Clips Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: NHL Free Agency Coverage: NHL Rumors, NHL Signings & Trades


Quinton Ross versus Marcus Williams

Quinton Ross does not seem to be generating a lot of interest on the free agent market.  I was assuming that he was definitely not an option for the Clippers if the Azubuike offer sheet goes through, but then it occurred to me that Ross could sign a minimum deal with the Clippers if he doesn't get any better offers from any other teams.  But there's not a lot of room left on the roster.

Maybe he'll get a little better offer - I certainly hope he does since he would seem to have been underpaid for the last 4 years, especially as a starter on a playoff team.  But if it comes down to it, and Q were available for the veteran's minimum, would you keep him or Marcus Williams?

Q has been on the team for four years, and while we hope that Williams will be a good wing defender in the NBA, it's hard to imagine he's as good as Q, who is a known quantity there.  On the other hand, although Williams has been far from polished on offense in his limited NBA and Summer League action, Q is also a known quantity on that end.  Williams is of course younger (21 versus 27) and would be a bit cheaper (since Q would get the 4 year veteran's minimum). 

So who would you put on the roster out of those two?  Discuss amongst yourselves.

0 recs | Comment 43 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Q can't shoot

I would rather try my luck with a player who does not make me cringe every time he attempts a basket. Camby is the new defensive specialist big, while defense should be provided by any of the top four guards. Do we really need Q to help out with defense while Thornton rests? I’ll take Williams

by bigclipperfan on Jul 22, 2008 12:30 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ill take.......

Marcus Williams. Watched him during summer league and he looks like a guy that can contribute on the offensive end. I think with the current make up of this team we don’t really need that perimeter defensive stopper because we got camby and kaman inside. Anothr thing that separates williams is his basketball IQ. He knows how to run the pick and roll, when to post up, when to give up the rock, he is not just a spot up shooter the way Q was. Dont get me wrong, love q, but i say give williams a chance to be another scorer off the bench who has the potential to be a good defender

by clipschamps on Jul 22, 2008 12:50 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Q

I’d definitely opt for Q over Marcus. Like you said, Q is a known quantity and obviously very familiar with the defensive system. He’s not a NBA starter by any means, or even a first-off-the-bench type guy. But as a 9th-10th man and defensive specialist, he can be invaluable. Williams showed nothing all of last season. He had the Korolev “deer in headlights” look on him that never went away. If the role that’s up for grabs is “defensive specialist” I don’t see why we’d choose Williams whose ceiling is Q defensively. And I actually like Marcus Williams a lot.

My only worry about having Q on the team is Dunleavy. I’m just afraid that MDSr will play Q far too many minutes. Just like I don’t think MDSr will all of a sudden change his offensive philosophy to run and gun, nor will he drastically reduce his reliance on Blanket. So if MDSr is going to overuse Q as opposed to underuse Williams, I’d certainly have to choose the latter.

I wonder if we might re-sign Q right after the ink dries on the KaBuike offer sheet. We have his Bird rights so we can pay more than the minimum for him. Not that we should, but it does give the Clips an advantage if he’s only getting minimum offers from other teams.

by supac on Jul 22, 2008 1:02 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Salary Concerns?

I’m treading in JohnR’s territory, but I think that part of Q’s salary is picked up by the league somehow, so the dollar differential isn’t significant.
Q baffles me. Somehow he’s the all-time scoring leader at SMU, (or something like that—I’m not going to look it up.) Yet he’s not that tall, not that athletic, not much of a ball handler, and not much of a shooter. His greatest attribute in the pros is one that wasn’t even on the radar in college.
Last summer he’s supposed to have worked hard on his shot, and I think he did well in our first regular-season game. Perhaps with the offensive (in both senses) collapse he had too much pressure, and was asked to do more than hit the occasional defense-spreading 3 pointer, and wasn’t up to it. I dunno.
Howsoever, as a long-time Clippers fan, hope springs eternal here, and I hope/believe that Q can still find his offensive game, whatever’s left of it.
With Jordan and Gordon and Thornton we’ve got potential, and Williams seems hardly a lock. So I vote for Q.

by pipedreams on Jul 22, 2008 7:02 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Q. Ross

I haven’t seen Williams yet.

F-Elton!

by mikey p on Jul 22, 2008 7:50 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is really a toss up...

considering that one of these guys will be the 9th or 10th man, NOT a starter or first man off the bench….I would have to opt for Marcus Williams though…I think the QRoss era is over. Don’t get me wrong, I love the guys D, but it may be time to move on. Marcus is younger, and from what we have seen in the summer league, can generate a little more offense on the floor.

by Clip Show on Jul 22, 2008 8:38 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Williams

The kid was a lock for the first round (and probably lottery) after his freshman season at Arizona. He dropped a lot in the draft b/c of his troubles his sophomore year at Arizona, but I think the instability of Lute Olson greatly contributed to his problems. I watch a ton of pac-10 ball, and this kid was absolutely legit. He’s got a decent shot, a good handle, and fantastic size.

The spurs are known to give up on their young players early. Just look at their late first/early second picks that they’ve either given away (I call that the “Camby”ed away) or just outright cut (Beno Udrih and Luis Scola amongst others).

Q was always overrated to me as a defender, and an absolute liability on offense. Those type of players need the perfect system to thrive, and he isn’t nearly as good of a shooter as “defensive specialists” like Bruce Bowen, Arron Afflalo, or Raja Bell. As alluded to above, I’m also scared that Dunleavy will play him 20-25 min per game like he has over the last few years (over Maggette!). I have no problem having him as a 10th player playing 6-8 minutes per game or in special situations, but not having him actually start or play more than one quarter.

Now that we have Camby on the inside along with Kaman 2.0, we can afford to give up a little offense. Marcus Williams could be a very productive role player in this league, and we shouldn’t give that up for a guy with absolutely no upside.

by BtheKUTA on Jul 22, 2008 10:05 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

UofA

I LOVED Marcus Williams in college. But I haven’t seen that guy, or even anything close, in the bigs. People who watched him in Austin in the D-League saw that guy, I guess.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by Steve Perrin on Jul 22, 2008 1:47 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not Ross

I still have nightmares about Q throwing up bricks against the Phoenix Suns back in the Clippers glory season. If this guy had any semblance of offense who knows how far we would’ve gone.

Since we’re cleaning house, I say dump him and go with the more unknown quantity in Williams, there had to be a reason San Antonio drafted him as a high 2nd rounder.

Sorry Q,

by ghost_ride on Jul 22, 2008 10:24 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I choose Q

I choose Q because of how he shutdown people. Two instances come to mind. Last season Q Ross held Redd to have 0 attempts in the first quarter, and to miss only shot in the half. Then once we took out Q Redd went crazy scored like 15 points in the last quarter (I believe we still won the game though). The second memory I have is of Q shutting down Carmelo Anthony in our playoff run a couple years ago. Q frustrated Anthony so much that after drawing a foul on Q in the fourth he threw is head band into the crowd and was ejected from the game.
What Q is very good at is getting inside a players head and locking them down through frustration and lack of sucess. I will admit I have not seen Williams much but I know he had some scoring sucess in summerleague but that is summerleague it dosen’t always add up to sucess during the season.

by bestclipfan on Jul 22, 2008 10:26 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Two corrections

Mobley got a lot of the Melo assignment in the playoffs. Q played him, but I’d almost say that Cat played him more. People forget that.

The headband incident was early in the 06-07 season, not in the playoffs. Of course, Melo has been T’d up and tossed so many times against the Clips that it’s hard to keep track. Before the playoffs that year, he knocked the ball into the stands and got tossed. In November 06 he threw the headband. I think he got tossed from a playoff game as well, but I don’t remember what for specifically.

I’m not a big fan of Mr. Anthony. Doesn’t seem real mature to me. I wonder what David Thorpe says about his ‘Emotional IQ’.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by Steve Perrin on Jul 22, 2008 1:51 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I recall that they both spent a lot of time on Melo

but Q is the guy who really frusturated him. It was very easy for Q to stay in front of Carmelo, who is not all that laterally quick.

Cat did his part, too, but I would say Q gave him the most trouble (ask B. Davis about Q – he took a swing at him out of frusturation once).

As for Carmelo, you nailed it. The emotional IQ is his big problem. The talent is there. And to think that some people thought he should go #1 over LBJ. It is getting close to a Peyton Manning/Ryan Leaf level.

F-Elton!

by mikey p on Jul 22, 2008 1:55 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No one's saying that anymore, are they?

I remember after their rookie season, there was the ‘Who’s the ROY?’ debate. Even then, it seemed ludicrous to me. As with so much, it seemed to be based solely on the ‘Melo’s team made the playoffs and Bron’s didn’t’ non-logic.

I had forgotten about the Davis swipe at Q. He does frustrate people, that much is true. Q’s defense is outstanding – it really is. The irony is that he could play big minutes on the right really good team (as happened in 05-06), but he shouldn’t play at all on a bad team. You just have to have good scorers at all 4 other positions for him to be on the floor.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by Steve Perrin on Jul 22, 2008 2:03 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Beg to differ

I know you’re not saying Q over MWilliams—yet. But according to your formula I think the Clips are out, since Camby is not a good scorer.

As I said, Q can have some great defensive games. And he generally plays at a very high defensive standard, plus he’s often guarding the best wing player or point guard on the other team. But it’s not like he doesn’t get torched sometimes. And the point differential can get very ugly—there’s little or no giveback. The Clips are going to be defensive-minded no matter what, with Dunleavy coaching. Dunleavy needs to be encouraged to put a good offensive team out on the floor, and continue to demand good defense. He’s got the backline defender he wants, with limited offense, in Camby. Q needs to be taken away from him as an option. He didn’t know how to use Q sparingly in the first half of 06-07, and letting him go now should be his punishment. Let’s see how successful he is playing somewhere else. Let him start figuring out the exchange rate and go and learn how to score again.

The Clips really don’t want an offensive black hole playing with Baron Davis. Yes, Davis is going to do plenty of scoring on his own, but he’s also going to get a ton of assists with creativity, penetrating and kicking the ball out. That would result in a whole lot more wide open shots missed by Q, who doesn’t run the floor and finish especially well either, and he’s not a particularly good ballhandler and passer. That’s another thing he can work on overseas.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 22, 2008 3:08 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good points

I am victim to my own emotional nostalgia sometimes. Q has been a trooper, and I would like to keep him around.

But it may not be feasible.

F-Elton!

by mikey p on Jul 22, 2008 3:11 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

These Clips are the wrong team for Q

I agree 100%. You’re exactly right that Camby, as a limited scorer on the floor, precludes having Q out there. You can’t play 3 on 5 (as we found out last season with large doses of BK and Q and Josh Powell).

I’m far from convinced that Marcus is any better. He has looked truly dismal on offense in most of his minutes. Two decent summer league games does not have me convinced.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by Steve Perrin on Jul 22, 2008 3:30 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Other SF/PFs

As I hinted, if they get Azu, does that mean that they can go with some one a little bigger? What kind of player would that be? Is that Archibong? Clipblog Kevin has a soft spot for him.

Getting into the fine lines of a different kind of combo player. No need to cross over into Tim Thomas and Josh Powell territory. Is Simmons still the model, Posey aside? Ariza is a good example I think. Where’s Tremaine Fowlkes, former Clip and pride of the Golden Bears, sort of?

Yeah, Williams still has a lot to prove. I liked what you said in your comment about him—great as a freshman, reportedly great in the D league, maybe pretty good in the last two summer league games.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 22, 2008 5:37 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes

don’t slight the Fresno St. Bulldog in Tremaine either…:P

by Clip Show on Jul 22, 2008 7:54 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nobody says that Carmelo should have gone #1 anymore

He is top 4 or 5 of that draft at best in terms of results.

Q. would be a lot better on a better team. That is true.

F-Elton!

by mikey p on Jul 22, 2008 3:09 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Williams.

I’m done with QRoss. He did have some great defensive games on occasion, but I thought his defense was somewhat overrated, generally speaking, and not worth the offensive hole that he created. He got a ton of minutes and missed a whole lot of open shots, more than I would have expected. Seems like he was always on the verge of semi-respectable offensive productivity, even by the minimum standard, but he just never stepped up to it.

Williams might be okay. He got a slow start in summer league but seemed to finish strong. I’m guessing another guy or two will be at training camp and playing during the pre-season. Williams should have to make a decent showing there to make the team. With the potential arrival of Azu, do guys who are SF-PFs deserve a look, to guard the bigger SFs? Do Archibong or some of the other guys on the summer league team fit that mold? I wasn’t really asking that question before now.

Williams is probably the guy. Still hoping to find the next Bobby Simmons.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 22, 2008 12:39 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Go w/ Q

He’s a good perimeter defender and he had to cover for everyone mishaps on the defensive end years before. It’s hard to defend one guy when you have maggette leaving his man open every second of the shot clock.

But if we’re talking about money, then go w/ Williams. He’ll be cheaper but we’ll be burned by the perimeter elite guards.

by Qlippers on Jul 22, 2008 1:31 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think the money is significant

The difference is small in minimums based on years of service. Also (and I don’t understand this real well) the league pays some or all of the min salaries after you’re over the cap. (John R, do you understand that provision of the CBA better than I?)

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by Steve Perrin on Jul 22, 2008 1:53 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Q is an above average defender, he’s smart and doesn’t make very defensive rotation mistakes, but he’s not exactly a shut down one on one defender in the mold of Bowen or Artest . Moreover, his lack of offense is glaring; allowing the defense to sag into the lane, his defender to help out on other shooters, and destroying our offensive spacing. At this point, it’s much better to let someone like Marcus Williams learn on the job, than to have another season with Q getting minutes. The guy had four years to learn how to nail a fifteen footer. If he can’t hit it by now, he never will.

by MichaelCage on Jul 22, 2008 3:26 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have to go with Q

I think Q is a great player if you know how to use him. With so many offensive threats in this new Clipper team, the only real concern for me is how are we going to stop the elite SG’s in the league right now. Q is a guy that can play as a starter when necessary as well as a solid player off the bench. He can make life difficult for teams like the Lakers who have so much offense from one position. In baseball there are highly paid players who play for one inning a game. They do that because they are elite at hitting or pitching but can’t handle the starter role. Finally Q Ross can now focus all of his attention as a defensive stopper. I definately don’t want any SG backup playing on Kobe to think for a second they can focus on anything but continuous defense. Q knows how to do this.

The Clippers fans (myself included) had high expectations for Q last year. When most were healthy (game 1-4) he showed improvement from the prior year. As his responcibilities increased, his offensive game disappeared. He is a defensive specialist – If he takes more than 5 shots a game, then he is overshooting. Who cares about the offense of a defensive specialist? He fits a roll that Dunleavy likes and needs, The Clippers have never had a good record once they took the lead in the first half. Third quarters last year were brutal. A more focused roll for Q Ross may actually help us control these runs or help us keep a lead. We just need to use him correctly.

by citizen bob on Jul 22, 2008 8:21 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The problem is

The reason why Raja Bell or Bruce Bowen don’t shoot very much is because teams have to at least respect their outside shot (well, except for MDsr- sorry for the DEwing reference). With Q, you can literally leave him wide open from more than 17 feet. With Bell, Bowen, etc you’re still playing 5-5, with Q you’re playing 4-5. And I completely agree with CS. In the absolute perfect system, Q might be a productive player, but it’s rare to find “defensive specialists” on bad teams that put more on a table than take off it.

And the BD argument below is a bad argument. You want to put good offensive players around true point guards. I can definitely see Marcus Williams being that guy, with enough size to back up both the 2 and 3 positions. I see him almost like Matt Barnes up in Oakland running alongside BD.

Here’s my biggest point though. We’ve all grown to love Q (despite his blatant limitations), but if we cut him, so what? Do any of you Q supporters really think our team will be that much worse without him? Marcus Williams was an early second round pick after a tumultuous sophomore year in a very deep draft. He was far and away the best player in his two years on a decent Arizona team. In 3 years, I would be shocked to see Q still in the league, but not surprised to see Williams turn into a decent bench player.

by BtheKUTA on Jul 23, 2008 2:40 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

QRoss all the way

I’m not sure who the 15th man will be or if there is even going to be one, but QRoss is really a top-of-the-line defender. He’s a guy who can defend virtually any PG-SF, with excellent lateral mobility. Why that doesn’t translate into more scoring is anyone’s guess. Perhaps last year he had less open opportunities or he forced up too many shots, no one really knows. It is interesting to note that his average minutes per game actually went down from 21 min in 06-07 to 19:48 min per game in 07-08, yet his FG % plummeted from 46.7% to 39.1%. There’s no real explanation from these simple stats, except that he sucked it up last year.
Nonetheless, I still believe role players have their roles in good teams. Like Clipper Steve says, he would be an important cog on a good team. Are a Clips a good team? Its hard to tell right now, but with Buke on board hopefully, it seems there’s at least an average amount of scoring. Marcus Williams is still unproven. QRoss can still be an important veteran presence on the team….now that he and Kaman are among the longest tenured Clips.
I’d argue he’s even better than an artest on defense, as he can stay with most PGs in the league, something Artest clearly cannot do. Why a guy like QRoss hasn’t been 1st team all-defensive, I don’t know.
Perhaps the better question to ask: QRoss or Livingston? Livingston is, as always: All potential, while QRoss has 0 potential, but a premier defender.

I love LAC.

by oasisman on Jul 23, 2008 12:57 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think Q

But that’s strictly a case of known knowns vs unknown unknowns.

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Jul 23, 2008 8:53 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hmmm...

Minus 2 for a Rumsfeld reference.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by Steve Perrin on Jul 23, 2008 10:55 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So?

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Jul 23, 2008 11:17 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So minus 2

My blog, my rules.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by Steve Perrin on Jul 23, 2008 12:01 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LOL

I tried to combo directly into a Cheney for maximum point.

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Jul 23, 2008 12:17 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Missed opportunity

Instead of the “so?” you could have gone with the “go falk yourself.” A Cheney with a FElton bonus point.

Wonder what the scoring on that would be.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 23, 2008 6:38 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Cheney/Rumsfeld '08

That would have been a winning ticket

F-Elton!

by mikey p on Jul 24, 2008 8:04 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There's no place for Q on this team

As CS pointed out, a team with Q and Camby on the floor at the same time is playing 3 on 5. And so is a team pairing Q with Brevin Knight or even scarier – Q with Brevin and Powell and Jordan. And Q should not be taking minutes from Thornton, Buike, EG or even Cat.

I hope Q catches on somewhere else, but he isn’t a good fit on a team that already has so many non-scorers. I don’t know how good Williams can be, but he seems to be worth a shot as a development project and backup SF. There’s not much risk involved with getting him some more run in the D-League in case of an injury to Thornton, TT or Buike.

by ClipCat on Jul 23, 2008 11:51 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Correcting comments...

Blog etiquette, for what it’s worth, doesn’t allow for editing comments. The comment log becomes a sort of permanent record, and you’re not supposed to go back and change that history. At least that’s what I’ve been told. I kind of understand, but I think it’s being overblown. At any rate, you can’t edit your comment, even to fix a typo. The de facto standard is to add another comment correcting yourself.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by Steve Perrin on Jul 23, 2008 12:00 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Can you edit a fanpost?..

I haven’t been able to find out how or where I can do that?

by Clip Show on Jul 25, 2008 2:00 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think so...

If you’re the author, I think you can edit it. Click on the FanPost, and just before the beginning of the comments (the red bar that says ‘Comments’), there should be a list of options, like eMail and Print. If you’re the author, you should have an Edit option.

At least that’s how it works for me. Of course my profile has more privileges than yours, so maybe it doesn’t work that way for everyone. But check it out, because it should work that way. The author should be able to edit his/her FanPost.

The Clippers! The (second) Best NBA Team in LA!

by Steve Perrin on Jul 25, 2008 11:24 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah it works that way for FanPosts too Steve

Done it many many many times myself. (I don’t think there is any great difference with 2.0 with fanposts vs admin-you in this case-except for the admin priviliges you get like deleting anything you don’t want and the like.)

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 28, 2008 11:06 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Clips Nation!
Start posting about the Clippers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Turkoglu Turnaround
Small
About that other LA team
Small
Clipper fans
Asset_small
Hedo Blazes a Trail West
Small
Best options for 7.3 M trade exception?
Small
Getting Ahead of Ourselves
Small
David Lee?
Small
Ariza to Houston; Artest to Lakers
Small
Ariza or Battier? Both could be possible.
Small
Lakers Land Ron Artest

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Managers

Clipsnation_small Steve Perrin

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports