Draft Day in Clips Nation
Is it just a coincidence that Draft Day 2009 is falling on June 25th, which just so happens to be half-Christmas? Like a kid who has known for weeks what he's getting on the big day because he found it hidden in the hall closet, Clipper fans finally get to unwrap their present tonight. But to continue the Christmas analogy, as it stands now this would appear to be one of those December mornings where we get one GREAT present, and nothing else. And frankly, especially for immature kids with short attention spans like us, sometimes it's more fun to unwrap a lot of little presents.
With the Clippers holding no other draft picks, this draft season has been quite out of the ordinary. With a brand new training facility that wasn't even open last June, a terrific marketing tool the likes of which the organization has never had, the Clippers have worked out exactly one player - Blake Griffin. The team leadership has however attended multiple group tryouts out of town, so they've gotten to look at many other draft prospects, and both MDsr and assistant GM Neil Olshey hinted last week that they would be active on draft day and try to come up with another pick, most likely in the late first round or early second round.
With some loaded teams who are already in the luxury tax, it makes little sense to take on a late first rounder who has a guaranteed contract but who would be unlikely to help the team - the Lakers (who just sold the 29th pick to the Knicks for $3M cash) are the best example of this, but Cleveland and New Orleans are other candidates to try to save some tax money later in the first round. Then there is a team like Minnesota with four first round picks - they might be in the market to deal one of those, rather than bringing in four rookies all in the same season. At any rate, while there likely won't be any big Clipper deals announced today, the Clippers may still try to get another pick tonight, so don't turn off the TV five minutes in after BG tries on his Clippers' cap.
But the net effect of having the first pick in a one player draft is that most of the speculation surrounding the Clippers these last five weeks since the lottery hasn't really merited comment around here. It started with "The Clippers really prefer Rubio." Then it progressed to "The Clippers are willing to trade the first pick if they can also get rid of Baron Davis" or "if they can get rid of Zach Randolph." But the truth is, according to Olshey, other teams haven't even bothered to call the Clippers for the last three weeks, because they've known the pick is not in play.
That leaves us with other teams' trades and Clipper bashing as the main fodder for discussion lately.
Trades
Because all of the trades so far have attempted to satisfy a known need or desire of at least one of the participants, they've all involved players that were at least the subject of some speculation for Clipper trades as well.
- Everyone knew that Cleveland desired some inside scoring to complement LeBron James - and early rumors had focused on Rasheed Wallace and (perhaps improbably) Zach Randolph. But if you're Cleveland, and you're going to take on a big guy with an even bigger contract using the Ben Wallace trade chip, you can certainly see why you'd want Shaq over Z-Bo. (On the other hand, I'm not sure why Phoenix would do this deal other than for Steve Kerr to help out his old Spurs teammate Danny Ferry. The only thing that makes sense would be if they have some sort of assurance that Big Ben is going to retire and save them some money. Other than that, what are they getting for a guy who made the all star team last season? Sasha Pavlovic?)
- Likewise there was a Mike Miller for Chris Kaman rumor floating around which can now be crossed off the list, and the Wizards had made it known that the fifth pick was in play. More than anything else in Clips Nation, this trade makes you thank the FSM for aligning those ping pong balls with his noodly appendage. The Wizards and Clippers finished the season with the same record, and the Wizards actually won the coin toss to get slightly better odds at the first pick. But the Clippers will end up with Blake Griffin, while the Wizards will end up with... Mike Miller and Randy Foye. (I know this draft is considered weak at the top, but this is all they could get for a top 5 pick? It's not like any of the players they got rid of had bad contracts either - Thomas is in his final year, the others have two seasons on relatively cheap deals. It seems like a terrible trade for the Wizards, even if Miller can regain some of his form.)
- Richard Jefferson has been known to be on the trade block because of Milwaukee's financial troubles, and it might have been nice to see him on the Clippers in exchange for one of their shorter length big man contracts. But in the end, the Bucks got both immediate and long term salary relief from the Spurs given that only half of Bowen's contract is guaranteed and that Kurt Thomas will no doubt take a buy out to go somewhere - anywhere - other than Wisconsin. And by the way, the Spurs suddenly look a lot better for next season.
- And of course Don Nelson made it clear long ago that Jamal Crawford would not be back in Oakland next season, though Crawford never made much sense as a Clipper. I'm not a huge fan of Crawford, but you can certainly see why the Hawks and Dubs made this deal, since neither really gave up anything that they were counting on.
Clipper bashing
With Blake Griffin being the best story and by far the brightest star in this draft, there's plenty of reason to focus on him in the national media. But along with webisodes of the Rookie, we've had to suffer through a bumper crop of "The Clippers are the worst franchise in the NBA" stories.
- Chris Brossard proclaimed them the "worst drafting franchise" (insider required).
- David Shoenfield took a trip down memory lane and looked at twenty years worth of Clipper lottery picks.
- And of course Bill Simmons had to have his say, with an Open Letter to Blake Griffin, cataloguing the franchises woes stretching all the way back to Buffalo.
What can you do about this stuff? Nothing. Hopefully Blake can do something about it, though.
I'll be at the Clippers training facility to cover the draft, so hopefully I'll be able to get some quick reactions from the coach and others if anything comes up on draft day.
Merry Half-Christmas everyone!
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can we say that this is perhaps the best single day in a Clipper Fan's life?
Clear number one, no-doubter choice. Danny Manning was a disappointment and got hurt his first year. Candyman was, well, not so sweet.
Blake Griffin? The second coming of Karl Malone, but with greater athleticism.
Can we coax John Stockton back out of retirement?
You never know...
Manning got hurt. And then again last July 1st, when Baron Davis signed supposedly to team with FElton, seemed like the greatest day in Clippers history at the time. So like I said, you never know.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Jun 25, 2009 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Being there and beating Denver at Staples was nice...
I think there is potentially a deep deconstruction of the psyche of Clipperfan available here, but I pass.
Something about...
potential versus reality? could be.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Jun 25, 2009 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Sounds like the Clips are working the phones to unload a center
We’ll see if they get any closer today. Not sure it will include a draft pick, and frankly, not sure I’d really want one.
I don’t think the Miller/Foye move was a bad trade for the Wizards, just a blah trade. Does it make them contenders? NO. Does it give them a sniff of the playoffs in the East. Probably. Was that worth a #5 pick in this draft. Who knows? If Rubio is still on the board at 5, they may be kicking themselves. I’m not sure why they were so intent on getting out from under Etan Thomas’s last year. They are not well run.
Jefferson helps SAS, but it doesn’t necessarily put them back in the Finals. But they are certainly back in contention. I think they are likely to go after Rasheed Wallace or Allen Iverson with their mid-level.
Shaq to Cleveland makes sense for the Cavs, but again, it doesn’t get them over the hump. They need to find one more guy for LBJ, hopefully a solid 2 guard.
I find it hard to believe that Rondo is on the block. Things must be really bad, because he can play.
Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)
Anticlimax
Something trivial or commonplace that concludes a series of significant events.
The significant event was winning the lottery and effectively selecting Blake Griffin a month ago.
Actually entering his name is mere formality. Some might consider it a trivial event concluding a series of significant events. Anticlimactic, even.
Used in a sentence: The Clippers were reprimanded for stating in no uncertain terms who they were drafting, and thus rendering the first selection anticlimactic.
I didn’t clap out disappointing.
To each their own I guess
I don’t see how anyone could possibly be MORE excited today than when the Clippers won the lottery and defacto drafted Griffin, but if you are Jax, you can have it. Otherwise, its simply a question of language usage.
Trivial? Commonplace?
I’m not sure you understand what those words mean if you think picking Blake Griffin is either of those things.
LOL
From the guy who clearly misunderstood the word anticlimactic.
The actual draft is quite trivial. On ESPN’s front page right now it says “With the second pick…” Do you know why? Blake Griffin has been a Clipper for over a month. Only thing that happens today is a few people stop pretending otherwise.
Oh please
I obviously understand the word better than you do, even after you had to look it up. I took the definition you offered and explained to you why your comment doesn’t make sense. Are you really that dense?
You said picking Griffin would be anticlimactic…a word you couldn’t even spell right to begin with. Then you said anticlimax = trivial and commonplace. I clearly explained that picking Griffin is neither. Thus, to connect the dots for you, picking Griffin is not anticlimactic. Is that so hard to apply that logic?
It may not be exciting, but picking a player of Griffin’s caliber is clearly not trivial (look it up genius), nor commonplace.
First draft
Where the clippers don’t really have to think about the selection, it feels strange
I wonder if the Clippers are looking at Omri Casspi as a late 1st round pick prospect
He could be a good glue guy.
Jonas Jerebko
If only because we have a Swedish Clipper fan here at Clips Nation. There can’t be too many Swedish Clipper fans, right?
Rumor is the Portland made that huge move to get up to 22 (from 24) with their eye on Casspi.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Jun 25, 2009 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Richard Jefferson or Zach Randolph...
If the Clips don’t send Tim Thomas and Cuttino Mobley off to the Knicks for Zbo, they have the pieces to make that trade for Jefferson. Of course you don’t know you’re going to get the #1 pick, but it’s not just the 2010 free-agent sweepstakes you’re sacrificing in that premature trade. So who would rather have, Randolph or Jefferson? The Randolph move, which I liked at the time, looks worse and worse.
Hind sight...
is always 20/20…..I am not saying you are wrong, but there are other factors at work here too. Say the Clips never made the ZBo trade and Cat Mobley collapses on the court and dies…that would be both tragic and devastating….and after reviewing the Clippers history, that is not totally out the realm. Then again, if MDsr doesn’t make the ZBo move, the Clips may have only won 10 games all season and MDsr would be gone right now. All speculation though. Fun to do, but still fruitless.
Do or do not. There is no try.
Not sure I agree
The Bucks got more salary relief from SA than Thomas and Mobley would have provided, since Bowen’s deal is not fully guaranteed. So I doubt they could have gotten RJ for that package. Having said that, the question of what the Clippers COULD have gotten for the Thomas/Mobley package is clearly a major opportunity cost of the ZBo deal.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Jun 25, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Absolutely true...
Hindsight is worthless and of course I don’t know exactly what those pieces might have brought. But in the past I’ve been one of those guys who’s been very positive about MDSr’s moves as a GM. Now six months after the move, the Randolph deal has crippled a lot of the Clips flexibility. A point made very obvious by the Jefferson trade. That’s a guy the Clips could really use who went for pocket lint. This year those expiring contracts are more valuable than they’ve ever been before… and the Clips bailed out on the game too early.
Cat Mobley dying on the court is not really something I think we should ponder, but Mike Dunleavy only winning ten games would play right in to many Clipper fans desires… if the result was Mike Dunleavy’s head on a platter.
“Opportunity-cost” is puzzling phrase. I think I get it but it’s meaning is elusive… maybe because it sounds too much like “opportunity lost”.
Opportunity cost
In economics, it’s what something could be worth if you used it differently. The classic example is the opera singer who loves to work in the garden. She can makes thousands of dollars per hour recording music, but instead she grows tomatoes. The tomatoes she grows are therefor worth thousands of dollars in opportunity cost.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Jun 25, 2009 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Can't think about it now
We need to move beyond this. We’ve talked about it a bunch of times, and we probably will keep talking about the Zbo deal for a long time. “Opportunity costs” include Eric Gordon playing ahead of Mobley, regardless of whether Mobley might have had a health issue. Getting rid of Tim Thomas might have saved the thin reed of sanity I was able to maintain through to the end of the season.
Still haven’t heard anybody say it yet: after last year, how is it possible for the Clippers to have too many big guys? The need injury insurance more than any team in history, after the last two seasons. If guys like FElton and Kaman are going to go down, and Camby misses preaseason and training camp and limps his way to playing 60 games, then let’s not forget that a troublesome injury history is part of Zbo’s repetoire that he hasn’t broken into yet as a Clipper. With Deandre the other piece no one mentions, by adding Blake Griffin the Clippers are absolutely guaranteed of putting an exciting, solid tandem out on the floor, no matter how many injuries they sustain.
I don't see
why you should count Mobley playing ahead of Gordon as an opportunity cost of not trading Zbo. That’s just enabling poor team personnel and coaching decisions.
"no matter how many injuries they sustain"
Did you really just say that? “No matter how many injuries they sustain?” What if they sustain, I dunno, five injuries to their top five big guys?
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Jun 25, 2009 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Apparently the Clippers should
request that the league grant them an exemption to the roster limit allowing them to field a team of 25 players.
At some point, I think we need to start looking at alternative explanations and resolutions, no?

by 










