Clips Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Jays Stun Rays With Walkoff Granny Bar-right-arrows



A Ron Artest trade idea

Many who know me on Sactown Royalty are aware of my dislike for Artest. I'm not sure what the opinion of him around these parts are, however, and this is why I'm writing this. A hearty assist goes to rory sayer who simply posted this fanpost about 15 mins ago himself. Let him detail (since it's his anyway) the basic proposal in this for you:
Artest: I think a very interesting, and intriguing possibility was opened up over the last week, with the LA Clippers. Nothing is final yet, but with Davis opting out of GS and agreeing to go to the Clippers, this puts the Clippers back on the playoff map, assuming that Brand does decide to stay. The odd man out, though, is Maggette, as the Clippers will be unable to resign him if they bring in Davis and resign Brand. This opens up the SF spot. The Clippers also have a bloated contract, being paid out to the bloated form of Tim Thomas, who is under contract for two more seasons. The Clippers, with a starting lineup of Davis, Mobley, Artest, Brand, and the resurrected Kaman, would be formidable, and a near playoff lock. The other benefit or the Clippers, and the ever cheap Donald Sterling, would be to get Tim Thomas off the books for next season. So, the proposal; Ron Artest for Tim Thomas, DeAndre Jordan, and the Minnesota Timberwolves' 2009 first round draft pick, which is top ten protected through 2011.

That's really the crux of the argument that rory makes. Why am I posting this? Because I've chatted with some of you around here, and I've watched you debate, and skillfully, or argue the merits of the recent Clippers action. I personally am in favor of this idea (although for the record would favor a Brandan Wright/trade exception created for Ron Artest personally only because of Wright's talent) because I like the idea of adding an extra free agent chip for next season. Or, they could always simply trade Thomas in the upcoming trade deadline for an expiring contract to get him off the books early. I disagree about DeAndre Jordan, and would be willing to take 2 picks (including the one from the Wolves if it still exists--I'm guessing one of Boston's picks may end up in the Wolves hands which may end up in the Clippers hands) also is enticing given that the Kings have some "older" younger players who don't seem effected much by younger or older teammates (Garcia and Thompson--although it's too early to tell on that front). But the idea of Tim Thomas, and 2 first rounders (Minnesota's included or not) is very enticing to me. DeAndre Jordan is not that interesting, and part of me thinks the Clippers might wish to hold onto him as part of a chance to develop a cheap role player while the rest of the roster is so expensive. Mostly I don't want Jordan because I don't think he's ready, and the Kings already have 3 young bigs.

I like the idea for the Clippers because it gives them an extra defender, an extra down low player, and it doesn't hurt the Clippers rebounding wise (given that Artest is an average rebounder and both Kaman/Brand are above average rebounders). I also think it hurts the Clipps from a sharing the ball standpoint, but coming in Artest will know whose team it is. It won't be his. That problem currently exists in Sacramento, and the other issue I have with this deal is MDsr.

I think MDsr, and Artest, are both headstrong. But there are ways around this. MDsr can ask for Artest to do the things he does very well (play lockdown D, low post play, and intense will to win) to balance out some of the things he doesn't do well (ball hogging, up & down stretches of play) with the idea that the 2009 market is there for him, and no mistakes are available for Artest this season playing with a motivated Brand and Davis.

Personally, unlike the Lakers, as Kurt at Forum Blue & Gold pointed out, that it's a bad deal for the Lakers. Too many young players, and not enough upside vs what Odom doesn't do to make the deal. What is the downside for the Clippers? Losing 2 potentially low non-lottery picks? Filling a void with Maggette's departure, and potentially adding a strong starter to help offset a weak bench? I think it could work, and I think it could backfire. That's always the potential of any deal. However, since the Clippers are throwing alot in the ring to bring Brand and Davis together in the first place, why not throw a small caution to the winds and trade for Artest on a one year deal? At least you'll have his Bird Rights which you currently can't say for Maggette.

0 recs | Comment 57 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Bad deal...

I don’t think this works for the Clippers, on many levels.
1. The Clippers would be “renting” Artest for a year…for what, a chance at the playoffs? As it stands, the Clippers already expect to make the playoffs this year, so how much MORE would Artest bring? Plus, a couple FIRST round picks is too much…especially if you are renting a player.
2. Thorton..or more importantly the development of Thorton. With Maggette gone, Thorton will now log starters minutes at the SF. This is the next step in his development, and bringing in Artest would directly affect his minutes. Not sure I want to sacrifice his development on a player the Clippers are only renting.
3. Defense….Brand and Kaman are not just above average rebounders, they are, dare I say ELITE rebounders….top 5 each …and the same goes for their shot blocking. If the Clippers played the Lakers for 82 games, and needed someone to guard Kobe all the time, then I can see why Artest fits, but other than the occasional mismatch, the Clippers are more than adequate on the defensive end, especially at guarding their basket.
4. Chemistry…..the Clippers are going to have a hard enough time getting their current starting lineup to play well together….given the fact that EB hasn’t played with Kaman 2.0, and no one has played with Baron Davis before. Getting Artest, with his history, just doesn’t seem like a good move right now…
I am sure I am missing a couple other obvious points as well, but I just don’t see how this deal benefits the Clippers at all…well, at least at this point. Maybe later in the season, if the Clippers need to make a change, they make this deal, but not before the season has even started.
One wild card is Livingston, and if he is able to play. If he comes back and is serviceable, then Artest is not needed at all…if Livie can’t go, then we might revisit this.

by Clip Show on Jul 7, 2008 2:03 PM PDT   0 recs

One thing about Artest that Rick Adelman definitely used to his advantage in his 4 month coaching stint of Artest

was his superior ball handling skills. That part might be something that might be appealing with no other reliable ball handlers, other than Knight or Livingston, potentially on the roster beyond November 1st. I don’t think MDsr is in Rick Adelman’s class as a coach, or anywhere close for that matter, but I think Dunleavy might want to remember that. He also might want to remember that Artest might be more agreeable because of the money available on the table, and the benefit it could bring to the Clippers in a S&T. That’s what I was referring to with Maggette. You dumped Maggette’s value on the open market (very little given how few teams have cap room) for Baron Davis who is a better player. But Artest is a better player than Tim Thomas, and I don’t possibly see how cutting Thornton’s minutes as a starter hurts him unless he proves to be a bonafide starter. Especially if he is a true combo F who might have too many mismatches with quicker more athletic forwards who can beat him off the dribble.

I’m not going to quibble about Brand/Kaman’s rebounding. (I’ve always though Mobley and Davis are above average rebounders for their position’s too) prowess in any way. My point is that hurt the Kings in their overall defense, and it won’t hurt the Clippers. In fact Artest may rev up an already, what could be anyway, potential stellar defense. Getting better defensively, especially if you have a scheme that uses the players in the right way, promises to make MDsr’s extension worthwhile. Brand Davis and Artest aren’t the only people with something at stake in this deal. MDsr’s ability to command the locker room is at stake too I might imagine. Mostly, though, Brand and Artest’s NY connection might serve well as Artest currently bonds with New Yorkers on the Kings (Douby and Garcia) a bit easier than he does with anyone else on the team. If Brand and Artest are getting along, and Artest is on Brand’s page, and everyone should agree the Clippers are Elton Brand’s team, then that will go a long way to solving the chemistry issue. I’ve watched Artest for nearly 2 1/2 years, and one thing I can say is that Artest is all about being the “man.” But unlike Jermaine O’Neal who doesn’t really qualify, and mouthes off more about it than Artest does, Elton Brand is the true goods. And, of course, the NYC connection means something too.

Personally I don’t see how “Livie” factors into this Clip Show. He’s a PG. Artest is a SF/PF. Your points about Thornton I think are of greater value than anything other than the draft pick. And with that end here I go.

You point out that the Wolves pick is top 10 protected. The wolves won’t give that pick up unless it’s 11th or higher. You think that pick is worth keeping against a rental for Artest? I can see that point, but I’m not really sure why. Knowing what I do with Artest, and knowing what he does well and doesn’t do well, I’m inclined to think the 2 perfect fits for Artest are the Clippers and Mavs. 2 creating PG’s, 2 great PF’s, and head coaches that could use Artest’s talent without disrupting the rest of the team goal’s. Frankly Artest is a better scorer than Kaman, and while he isn’t as consistent as Brand, or as high end as Davis can be, when he lights up it changes the game. Simply put when Artest is on it’s him vs the world. Those talents are unique, and the chances of finding that player at a 11 to 14 pick is extremely low (that’s noting Artest was picked @ 16th overall).

Thanks for the response Clip Show.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 2:29 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Good points...

The thing about Livingston is that, when healthy…he plays 3 positions…pg, sg AND sf…depending on the matchups…so that is why he is the wild card. He is also a defensive stopper, so they would overlap in defensive assignments.
Now lets talk about Kaman…he is a true center, and not many teams can claim that. Not only that, he has transformed into a top 5 center in the league…and he can command double and even triple teams, which he frequently did last year. MDsR is a notorious low post first kind of coach, so, reiterating mikey P’s point, Artest would be the 4th option on offense at best on this team. To me, I don’t think Artest would go with that.
Finally, the draft pick situation. That protected pick is only 2 years away (I believe), and Minny does NOT look like they will be any better in the near future. This pick could easily be top 7 or 8. Why waste that on a guy that will only be around for one year…
I like your point about the NY guys. I hadn’t thought of that angle, and that may be true. But ultimately it doesn’t work.
I have relatives in Sac, so I am quite familiar with the Kings and their history, so I know where you guys are coming from.
This deal just doesn’t work I think.

by Clip Show on Jul 7, 2008 2:45 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Since you seem to be focused on how bad the Wolves will be

When does the draft pick lose it’s protection, and can the Wolves use any picks they get from Boston as compensation to satisfy the deal? (This is what I’m mostly curious about.)

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 3:00 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I want to say

it becomes the Clippers outright in 2011 (can some one confirm this?), and I am not sure what you are asking when you talk about the Boston pick. Are you suggesting that Minny swaps the pick they got from Boston with the lottery protected pick? This doesn’t make any sense…can you explain what you mean?

by Clip Show on Jul 7, 2008 3:06 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Well

As long as it’s a pick, and their property, and the Wolves have a lottery pick, and a non lottery pick, wouldn’t giving that to the Clippers satisfy the agreement? The agreement was for a non-lottery pick, and not when the Clippers choose to give it either if I understand what happenes in those type of scenario’s correctly. Maybe I don’t, and would like futher clarification.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 3:47 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

They way it works

it that the T-wolves agreed to trade their pick to the CLippers for that year, only if it was NOT in the lottery. If their pick WAS in the lottery (which is was), the pick gets rolled over to the next year. This continues to happen until the agreed upon year (which happens to be 2011 I think) or the pick is not in the lottery, whichever comes first. At that time, if the pick is still in the lottery, the Clippers own Minny’s pick outright. The T-wolves do not own it at that point. This is totally separate from any other pick Minny would get via trade, etc.

by Clip Show on Jul 7, 2008 4:16 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Well I'm interested to see how this plays out

But I don’t see how it doesn’t apply to any other pick they acquire in a trade. Maybe I don’t understand the ways these types of things can be compensated, but something tells me that’s your preference, and that’s not necessarily the truth. (Not saying it is or it isn’t. I understand all the things you just said.)

Basically what happened is the Wolves traded a future 1st rolled over to the Clippers until a non-lottery or the pick didn’t fit the criteria. But any pick they will get from Boston WILL fit the criteria. That’s all I’m saying. And even though it came from Boston, it’s technically their pick. I don’t see how that wouldn’t fit the criteria of any trade. (I do think one of the things Boston traded to Minnesota was one of the picks traded to them in the Telfair/Roy deal though. So that may be a problem for Minnesota.)

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 4:33 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It only applies

to Minnys ORIGINAL pick…NOT any other pick they may have gotten via trade, which would automatically disqualify ANY pick originally from Boston, or any other team for that matter. Any pick from Boston will NOT fit the criteria…it’s really not that difficult to understand.

by Clip Show on Jul 7, 2008 4:38 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It's not difficult to understand

I’m finding it hard to believe that’s the criteria.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 4:38 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Then again we are talking about Kevin McHale

So I believe it’s very possible.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 4:39 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

The pick is protected

through the 2011 draft. It is not outright traded until 2012. I agree that two draft picks is probably a bit too much to give for a year of Artest. However, I think that that deferred draft pick, and DeAndre Jordan, along with taking Thomas’ contract off your hands would be more than fair, as far as value. What you are looking at here, is that the Clippers have a window of opportunity right now, and nobody truly knows how long it will last. Kaman is young, and should continue to improve for a little while. Gordon will get better as the years roll on, and Thorton is likely to get a little bit better (more on that in a minute).
However, Brand and Davis are right in the middle of their prime, right now, and Davis is VERY injury prone. Between those two, you will begin to see a decline in only a few years, if not sooner. Brand is also undersized. He is very good, elite. However, undersized guys tend to age a little more rapidly. You have to make the big push while the window is still there.
As you said, the Clippers expect to make the Playoffs as is. If and when they do make the playoffs, though, how do you expect them to perform? The Clippers, even if they complete the Davis acquisition and retain Brand, are one of the thinest teams in the West. Without Artest, Eric Gordon is the only guy that’s really worth anything coming off your bench. Brevin Knight is ok at best, Tim Thomas is horrible, and you may or may not eventually get something out of Fazekas or Paul Davis. With Artest on the team, Thorton comes off the bench as the sixth man and as a big scoring threat, backing up Artest and Brand. There’s a good 25-30 minutes a night in there, plus starting when they have to have a day off.
As far as Thorton developing much, I think you’re reaching a bit there. Yeah, he was a rookie last season, but a 24 year old rookie. He’ll be 25 this year, older than several guys that have already been in the league for a few years. The track record for guys coming into the league this late isn’t strong. That being said, he is still a good scorer, and would be a valuable sixth man. The bench would then have three solid options, with the hope that Fazekas, Davis, or Powell can provide some help.
As far as your defense, after the impact that defense has had lately, I can’t see how you would say that you don’t need Artest. As it stands, you have no perimeter defenders. Davis can’t, and Mobley’s is overrated because he gets steals. Guarding the opposing team’s best wing every night would take a lot of strain off the rest of the team.
I fact, the only part of your argument that seems to make any real sense to me, Clip Show, is that you are worried about chemistry. However, if you remember, Artest had great chemistry in Indiana, and has decent chemistry in Sacramento. The problem with him in Sacramento, is that he believes that he is the best scoring option here, because he was when he got here. Going to LA, he would defer the scoring to Brand and Davis, because he knows coming in that the team is theirs.
As far as him being a rental, well, that’s at least partially up to the Clips. You are located in LA, so he wouldn’t be in a rush to take off, especially after a good season, and you would own his Bird Rights.
You’ve talked about Livingston, but there are no guarantees that he can really play anymore, and neither are there guarantees that if he does it will be with the Clippers.
This season, Artest would give the Clippers a legitimate shot at a title. Remember how acquiring him turned the Kings season around two years ago? With Artest in the game this year, the Kings were 30-27. When he wasn’t, 8-17. He adds a ton to the game.
In essence, you would be trading Jordan, a future draft pick, and getting rid of a bad contract, for a legitimate shot at a title. Which may not come around again soon.

by rory_sayer on Jul 8, 2008 11:19 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Good points...

After reading what I wrote some more, I think I would mainly focus on the 2 first round draft picks part, and the rental aspect. I don’t think I ever said that Artest would NOT be a great addition to the team (at least I don’t see it there), and I hope I wasn’t implying it either. I also don’t think I ever said the Clippers don’t NEED him as well. Obviously he is a talent and that is pretty indisputable. I would argue (to an extent), that he was the best player on both his Indiana team and Sacto teams, and here he would be 3rd or 4th fiddle….and therein might lie a potential problem.
I disagree with you in the part about the Clips having some say in Artest staying. Yes, they can make a contract offer, but ultimately (as we are seeing with Brand now) it is up to the player, not the team. That, in my mind, amounts to more potential for a “rental” than not. Thats just my opinion though…..
I would much rather see the Clippers start the season with what they (potentially) have, and if they need something more, then go get it at the trade deadline (as I mentioned in the first post). Artests isn’t going anywhere soon, is he?

by Clip Show on Jul 8, 2008 11:40 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I agree

that on the Clippers, on offense, he would be the number three option at best, and the number four option at worst. As far as whether or not the Clippers could keep him, who really knows with players, you’re right. However, he wanted to sign an extension to stay in Sacramento, even though it is a small town, and the team isn’t winning. Playing on a good team, and in a big market should be even more enticing in my opinion. Even still, there is the risk he splits.
You’re likely to get your wish though, that the Clippers will stay with what they have entering the season. However, I wouldn’t bet on Artest being there at the deadline. He may be, but I think Petrie is pretty motivated to move him this offseason, because he’s already told Artest that he isn’t in the long term plan, and won’t be offered an extension. He’s probably played his last game for the Kings.
As for the two draft picks, obviously being on this side of the fence, I would prefer that. However, I would also accept one pick, along with DeAndre Jordan. After the Bibby trade, in which we got almost nothing, I am eager to actually get something this time.

by rory_sayer on Jul 8, 2008 12:20 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Good points

I really like the idea of the Clippers making a deal to get Artest. Obviously the dust has to settle on everything else first, which involves quite a bit of doing, and we don’t even know what’s going to happen.

It’s fairly certain that the Clips will be looking at what they can get for Thomas and Mobley, up to the 09 trade deadline. But moving Thomas now to get Artest and hitting the ground running with BD is a tantalizing prospect.

The one-year rental helps here too. If it doesn’t work, it’s over, and Artest and Thomas are both gone. Looking at the way that MD has handled vets that he has brought in prior to this, I’m not too worried about the chemistry issues. One thing is that it’s a lot of guys to try to get onto the same page in their first training camp together, but we’re talking about a whole bunch of experienced professionals, and Brand and BD should be able to set a tone of staying focused on winning. And that lineup would be able to win a lot of games.

The best thing about Artest for the Clips is his defense, and the way that he complements Thornton. But Artest is just a really solid player who does a lot of things well, and adding him to the Clipper lineup is the type of thing that puts you in a position to win a championship.

I’ll dispute just a couple of small points from your post. There’s a lot of growth in Thornton and his productivity only because he was a fourth string rookie at the beginning of the season and didn’t start getting real minutes until January. He was playing behind Reuben Patterson and QRoss and Paul Davis, and not just Corey Maggette and Tim Thomas. He played a lot of minutes at PF alongside Maggette at SF. He can play behind Artest and be a 6th man (with Gordon) and create a lot of offense. Bringing in Artest would stunt his growth a little bit, but it’s just his second year in the league, despite his age, and he would be good in the role, and the team would be better with, as I said, Artest’s defense. Thornton is ready to start and he will put up great numbers if he has the job from opening day, and Thomas should be relatively effective backing him up, and we’ll see what happens with Marcus Williams—that’s a guy to watch with some care in summer league, because his effort could affect the possibility of this trade or similar ones.

At any rate, the Clips would be better with Artest, and no one around here would miss Thomas. But that gets to part two, which is what the Kings get out of the deal. That’s another reason to watch summer league games next week, to get an initial sense of where Jordan is and how he looks out on the court. Is he a 3 or 4 or 5 year project? Kaman took a really long time to develop. Bynum, who was younger, was going slowly, then shot forward and then got hurt. Jordan may have been a 2nd round pick, but he could turn out to be a steal, and the Clips could wait on him for awhile if he’s going to be pretty good, but they’re also built to win sooner rather than later. Right now I would say that throwing in the Minnesota pick and a 2nd round pick would be highly preferable, and we can all wait and see if Jordan makes some kind of impact in summer league.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 8, 2008 12:49 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

CZ (and to everyone else on Clips Nation)

I’m the one who wants 2 1st rounders. I want no part of DeAndre Jordan. I want to make that clear to everyone here. The original proposal was rory’s, and I tweaked the proposal by adding an extra 1st rounder and dropping Jordan. I apologize if that wasn’t clear at the beginning.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 8, 2008 4:00 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

No worries

I was responding to Rory-I think. I remember your tweak. But I’m kind of curious about what summer league is going to hint about some of these guys-Beasley at least seemed to get comfortable very quickly, although that doesn’t mean too much. You might have seen how I posted that Gordon was ranked #22 by Thorpe. Even the most basic indication about Jordan could be helpful.

It’s kind of a tweener. I think everybody agrees that the Kings can have the Minnesota 1st rounder. From the Clip perspective, another first rounder seems too high. Jordan is the tweener—he’s a 1st round project who was picked up with a 2nd round pick. The Clipper perspective would be to give up a 2nd round pick. But we’ll see.

It may be that the Kings will really try to make a deal because they don’t want him coming to camp and being part of the team. He’s a good enough player that they might rely on him too much and he would be a distraction from what they are trying to accomplish. Tim Thomas is pretty neutral that way—good guy, goes with the flow, and he’d be an okay limited-minutes backup to a young player. That’s what he’ll end up doing on the Clippers, but if you have to rely on him or, even worse, start him, you’re in big trouble.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 8, 2008 4:59 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

This is true

You have to look at this though. I’m not sure Petrie will willingly trade Artest within the division regardless of the one year status. I still think that part will weigh heavily into any trade with the Lakers, Clippers, Warriors or Suns assuming he likes any asset’s any of the aforementioned 4 offers. (For the record I like what the Clipps & Dubs could offer best, but that’s just me.)

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 8, 2008 5:15 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Good analysis considering you’re not much of a clippers fan

First point about the Minnesota pick: They cannot just give us any pick they want, meaning that we don’t have a Boston pick. We have the pick the wolves would normally get in their draft order. It looks like they’re going to be bad for a few more seasons so we won’t get that for awhile. But a lot of us just want to wait it out because it could be pretty high.

Secondly: The entire league knows artest is leaving when the season is over. So I doubt you’d get 2 draft picks. Maybe 1 that’s lottery protected if we have it after Brand and Baron sign later this week. Also we’d loose a power forward that can spread the floor.

Lastly, You’re probably correct in pointing out that MDSR and artest would have issues. If artest came he would have to know that he’s the 4th option of the starting 5.

I do however like it because artest has a contract for only 1 more year. If things go south, the clippers can simply let him walk.

by cantthinkofagoodname on Jul 7, 2008 2:13 PM PDT   0 recs

I'm not a Clippers fan period (although that is funny nonetheless)

I believe in following other teams, and their success and downfalls, simply because it helps to putting a realistic trade when you’re thinking them up. I can say I want Elton Brand this upcoming season, but what’s the chances of that happening? Artest to Clip Joint land? That’s a bit more likely.

I only disagree about being the 4th option. I think he would be the 3rd option, or at least he and Kaman could trade off in that option anyway. Maybe I’m wrong in that, but that would be a great way to showcase that Artest can play without disrupting a team fundamentally. I believe the Clippers COULD provide that type of opportunity for him. As to how they value their draft picks internally I’m inclined to believe they wouldn’t want to include both, but do remember you also lose Tim Thomas in this deal. He has no appeal to a Kings team with 3 players at the wing spots vying for minutes (not including Quincy Douby) already.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 2:35 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

not a clippers fan? thats ok

Artest would be the 4th option of the starting 5 only because I think we’d always like Kaman (who will probably have the higher field goal percentage) to be the 3rd option over artest.

I’ve read a few of these other comments and I do think Tim Thomas has value, he’s similar to al haringotn with a less reliable 3 point shot, and i do think he does have a place on the clippers for when either kaman or brand comes out to spread the floor so that the big who is left in wont be facing too many double teams.

Also, I dont know why the kings would want Thomas… I figured you guys would just want his contract coming off the books, not replace it with a similar one with an extra year?

by cantthinkofagoodname on Jul 7, 2008 3:05 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

No the 2 draft picks is what I want

Tim Thomas is the pill we have to accept to do the deal. The Kings won’t have any cap room until the “summer of 10” anyway.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 3:17 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

oh ok, well

The pau gasol trade only gave the grizzlies first round picks in 2008 and 2010. and I think the wolves only got 2 as well for KG. Putting those trades in perspective, 2 draft picks is a pretty hefty price to pay for a questionmark in the form of artest. You agree?:

by cantthinkofagoodname on Jul 7, 2008 3:40 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yes in a sense I very much do

I also think taking back Tim Thomas isn’t worth anything which is why 2 draft picks was necessary. Also in the Gasol trade, was those 2 picks of that much value to Memphis?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 3:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

draft picks themselves are very valuable

regardless of who is picked at that spot.

by cantthinkofagoodname on Jul 7, 2008 3:50 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I can think of many arguments against that

It’s all about the team drafting them. Elgin Baylor can spot talent, but if there isn’t any talent there, he can’t do anything about that. The draft, like a trade for any player, let alone any player, is always a risk. Surely we can agree on that. Last but not least, the insistence on keeping those picks, I suspect, would be more about money that Sterling doesn’t have to pay as opposed to money he would have to pay with Artest around.

There are arguments for this, and counter arguments to this. Not wanting Artest is a valid reason to not want him. I’m a Kings fan and I don’t want him. Doesn’t mean I think dealing for Tim Thomas and a single first rounder is worth it either especially considering the Clipps are in the same decision. Do I think the Clipps will do it? NO, because Donald Sterling is a bottom line guy, and won’t be backed into a corner into what “could” be a potentially bad business decision by giving up 2 picks.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 3:55 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Those trades

are terrible examples. One the Grizzlies trade has been condemned by everybody outside of those teams since the minute it took place. And for Kevin Garnett, the Celtics also had to give up a guy named Al Jefferson, who, in case you didn’t remember, is a 20-10 guy, at only 23 years old. However, I would be completely agreeable to a trade that saw the Kings taking on Thomas’ contract, and getting Jordan, and the Minnesota pick.

by rory_sayer on Jul 8, 2008 11:25 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It is appealing...

but I am at my wits end with Artest and his nuttiness. He is very distrubed. Now he wishes he opted out. Why didn’t he, then? He would have had a lot of interest right about now. GSW, Philly, Memphis…I think all would have interest. Not to mention all of the teams that are vying for Maggette right now. Miami, Cleveland, Boston, San Antonio…he could have any mid-level he wants. He is a good player.

That said, I agree with Clip Show…Thornton is ready for the starting spot. Would Artest come off the bench?

Also, I am excited about the prospect of having Thomas and Mobley’s contracts expire at the same time next year. They will be huge trading chips for teams trying to get in on the LBJ sweepstakes.

Plus, I like DeAndre Jordan, and would rather just keep him than send him to a division rival.

by mikey p on Jul 7, 2008 2:27 PM PDT   0 recs

Well it's a little complicated

I would suggest you read StR as it pretty much details why. But the short version is simply he thought he would get an extension from the Kings, and when it didn’t happen, he lashed out.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 2:30 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

A Good Try

Not a bad attempt, but there are a lot of problems here.

First off, let us do you a big favor: you don’t want Tim Thomas on your team. Nowhere in the post do you talk about what benefit Tim Thomas would bring to the Kings. His contract doesn’t expire this year, so you’d be taking him on for an extra year. The good thing about his deal is that it expires in 2010, the year of Lebron.

You’re right about not including Jordan—he’s not going anywhere. The Clips have a surplus big man or two, but AJ has too much “ridiculous upside” for him to be the filler at this point.

The big flaw here is that you don’t mention Al Thornton, and he might not have been part of your thinking. The Clips are in pretty good shape at SF, although they could use one more guy… who would be a whole lot like Ron Artest.

So yeah, Artest would be a pretty good fit. There’s a tossup here-Thomas or Artest. I think if you want to win right away-which may be true of the Clips—then you take Artest. We know that MD has always liked him and tried to trade Maggette for him. He would complement Thornton very well, and one way or another the Clippers would get some credibility for their bench, which Thomas doesn’t seem to be giving them at this point.

But still, in a limited role coming off the bench, Thomas does provide some things that the Clips need. I don’t want to go so far as to say that it’s a straight up trade, but it’s a straight replacement in many ways and I don’t see the Clips giving up very much in addition to Thomas.

It’s weird to have the Clippers in a position like this, where they would be fine staying the course. And they’re not going to throw in any 1st round picks unless they see significant value added. Artest brings baggage that drives his value down.

In the end, I would say that this might be the type of thing that gets revisited during the season, before the trade deadline after things have settled in a bit.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 7, 2008 2:40 PM PDT   0 recs

First off it wasn't my attempt

But I thought the good ole college try it did attempt was worth it, and since the guy who did post on StR was new, I thought it might help him gain confidence. I’m so full of shit, and I love it.

No, I just wanted your opinions, because if nothing else, you all cover the Clippers angles pretty well. You after all fans of the team. I don’t come here because you all are the 2nd coming of Jesus’. I come here because you know the Clippers very well, and your responses show it.

I disagree about Kaman vs Artest. Artest is a quality post player. The real problem as I see it is keeping Artest from taking too many long off balance shots. If Artest can keep from jacking up shots, and sticking to his quality shots, shooting 50% is no problem for him. That however is his real offensive weakness. Kaman has never scored 20 a game in the League though, and Artest has. I’m inclined to say that because Artest can help the Clippers play a variety of ways, including playing at the 4, and guarding players at 5 positions, then he can bring more than Thornton can. I really do believe don’t get how talented Artest is unless you see him play on a daily basis. With all due respect, you’re severly underscoring Artest’s ability. You see the warts. and rightfully so, but what you don’t see is the other side of Ron. I have, and for 2 1/2 years. Short term, and on certain parts of the court, he is unstoppable. Is he Kobe? No, but only Michael Jordan has accomplished @ SG what Kobe is. Think about that for a moment.

Artest is a great 2 way player, but he is limited. He isn’t adept at blocking shots, but Kaman is. Kaman is a greater rebounder, and so is Brand. Brand has a fundamentally great game, but he isn’t flashy. He’s consistent, and rather reminds me of the old time Tiger great from the 30’s, Charlie Gehringer. As Mickey Cochrane said, ” He says hello on opening day, and goodbye on closing day, and in between he hits 350.” Brand isn’t that quiet, but you can pencil in that consistency. But the Clippers also need somebody who can light up on a moments notice, and Davis shooting the ball deep constantly takes away from his penetrating and dishing abilities. That’s where I think Artest can help the Clippers.

I understand the baggage angle. There are so many things about this I don’t like him. The taking himself out of games a year ago, and the 7 game suspension that was part of the punishment from his domestic dispute with his wife (at least she got hurt by his losing that money too-she was as much to blame as he was for that), and of course the previous distractions that led him to be traded to the Kings in the first place. However, let me point out a few things. He got into less problems in Sacramento than he did in Indy. He got into less problems in Indy than Chicago (forget the brawl-isolated incident). He got into less problems in Chicago than his childhood. Everything is rather relative. Artest as a 28 year old is very different than himself at even 25 years old. That is something we all should remember. That, and 50 million dollars will get anyone to at least consider how they’re perceived externally anyway. Especially if that perceived external view is the key to getting 50 million bucks.

I see the point about the Clippers not wanting to do a deal like this. Then again, as I pointed out the first time, do the Clippers really have that much to lose?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 3:16 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Hard sell?

It sounds as if you are trying to sell us on Artest, and I don’t think you need to do that. Most who post here are not just Clipper guys, but rather basketball guys, so it’s not like we are blind to all other teams and players in the league. Personally, I have followed Artest since Indiana, prior to his incident, so I know what we would get on both ends of the floor from Artest. I also know what other baggage we get as well.
I am also not sure you understand who the Clippers as a team are and how they operate. As I mentioned before, this team is built around the low post, with Kaman and Brand. Add in Baron Davis who is a great post up point guard, and you now have 3 legit low post threats that will command double teams. From that, the Clippers need guys who can hit open shots, or slash to the basket…like Maggette, or Thorton, or Mobley/Gordon. Artest can hit open shots, but you said yourself that he has a tendency to take ill-advised shots as well….what’s going to stop him from doing that now?
And finally, no way the clippers give up 2 draft picks…maybe one, but not 2.
On the flip side, why does Sacramento do this deal?..for the draft picks?...Tim Thomas can NOT be the reason…so, if the clips are unwilling to depart with draft picks, then deal falls apart…

by Clip Show on Jul 7, 2008 3:42 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Don't want to sell you on Artest

I just don’t agree Kaman is a better offensive player. I don’t like Artest, and I don’t dislike Kaman (despite his frequent abuse of Brad Miller—which I find rather funny more than enraging honestly) in any way actually. What I particularly think is that the Kings and Clippers both benefit. There is both risks and potential rewards to doing both deals. You’re not going to ream either side, and that’s the bottom line all of us are getting at. But I already knew that, and if nothing else, I’m enjoying the dialogue.

I don’t know if the Clippers are a pure low post team. Brand has a diverse offensive game, and so does Artest, but so does Davis too. Getting shots for those 4 guys over the course of the game could provide a challenge, but getting them all shots in the course of a 48 minute game is also a problem that some coaches would welcome. There are 2 flips to every coin gentlemen.

The reason Sacramento does this for draft picks is that dealing Artest now provides them with the flexibility to move any player on the roster minus Kevin Martin Spencer Hawes, and depending on his perceived upside within franchise ranks, Jason Thompson. With so many contracts that will be by the deadline expiring by 2010, that gives Geoff Petrie an opportunity to do what he likes best: Dealing his assets on the team for maximum value. First round draft picks that turn out well from an Artest deal will be simple icing on the cake. If there is anything about Petrie I like at this point, some things I like, and alot of things I don’t, it’s that he’s willing to take intellectual abuse from anyone to get the things he’s after.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 4:01 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Something else I believe that has merit to consider

is how many players on this roster (if you add Livie that’s one more) who have the abilities to play multiple positions both offensively and defensively. That makes any short coming’s on the bench a much easier pill for a control freak like MDsr to swallow if he has 4 all-stars ( or near all-stars) that are either in their prime or young, and supporting talent that is a mix of both as well. You’re telling me that Artest can’t help the team in providing versatility? I’m sorry, but I just happen to disagree. No matter how you sell me on the virtues of Corey Maggette, he just flat out doesn’t really do that with the exception of being a SG offensively. You can go big and small with Artest at your leisure, which is not something the Clippers can do without giving something up.

I’m a veteran of watching this scenario play out game after game with the Kings in their glory years. Personally I think it’s the single most under-rate trait those teams had. I also think the fact that Brand Artest Thornton Gordon Mobley Kaman Davis as your top 7 can win you alot of games if you’re playing the big 4 35+ minutes consistently. It makes having a strong bench less important, and the note on health aside, when isn’t being healthy i mportant? You take those risks with athletes because it comes with the territory. Personally I understand the reticent approach to taking Artest on. I really do. I don’t think it has anything to do with meshing with the Clippers or MDsr though. I think that’s a red herring that’s a smoke screen revolving around one cenral fact: giving up 2 draft picks for anything less than a sure thing is poor business sense. And I would agree. That is, I would have, had the Clippers not mortgaged a ton of their future by doing what they’ve done this past week.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 4:08 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Couple of things...

Artest is a great talent, and the Clippers would welcome him and they most likely would be better off for it….the actual difference in # of wins…now that is debatable.
Second, the way it stands, the Clippers have NOT mortgaged their future by getting Davis and Brand (assuming all goes to plan). Both Mobley and Thomas come off the books in 2 years. Teams will be looking at trades for these guys BECAUSE of their huge contracts and the fact that they expire soon. This is a great thing for the clippers, as it will leave them with many options. They will have their big 3 signed for a minimum of the the next 4 years, and have plenty of $$ to go after free agents, resign their rookies, or do whatever they please. This doesn’t sound like mortgaging their future to me…
Third, this deal will NEVER happen, so I am not really sure why we are even talking about it anymore. Most here at the Nation agree that 2 draft picks is too much..and that is that.

by Clip Show on Jul 7, 2008 4:33 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Well first off okay

If the Clippers don’t think it wouldn’t give a great chance to increase their win total why do the deal? Better yet why say they would welcome him if they doubt his ability to help them increase their win total?

This is true Mobley & Thomas come off the books in 2 years. Artest comes off in one. Are you implying that 2010 is a strong FA class that the Clippers can take advantage of? My question is what makes them more attractive than every other team that will have cap room? I personally think any time a team has cap space is a time a team can be a player in the off-season. Look at the Clippers this year. They’re the entire Free-Agent talking points. Without them it would be an extremely pedestrian off-season.

Let’s do some math. Let’s say Kaman makes 9.5 million, Davis starts out the first season at 8 million, and Brand’s 5 year 85 million deal holds true, and taht starts around 13 million. Right there you’re looking at 30 million, and that’s not accounting for any other player on the roster. And those totals only go up over the next 4 years. That will eat up any salary cap room. Plus you have Thornton and Gordon on the roster, and assuming they aren’t going anywhere, a fairly worthwhile assumption, then you can add another 4-5 million over the next several years at least. So let’s assume that you don’t deal for Ron, and you’re looking at 2 years from now. The Clippers will have a total of close to 41 million dollars invested in 5 players. That’s not the highest 5 total anywhere, but it’s going to be hard to have gobs & gobs of cap room too.

Besides if you’re trying to win now with Brand and Davis, why does thinking about 2010 and flexibility have anything to do with a guy whose contract expires in 2009?

Last but not least, there is a difference between saying the nation doesn’t agree with giving up 2 draft picks when you aren’t the nation itself (although I don’t doubt that the topic has come up in one form or another). I do think that it’s a tad arrogant to tell me what an entire group thinks when 3 members of it have been the only one’s to post (other than me) so far up to this point. It would be very arrogant of me to tell you that many Kings fans would think this is a solid proposal (many, I suspect, would demand an all-star in return like Kaman). In fact many would be opposed to doing so just simply because the Clippers could profit off what the Kings and Ron did for 2 1/2 years.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 4:57 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

If anything,

we have found someone to rival Zhiv in word volume.

Nice job, pookey.

by mikey p on Jul 7, 2008 3:19 PM PDT   0 recs

I've posted longer than anything I've seen zhiv post

Zhiv is farily long, but I don’t he’s posted a fan post of this length. Might be wrong, but that took a very long time to write. I also took 6 hours to write something on Blazers Edge once. That was too long too. Way too long.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 3:43 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

HaHa

Not posting Fan Posts for StR that’s for sure. I work for Yellow Cab of Seattle though.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 5:25 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Cool

Thanks for answering, though the question was rhetorical.

I hope you don’t post while driving.

by mikey p on Jul 7, 2008 5:42 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

C'mon, that's nothing

Pookeyguru might want to take a glance at CS’ Maggettifesto.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 7, 2008 5:38 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Requires focus and commitment

A bracing double expresso and you can fly right through it.

Now it’s CS’ version of Remembrance of Things Past.
Proust/ClipperSteve, ClipperSteve/Proust… take your pick.

by citizen zhiv on Jul 7, 2008 6:40 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

That is impressive indeed

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Jul 7, 2008 10:00 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I would love to see

Artest in a Clippers jersey for Thomas and some SECOND round picks. But no way would I ever give up 2 first round picks for a rental. I agree with all of Clip Shows points but would gladly take a shot on the chemistry issues with his talent.

"Lets get one thing straight, the only reason you are conscious right now is because I don't feel like carrying you." - Jack Bauer

"Consequences, Schmonsequences, as long as I'm rich." - Daffy Duck

by Badd on Jul 7, 2008 5:08 PM PDT   0 recs

Come on

You really think that Artest is worth nothing better than second round picks? The guy is one of the top talents around the league! The ONLY set back, is his baggage.

by rory_sayer on Jul 8, 2008 11:42 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

If he is so great....

Why are you guys so intent on trading him away? That part I don’t understand. I mean, if you were to get someone who could start for you in return, yeah, I see it. But you are asking for Tim Thomas, a guy who was drafted in the second round this year (Jordan) and may not even make an NBA team, and a future (2012) first round draft pick. How does this help the Kings in anyway in the immediate future (read: next 2-4 seasons)? I mean, Artests’ contract is even shorter than Thomas’ too, so you won’t be saving any money either. Maybe I am missing something….

by Clip Show on Jul 8, 2008 11:48 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

That's what I'm getting at.

I’m not looking for the Kings to make a fast rebound back into the playoffs in just a couple of years. This particular trade proposal I made was within a much larger rebuilding plan that I posted on SactownRoyalty. If you want to read it, click on the my name that is a hyperlink at the top of the page, and it will take you to the article.
In short, though, I want the Kings to take a longer, deeper rebuilding process, so that through the draft, they can rebuild into a deep, heavily talented team. The process will take several down years, and Ron Artest simply isn’t a part of the equation. I also have proposals for trading Brad Miller. The goal, is to accumulate draft picks over the next few years, clear cap space by 2010, and hand the team over for the time being, to the young guys. Martin needs to be given the leadership role on the team, which Artest currently owns, and Hawes is swallowed behind Miller.
I sincerely think that this team would make the Kings much worse for the immediate future, and significantly improve the Clippers for the immediate future. The reason I’m okay with this, is because my aim is to be a serious title contender when we do return to the playoffs, rather than a perennial one and done team.
The reason I want Jordan, and believe that it is fair, is because he couldn’t help anybody immediately, and would actually hurt a team if he played now. However, eventually, he MAY be excellent. It’s the kind of all or nothing gamble that I think teams need to make when they are in the basement, because a lot of average players isn’t going to get you anything.
My goal isn’t to screw over the Clips in this trade. I look for trades that could potentially help both teams, because they are the most likely to take place. Not that I think this trade will actually happen, as none of the trades that I see as viable seem to happen.

by rory_sayer on Jul 8, 2008 12:07 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Late to the party

I think the debate has been quite informed. Artest is a terrific fit from a basketball only standpoint, and few on ClipsNation have significant allegiance to Tim Thomas. But two first rounders is a pretty steep price to pay for a one year rental. Like someone said, Memphis barely got more than that for Gasol.

Most importantly, there’s really no rush to do this deal. The market for Thomas (and Mobley, for that matter) will continue to go up as we get closer to 2010. Integrating Brand and Baron and Kaman 2.0 will be enough for the first half of the season. We’ll see how that goes, and maybe go shopping at the trade deadline.

Having said that, if I was Elgin Baylor and Geoff Petrie came to me with this deal, I’d certainly make a counter. One lottery protected pick. One first and one second. Who knows where it might end up? A