issues are negotiable, and he’s going to have to earn his money, it’s not just going to be handed to him. It’s funny, but when a kid like Jordan drops to the 2nd round, you see clearly how the lottery and first-round picks can turn certain kids’ heads completely upside down. They’re not getting 150 or 250k-a sizable chunk of money out in the real world-but instead people like Wilcox and Miles are getting a few million. And then they play just well enough to somehow get double digit millions more. Kaman himself, it seems, didn’t get it the first couple of years, but he did have a good time spending his money. He filled out and got bigger, and he had his own psychological hurdles, but his game never really got going until the end of year 3 and he didn’t make the big leap until year 5. So we’ll see what kind of kid Jordan is, and I think the fact that he’s a 2nd round pick might speed up his progress, because he’s going to have to do the work to get paid.

by citizen zhiv on Jun 28, 2008 7:50 AM PDT   0 recs

About CDR (and Giddens and Chalmers)

One of my fears about the Clips taking Jordan instead of CDR is that they’re still holding a roster spot for QRoss. In my own (nonexistent) Clipper roster, I have Livingston penciled in to take that spot and replace Ross, which gives the Clips flexibility to sign another PG, and the alternative to Liv is Marcus Williams. Marcus Williams is a guy who should be part of the CDR discussion. Williams excelled in the D-League, and the Clips have firsthand knowledge of his game. And oh, by the way, he still almost never got minutes on a team that was tanking hard and losing virtually every game. If the Clips had drafted CDR, there’s a 98% chance he would play less than 100 minutes next year, if there was even a roster spot for him. Let’s also not forget that Mobley is on the roster and playing over 2500 minutes (despite chronic injuries). Is CDR a better bet than Chalmers, Ewing, or JJordan? Yes. But would he get a shot on a team with a provisional roster with Maggette, Thornton, Thomas, Mobley, Gordon, Livingston, Ross and Williams?

On the other hand, if Maggette ships out for a PG, and Ross sticks somewhere else and MD tearfully watches him depart, Liv can’t play, and Williams is mediocre, the Clips would be thin enough at SG, basically just Mobley and rookie Gordon, that they could use a 3rd string SG. But that’s a lot of ifs.

One question is whether the Clips would have taken Chalmers instead of Jordan. I hope they would have. And the fact that they went after Taylor once Chalmers was off the board seems to confirm that. They wanted to get some kind of serviceable PG in the 2nd round, and they got one, but he probably wasn’t the one that they wanted.

I had my eye on Giddens, even though he would have run into the same issues as CDR. I’m not worried about Giddens character issues, but his draft spot is interesting as he was the last pick in the first round, so he gets a guaranteed contract.

by citizen zhiv on Jun 28, 2008 8:09 AM PDT   0 recs

A little Chalmers confusion

Reading over the above post, I notice that I moved from writing about Mario Chalmers to mentioning esteemed former Clipper 2nd round pick Lionel Chalmers without noting the difference. “Is CDR a better bet than Lionel Chalmers, Daniel Ewing, or Jared Jordan”—or Guillermo Diaz, I would add. Is CDR a better bet than Mario Chalmers? Perhaps. Kind of a good question.

And while I’m at it, CS has “it’s” and “their” flubs in the original post, which I only point out because the J-school admissions folks might be watching! Hi there, admissions folks! I bet you would have been smart enough to draft Stuckey last year! But I know you’ll be smart enough to draft Clipper Steve!

by citizen zhiv on Jun 28, 2008 8:16 AM PDT   0 recs

There their

Their. Its fixed.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by ClipperSteve on Jun 28, 2008 3:24 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Zhiv feeling his oats

What the hell, Zhiv? Stuck on Stuckey? Pondering the impact of gas prices on the decidedly not green Chris Kaman? OK, I promise never to leave you for 9 days again. You’re (not your) still recovering.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by ClipperSteve on Jun 28, 2008 9:59 AM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Clips Nation!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ftb_small
Baron Speaks on Elton
Jerseyroad_1280x960_small
Brand and MDsr still have not talked
Lastdragon06_small
Rumor about Bobcats trade
Small
Hollinger, Clippers Could Go 1 - 81
Small
When are we going to see DeAndre?!
Small
Anthony Morrow...Not Just a Clipper Killer
Small
we're #1...
Small
Dear citizens: We didn`t want to see
Clipsnation_small
Clipper Bob?
Small
Roger Mason Beats Clippers, 86 - 83

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter