Clips Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: MLB postseason scores, schedules and blog coverage Bar-right-arrows



More than a Little Embarrassing

I have to admit.  With all the news coming fast and furious this morning, I didn't bother to read the Orange County Register.  AT3 is off the beat and I didn't expect anything interesting to be there.  Indeed, checking the HoopsHype Rumors page, I was pointed lots of other places for Clippers news, but no one sent me to the OCR.

As it happens, columnist Mark Whicker deigned to honor us with almost 400 whole words about the 'other' team in LA.  What he wrote was that the team was imploding, based on the ill-informed assumption that the fact that Elton Brand and Corey Maggette had both opted out meant that they were out the door.

The saga continued Monday night when Brand and Maggette opted out of their contracts and became free agents, and although the ever-diplomatic Brand took pains to say he still would like to remain a Clipper, he obviously wants to play in a winning environment. Any serious NBA contender, after ascertaining that Brand is indeed healthy, will shuffle its roster to see if it can land Brand.

It's one thing to misread the situation.  And certainly plenty of sportswriters in other towns would make the simplistic conclusion that having your two leading scorers become unrestricted free agents is a bad thing for your team.  But I would expect a LITTLE more from someone in the greater LA area.  All he had to do was read this blog from time to time to know that Brand's opt out was good news for the Clippers.  As for Maggette, it was hardly news since Corey had been planning to opt out for months.  Then again, when the author AND the editors both miss a glaring error ("Cassell ... got himself traded" - Cassell wasn't traded, he was bought, and it was a pretty big deal at the time), you get an idea of just how much these guys know about the Clippers.

But it's just plain embarrassing to publish a 'Stick a fork in the Clippers' column ON THE SAME DAY that the franchise has arguably it's most positive day ever.  Writers get stuff wrong all the time.  I myself said that Baron Davis was an unrealistic target yesterday.  But here's the thing.  Davis opted out of his contract last night at 9.  Marc Stein had the story of the Clippers pursuing him a couple hours after that (and speculation had begun before then).  This guy has his column sitting in everyone's driveway 6 hours after that?  Awkward.

The big question is, now that the Clippers are suddenly relevant in Southern California, does AT3 get his beat back? 

Oh, and let's be sure and check out Mark Whicker's column tomorrow.  That should be fun.

0 recs | Comment 20 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

That is ...

totally embarrassing…but sadly is par for the course, even here in the Clippers backyard. Unless your job is to follow the clippers (ie, beatwriter, blogger, etc), no other media seem to care about the Clippers, and rightly so I suppose. But to blindly think the worst, and publish your thoughts for all to see before checking…now that is just plain stupid. Check out the comment that was made right after the article…sums it up completely…

livnlgnd45 wrote:
Ya, your credibility is looking really solid right about now. What an idiot, writing this drivel hours before we landed Baron Davis. GO CLIPPERS! F* the Lakers.

by Clip Show on Jul 1, 2008 9:21 PM PDT   0 recs

hahaha

I feel like Marc Stein, being quoted on here and all

(That comment was by me)

by clipped on Jul 1, 2008 10:22 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

That was awesome...

I couldn’t have said it any better myself. Kudos to you…

by Clip Show on Jul 1, 2008 10:31 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Maybe we can petition to re-instate AT3

or at least someone who takes their own column seriously enough to get their facts straight. Boy, that Cassell trade was really something, wasn’t it?

by OhMeOhMy on Jul 1, 2008 9:31 PM PDT   0 recs

Dewey beats Truman

Nice, quick work, CS. It strikes me that you’re something of the man of the hour, what with the J-school applications and “nominations” and all, but more importantly, the fact that suddenly, out of nowhere, the Clippers matter. I think we might have been blithely speculating about this a couple of weeks ago, going into the draft or whenever the “nominations” and the CS press pass were discussed. It’s all a blur. I have to say, you were wise to take a break, because I myself have been obsessing and pointlessly trying to will the Clippers into significance and a hopeful outlook, and I think we’re all completely shocked that this has happened. I’ve got nothing left, it was a good week to ignore the movie business for virtually two complete workdays, and if I can manage to pull myself away from this unexpected bonanza and good fortune I have to do it somehow.

Your posts have all been solid and then some. Now comes the next phase. You say that “all he had to do was read this blog from time to time,” which strikes me as a false beat, because we all know that the number of guys like that who read this blog from time to time are exactly zero. But they will now. And you’ve worked too hard and know too much not to step up. Truehoop and others should be linking here—they don’t know that Clipperblog phoned in this season after the Brand injury, and you provide much more in-depth, straightforward, and accurate (less glib) analysis anyway. Yeah, it would be nice to see a full-length explanation from Whicher about his Dewey beats Truman article and a reinstatement of AT3, but ever since the AT3 incident I’ve been telling people that I’ve seen signs that the newspaper business might fold much more rapidly than we might have guessed, going through massacre after massacre and disappearing overnight like the record business. I don’t know how things will end up with OCR and AT3, but ClipsNation is not only more solid than ever, it just grew exponentially in size and relevance over a 24 hour period.

So now’s the time. For the Clips, ClipsNation, and ClipperSteve. It’s gonna be great.

...with one last “it’s” mistake in this post for old time’s sake.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 1, 2008 9:50 PM PDT   0 recs

It just got a little crowded

in here (Clipsnation blog), but it’s all good. The more the merrier I say!

by Clip Show on Jul 1, 2008 10:08 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm loving every minute of it

This is a long time coming. I like J.A. Adande’s piece on ESPN.com right now. A little snarky, but kudos to giving the Clips front page props.

by Jonee on Jul 1, 2008 10:10 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It's sad to witness...

the continued irrelevance of the printed media. Clipsnation has become an unlikely, but effective tool. The reason for its success is that it’s carefully written and edited by a smart guy, which has attracted more smart guys… all without the benefit of a press pass. But isn’t that the next logical step? Isn’t that the future for CS? I hope so.

by swamigusto on Jul 2, 2008 9:01 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Totally Right

Yeah CS, time to forget grad school. Until now you have been the only source for good Clippers analysis, now you have be the ULTIMATE source.

Though maybe Clipperblog will come back to form and take a little of the burden off of your scholastic shoulders.

by Citizen Roy G Biv on Jul 1, 2008 10:47 PM PDT   0 recs

The logo

Maybe I’m getting ahead of my self.

However, given recent events I think we can justify changing the logo.

by 69knicks on Jul 1, 2008 11:20 PM PDT   0 recs

I saw this hack's piece

earlier today…I didn’t want to link it as it was nothing but a negative piece…I get the dead wood delivered to my house each morning and the piece was not in there(he had a “relevant” piece on TWoods), it is one of those online exclusive pieces, so I am sure we won’t hear a peep about it tomorrow morning…

by Lawler's Law on Jul 1, 2008 11:31 PM PDT   0 recs

Not in the dead tree edition?

Pity. They dodged that bullet. They should just take it off the website in that case and save themselves further embarrassment.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by ClipperSteve on Jul 1, 2008 11:54 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It's incredible

it is one of their “Top Stories” as of 11:55pm…

by Lawler's Law on Jul 2, 2008 12:00 AM PDT   0 recs

hhhmmm...

the column has magically disappeared…it’s not even listed as part of his most recent columns…

by Lawler's Law on Jul 2, 2008 2:31 PM PDT   0 recs

Good call

It took them a while to figure it out though.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by ClipperSteve on Jul 2, 2008 2:59 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

This got me thinking...

With the new wave of journalism which has taken over, blogging and whatnot, is journalistic accountability completely out the window? Take this case for example. Some hack journalist who obviously has done no research and knows nothing of which he speaks writes an article which hours later sheds light on his incompetence. All that the author or the website has to do is delete the post. Sure, plenty of people may already have seen it, but its it’s critical damage control. I’m all for the revolution, but at least the dead trees can’t be “deleted.”

by clipped on Jul 2, 2008 9:39 PM PDT   0 recs

He's a columnist

He didn’t say anything that has to be retracted. He got it completely wrong, but it happens all the time. They would not have done anything to ‘retract’ this as a print story either.

It’s an interesting point. But even when papers admit their mistakes, it’s rarely handled in a commensurate fashion. A front page story has a factual error – and the correction gets printed the next day on page 33.

But in the wild wild west of blogs, there is no official accountability. When I was wrong about Allen Iverson in Dec. 2006, I was just wrong. I admitted it. But of course I didn’t have to. I try not to be wrong. Just like a reporter. But there are many, many ‘journalists’ who fear blogs as the end of civilization for this very reason.

My own opinion is that to build an audience, the author (and the site) has to be credible. So ethical and journalistic standards are their own reward. But it’s not clear that all blogs agree on that.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by ClipperSteve on Jul 2, 2008 10:07 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I understand your point about retracting errors. But my point wasn’t really about factual stuff that newspapers retract for the sake of clearing things up. I was commenting more on the opinion-oriented stuff (which his article was completely based on). There’s a difference between making a factual mistake or error in judgment in a fact based piece. But an opinion post should not be deleted immediately just because its author is a bonehead.

by clipped on Jul 2, 2008 10:14 PM PDT   0 recs

Ah, I get it.... Agreed

An opinion piece would never have to be retracted – everyone is entitled to their opinion. but to pretend like you never said it when it turns out to be so far off the mark is definitely chicken poop.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by ClipperSteve on Jul 3, 2008 10:34 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed



Site Meter