New Orleans 107 - Clippers 80
I missed the first half of the game. As I mentioned in a comment recently, my TiVo died, and I'm one of the few people who had a Toshiba box with the free 'TiVo Basic' service - turns out, no one wants to fix those, especially since there's no such thing as 'TiVo Basic' any more.
So I'm viewing this as an opportunity to dive into HD. No, I don't have it yet - partly because of the hassle of changing the TV, the service and the DVR at the same time. So with a dead TiVo, I called Verizon Fios to get me an HD DVR. They sent me to one of their offices to pick up the new box, where I stood in line with the people paying their phone bills as the game was tipping off. And after about an hour, I got to the front of the line where they told me that they didn't have the box I needed - and they told me I should have called ahead, which I did, but no one answered the phone. So that's why I missed the first half. And also why I hate Verizon. But I hated Charter Cable even more than I hate Verizon, so it seems like the lesser of evils.
I did listen to some of the first half on the radio. As the Hornets were draining 6 of their first 7 threes, I was wondering if the Clippers were at least contesting the shots. I mean, on the radio or in a box score, you can tell yourself "That team was just crazy hot to make all those threes. Nothing we could do about it." But defense matters. And NBA players shooting behind the arc in warmups will make 60% or 70%. So which was it? Were the Hornets just 'forget about it' hot to the point that the defense didn't even matter? Or was more like a shootaround out there?
I got my answer when I got home and watched the second half. Not only did I get to see the wide open looks the Hornets were still getting, but FSN was kind enough to show me a montage of Rasual Butler's overall shooting. In the five threes they showed him making, there wasn't a defender within 5 feet of him for any of them, and there wasn't a defender in sight on at least two of them. So surprise surprise, the Hornets made 51% overall and 11 of their 21 threes.
Losing this game is incidental. It would have been truly shocking if the Clippers had won any of the games on this trip. Sure, they led Dallas by 5 late, and that was encouraging. But look at what happened to Dallas in Phoenix. The Mavs are not a very good team right now.
We spent a lot of time talking about the matchup zone after the San Antonio game. I know MDsr feels like he has to use it to keep people out of foul trouble. But against the Spurs and the Hornets, teams that are just made to destroy the zone, don't you have to play man to man and take your chances with foul trouble? "Well, we lost by 27 - but at least no one fouled out! Really dodged a bullet there."
I have to admit that Mardy Collins is really surprising me. He's got a decent handle, and playing at the point, he's got a significant size advantage in most of his matchups. So it's tempting to think he can post up guys like Chris Paul. And watching him, you can tell that he believes he can do it - he's not Quinton Ross, afraid to shoot. The problem is, in his first 19 games as a Clipper, I was afraid of him shooting, even if he wasn't. But in the last three, he's been converting a much higher percentage and has looked pretty good. He even made 4 of 7 threes on the trip.
In that sense, although the Clippers have been severely short-handed in all of these games, it's actually pretty hard to imagine them playing much better on the offensive end. Eric Gordon has been great, Al Thornton has been pretty good, and Mardy Collins has been much better than expected - which is to say almost acceptable. Neither Camby nor Skinner are ever really going to make plays for you, which is a big reason why the team has so little hope without either Randolph or Kaman. But the offense has been about as good as it can be.
In this game, even Novak chipped in with 14 points and 4 threes.
But whatever small chance they may have given themselves with better than expected offense was wiped away by very poor defense.
By the way, how about my call on Rasual Butler? I finally got one of them right, which is a bad thing since I can no longer eliminate one player through the power of the blog post.
Did anyone hear Zach's phone interview in the first quarter? Was there any news on when he might be playing again?
Comments
Zach's Phone Call
He didn’t really say anything about when he was going to be back. Just as soon as possible. They talked about how well the team was playing before he got shoved by Voshkul and that he’s excited for everyone to come back and really gain chemistry and finish the season strong leading into next year. That was pretty much anything of any importance. And Ralph asked him if he sees other guys rehabing and he said that he sees Baron, Chris, and MT all the time working hard to get back.
As for the game tonight, I’ve pretty much accepted a loss every night, and would be very surprised with a W. The funny thing is, that I don’t really mind when they lose. I love watching Gordon, Al, Camby bust their buts and play hard and the outcome of the game doesn’t really matter to me anymore. I really do believe that if everyone is healthy (when was the last time we could say that about a Clipper team?) that this team can be really dangerous.
by besaje on
Jan 9, 2009 10:36 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
You didn't miss much.
Plus, the game wasn’t even broadcast in HD. I pretty much did the opposite of you, I saw the first half and then tuned in and out of the second half. It was getting depressing. The Hornets weren’t taking us easy at all.
Once again, the zone was terrible. Is it just me, or is that baseline three ALWAYS open? I swear, all shooters have to do is set up shop there with this zone in play. I feel the same that foul trouble doesn’t matter a whole lot if you’re losing by as much as the Clippers. I realize that the Clippers may not have the “man to man capabilities” as Ralph said, but you have to give it a shot if these teams are getting open threes at will. I love Milph, but I can’t stand it when they talk about how “hot” another team is rather than conceding that the Clippers are playing terrible defense. I watch most of these games alone, and I start to go crazy when the guys seem to act oblivious to the fact that the Clippers are not playing well at all.
The Zach phone call was really unexciting. I did learn that the nickname Z-Bo came from the movie Friday, which I have yet to see. I probably should. Alas, I digress. Anyways, he said he’ll get back on the court sometime next week and he’s “excited” about this team with everyone healthy. He pretty much threw in the towel for this year. It was mostly cliches. He said that he’s been talking to Baron and that the two think that this team can make some noise when they came back (though I’m pretty sure that the only noise Baron will make is in the ears of the officials).
So, another ho hum game in Clipper Nation. I guess watching these guys try is better than watching Baron Davis on a Sunday jog. Collins has been impressive, but I just don’t see him continuing this offensive streak. I think if you have a backcourt of him and Gordon, that would be a good time to go to a man to man, as both those guys can D up anybody.
I was thinking that most of the douchebag Laker fans are probably going to go their whole lives without seeing their team drop 10 in a row. Well, I guess that’ll make it so much sweeter when they have a great year, which seems almost unfathomable at this point.
by WestsideBrandon on
Jan 9, 2009 10:57 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Zach call
Adding to what WB said, he was asked about Mardy, and in answering said he diddn’t start playing ball until Sr year in high school. (Interesting) Also I have FIOS and like it, support sucks(every time my wife calls she gets different info), HD is good, although prime ticket has only broadcast a couple of games in HD, all games on KTLA are in HD.
The World Series would be a lot better if the Angels were in it.
by Andyman on
Jan 10, 2009 9:28 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Fios
I like Fios TV and Internet services a lot. Support has been atrocious, but no worse than any other utility company I suppose. I’m not clear on why they have to be so bad.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on
Jan 10, 2009 10:31 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
plain and simple....
Outsourcing. People in different country’s could care less about joe shmoe’s service in LA. I had charter canceled it today. There support has to be the worst on the planet. Four phone calls four different answers. Three angry women with smart answers. Two cancellations and one very unhappy clipper fan. =(
by Spontane on
Jan 10, 2009 6:54 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs





