The Blake Griffin Effect
This is something that I've been thinking about since the Clips won the lottery. Getting Blake Griffin does two very obvious things: 1) the team and its fans something to feel good about, and 2) greatly improve the future of the team.
However, I think Griffin's most immediate impact will be felt off the court. What Griffin does is thrust the Clippers in the national media spotlight for a positive reason (for once). Griffin is a guy who the national media loves, who has name recognition and a who has a national following. Now all of those qualities will be attributed to the Clippers by association. You can't have Blake Griffin without the Los Angeles Clippers.
The Clippers have desperately been seeking a player who provides them with a national identity. Even when we were a playoff team, neither Cassell nor Brand received much attention. The last time we received any media exposure was when Darius Miles and Quentin Richardson made it hip to clip and were featured on those Jordan Brand commercials.
In Blake Griffin, the Clippers have a player who can and should easily surpass what little media exposure the Clippers have ever had.
This has already started, as evidenced by all the Clippers related articles and comments on various media outlets. Chad Ford has already said that he's doing a big piece on Blake Griffin coming soon. Today is no exception:
1) DraftExpress reports on a Blake Griffin workout (with video!)
2) DraftExpress interviews Blake Griffin
3) NBADraft.net interviews Blake Griffin
4) Clippers featured heavily in Bill Simmons' mail bag (not very positively)
What I love is that this is going to continue until the day of the draft. From now until the end of June, we will be hearing a lot about Blake Griffin and the Clippers.
It will be nice for once to get some positive news associated with the Clippers
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A bust waiting to happen,, Help me!
by dungeness crabdribble on May 22, 2009 1:20 PM PDT reply actions
TY for the reverse jinx :)
"This kid is the best new talent in the league right now, and I don't care who else you mention." -Suns Coach, Alvin Gentry, on Clippers rookie sensation, Eric Gordon.
yet it seems writers always find something bad to say about the clips..or find some way to laugh at us…saying we will mess the pick up or it wont help us blah blah.. im tired of everyone dissing the clippers
Interesting Evolution
Good post. It’s interesting to see the Clips with a marquee name, a consensus #1 who is universally projected to be an impact player.
One thing it shows is that the franchise has come a long way since FElton first arrived from Chicago. If the Clippers are still getting very little or no respect now, and no one is spending much time giving serious consideration to how Griffin will fit into their roster, things were much worse when EB pulled off the trade that brought FElton to the Clips. At that point, the Clips were definitely more comical and bumbling and pathetic. They were cheap and were just starting to play at Staples, which was a big step forward (did FElton ever play at the Sports Arena? I don’t think so.)
In the interim they’ve signed free agents, made a lot of good personnel decisions and trades, things like not overpaying Bobby Simmons, the sign and trade with Jaric for Cassell, the trade for Camby, drafting Al Thornton and Eric Gordon. They didn’t overpay for Maggette, and should have solved the PG conundrum by signing BDavis, although that’s very much a work in progress, along with lots of other things. And they have the sterling-quality practice facility. It’s a professional organization, despite the fact that the national (and local) media wants to diminish their legitimacy.
A lot of the credit for this development should go to Dunleavy. He’s a deeply problematic figure, but he has pushed DTS and the Clippers forward with the same stubborn focus that he has shown in making some horrendous coaching decisions.
But I’ve been thinking about the impact of Griffin quite a bit over the last couple of days. We need to spend some time focusing on the positives. This is a truly fortuitous event, a tipping point that will have an amazing impact on the Clippers. But the ground has been prepared throughout the Dunleavy era, and the team has been making good decisions and making determined efforts to improve and compete, even though it hasn’t seemed like that at all on a daily basis and through a long death march of defeat. All of the injuries were very bad breaks, misfortunes, and they were compounded by the bizarre reactions of a stubborn, old school, conservative coach.
But now this downtrodden team has finally gotten a lucky break. We’ve been waiting for things to turn around and for something good to happen for a long time.
Sorry, Zhiv - couldn't disagree more
As I’ve said, Griffin is nice, but they need a good foundation for him to grow. The ground has been prepared through the Dunleavy era? Are you serious? I guess what you must mean is that MDSr’s decisionmaking is so bad that he put them in the position to get lucky and get the no. 1 pick.
This is not a tipping point unless ownership takes the opportunity to clean house. You really must get back to basics. MDSr is not a good game day coach – never has been and never will be. They were fortuitous when Sam C took over the team for a year, but other than that, nothing.
As my old high school coach (and john w) said over and over: “failure to perpare is preparing for failure.”
Isn’t there such a thing as a “zhivian realization?” When will that happen to you? I’ve been waiting for two years, and you’re almost there, but this Griffin thing has set you back another year, I fear. I might have lost you.
Matter of Degree
I think that I’m trying to make more than one point here.
I’m not going to dispute the fact that Dunleavy is a bad coach, and that he has taken bad injury situations and made them worse, misused the personnel available to him, and made some highly questionable moves as a GM, starting with the Randolph trade.
But I definitely don’t mean to say that “MDSr’s decision making is so bad that he put them in the position to get lucky and get the no. 1 pick.” What I’m saying, is that the Clippers were a joke and completely unprofessional before Dunleavy arrived. They were hopeless in a different way than what we see now, they routinely made ridiculous decisions, based on ignorance or cheapness or both, with a glaring lack of professionalism. Sterling’s management was absurd and disgusting and demoralizing, and the team was a perennial gang of misfits with literally no chance at success.
When a lot of people see the Clippers get the no. 1 pick, they think that they’re the same team from a decade ago, and that they will do something completely absurd. They keep saying “how will the Clips mess this up,” thinking that they’ll go out of their way to find the next Olowokandi.
My first point was simply to say that the Clips aren’t that team anymore. They have made a ton of progress in the level of their professionalism. Sam Cassell led them to the playoffs—but the team deserves some credit for making the deal for Sam Cassell, rather than losing Marko Jaric for nothing. And they signed Mobley at the same time, who turned out to be a nice complement to Cassell. These weren’t perfect, championship moves, but they marked definite progress.
When it comes to Dunleavy and getting rid of him, I’ve been saying be careful what you wish for for a while now. It’s nice to think that the Clips can “clean house,” as you say, and give Griffin and Gordon a good foundation for growth. But they’re just as capable of hiring somebody who is wildly incompetent, who doesn’t know the NBA and how it works, and who will take the team backwards to a place where nobody believes in them at all. It would be great if the Clips could bring in somebody who is smart, talented, and innovative. It’s very hard to see that happening with Sterling as the owner. As I said, Dunleavy’s stubbornness is an asset when dealing with Sterling. It’s far from ideal, but it keeps Sterling from having control himself and making truly zany decisions.
The other point, and the other factor, is the bad luck of injuries, along with the FElton departure. When you look at the Clipper roster over the last 5 years, you see steady, ongoing improvement in the general quality of the personnel and the depth, with greater continuity as well. Again, it’s far from high quality and it’s very questionable whether it is competitive, but it is improving. It’s hard to tell what it is, exactly, because guys keep getting hurt.
Dunleavy is the worst type of coach when there is a big setback, like an injury, and making changes and innovations. He needs to work from strength, and even then he’s mediocre. But he’s a tough guy who works hard and goes after quality, experience and consistency.
All I’m saying is that Dunleavy got lucky. He was on the ropes and stumbling, but it wasn’t as if he didn’t fight hard and do his best over the rounds/years. And Dunleavy’s luck is the Clippers luck at this point, that’s just the way things are. It could be better, it could be worse. But the situation as it is, in the real world, is improved. And Dunleavy’s hard work, in this context (getting a stroke of luck), set the stage where he has an opportunity, and a much better chance, to turn things around.
We’ll just see what happens I guess.
by citizen zhiv on May 22, 2009 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions
A big plus one...
I’ve been trying to stay out of this argument, feeling as though I was repeating myself to the point of boredom, but I think Zhiv absolutely nails it. Decrying Mike Dunleavy’s coaching ability without weighing his authorship of fundamental change in the way this franchise does business is a major oversight. Since the arrival of Dunleavy, the Clippers act like a viable NBA franchise that is trying to build a winning team. They draft well, they spend money in an appropriate manner, and they have even seen some success (though admittedly, not nearly enough).
Those of us who watched what went before might be reminded of another quote we heard in high school: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
If you dont raise expectations, then we dont expect more. Its that simple. Why do you think Mike Woodsen is almost on his way out ? Once you start winning, you can’t just go back to losing and say, well this is ‘normal’. Mike Dunleavy set the precedent for his self, we’re not going to judge him on the clippers of past. and if we’re so good about spending money now, then DTS should be able to find a competent coach who makes money. DTS and Dunleavy lucked out that we got this pick because im pretty sure staples would have been damn near empty next year. Im not really sure how much worse a coach can do – 42 wins in 2 seasons. If we’re not winning next year I bet we’ll have more excuses, more injuries and upset STH’s.
Injuries only work as an excuse if you accept them. Houston had a ton of injuries and almost beat the lakers in the 2nd round. You cant get injury prone players and expect them to be healthy all season. And trust me, when you’re losing, it doesn’t take alot to get ‘injured’ and sit out. if we were winning, no one would sit out like kaman or baron did.
I suspect
That many of the pro-MDSr folks are Clipper plants.
That sounds a little crazy
Where are the pro-MDSr folks? I don’t think there are a lot of them around.
There are a few different categories, not a simple pro and con.
by citizen zhiv on May 24, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Swami, you've mistaken a discussion
for an argument. These are legitimate issues that ought to be addressed on this forum.
Now to the substance of your position. You suggest that the “Clippers act like a viable NBA franchise that is trying to build a winning team” and that MDSr has somehow dramatically changed things. Really? The ONLY positive thing he’s done is get Sterling to open up his wallet. That in my view does not a lifetime appointment as coach and GM make. For that i’d give him an Assistant VP job at most. I guess others have easier standards.
Let’s look at the facts. MDSR has been here EIGHT YEARS NOW. He’s the second longest tenured head coach in the NBA (after Jerry Sloan – shall we compare records?) Do you really think that what he’s done here somehow warrants that tenure? Has the team won more over the past eight years than before MDSr? No. They have one season winning record in that span. That’s “fundamental change” in your view? Last time I looked the Clippers are still the laughingstock of the NBA if not of all professional sports.
I guess you’re smarter than I am (and 99% of sports fans in this country). We’re just not smart enough to see the “fundamental change” to which you refer.
Do you really think propping up Elgin Baylor as the GM of this team to the world when in fact it was MDSr all along is an example of a professional franchise? Or of “fundamental change?” I personally find that move horribly insulting on a number of levels, and Elgin’s complicity in that is just sad. MDSr – the fundamental change agent that he apparently is – apparently had no problem being involved in that pathetic charade.
MDSr’s draft choices have been below par on average. I don’t need to go through that again here. Do I?
MDSr does not get along with his players. He does not garner their respect.
The most important issue fur me, however, is that he’s a horrible game day coach. He’s reactive. He does not strategize. His plodding offense, 8,000 page playbook, etc., are not hallmarks of a successful NBA coach. But hey – let’s just stick with him, maybe it’ll be different next year.
As you can see, your suggestion about remembering the past certainly applies, but not in the way you meant it to. This team has got to move forward to be successful. In my view, it cannot do so with the current coach.
I respect the fact that you think otherwise. I just disagree with you.
Big Point
The national media attention is something we’ve never really had…BD definitely created some news but we got off to such a bad start that it never gained any steam.
We really need Griffin to not be a bust and to help the team start winning. This really could be our last chance to achieve respectability.
Good discussion
We’re taking our time getting around to it, but the question, it seems, is an analysis of MDSr’s tenure.
Let’s start by saying that he shouldn’t be the coach, at least not in a reasonable world. But the DTS Clippers aren’t reasonable and never have been. And the fact is that he is the coach, and he is the GM.
And yes (working backwards), he’s a horrible game day coach. That’s reason enough why he shouldn’t have his job. And yet he still has it.
Getting along with the players is a little bit trickier. He’s nobody’s buddy, but he did seem to have a good relationship with certain players until recently, when his conflicts with players became magnified by the Baron Davis conflict. He had issues with Maggette, and with Chris Wilcox before that, but those issues were based on style of play. He seemed to have good relationships with Cassell and other veterans. He seemed to get along with FElton, although FElton had questions about the Maggette debacle. I like to remember that he pushed FElton to improve his fitness and play and FElton responded with an MVP-level season. And the following year, Chris Kaman became Kaman 2.0, showing remarkable improvement.
I would argue that MDSr is an especially poor coach when faced with injuries and unforeseen problems. When he needs to experiment and innovate, he becomes more conservative and stubborn, and he stands on bad ideas for much too long. His system is probably not so bad when you have a rock solid roster, one that is able to prosper in matchups and play hard defense. But through one circumstance or another, over and over again, MDSr hasn’t had anything close to a solid lineup that could execute his system, and he has never made a commitment to do anything differently, even in the midst of continuing abject failure.
Along with the bad, he made one unforgiveable draft pick when he passed on Granger and picked Korolev. Thornton was a good enough pick, and Gordon was solid. The Livingston pick was an honest mistake, although it foreshadowed the Korolev pick. Going for the obvious and playing it safe in both cases would have yielded far better outcomes. The second round picks have been unfortunate thus far.
That gets us to trades, where he has done well enough. The Randolph deal is still in question, I would think. I like the fact that the Clips got a productive player who filled FElton’s role to some extent, and that they got rid of Tim Thomas and Mobley, allowing Gordon to start. There’s a false argument here, to a certain degree, because MDSr could have just started Gordon and brought Mobley off the bench (and made Davis2 earn his minutes), and he could have benched Tim Thomas, started DJordan or Skinner, and brough Novak off the bench.
Again, all good reasons why MDSr shouldn’t be the coach. But we should probably look at them as reasons why he won’t be the coach much longer.
But now I hit an area of disagreement. The eight year tenure. Has it really been that long? I don’t think it’s fair to put it all in one block. Yes, the Clippers could have won a lot more games over that span with a better game day coach, and a coach who had a better ability to utilize his personnel.
I like to look at the old Wilcox-Kaman controversy. After seeing Kaman 2.0 in 07-08, it appeared that MDSr made the right call on that one, that Wilcox was an athletic player who couldn’t thrive even when he got consistent minutes playing for the Sonics. But the problem with that argument is that it doesn’t account for the fact that Wilcox was a much better player than Kaman over the first two years of Kaman’s career, when Kaman was basically a doofus. Starting Wilcox (or Big Z) at that time, and reducing Kaman’s turnovers and empty minutes, would have helped the team considerably. It’s notable that Dunleavy played Kaman extensively as a rookie and coddled him for years, and yet he failed to get DJordan many significant minutes on a depleted roster with 60+ losses. The same type of choice is evident in the infamous Maggette debacle, when Dunleavy cost a talented, successful team multiple wins when he stayed with QRoss in the starting lineup for half a season.
That 06-07 season was the watershed moment. The best thing would have been for Elgin to step down, or take the VP job you mention, and for MDSr to become the GM. My guess is that MDSr would hire a good coach, if he was forced to, not one of the scrubs that the Clips might have had in the past. It was probably too much to ask, however, for MDSr to kick himself upstairs right after almost making it to the conference finals. But that was the moment, it seems to me.
At any rate, I think you have a rising but flawed effort and record through the first 5 years, leading up to the 06-07 debacle, when things took a turn. The franchise really did take some significant strides during that first period (five years seems a year too long to me, but I’m not going to check), and the trip to the playoffs consolidated that effort. The important twist came when Dunleavy got the big new contract and extension: that was another watershed moment.
What’s interesting is that the horrible failures in each of the last three years have been so strange and twisted and complex. It’s simple and correct to place MDSr at the center of the poor decisions in each separate case, but the injuries have distorted the picture. It adds up to an inexcusable record, however, for the reasons cited above: inflexibility and a lack of resourcefulness with the personnel, poor game day decisions.
That’s a more developed breakdown. It doesn’t inspire greater confidence in MDSr, but it does allow the discussion to procede in a more thoughtful way. There are reasons why MDSr got the extension. The Clippers don’t work on the same clock as other teams, and they’re not going to start. When MDSr got the extension, he was virtually guaranteed to be coaching this upcoming season. It’s amazing that he could lose so many games and that so many things could go wrong, and still have his job. Even more amazing is the idea that he’ll be making deals and heading into the season with renewed confidence, based on the Griffin pick and the somewhat impressive roster that he has put together, even though it is yet to approach even the most modest level of respectability.
I would love for the clips to get a new coach...
MIke Dunleavys substitutions/lineups are absolutely maddening sometimes. But I would argue that his work as GM deserves a lot of credit, particularly if you give him credit for being GM all along, as you have suggested (and I agree). Since that time, he traded Marko Jaric for Sam Cassell (The best Clipper ever in my opinion, but that is another post) AND a 1st round draft pick. He traded Chris Wilcox for Vlad Radmonivic, who was a major contributor for us in the playoffs that year, a great move in my opinion. He Got Marcus Camby for nothing, and managed to dump Tim Thomas and pick up a 20-10 power forward to fill the void left by Elton Brand. Furthermore, and contrary to what you have suggested, I would argue that his Draft day record is excellent:
In 2003, he drafted Chris Kaman, easily the best player left in that draft (It would have been nice to have a top 5 pick that year, but that’s just how it goes sometimes). In 2004 he took Shaun Livingston. I still contend that was the correct pick. Livingstons injuries were unfortunate, but his talent was undeniable and its not every day you come across a 6’7 point guard with super court vision. 2005 was the lone stain on Dunleavy’s draft day resume, as we definitely should have taken Danny Granger, who somehow slipped to 14 (although other than Granger there was a whole lot of nothing left , and 13 teams passed on him…only 2 of them don’t regret it). IN 2007, Dunleavy grabbed Al thornton with the 14th pick in the draft, an absolute steal, as AT is definitely one of the top 5 players in that draft, and I would argue even higher than that. 2008 saw Dunleavy take Eric Gordon, which has worked out perfectly, and 2009 looks like the year that Dunleavy will take Blake Griffin. Nothing about that record says below par to me.
I would argue that there has been a fundamental change in culture, as Cuttino Mobley and Baron Davis were the type of major free agent signings that the Clippers never saw before. A lack of success since our terriffic year in 06 is disappointing, but not really all that surprising. the 07 Clips were disappointing, as that team certainly underachieved (finishing just under .500), but Sam Cassell was another year older, Shaun Livingston was lost in February, and the injury bug got so bad that Luke Jackskon and Doug Christie were signed to 10 day contracts. In 2008 the Clippers were destined to fail, Sam Cassell was washed up/ hurt, Shaun Livingston was out for the season, as was Elton Brand. We all know how the 2009 season went. The Clippers “star” player, Baron Davis, was either out of shape or hurt, and the Clippers were going to have a lot of trouble winning without him producing. Alex Acker, Steve Novak, Brian Skinner, Mardy Collins…all these guys got significant minutes because the Clippers were so desperate as a result of injuries.
You mentioned that Dunleavy does not garner the respect of the players. I refuse to accept this as an excuse for the players. Who are they going to respect? The Clippers are not going to sign Phil Jackson or Greg Popovich, Red Auerbach and Chuck Daly are dead, and MJ, Larry Bird, Kevin Mccahle are all working for other teams at the moment. At some point the players, starting with Baron Davis, have to play like professionals with some heart. It starts with Baron Davis. If he would try play the best he could within Dunleavys system, the entire team would benefit, most notably he and Mike Dunleavy (and I think he will).
I would love to see the Clippers with a new coach, I agree with your criticisms of Dunleavy as a game day coach. But who are we going to replace him with? Phoneix just fired terry porter and replaced him with Alvin Gentry, so the coaching talent pool isn’t exactly overwhelming ( I would keep Mike Dunleavy over either of those guys every day of the week). It would have been real nice to give Rick Carlisle or Flip Saunders a shot, but those ships have sailed.
As a GM, Mike Dunleavy has formed a nice group of young players whilch should begetting even better with Blake Griffin, and the CLippers have the 2nd lowest payroll in the league. Ill take that.
Argument or disagreement...?
There was no hostility on my part, and I wasn’t accusing anyone of same, so call it a disagreement.
Zhiv and Johnnyoc21 have made excellent arguments above, and rather than repeat their points, I’d like to amend a couple of things. MDSr. came to the Clips in the summer of 2003, after the draft of Chris Kaman but before the free-agent signing period. He has been coach for six seasons (not eight). He took the team to a second place in their division in ‘05-’06, his third year as coach. The last three years have been continually and increasingly disappointing. I won’t argue his record as coach, the team has been hit by massive injuries, and one unfortunate defection of a star player, and the acquisition of another star player who’s play and behavior has been less than star-like. I will even agree that, in a perfect world, Mike Dunleavy would no longer be coach of the team.
But it’s not a perfect world. And this franchise has an unfortunate history. I’ve been a Clipper fan since the Danny Manning days. I watched them squander draft picks and make terrible decisions regarding players and coaches for almost fifteen years. And you can draw a line through those wasted years… from Larry Brown to Mike Dunleavy and forget every other coach and all the players involved (and there were a few good ones along the way). Oddly enough, one of the best lesser-coaches was Dunleavy’s full-time-predecessor, Alvin Gentry, who had a positive effect on the team and, I think, on GM Elgin Baylor. But Gentry never had upper managements ear and, unfortunately, made the mistake of bringing in a sullen, uncommunicative star point guard who didn’t mix well with the team on hand (sound familiar?), played poorly, and fled a year later, long after Gentry was gone.
Mike Dunleavy arrived a few months after the season’s end, and immediately convinced Donald Sterling to open up his wallet and sign Elton Brand and Corey Maggette. This was unheard of in Clipperdom… it is probably, the single most significant event in the Clipper’s Los Angeles history. It is the event I cannot forget or ignore.
Dunleavy/Baylor drafted well (though actually so did Gentry/Baylor). Dunleavy tried hard to develop Chris Kaman and Sean Livingston… and almost succeeded. He failed to develop Chris Wilcox though as Zhiv points out, no one else has done much better (though Zhiv’s argument that he coddled Kaman over Wilcox seems specious, one is definitely a center, the other definitely a power forward, one was a reasonably effective defender, the other was not interested in defense.)
Dunleavy then drafted Yaroslav Korolev, a bad choice at twelve, (Granger wasn’t actually picked until seventeen). As johnnyoc21 points out, Dunleavy certainly wasn’t the only GM who failed to find a good player in that draft (it was an inarguably thin list) and there were four more players taken before Granger was picked. And while we’re at it, remember it took four years for Granger to become a consistent starter in Indiana… and he was 22 when he came into the league! (Remind yourselves of that, all haters-of-Al Thornton).
Ah - it's only been six years
It just seems like eight ;-)

by 









