Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

Clippers 123 - Washington 108


Final - 3.18.2009 1 2 3 4 Total
Washington Wizards 32 32 29 15 108
Los Angeles Clippers 27 29 37 30 123

Complete Coverage >


I'm just all mixed up after that game.  Am I happy about the Clippers outscoring the Wizards 67 to 44 in the second half?  Or livid that they allowed 64 points in the first half and fell behind by 14 to a pathetic team?  And it's more complicated that that - if only they had played the entire game like they did in the first half, surely we could be getting past the Dunleavy era once and for all.  But I want them to pull it together sooner rather than later.  If they can do that under Dunleavy, I'm fine with that. Not that I think it's going to happen, but I hope it does.  I think.

From the moment Baron Davis strolled toward a loose ball near half court as Dominic McGuire ran past him to get a dunk for the first points of this game, it was obvious that the Clippers simply were not ready to play tonight.  The entire first half the Wizards got an array of layups and dunks that was shameful.  I kept waiting for MDsr to clear the bench, college style, and just put in five new guys, because no one on the team was interested in playing.  There's no way that Alex Acker could have been worse than the guys that were playing, and at least the minutes would have meant something to him. 

Even during the third quarter, when the Clippers turned an 8 point deficit into a 5 point lead at one point, they still weren't playing much defense, allowing 29 Wizards points.  But at least they started shooting.  Man, did they start shooting.

They opened the period with back to back threes to trim an 8 point lead to 2 within a minute.  Five of their first six field goals in the period were threes, and they hit seven total in the third.  Most of the damage was done by the crazy hot Steve Novak and the imperturable Eric Gordon.

Gordon had his worst game as a starter in Oakland yesterday.  He was 1 for 8 in that one, couldn't really buy a basket, and fouled out to add insult to injury.  Then he opened this game 0 for 5, and even missed his first free throw.  At which point, he just decided to stop missing.  He was 8 for 10 in the second half, including 4 threes, and one of the misses was an uncontested layup (something he does a little more often than he should, frankly).  He finished with 26 points, 6 assists, 3 steals and a blocked shot to end his longest slump of the season - 6 quarters long - that's how consistent he's been. 

As for Novak, there have probably been players who were hotter from deep over a four game stretch - but I sure haven't ever seen one.  He's made 21 out of 34 threes in the last four games - 62%.  And it's not like he's getting a lot of wide open looks.  Defenses know they've got to stay close to him, but if they're even a half step late, he burns them.  He even cut to the basket tonight after a Baron Davis offensive rebound and caught the pass for a layup and an old-fashioned three point play.  I told you guys he could do more than just shoot threes!

The Clippers featured solid offensive games right down the line.  Al Thornton scored 22 on 9 for 12 shooting, extending his string of good games to 7 straight.  Chris Kaman had a great shooting game, scoring 19 points on 9 for 10 field goals in just 21 minutes.  (But remember what I said about Chris' turnovers - he had 6 tonight.  He'll be back when he cuts those down.)  And Baron Davis had 20 assists, and a near triple double (11 points and 8 rebounds) to go with them.  It's the second time in five weeks that Baron has had 20 assists in a game, which is a career high.  It's hard to say if he's the chicken or the egg - is he getting assists because his teammates are making shots, or are his teammates making shots because of his passing? - but it's clear that the Clipper offense is in a different gear when he's distributing effectively.  They shot 59% tonight - 58% from three! 

The Clippers even played some defense in the final quarter, holding the Wizards to just 15 points after allowing 93 to that point.  Better late than never I guess, but it would seem to be a relatively simple task of stopping the Wizards when all you have to do is worry about Antawn Jamison.

So, what do we do with this one citizens?  Savor the offensive (as in lots of offense) display of the second half?  Or lament the offensive (as in they offended us) display of the first half? 

P.S.  It's nice having shooters on the team for once.

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Inside-outside game

I have to say the inside-outside game between Gordon and Kaman in the 3rd quarter was very effective tonight. I much prefer this to simply giving the ball to Zach and have him jack up shots. It just felt like they were actually running plays.

by hip2clip on Mar 18, 2009 11:45 PM PDT reply actions  

ill take it

solid second half effort, think kamans coming back? happy with AT too these last few weeks. BD looked good, wasn’t trying to force (too many) shots and looked smooth passing the rock

by MarekTheBrave on Mar 19, 2009 12:01 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm already thinking about the road trip...

It’s one thing to take it to the Wizards, but it’s a whole other matter to do it on the road against the some really good teams. But our Clips have some weapons and I hope the team, collectively, figure out how to get the most out of each other…and keep that info in their head. The lights seem to come on one game and off again the next…

by bystander on Mar 19, 2009 12:49 AM PDT reply actions  

I wish I had finished the game

It was really boring in the first half. I tried to catch the fourth but the game ended pretty early. I was surprised that Gordon was able to score 26 when he was having such a hard time in the 1st and 2nd quarters . I’ll try to finish watching the game today.

"This kid is the best new talent in the league right now, and I don't care who else you mention." -Suns Coach, Alvin Gentry, on Clippers rookie sensation, Eric Gordon.

by cliptakular on Mar 19, 2009 9:29 AM PDT reply actions  

On Randolph and Kaman

From what I’ve seen from the first half, Randolph was looking really sluggish. He kept getting out-rebounded by shorter guys. He doesn’t box out at all.

Kaman was a lot better this time but it doesn’t surprise me. He usually dominates when he’s bigger than the opposing big men. What he has trouble with is playing against the likes of Andrew Bynum, Dwight Howard, and even Nene Hilario.

Yeah, I was also in distraught and amazed when the Wizards almost scored 70 points in the first half. They just didn’t show energy.

"This kid is the best new talent in the league right now, and I don't care who else you mention." -Suns Coach, Alvin Gentry, on Clippers rookie sensation, Eric Gordon.

by cliptakular on Mar 19, 2009 9:35 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree

Randolph was not having a good game last night, but that’s precisely the bonus having both Kaman and Randolph on the team is. I thought Kaman was the better option last night, but the night before Randolph was tearing up and losing minutes to Kaman. These guys can play together (to me its Camby who should be dealt) and when used effectively can be a really nice boost.

by Michael White on Mar 19, 2009 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

This makes me think back to the EB teams

A question that was often asked is why don’t you guys shoot the three. And MDSr would answer, “because we can’t hit it”.

Gordon and Novak are going a long way to prove he was telling the truth.

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Mar 19, 2009 10:22 AM PDT reply actions  

indeed

he led the league in three point shooting as a player. He broke into coaching under Don Nelson. It’s clear as Zhiv has been pointing out recently that they just didn’t have the options previously. Why they didn’t sign more shooters is a reasonable question, but beyond Cat and Radman/Thomas, they just haven’t had enough shooters around.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Mar 19, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, but

I’m pretty angry at Dunleavy right now for taking so long to play Novak. The Ricky Davis signing has just been a huge disaster. Now that we can see it clearly, it would have been one thing for Eric Gordon to be the backup to Cat Mobley, and we could have argued that Novak should get every single one of Tim Thomas’ minutes. But Ricky Davis created an extra layer of absolute futility that really hurt the Clippers this season. When Thomas and Mobley were shipped out, Gordon and Novak could have immediately taken center stage. Gordon, as a high pick and the only available SG, got his chance and his minutes soon enough, but it has taken forever for Novak to have a meaningful role on the team. And this was a team that was routinely going 5-10 minutes or more without scoring any points at all—there was a whole month of horrible scoring droughts.

Some one said it after last night’s game: hitting shots is contagious. It was just so obvious last night. Novak brought the team to life simply because he is able to put the ball in the basket. That’s just part of the game and how it works. One of the reasons Gordon was able to slam through the rookie wall, as CS says elsewhere, is because Novak came in and showed that the ball could actually go through the hoop. Gordon, being a young savant, took his time and smartly took the ball to the hoop, hitting a lay up to get started. But then he took off.

One of the things that perhaps isn’t being stated clearly enough is that Eric Gordon is a phenomenally good shooter. He has a perfect jumpshot, he has great range and can hit the three. For the last couple of months we have been pointing out all of the other things that he does, that he plays defense, blocks shots, finds other players, stays inside the game and doesn’t force things, goes to the basket, finishes… the list goes on. But the main thing about Gordon is that he’s one of the very best shooters you will ever see—he really is extraordinary.

And Novak is a much better shooter than Gordon.

by citizen zhiv on Mar 19, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

JVG didn't use him (191 total minutes)

Adelman didn’t use him (264 total minutes)

Its just not easy for that guy to break through.

Get me BD and 75 and I'm in

by John R on Mar 19, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

And it all would have been fine if the Clips had a healthy Camby in the preseason and at the start of the year, and then after the trade if Kaman hadn’t gone down, along with BD, etc. Yes, it’s hard for him to break through. Yes, he has limitations. But the Clippers were in dire straits—that’s my main point. And on top of injury issues, they were losing game after game after game. And Novak was available the whole time. Not the case for JVG or Adelman.

by citizen zhiv on Mar 19, 2009 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I dislike Tim Thomas as much as the next guy...

But he’s a very different player than Steve Novak. Novak does one thing better than Thomas – shoot threes. Now, we tend to pigeon hole Thomas as a big with range, and if that’s all you want him to do, Novak is better at that. But Thomas can create shots, he can post up, and he can defend (when he wants to). I LOVE Novak – but his role is necessarily limited. Darius Songaila is a really good guy to be starting for the other team if you want Steve Novak to play a lot of minutes, if you catch my meaning.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Mar 19, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey, Tim Thomas is likeable!

He’s just deeply problematic on the basketball court. Big difference between “can” and “does.” Yes, TT can creates shots, can post up, can defend (at will), and can even rebound too. The problem is that he actually does none of those things with any effectiveness. He doesn’t rebound. I suppose that there’s a distinction between the ability to create a shot and post up, and the effectiveness one has doing it. My argument is that TT SEEMS to be better able and more effective at some of these things, but in practice and reality (all last year, after FElton went down, at the beginning of this year before he was traded) he does those things very poorly. In the end his significant contribution is as a big who chucks up shots from distance, that he doesn’t make.

Break it down, thinking about what TT does even when he has a good game—and add in the fact that in that case he would be getting 35+ minutes. He never once had a game that he took over with his defense, really shutting down an important player. Yes, he might have slowed down a few decent guys—when he was playing his best. He has never had a “great” rebounding night. As the starting PF last year, he led the team in rebounds 6 times (8, 12, 13, 9, 9,11) and had 323 rebounds in 1940 minutes (Zbo has 281 rebounds in 1031 minutes), 62 offensive (Zbo at 93). Novak has 98 rebounds in 936 minutes, 16 offensive—the point being that Novak can more or less do what TT effectively does, get a smattering of defensive boards. TT can post up or get his shot, and he was 208-434 48% over those 1940 minutes (and 51 starts). But the problem is all of those 3 pt shots that he misses, as he was 83-271 30%. He “can,” he just doesn’t. If he took less than 100 3 pt shots and took an extra 100 2 pt shots, and did some more rebounding instead of camping out behind the 3 pt line, he might be okay. He was playing next to Kaman 2.0, which created all sorts of inside/out opportunities—and how many times did he miss wide open 3s (…about 100 to 150 times…). In the end, TT slumped his way to 31 min a game, 12.4 pts and 5.1 rebs, playing a crucial starting role (and he missed 20 games). So now put Novak into the same equation. It’s not an ideal situation, but let’s just say you have the choice, and you know what we know now.

I like the way Kaman looks to see if the guy moves off Novak at all and comes toward him in the post. Kaman has fired two of those passes out to Novak with great gusto. Kaman 2.0, playing at a high rate of energy, can do some damage with shooters like Novak and Gordon.

by citizen zhiv on Mar 19, 2009 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't disagree with you about Thomas...

Part of the problem is that he’s catnip to coaches. I think it was Woody Allen (or possibly Tony Roberts in a Woody Allen movie) who talked about the lure of troubled women – you always think you’re going to be the one to change them. MDsr thought he would be the one who finally tapped into all the delicious TT potential.

With Novak, there are no delusions. You get what you get, which is one of the best shooters pretty much ever.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Mar 19, 2009 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Clips Nation!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Joc_01_small
Stats/Box/Game Log question?
Small
Clippers All Time Leaders in Wins Above (Below) Average
Small
Adjusted Point Differential and Pythagorean Wins
Small
A look at efficiency and point differential
Small
Anyone have a video of DJ's jumper?
Blake_griffin_cropped_small
It was a good day
Small
Poll: April 27th where do you see the Clippers?
Small
40-26 and getting there
Small
Are we showing Mo enough love?
Blake-griffin-dunk_small
JR Smith. Yay or Nay?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Clipsnation_small Steve Perrin

Editors

Joc_01_small John Raffo

Authors

Blake-griffin-dunk_small Lawler's Law