Who Was the Man Behind the Curtain?
This didn't happen by accident.
For one thing, within an hour of Baron Davis' surprise decision to opt out of the final year of his contract, suspiciously accurate speculation was circulating that he might land in LA with the Clippers. For another, Elton Brand and David Falk dropped pretty big hints in their official statements about EB's opt out about 'stars getting together' and 'providing the Clippers with flexibility.'
Tim Kawakami of the San Jose Mercury News is wondering the same thing, and he thinks it has Falk's fingerprints.
So who was it? Was it the Clippers? The Davis Camp? Or the Brand camp?
If it was someone in the Clippers camp tampering with Baron Davis, it was a brilliant maneuver. It's against league rules to talk to another team's player, but the only way the plan would work was if Brand and Davis both opted out. Until the last minute, it appeared highly unlikely that Davis would do so. If Elgin Baylor or MDsr dreamed this up, they played it beautifully. Not only did they get the necessary Maggette, Brand and Davis opt outs to go down, but they also set up an alibi - MDsr in New York talking to a DIFFERENT point guard. A deal with Beno Udrih would have completely scuttled any chance at Baron. Udrih falls through (darn the luck!), Baron falls into their laps, the NBA is none the wiser - the perfect crime. I don't think that's how it happened.
So was it someone in Baron's camp? Maybe. He was the one with a destination in mind. Did he or agent Todd Ramasar target a return to LA, crunch some numbers on the Clippers roster, and make a quick call to Brand and Falk? Maybe.
But the trail really does lead to Brand and/or Falk. For one thing, Brand's decision to take less money is really the catalyst for the entire deal. Sure Baron is taking less money than he was going to make in the final year of his deal - but he's getting a lot MORE money than the Dubs were offering in an extension. Baron just came off a great year and a completely healthy year - if the Warriors were lowballing him in 2008, there was no reason to think things were going to change significantly in 2009. He has an injury history and a history of wearing out welcomes - a maximum offer wasn't likely from another team, and it certainly wasn't coming from the Warriors. Brand on the other hand could certainly have commanded a maximum contract, if not this season then next season. Sure, he might have gotten hurt again, or he might have had a down year. But all indications are that Miami would have given him a max contract now in a sign-and-trade, that the Clippers were willing to max him out to keep him, and that he could have played another season and then gotten max money. Baron left 'old contract' money on the table. Elton is leaving 'new contract' money on the table.
Given that, it's hard to imagine either the Davis camp ('Hey Elton, would you take a pay cut for me?') or the Clippers ('Hey Elton, would you take a pay cut for Baron?') broaching the subject. No, it would most logically be Brand (or his agent) hatching this plan. That also fits with Davis' sudden reversal regarding the opt out. With Philly and Memphis uninterested in his services, he was looking at the MLE if he opted out - he really had no serious options until this Clippers idea was born. Hence the last minute decision.
And as with the Clippers, if it was Brand and Falk, they put up a little smoke screen to throw people off. Brand speaks specifically about Udrih in the immediately aftermath of the opt out. Brilliant.
Some are saying that the Clippers had to have colluded - that Baron would not have risked that much money without discussing a specific offer with the team in advance. I disagree. Bill Plaschke and others are praising Donald Sterling for making this deal happen, but come on. If Brand and Falk and Davis had the idea in place on Monday, there was no reason to check with the Clippers to see if they were on board. It's about the biggest no brainer of all time. "Let me get this straight. Elton Brand and Baron Davis want to take a 25% pay cut and sign with the Clippers long term, for the same annual amount give or take as we were already paying Brand and Corey Maggette. I'll have to think about that." The other key elements of the plan (Maggette's opt out, no QO for Livingston) were expected for weeks. Brand and Falk could clearly have anticipated those things happening, and they must have had a high level of confidence that the Clippers would do their part once the dominoes started falling.
We may never know exactly how this went down. Unless Brand or Davis decide to produce a movie about it.
0 recs |
36 comments
Comments
Great Post (love the movie bit)
I think this is exactly how this went down. I would even bet that it was all done without the Clippers and Davis’s agent ever speaking. Falk, Brand and the Clips probably cooked it up, pitched it to Davis, and made it happen.
This is similar to Karl Malone and Gary Payton taking huge pay cuts to join the Lakers. EB is the man. Hope it works out for him.
by mikey p on
Jul 2, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Interesting point made on Falk
Kawakami’s premise seems true, and Falk also knows that it is tampering. I wonder if this deal going down the way it has frames any talk in the next CBA in what roles agents can take in doing deals for their “clients.”
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 2, 2008 12:21 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hertz doughnut
If this is how it went down, and its certainly likely, EB is central to the situation Maggette finds himself in.
Now that is real drama.
He may have cost his Best Man millions of dollars.
I feel bad when its last call before my round comes up again.
by John R on
Jul 2, 2008 12:21 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Well
I suspect Corey wants out of here anyway, for obvious reasons.
by Jax on
Jul 2, 2008 12:22 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No question
But if he ends up with the mid-level, that’s an expensive price…
...to go somewhere and be annoyed by another coach.
by John R on
Jul 2, 2008 12:27 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I suspect...
Brand and Falk got to a certain point in the plan and then lost the thread. At this point, we all realize the impact on Corey. But it took a while for that light bulb to warm up, at least for me. I wonder if this is a law of unintended consequences thing for EB. He certainly knew Corey would not be a Clipper. But did he know he was taking money out of his best friend’s pocket? Interesting question.
The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!
by Steve Perrin on
Jul 2, 2008 12:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Probably never crossed his mind
Just because we know the salary cap inside and out around here doens’t mean other people don’t have better things to do with their time.
Falk is responsible for Brand, Pelinka is responsible for Corey. I would bet that EB feels for his friend at this point.
by mikey p on
Jul 2, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maggette was Brand's best man?
I didn’t know that.
by citizen zhiv on
Jul 2, 2008 1:22 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wonder what the penalties would be if there was some sort of “under the table deal” involving the clippers…
I doubt that though. I agree it was probably brand but I dont know if I’d say he broke the rules… especially after seeing other trades and player movement around the nba in the past year.
by cantthinkofagoodname on
Jul 2, 2008 12:53 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Almost impossible to prove
Even if there was something, it would be next to impossible to prove. The old Glen Taylor, Joe Smith thing in Minnesota cost the T-Wolves several years of first round picks. But Taylor made the mistake of putting that offer in writing. No one will be that stupid again.
The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!
by Steve Perrin on
Jul 2, 2008 1:07 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What about Juwan Howard to Miami in the 1990's?
That was a big scandal.
by mikey p on
Jul 2, 2008 1:15 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That also ended up being taken away
Even though it is a scandal. That’s probably the biggest reason why there are serious tampering charges now.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 7, 2008 3:38 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Et tu, EB
I’ve tried to stay out and stay silent and regain my sanity, but it’s all just too rich. Fantastic post, best ever last line. We’re all inspired, and it’s great to see CS show his stuff-that last post is like a rising fastball with that little popswerve just as it crosses the plate. I’m trying to figure out how to get TrueHoop to start checking in over here-his reliance on Clipperblog dates back to the 06 playoff run. But I digress.
One interesting clue is that we have visual and quoted evidence of BD’s whereabouts over the weekend-our new favorite player was all over the web making a big splash in New York playing in Steve Nash’s streetball soccer game. Hmmm-wait a second-wasn’t Dunleavy in New York over the weekend as well, and then he stayed over to meet with Udrih? So someone should start with Marc Stein’s post (also on Truehoop-he played in the game with Baron—maybe Stein is the key man! And put in a word for ClipsNation over there while you’re at it.) and look at the other internet coverage of the game that he links to, and try to find BD’s quote about “going home.” The Dunleavy timetable takes a bit of the beauty out of the Udrih smokescreen
My question is whether it’s okay, or against the rules, for EB to talk to BD about it. Maybe that’s something that our rules specialist John R can work on (we all have our specialities here at ClipsNation-and I must say yesterday was a memorable one for Club Optimism). That’s a thorny and complicated topic. EB can obviously talk to Falk and get his advice-duh, right? And we have the other “cover story” of EB watching Boston in the finals and having the epiphany of trying to build a winning team. (He had to watch the finals to figure that out?) Can Falk talk to BD? Can Falk talk to Ramasar?
I’ll tell you one person nobody talked to: Corey Maggette. Except DTS, of course. I want to do a post nominating Maggette for the Clipper Hall of Fame, and I’m sure we’ll see the final chapter of the Maggettifesto soon enough from CS, although it probably won’t be before Maggs lands somewhere.
The Brand-Maggette relationship needs some analysis at this point. They must have talked to each other about their plans, probably around the end of the season and at some length before that. Brand has had a front row seat for Maggette’s conflicts and issues with Dunleavy and all of his other relationships with the team. They’ve been together for years, and have known each other for much longer. They don’t seem, for whatever reason, to be close friends, but they have both been completely collegial and professional. From what little we know, it seems that Maggette is actually closer to Kobe than he is to Brand, although that doesn’t mean much (unless the Lakers trade Odom and somehow end up with Maggette). At any rate, I think it’s safe to say that Brand seems to have had definite knowledge that Maggette would opt out. It’s harder to tell if Maggette knew what Brand was going to do. My guess is that both of them, in the beginning, were taking the Clippers at their word that they would resign them, and it’s possible that they started out assuming that they would make new deals and be playing together for years to come. It should be noted that Maggette might have had some reservations about this, and Brand could have as well. So they might have been slightly guarded with each other, and it wouldn’t be surprising if they had an understanding that neither would blame the other if they took a better deal somewhere else.
So let’s pick things up with the finals epiphany story, although I think Falk at least, would have been trying to figure out a clearer sense of Brand’s options much earlier. That’s his job, after all. Let’s say that Brand and Falk are conferring, and that at some point they have the same conversation about Baron Davis that we had ourselves for the first time over a month ago. Baron Davis could opt out, but why would he, and leave 17 million on the table, when there aren’t any good teams that need him, that have cap space. The Warriors will resign him, or he’ll play it out and go somewhere next year. End of story.
But watching Garnett and Pierce and Ray on the court together must have clarified and simplified things for Brand, and he could have asked the same thing that we were asking here at ClipsNation after the Gasol trade: just how do you build a superteam anyway? How is it possible to have so many good players. Falk either has John R skills himself (once again, his job), or he has somebody who knows the formula and minutae, and he shows Brand how it works. At some point, Brand learns that the first, essential domino is that Maggette has to opt out. As soon as he does that, the light turns green. Then it can be done.
He also learns at some point, however, that in order to make it work the Clippers have to renounce all rights to Maggette. So Brand is left with the dilemma, which is not just a professional issue, but a moral one: if you want to go after BD, the Clippers will not be able to resign Maggette. You will not be playing with him anymore. Furthermore, he could easily suffer a significant financial loss, because it’s likely that the Clippers will make the best and most generous deal for him.
So that’s how it lays out, Falk tells Brand. If you’re going to talk to BD-and I’m not saying that he is, or he’s able to-you can’t say anything to Maggette. If you think he might not be opting out, then there’s no reason to talk to BD. BD is in good shape. If Maggette doesn’t opt out, BD just stays with the Warriors and makes 17 mil, then becomes a free agent. Don’t worry about BD. If you want to you can leave it up to Maggette, and if you think he’s very likely to opt out, then you can call BD and have a conversation right now (unless that’s against the rules). But this is how it’s going to work, and if you do this, there will be consequences for Maggette.
In the movie version, where is Maggette when he finds out that Baron Davis has opted out? If you’re writing the script, how do you describe the look on his face and his emotions? Remember, show, don’t tell. In my version, the gentlemanly Maggette gets off the phone and walks towards the french windows leading to the backyard and the pool. He sees his wife and child, the good life he leads, his bright future. (At this point in Mike Smith’s version, Smith comments on Maggette’s manly physique.) He takes a breath and dives deeply into his swimming pool, washing himself clean in a baptism of sorts, and then he rises to the surface for the first moment of his new life.
by citizen zhiv on
Jul 2, 2008 1:20 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL, good script
Let’s option it. Just don’t tell Baron Davis.
by mikey p on
Jul 2, 2008 1:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Best Man
The whole Best Man thing is freaking me out a little bit. EB is a saint as far as I’m concerned, but he just stabbed his Best Man right in the back. Is there a term for the mutual Best Man thing? Which is worse in this scenario, that Brand was Maggette’s Best Man or that Maggette was Brand’s Best Man. And I’m going to stop capitalizing best man.
So now, after showing some highlights at Duke-did Brand’s wife go to Duke?-that might include the rat-faced narcissistic fraud Coach K (UCLA fan here) incensed that Brand and Maggs are going to the pros, the movie opens at a wedding. Which one? Any chance Baron Davis is there?
by citizen zhiv on
Jul 2, 2008 2:04 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your killing me
Did Duke play UCLA in 1999? Gotta work that in.
Maybe EB didn’t know how this would affect Corey. Not everyone has John R. and CS to explain the salary cap to them.
It is Pelinka’s responsibility at the end of the day.
by mikey p on
Jul 2, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, EB had to know.
That’s the thing.
From the Pelinka point of view, I think Maggette had enough conflicts with Dunleavy that he had a strong inclination to opt out, which would present new options and seemingly force the Clippers to give him a financial vote of confidence.
The other funny part in here, which I barely touched on, is Sterling’s call to Maggette, telling him that they were definitely going to resign him, no matter what. Which creates another good scene: when Baylor or MD or Roeser tells DTS that the only way the Clips can sign Davis is to renounce Maggette.
by citizen zhiv on
Jul 2, 2008 2:17 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The midnight meeting will be great, too
Christopher Walken can play Dunleavy, and Ryan Gosling can play Beno Udrih.
Albert Finney can play Sterling.
And now that we know Robert Downey, Jr. can play a black guy, sign him up, too.
by mikey p on
Jul 2, 2008 2:30 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes, that's what I've been saying
It’s really from the Corey point of view. Who knows what really went on.
by Jax on
Jul 2, 2008 2:33 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Stein soccer game article
Others are better at pasting than I am.
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-32-382/Marc-Stein-on-his-Time-in-the-Soccer-Spotlight.html
The man of the people: It wasn’t Nash or Kalou or even Henry … and it wasn’t close.
Accounting for everything I just said about Henry’s Jordanesque display, Baron Davis was the clear fan favorite.
It didn’t matter that Baron had never played soccer in his life. He wowed the crowd with his exuberance, attire and flair for the dramatic.
He played in a Dodgers hat with the LA insignia upside down, sported glasses with thick black rims that wouldn’t have looked out of place on celebrity spectator Judah Friedlander from 30 Rock and played in white Reebok Pumps from the Dee Brown era … white with a lot of orange in them.
He also got himself all the way to the far post early on for an easy tap-in goal, dispossessed his buddy Henry at least once - turns out they’ve been pals ever since meeting at Parker’s wedding - and could have been sent off three times for two intentional hand balls resulting in penalty kicks and a playful WWE three-count pin of Fowler after a foul.
Yet it probably didn’t hurt BD’s popularity that there seemed to be numerous hoop fans in attendance, well aware that he had the right to opt of his contract and become a free agent Tuesday.
“Every time I turned around,” Baron said with a laugh, “it was, ‘Come to the Knicks!’”
Nothing in here about “going home,” but I want to go back for the links. Conspiracy theories aside, this gives a glimpse of Baron’s popularity.
by citizen zhiv on
Jul 2, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Soccer game video
http://www.youtube.com/swf/l.swf?video_id=KpwA6pfXzcs&rel=1&eurl=http%3A//myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-32-382/Marc-Stein-on-his-Time-in-the-Soccer-Spotlight.html&iurl=http%3A//i.ytimg.com/vi/KpwA6pfXzcs/default.jpg&t=OEgsToPDskJNnAP1lxA_4oTP0Y46uOcZ
I didn’t see Dunleavy anywhere in this video.
by citizen zhiv on
Jul 2, 2008 2:44 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He's right there
Back, and to the left.
by John R on
Jul 2, 2008 2:59 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Philadelphia and Maggette
Seems like Maggette should be able to able to get an offer from Philly, maybe for an extra 10 million above the MLE (5 yrs/40-45 million) where he’s a pretty good fit. Without the Clips in the mix, he goes from 9-10 to 8-9. Not too bad, get to start, play in the East, good PG (with no personality) and SG (Iggy). Waiting for Atlanta to do an extension for Josh Smith. Or am I missing something?
Celtics are a good option—chance at title, “all for one” attitude, fun city and crowd, minutes perhaps hard to come by. Spurs are elite organization, great coach and players, title contenders. Starting spot (with Ginobili coming off bench) and lots of minutes available. Pretty good choice.
by citizen zhiv on
Jul 2, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thatt sounds about right...
They, along with Memphis are the only teams with money. And all signs point to Atlanta matching any offer Philly can come up with for JSmith. This would work out well for Maggette since he can now get his $$. Plus, he goes to the Eastern conference on a team that was one win away from beating the eventual NBA champions.That can’t be that bad, can it?
by Clip Show on
Jul 2, 2008 4:43 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Philly doesn't want him
They have Iguadala & Thaddeus Young. If they do sign Corey, it would be with the intention to trade him a the deadline for cap space and picks.
by mikey p on
Jul 2, 2008 7:10 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Are you sure mp?
Don’t they want the depth and scoring, and the steady march to the free throw line? Is Thaddeus Young ready? I know he’s good, but the Sixers know that they can do well in the playoffs and add some good players as they go along. They can offer Maggette the same money that Cat Mobley makes and add a lot of points and productivity to their roster, and still have plenty of minutes for Young and let him develop.
Look at it the way that we were last week, when we had Maggette and Al Thornton. We want to have both of them. And Young is probably less like Maggette than Thornton is, so they don’t exactly duplicate each other.
Igoudala is an SG-and a good one-and Maggette will make them a much better team. They just have to make sure that they don’t overpay him, which I don’t think they will. And one of the ways that you can tell that they need him is that he would probably become their marquee player and possibly their leading scorer. Igoudala is really good and Miller has played well for them and Young is young and rising, but Maggette and his experience and scoring would probably make him the most visible member of the team, and worth the money.
by citizen zhiv on
Jul 2, 2008 10:29 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is this part of the plan?
It’s 7:15 pacific and still no word from EB. I kinda assumed that EB would be quicker for the clippers to negotiate than Baron Davis would be.
I wonder if this whole waiting to announce what team Elton Brand is going to play for is part of the plan to throw suspicion off those rumors of an "under the table" deal. If it is, it’s tremendously effective. I feel like every hour that passes means that it’s not going smoothly or he’s seriously considering golden state… (which I know isn’t likely like you all said on the "100 million" fanpost)
Or could it be that the clippers want to see what the new cap number is going to be and that’s when they’ll announce his new contract so they’re sure to give him the most money possible… in which case we won’t know anything until July 9th?
by cantthinkofagoodname on
Jul 2, 2008 7:18 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The Clips can say
the have agreed to sign EB to a contract with out giving specifics at any time…just like we don’t know the exact numbers of the DAvis deal….so in that regard, we should NOT have to wait until the 9th to hear that he is back. In the back of my mind I keep thinking that maybe, just maybe, EB is trying to work out a deal for his “Best Man” to also remain with the Clips…possibly through another paycut…that is the only thing I can think of…and it is HIGHLY unlikely, as I have been told by multiple Clips nation citizens…
by Clip Show on
Jul 2, 2008 8:00 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A little suprising, yes
One thought I had is definitely the idea that they are adding to the smoke screen. They have to make it look good. Listen to the Dubs; wait for an offer from the Sixers. But the GSW scenario, for instance, makes zero sense. He can have the money in either place – in fact he can have more money in LA. But taking the money means losing Baron Davis. It was his plan to begin with – he’ll execute it.
Beyond that, it is possible indeed, as ClipShow suggests, that they could be discussing less money for Brand, to be able to add another player. Maggette actually seems unlikely – it’s just too much money that Corey wants/needs. But would Brand give up some of his money to bring back Livingston? Who knows.
The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!
by Steve Perrin on
Jul 2, 2008 9:27 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maggette is a rich man
Corey decided, with the help of his agent, to opt out of the last year of his contract in hopes of testing the free agent market and making even more in a long term deal. If he makes less next year, he and we need to understand that that is the cost of doing business. It’s too bad if he got screwed by his buddy, but they’re all already multi-millionnaires. What’s a few million here and there between friends?
If Elton’s idea was to make sure everyone got a lot of money this year, he did – just not as much as they could have, had they all just stayed in their contracts. If Elton’s idea was to win, he probably made a good decision to replace Corey with Baron Davis, with Corey’s unknowing support. As a Clips fan, I’m just glad he decided to make the win decision over the money decision.
Someone out there will be willing to pay Corey loads and loads for his talent, and Dunleavey and many Clipper fans will be glad it’s not the Clippers. So, don’t feel bad that multi-millionnaire, Corey Maggette is going to make a little less next year than he had hoped. It’s the price of doing business in a game where some care more about winning.
by bigclipperfan on
Jul 2, 2008 11:20 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It's all relative
Yes, Corey Maggette will make more on this contract, whatever it is, than many of us combined make in a lifetime. And he’ll probably believe that he could have made that much more again.
But it’s still far, far less than Orlando paid Rashard Lewis last year.
So one sees how timing has negatively impacted Corey in this case. But still, your perspective is appreciated. He’s doing fine, and Corey is at least bright enough that he’s not going to end up broke 5 years after retirement as some NBA players do.
The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!
by Steve Perrin on
Jul 3, 2008 9:12 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs





