Clippers Acquire Steve Novak
The Rockets expect to trim their roster and their bloated collection of forwards on Wednesday by dealing Steve Novak to the Los Angeles Clippers, an individual with knowledge of the deal said Tuesday.
The Rockets will receive future draft considerations, likely the right to switch places with the Clippers in a second round. It is unclear which season that would be because both teams have future second round commitments.
The Rockets selected Novak, 25, in the second round of the 2006 season. A 6-10 forward, Novak averaged 2.7 points in 70 NBA games, making 44.1 percent of his shots and 42.7 percent of his 3-pointers.
The highlight of his two seasons with the Rockets was likely the buzzer-beating 3-pointer he made to defeat the Kings during the Rockets’ 22-game winning streak last season.
1 recs |
28
comments
Comments
Uhh where are your sources
I’ve checked a lot of sites and no sign of this trade at all.
by bestclipfan on Aug 5, 2008 8:42 PM PDT 0 recs
Houston Chronicle
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/bk/bkn/5926955.html
Sorry, we are the BEST team in LA!
by LAC on
Aug 5, 2008 9:19 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Steve Novak?
Nice find LAC…but just who is Steve Novak…can he hit the off speed pitch, is he any good against left handers? Does he play a little basketball in the off season?
But the burning question; is he worth a second round draft swap? I mean we got Camby for a second round draft swap…we shouldn’t be throwing those second round draft swap away like they grow on trees. Heck if we save enough of them, we might be able to bundle them up and trade em for T-Mac or Lebron…wouldn’t that be something.
by MichaelCage on Aug 6, 2008 12:00 AM PDT 0 recs
A 3pt shooter
If you type in Steve Novak on youtube, you can be assured to see a bunch of 3’s being shot. Seems to be his only NBA “skill”, and being 6’10”. Can’t complain for a bottom of the barrel find. By this move, seems like they are committed to an up-and-down style with plenty of 3’s being shot. Not sure if the Fazekas QO debacle is directly related to this or not, but it sure seems like it. Haven’t really seen this guy play…seems to be like a 1 dimensional TT. Then again, we are talking about the 13th man, so nothing to get too excited or worried about. With Skinner as the backup C and Fazekas apparently gone, looks like the Clips are committed to playing D Jordan a few minutes a night now.
I love LAC.
by oasisman on Aug 6, 2008 1:54 AM PDT 0 recs
an upgrade
looks to me like an upgrade of fazekas. i think the reason the clips signed fazekas in the first place was so cuz he was suppose to do wat novak does, spread the floor and make threes, but surprisingly fazekas scored a lot of his buckets inside and rarely shot it from downtown. good move, one of the underrated shooters in the league
by clipschamps on Aug 6, 2008 2:13 AM PDT 0 recs
He's caught my eye when watching the Rockets - he can shoot
But I’ll believe MDSr has committed to uptempo when I’ve seen it. I hope so.
by Jax on
Aug 6, 2008 9:19 AM PDT
up
0 recs
STEVE NOOOOOVAK!!!!
WOO-HOO!!! Season saved!
I am Greg Oden, i am goingz to be trade to The Warrior. hoooray.
Warriors for life. Raiders till death. And The A's when i get free tickets.
by STIX on Aug 6, 2008 2:27 AM PDT 0 recs
Clippers.com has yet to confirm
they might still be in negotiations. But if this is true it is a good move.
by bestclipfan on Aug 6, 2008 8:04 AM PDT 0 recs
Novak
He’s probably the BEST SHOOTER in the L right now. I’m not really trying to exaggerate either, his stroke really is sweet. It’s too bad he has cement feet, I wonder if he can stay in front of a statue.
by supac on Aug 6, 2008 9:45 AM PDT 0 recs
Well as long as people are going Novak crazy here are some videos
Novak game winner against Sacramento
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzzN4exB8tg&feature=related
10 points in 2 minutes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSUOsY2kr6Q
by bestclipfan on Aug 6, 2008 9:48 AM PDT 0 recs
72 points per 36 minutes isn't too bad
Get me BD and 75 and I'm in
by John R on
Aug 6, 2008 9:52 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Looks good to me
No one is a bigger Fazekas fan than I am, but with Camby, Skinner, Thomas and Jordan the minutes for a backup PF/C with great hands and a knack for rebounding are fairly limited. Fazeke’s defense, lack of a postup game and lack of athleticism are critical weaknesses. Add to that the fact that he seems to have an incredible touch around the basket and capitalizes on offensive rebounds, but he never really showed the perimeter game where he was supposedly so solid, and it certainly didn’t stretch out to the 3 point line.
Steve Novak appears to be a completely different player.
He has height (6’9”-6’10”), but his draft measurements show a short reach. He’s really not much of a power forward at all, as he lacks the heft to rebound and play defense. He appears to have a varied offensive arsenal and the all-around skills and work ethic of a coach’s son. There seems to be a fair comparison to Adam Morrison in some ways, from the same draft class. Novak was taken two picks ahead of Paul Davis.
The thing that Novak can do is shoot. And I mean, he can really shoot the ball, and shoot the three. In 266 minutes, he made 34 3pt shots in 71 tries. As a comparison, Dan Dickau made 36 3s in 1042 minutes and 108 tries. Clipper 3pt s were abysmal: TT 30, AT 33%, CMo 35%, CMa 38%. And the totals are just as bad. Tim Thomas made 83 3s in 271 attempts. Novak appears to be a Kapono-quality 3 pt shooter.
So when defenses collapsed on Yao Ming, Novak was able to knock down the open shot. With Kaman inside and BD breaking down defenses, the more shooters the better. This seems to be another strong move.
by citizen zhiv on Aug 6, 2008 10:58 AM PDT 0 recs
If he's that good...
...why did the Rockets give him up? It’s an obvious question… are they so overloaded that they’d cut a shooter before training camp? Is it salary issue? Can’t be, can it?
by swamigusto on Aug 6, 2008 1:34 PM PDT 0 recs
Especially SF/PF tweeners
They had Battier in the position last year, and Novak struggled mightily to get minutes. They just added Artest.
by citizen zhiv on
Aug 6, 2008 1:56 PM PDT
up
0 recs
clippers.com just acknowleged the signing so its official
I hope they play him more at the 3 then the 4 because he seems more like a perimeter player then a post up guy.
by bestclipfan on Aug 6, 2008 4:25 PM PDT 0 recs
Terms?
Is Novak a guaranteed contract? Or is he a training camp decision? Anyone know? I like this acquisition. A shooter on the bench? When have Clips had that luxury? The only thing that concerns me is depth at the 4-5. Kaman has never been a forty minute player. Camby’s old and has been injury prone. Jordan is an unknown. TT is TT. Brian Skinner is the only legit backup with a contract. Does that mean Paul Davis and Fazekas (if he’s still around) fight it out for the 14th spot in training camp? It doesn’t seem like Dunleavy will carry fifteen, and I think they have to carry a 3rd pg, given BD’s history. According to my math, that leaves Livingston without a roster spot.
by swamigusto on Aug 7, 2008 9:06 AM PDT 0 recs
I can't believe...
you don’t remember the GREAT Eric Piatkowski! He is the only player I can think of that would fit in this same role. However, the problem with Pike was tjat he was starting the majority of games, or at the very least, getting big minutes. Novak will be a bench guy, and may not even see time in forty games this season.
The roster is getting full pretty quickly here….I think the clips keep either PDavis as another backup. Remember also, Mike Taylor is NOT guaranteed a spot on the roster, so there still is a little wiggle room there. If the Clips do end up resigning SL (which I hope they do), MDsr most certainly has to use all the roster spots, right?
by Clip Show on Aug 7, 2008 10:05 AM PDT 0 recs
Oh, I remember...
But I really was referring to a “shooter on the bench” and, you’re right, the problem was that Pike wasn’t on the bench… he was usually a starter. And I remember how well he shot, but also that he had difficulty getting open, couldn’t handle the ball, and was a liability on defense. Amazingly, the guy actually wore a uni last year, his fourteenth, at age 37! But it’s true, with the Clips, he needed fewer minutes, not more.
I know Taylor’s not guaranteed, (I’m not sure Novak is either) but they need to carry that third PG or at least leave a roster spot open for that player. Maybe they will carry fifteen, and I’d like to see them sign SL as well, but then you’re cutting and paying a guy if you get short at the wrong position because of injuries. Donald Sterling seems to have changed. But I don’t think he’s changed that much.
by swamigusto on
Aug 7, 2008 10:57 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Never forget
All these moves merely get them TO the cap. The cap is more than the minimum, but its a far cry from paying the tax.
I’ll give him credit the first time he pays the tax.
Get me BD and 75 and I'm in
by John R on
Aug 7, 2008 11:10 AM PDT
up
0 recs
A little better than that...
Got to give DTS some credit for greenlighting all of this activity. I also like the “no bad contracts” philosophy, because those can really dig a nasty hole.
You’ll probably get a chance to give him credit fairly soon, but not yet. He can’t really pay the tax unless he’s extending or resigning one of his existing players, right? At this point all the Clippers can do is sign guys for the minimum. They might be spending money in 2010-doubt they would be resigning Thomas or Mobley, although Camby might be a different story-and they seem to be positioning to do even bigger things down the road, but unless I’m wrong in 2011 they could be paying tax to extend guys. But things seem to be changing fast enough that it’s very hard to keep it all staight, and luckily before long there will be some actual basketball to watch so we can see how it goes.
by citizen zhiv on
Aug 7, 2008 11:42 PM PDT
up
0 recs
You are correct about all that
And he may yet do it. I just wanted to convey that despite what appears to be a flurry of activity, the Clippers are not in danger of the tax for at least 3 years. 2 years to get to 2010, then 2010 they will be operating below the cap again, so 2011 is the first real chance to pay the tax.
Get me BD and 75 and I'm in
by John R on
Aug 8, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
up
0 recs
And...
It wasn’t that long ago that they were at the minimum and seemed happy to be there. All that brings up one more thought… when is the player’s agreement up? All these formulas may change when that happens. Does that happen before 2010?
by swamigusto on
Aug 8, 2008 11:08 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Minimum vs the Cap
Its the quintessential economics question in sports. Since wins are the thing that drives attendance, how much do we increase spend over minimum to increase attendance before we hit diminishing returns on investment.
So the reality question is, are the Clippers still navigating that margin, or are they spending to win for winnings sake?
We don’t have an answer to that yet.
Get me BD and 75 and I'm in
by John R on
Aug 8, 2008 11:14 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I've always thought the NBA had the best deal...
You’re right, “the quintessential economic question in sports”.... Now, if you go back, way, way back to that point in history when the NBA was pretty much a third rate sport… (early seventies I think?) very little tv coverage, contracts out of control, the league was in trouble. So Larry O’Brien goes to the Player’s Association and makes a deal… splitting revenue between club ownership and the players (a point or two in favor of the players I think)... it was the first modern, sensible agreement between management in player in all of sport. The model stills stands today… and it works! Yeah, it’s gotten more complex, a little whacky, and needs constant tweaking, but it works far better than the systems in place in baseball and football. (IMO the NFL deal is, in contrast, the worst in all of sport. Those ridiculous rookie signing bonuses and no guaranteed contracts! A player signs a multi-million dollar ten year contract, two years later he gets cut and gets nothing. It’s almost criminal given the risk inherent in that sport.)
It’s weird but this is one of the things that keeps me interested in the NBA. They have a deal that’s fair to management and the players. Their books are relatively open. I like the salary cap and penalties. I like the risk/reward factor. I hated the “Alan Houston” excuse they pulled that one year, where teams who made foolish deals got bailed out.
I think the Clips have made sensible deals and appear to be in a position where they might actually reap some reward. I like it. I think it’s good.
by swamigusto on
Aug 8, 2008 11:43 AM PDT
up
0 recs
No Bad Contracts
That “no bad contracts” philosophy is very significant: Look at what’s happened to the Clips in the last few years: Shaun Livingston’s terrible injury, Brand’s injury, then the flight of Brand (and Maggette). Any team that carried even just one “bad” contract and suffered a similar series of events would have been completely screwed. They would’ve been immediately plunged into a “rebuilding” program. But because of salary flexibility, and sticking to this NBC philosophy, the Clips actually might come out on top… and still have salary flexibility down the road. If I’ve got it right, Al Thornton’s deal is not up until 2011 (that might be his option year). That’s really the next big contract of their own that they’ll have to deal with. And, if Thornton can develop into the player we all think he might be… the Clips will be in a position to pay him… or overpay him. It will be interesting.
by swamigusto on
Aug 8, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
up
0 recs



