The Acker Trade is Official
As first reported yesterday by the AP, the Clippers have acquired Alex Acker from the Detroit Pistons. Here's the full press release from the Clippers:
CLIPPERS ACQUIRE ALEX ACKER FROM DETROIT PISTONS
Clippers Also Receive Pistons’ 2011 Second Round Pick
The Los Angeles Clippers today acquired guard Alex Acker and the Detroit Pistons’ second round selection in the 2011 NBA Draft from the Pistons in exchange for a conditional second round selection in the 2013 NBA Draft. In a related move, the Clippers also waived center Cheikh Samb.
A Compton native, Acker has appeared in seven games this season for the Pistons, averaging 1.3 points and 0.1 assists in 2.9 minutes per game. A former star at Pepperdine University, Acker was originally drafted by the Pistons in the second round of the 2005 NBA Draft (60th overall) and played in five games and averaged 1.8 points during his rookie season.
Acker, 26, moved to Europe in 2006-07 and averaged 14.6 points, 5.6 rebounds and 2.4 assists with the Greek team Olympiacos in Euroleague play. Acker appeared in 30 games with Spain’s FC Barcelona in 2007-08, averaging 6.8 points, 1.7 rebounds and 1.0 assists.
A former standout at Eisenhower High School in Rialto, Acker finished his collegiate career at Pepperdine as the 20th all-time leading scorer in school history and was named to the 2004-05 All-West Coast Conference team as a junior and named the WCC Freshman of the Year in 2002-03.
In a related move, the Clippers waived center Cheikh Samb. Samb was acquired by the Clippers on Jan. 5 in a trade with Denver and proceeded to play in 10 games with Los Angeles, averaging 1.1 points and 1.3 rebounds in 5.4 minutes.
This deal, for what it's worth, turns out to be a little different than the deals involving Cheikh Samb and Hassan Adams. In all three cases, the Clippers basically agreed to take on the contract of a little used bench player, but the offering team had to throw something else in to sweeten the pot. In the case of Samb and Adams, it was 'cash considerations' - i.e. they paid the player's remaining salary, which was worth it to them to avoid the luxury tax. This time, the Clippers are getting a second round draft pick in 2011. The 'conditional second round pick in the 2013 draft' that the Clippers are sending back is like so conditional that it will never happen. But the rules won't allow to trade something for nothing - so this is the equivalent of nothing that makes the trade work.
By the way, those Euro credentials on Acker's resume are nothing to sneeze at. Olympiakos (for some reason, I insist on spelling it with a 'K') and Barca are major Euroleague teams. I followed that Olympiakos team pretty closely, partly because of Acker (remembering the Pepperdine connection) and partly because of MBFGC - Acker was their most consistent player by far. His time in the ACB in Spain was a little disappointing by comparison.
As I suspected, the Clippers waived Samb to make room for Acker on the roster. Samb gets two indelible impressions from his time with the Clippers - rejecting 2008 Rookie of the Year Kevin Durant during a Clippers win in which he played a career high 23 minutes, and being completely posterized by 2007 ROY Brandon Roy in a game changing dunk.
With Mike Taylor and Mardy Collins hopefully healthy enough to play in the near future, the Clippers now have 6 players who will look for time in the point guard rotation (not to mention a seventh in Eric Gordon capable of playing some point). I guess three years of point guard injuries have done a number of MDsr's psyche. Acker (6'5") and Collins (6'6") are bigger than the others, and may get a look at a wing spot. More importantly, they will each get a chance to be the perimeter defender that the Clippers have been missing in the absence of Quinton Ross (and Cat Mobley and Shaun Livingston).
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting possible strategy on the other end
http://blog.mlive.com/fullcourtpress/2009/02/alex_acker_trade_a_precursor_t.html
Ugh the wheels keep spinning, aside from injuries barring trades, why we have a plethora of bigs and a shifty landscape at point is still befuddling; the PG position can’t be a platoon. Telfair/Foye, Udrih/Jackson/Garcia, Conley/Lowry, Felton/Augustin, Ford/Jack, using this season as the sample size, the only platoon that has worked (and by worked, I mean can barely approach mediocrity) has been ridnour/sessions. Even the Knicks have a stable PG situation. Does DunleavySr have a plan going forward?
by Abstract Capital on Feb 16, 2009 12:43 PM PST reply actions
It's not a platoon - not yet anyway...
As bad as Baron has been, he’s the starter and will get the bulk of the minutes. I think the team’s fortunes are inexorably linked to him. There’s no downside to playing him this season, as a few more losses here or there don’t matter. So it’s a chance to let the team gel around the guy. So the 5 backups on the roster become a smackdown to determine next year’s number 1 backup (or to know if they have to bring in a vet). Jones isn’t really a point, though he has played well. Hart’s a non-issue – his in the last year of his contract and will be out of the league next year, about 5 years too late. Collins and Taylor are both signed for a couple more seasons, so they have the inside track on the job over Jones and Acker simply because they’re on the roster.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Feb 16, 2009 1:55 PM PST up reply actions
one wonders...
The thing about all these trades is that, even though no one expects them to lose the pick, they can’t include it in another trade until it’s resolved. So a 2013 2nd round pick, conditional or not, can only be traded once. With Camby, Mike Taylor, Samb, Adams and Acker, they’ve traded 5 second round picks in 7 months! Only one of them (the Taylor trade) is realistically going to cost them an actual pick, but we’re now trading 5 years into the future at least. (Which may be why the Acker trade ended up sending back a 2nd rounder, instead of cash as originally reported by Ramona.) I wonder if the NBA limits the time horizon for these things. What happens if the Clippers trade a 2050 second rounder?
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Feb 16, 2009 1:43 PM PST up reply actions
An excellent point...
…not that it matters much. Second rounders are like monopoly money.
Interesting that they didn’t just cut Jason Hart. As you, CS have pointed out before, once the Clips get back another guy he’s not gonna play at all, so why not just pay him to stay home. I don’t think they save money by cutting Samb.
Now, even if you look at Collins as more of a 2 or a 3, and Jones as a 2, you’ve still got a lot of ball-handling playmakers, including Eric Gordon who looks more and more like a high quality combo guard.
Good point
Especially going against Shaq without Camby. They could use Samb a lot more in this game instead of Jason Hart.
by citizen zhiv on Feb 17, 2009 7:23 AM PST up reply actions
I am wondering if teams that want these sort of deal immediatedly call MDsr...
or does he call those teams just above the luxury tax and ask, “you got anything for me?”
"Duck, Crab. Crab, Duck"
Roger Sterling - Mad Men
Wondering the same thing
It’s a good question. How are these deals generated? Maybe the Clips sent out a coupon or something. But you have to assume that it’s the Clippers who start the conversation, perhaps after they field calls trying to get Camby for loose parts or nothing at all. “No, we’re not giving you Camby. Yes, we know we got him for free, but we like him. But we know you have a luxury tax problem, and what we can do is…”
But this also reminds me that we had a conversation at some point about the actual cost effectiveness of these moves for the Clippers, since they are beneficiaries of other teams paying the luxury tax. Don’t care much to remember or work out the specifics, but maybe CS has it handy.
Minor distractions during a lost season, not nearly as interesting as Gordon getting his due (LA Times checks in with a Gordon story this morning, but wouldn’t that have been better placed BEFORE he played in the rookie-soph game?), or the team getting everybody back, playing together, and winning some games.
by citizen zhiv on Feb 17, 2009 7:29 AM PST up reply actions
More good points...
LOL on the coupon. Only it’s not just a coupon, it’s one of those homemade sheets with a bunch of tags cut on the bottom and stuck on a bulletin board, only instead of “guitar lessons”, or “man with van” it says, “Cap Trouble? Call Mike! No deal too small!” I can can see Joe Dumars scanning the board, tearing off the little flag and carefully storing it in his wallet.
Interesting point about the actual cost effectiveness. Clips might only break even but it costs OTHER franchises dough. Like to see more on that.
Watch the Clips get somebody amazing with that second round pick.
Their luck in the draft does seem to be getting better.
"When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be twenty-one, I was astonished by how much he'd learned in seven years." -Mark Twain
by WestsideBrandon on Feb 16, 2009 11:20 PM PST reply actions

by 













