Steve Novak's role on the team
On paper, the Clippers are so talented this year they should have been far more successful - even given the injuries. There is talk about speeding up the game but with our lineup I think that would just play to our opponent’s strengths. With a healthy group of starters we could do some damage – but there is also a real concern from what I have seen that the team will struggle as our starters have no defined roles and our bench has very little offensive punch. What is the solution? – I think the solution is to play Novak as starting SF and move Thornton off the bench.
Obviously Thornton is a better all round player than Novak. They both have defense vulnerabilities – Novak is a step slow and Thornton forgets his assignments. From what I have seen though, I think Novak is slightly more reliable. He seems to take control of his section in a zone and keep close to his man when Dunleavy calls other plays. He also never rebounds on either end but brings a huge advantage of having a tall guy first back on the missed shot. Next time he plays pay special attention to how many fast breaks the other team completes. It is not his defense that has me intrigued though.
Offensively, Novak has the range on his 3ball that is very valuable when partnered with Gordon and Davis. Has anybody else noticed how much attention he gets on offense? Did Dunleavy notice that Detroit put Prince on Novak much of the game? As a Clipper fan I have made many comments about spacing and our lack of ability to create the kind of spacing that wins games. When you have a big team it makes sense to take it slow and focus on ground & pounding your way to victory. The key to a solid ground & pound offense is spacing. Dunleavy always preaches that his style wins Championships but the reality is that his defensive style combined with solid 3 point shooting and a starter off the bench wins championships – aka San Antonio.
Thornton loves the midrange shot – I don’t think this helps our spacing at all. Better that he moves to the bench to be the spark Ricky never was. He will still get his time, but like Maggette when he does not have the ball he is useless and when he does have the ball you can be sure it is going up. Playing against weaker defenders and being the focal point on offense will play to Thornton’s strengths – off the bench. He is a major talent and will be an all star one day. He is just too good at getting his own shot to start on such a talented team.
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
Agree but.....
I can see the benefits of Thornton coming off the bench, but this would only be the case when we have a full line-up to choose from.
We currently do not have the depth or scoring options within our current healthy core of players to bring Thornton off the bench.
But I agree that when everyone is back (maybe in March/April??) I would not hesitate in starting Novak, he has made a career out of being a role player and does not jack up the high volume of shots like AT, but would still command respect from the defense for his shooting abilities.
I like the balance of our line-up with Novak in, and AT playing against the opposition bench players may be of benefit to the team during games.
But how would his ego handle it?
by Natedog1977 on Jan 16, 2009 12:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I also agree
I made a post earlier in the season, noting the poor production in points from the bench, and suggested that Novak could be useful given some minutes with the starters, and let Thornton be the energy guy we were lacking. Of course, that was when we had the complete roster. I still think the same way, it could be an interesting move when the injured starters return and/or the not-so-injured decide to show up.
by edu_argentina on Jan 16, 2009 1:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think Novak’s weaknesses override any positives he brings to the table as a great shooter.
http://nbaroundtable.wordpress.com/
by NBR on Jan 17, 2009 6:53 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I like the thought behind this and lets face it, we’d have nothing to lose to try this in the final 10-15 games of the season. It wouldn’t halt Thorntons development and after a tough two seasons he could probably do with a few mins extra rest each game.
I’d like to see what Novak can do. He can sure shoot the 3, that is beyond doubt.
My worries are that Dunleavy in my eyes acts like a school teacher that has favourite pupils and I’m not sure that Novak is in that group. It’s like when your not one of his favourites, it doesn’t matter how you play when you get courtime, you aren’t going to increase your minutes.
If he can’t get decent minutes now, what makes us think he’s going to get them when another 4/5 rotation players return?
by ClippersUK on Jan 19, 2009 12:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
SF or backup PF I think
After watching Steve knock down 18 tonight against the T’Wolves, I think that he can play some time at the 3 or 4. At the 4 he got some really good looks tonight as the defence didn’t want to follow him out to the arc.
He deserves more minutes as he’s proved he can flat out score when given the chance and I’d love to see eric and baron drive and kick the ball out to him.
He should definately be in the rotation in my opinion even when we get the full squad back.
by ClippersUK on Jan 19, 2009 3:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mike made a good point about Novak
he said that if Novak put on about 20 or 30 pounds he could play PF and be a real good pick and pop guy.
by bestclipfan on Jan 19, 2009 4:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 









