Utah 109 - Clippers 107 - An Extraordinary Game, the Ordinary Outcome
As you might imagine, in the 15 consecutive road games that the Clippers have lost to the Jazz, there have been some narrow escapes for Utah. During the 04-05 season, the Clippers lost two games in Salt Lake City by a total of 3 points. In the second of those losses, Bobby Simmons had a chance to win the game at the buzzer on a layup which he just flat out missed. It was such a noteworthy game, that even though it pre-dates my career as a blogger, I actually saved an email I wrote about it at the time.
The following season, 05-06, the Clippers tied the game in the final seconds. Some rookie, I think his name was Deron Williams, came down the court and scored to give the Jazz the win. So some things just don't change.
Of all the Clippers-Jazz meetings in Utah, none can compare to last night's classic. The Clippers built a big first half lead, as high as 18 at one point, and still held a 16 point advantage at halftime. But as has been the case for much of the young season, a terrible start to the second half changed the complexion of the game completely. Utah opened the third quarter on a 17-3 run to cut the lead to 2, and it was close the rest of the way.But instead of slipping away quietly once the Jazz took the lead as one might expect, the Clippers battled back into the game on multiple occasions. Utah enjoyed their biggest lead of the game, 91-84, with a mere 65 seconds left. The idea of the Clippers catching them, while mathematically possible, seemed unlikely to say the least - particularly when you consider that two of their top guards weren't even playing, and rookie sensation Blake Griffin had fouled out a few moments earlier. What do you need, down 7 with 65 seconds left? Well, you need a quick three, a stop, a quick two, a stop and another quick two. That's all. How hard could that be? That's what has to happen if you're going to come back without fouling. And that's exactly what happened. And it was almost entirely due to Eric Gordon, on both ends of the floor.
First he drove to the basket, drew a foul and made the layup for a three point lead. Clippers down 4. Then he and Eric Bledose combined for a steal, with Gordon converting the resulting layup. Clippers down 2 with 36 seconds left. On the next Jazz possession, Gordon forced a 24 second violation, almost single-handedly. He pressured Deron Williams on the ball, until Williams got the ball to C.J. Miles. On the dribble handoff, Gordon and Bledsoe switched, with Gordon remaining on the ball, and he stayed attached to Miles until he shot (and airballed) a pressured 20 footer at the shot clock buzzer. It was 24 seconds of pressure defense from one player, reminiscent of Gordon's play against Turkey in the Gold Medal game of the World Championships over the summer. With possession and 12 seconds left, now down 2, everyone knew who was going to the ball, but it didn't matter. Gordon turned the corner on the high screen in a flash, and went all the way to the rim for the tomahawk jam, as emphatic a game tying basket as you will ever see. The game was now tied, but Gordon wasn't finished - he once again played the defensive star, stuffing Williams jumper attempt in the final seconds to force OT.
The Clippers never trailed in the first overtime, and had a chance to win on the final possession. Gordon made a great move, freeing himself on a step through after pump faking his defender into the air, but he left his bank shot short and the game went into a second overtime.
When EJ re-injured a left shoulder stinger that had occurred in the first half, it seemed as if the Clippers would finally have to succumb. And when the Jazz took a 6 point lead with 52 seconds left, it seemed all be inevitable. What do you need, down 6 with 52 seconds left? Well, you need a three, a stop, and another three. That's all. How hard could that be? Once again, they managed to get exactly what they needed, as Rasual Butler hit threes on consecutive possessions (an unlikely sequence made even more so when you consider that the Clippers were 3 for 18 from deep before Butler connected back to back).
Unfortunately for LA, as was the case back in 2006, Williams took the inbound pass and went coast to coast for the game winning layup. (It goes without saying that had Gordon not been injured, he would have been defending Williams, and the result might have been different). With about 7 seconds still on the clock, but no timeouts left, the Clippers pushed the ball up, and eventually Craig Smith got a very makeable shot at the buzzer, but was unable to convert.
So it goes down as a loss, and the Clippers drop to 1-6. But it's not just a loss.
It's just one game, but it was a major step forward in the development of Eric Gordon. It's difficult to overstate just how impressive he was in the final moments of regulation, right up until the point at which he was injured. He scored 13 of the Clippers final 14 points in regulation, including three traditional three point plays. He even made another driving layup with contact down the stretch, but that basket was nullified by an offensive foul - probably the correct call, but a symptom of a guy being forced to play one on five more than anything else. In the first OT, he made one basket and assisted on another, contributing to 4 of the Clippers 6 points. In the fourth quarter and overtime combined, he scored 6 baskets and assisted on 2 - and those were the only 8 baskets the Clippers made during that time. He also went 9 for 9 from the line during the game, a very welcome change given his struggles shooting free throws this season. He still hasn't found his three point shot, missing all 6 of his attempts in Utah. Assuming that he hasn't suddenly gone from being a great three point shooter to a terrible three point shooter and that eventually he's going to revert to his career mean from deep, he's going to be even more unstoppable when those long range bomps start falling. The Clippers have, for years and years, been searching for a go to scorer in difficult situations. I'm not saying that this one game proves that Gordon is now that guy, but ask yourself what SportsCenter would be doing with those final 65 seconds of footage had that been LeBron James or Kobe Bryant or Dwyane Wade, scoring on one end and defending on the other? I'm just saying. We have to wait and see now how bad the shoulder injury is - EJ seems to think he'll play Tuesday against the Hornets.
The last thing to point out about this game is the series of strange close calls and plays from the fourth quarter on that, in a double overtime game, could each have changed the final outcome.
- Gordon was 9 for 9 from the free throw line, but on one fourth quarter trip he only got one point, as a lane violation negated the second make.
- On a Jazz possession with just over 5 minutes left, the Clippers played 24 seconds of terrific defense, forcing CJ Miles to shoot a running three under severe pressure - the ball went in and was originally ruled to be before the shot clock buzzer (eliciting a stream of expletives from ClipperSteve - just the Clippers luck to play great defense and give up three points!) However, under the new instant replay rules that allow refs to review plays at the next stoppage, provided that the result can be accurately 'unwound', the refs did exactly that, and took the three points back off the board - an obviously huge reversal in a close game. (By 'unwound', I mean that, as in this case, nothing would have to be replayed or adjusted other than the score. The result of the play, whether the shot was on time or late, was Clippers ball out of bounds, so the intervening plays between the make and the review were unaffected, other than the score on the scoreboard. This, by the way, is a great rule, and something I've been arguing for for years. The prior rules for instant replay always mandated a strictly enforced set of situations, inevitably leaving obvious cases where replay could and should be applied, but where the rules prohibited it's use.)
- Tangentially related to the above, the Clippers came out in a zone on a subsequent defensive possession. For most of the fourth, with Gordon locking up Williams, the Clippers' man to man defense was very effective. Why they decided to go to a zone at that point was a bit mysterious. Paul Millsap got a relatively easy layup on that possession, and the Clippers went back to the man defense the rest of the way.
- The instant replay rule worked against the Clippers in the second OT, when a possession originally awarded to the Clippers was given to the Jazz after it was correctly determined via replay that Kaman had touched the ball last.
- The officiating for the most part was very good, and it's difficult to complain about calls favoring the home team in this one. For instance, it would have been incredibly simple to call a foul on Gordon blocking Williams jumper at the end of regulation. It would have been the wrong call, but it certainly would not have been an unusual call. Having said that, on back to back possessions in the first OT, Kaman blocked an Al Jefferson shot and was called for a foul, while Jefferson blocked Kaman and was not. To my eyes, Kaman's block looked clean as a whistle, while it looked like Jefferson got a lot of wrist. I would have thought, in a close game, that neither would have been called a foul, but with Utah struggling to score during that stretch, the call against Kaman was huge.
- Butler was the hero for making back to back threes, but he was the goat moments before for committing a flagrant foul on Andrei Kirilenko. In a game in which no team had led by more than two points for almost nine minutes of overtime competition, Butler's play gave the Jazz two free throws and the ball. By the time the Clippers had the ball back, they were down 6, and only his own heroics got them back to even.
I guess it says something about how exciting this game was, that I haven't even mentioned Blake Griffin's 16 point, 17 rebound performance, or Chris Kaman's 23 points, until the final paragraph. Yeah, it was an exciting game.
78 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Steve....the Clippers are 1 - 6, not 1-7....
don’t jinx it!
Sorry about that...
Reverse mojo? If I say 1-7, then surely they won’t be?
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
No
I mean he said “I see what you did there” implying there was some sort of hidden joke in “I love Gomes”
by baron_davis needs a fro on Nov 7, 2010 3:15 PM PST up reply actions
CC has been highly critical of the Gomes signing
ever since he been signed.
Sarcasm does not work well over the internets, neither does hidden jokes. But CC deserves an lol for both comments
http://fullyclips.com/ - FullyClips!
Bingo
Please note the biggest homer of them all for the FO has been really really quiet about the free agent jackpot signings. If it wasn’t for the surprisingly rapid development of Eric Bledsoe it would be a shutout.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
If you're talking about me . . .
that’s a lame post. I’m not a homer. I merely have said that we need to be patient.
Which as anyone with half a brain can see seems to have been right so far.
Very sad that the only thing you can say aobut this great game which is a watershed event for EJ and another good game for BG and Bledsoe is something negative about Gomes.
Good stuff
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Nov 7, 2010 7:11 PM PST up reply actions
Good stuff indeed
I already said I like what I’ve seen from Bledsoe, BG and EJ. Too bad our FA haul has been a terrible let down.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
Yawn
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Nov 7, 2010 9:30 PM PST up reply actions
Paging Bill Walton
Where would the Clippers be without Jax’s insightful commentary?
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
Oh, you guys.
You guys either need to get a room together to let out all that subconcious homoerotic tension a la Iceman and Maverick in Top Gun or get into a ring and box it out. I must say that I would miss the back and forth banter if either of you decide to leave this website.
I heard about that scene in Top Gun well before I ever saw the movie.
It completely killed the movie for me.
by Michael White on Nov 8, 2010 10:38 AM PST up reply actions
What about Internal Affairs?
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
You did?
You couldn’t have been more than 8 when the movie came out.
@Banandy – Not really, I have a feeling very few people would want to watch us play volleyball.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Nov 8, 2010 12:13 PM PST up reply actions
I watched the movie for the first time last year
by Michael White on Nov 8, 2010 12:18 PM PST up reply actions
What???
That’s about 25 years too late. Isn’t it trippy to watch a movie where Meg Ryan, Anthony Edwards, Val Kilmer, Tom Cruise and Tim Robbins are so young?
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Nov 8, 2010 12:19 PM PST up reply actions
I'm actually the most impressed with this fact..
We scored in crunch time off of a timeout! Props to Vinnie for giving Butler a good look on that nice play in the second OT. When we needed a 3 last year in crunch time against SA, it resulted in a fadeaway 30 footer for Baron. Good job, Vinnie
by baron_davis needs a fro on Nov 7, 2010 3:11 PM PST reply actions
I wonder if that would have been the play
…if Baron was in the game?
That's a great point...
So much to talk about from this game, but that was a big one for sure.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
Chief needs to play
Had Baron never gotten hurt, we would never know we have a gym in Bledsoe. Its time to let Chief get his reps in.
+1
I’ve been thinkin the same thing. Gomes is just not hitting his shots right now. Reminds me of how Rasual started out on a slump last year.
+1 for Club D
Aminu needs burn. We can lose with Gomes or lose with the Chief — which one does more for us in the long run?
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Can anyone clarify the ruling on the flagrant foul?
Did the refs feel that Kirilenko was endangered? Is that the definition of a ff?
Butler didn't go for the ball at all
He obviously went for Kirilenko’s jersey. If the ref’s think the players intent was to grab a player instead of the ball, they can call a flagrant.
http://antilakers.tumblr.com/
Yeah I felt the refs had to call it
even though it occured after the travel
http://antilakers.tumblr.com/
The travel occurred well before the foul
I think the refs just missed it. I don’t know if they could have called BOTH a travel and a flagrant… both were certainly well deserved. But the travel should have been called. A flagrant shouldn’t negate a TO that happened beforehand.
"i know huh........freakin clippers man.....its like a wild ride rooting for this team....gotta love em....(sometimes) lol" In GrIfFin We TrUsT
I think the imagery of the jersey pulling was so overwhelming...
that it mentally overrules anything prior….
it was pretty blatant…
we are all human.
I would agree with this.
If a flagrant is issued because it endangers the player, then the lesser infraction, in this case the traveling violation becomes moot.
Even though Butler’s effort was designed to stop Kirilenko from scoring (and he cannot assume AK would be called for a travel) if the refs believe he might have been injured by Butler’s play, then the call was correct. If Butler just hacks Kirilenko after the travel, then the traveling call is correct and precedes the foul.
Of course that’s only my opinion…
What about calling a travel on AK and just a technical (or double T) on Butler?
A flagrant implies that that the ball was actually in play. Had the refs seen the travel, then the ball should have been dead when Butler grabbed AK’s jersey.
"i know huh........freakin clippers man.....its like a wild ride rooting for this team....gotta love em....(sometimes) lol" In GrIfFin We TrUsT
The issue is... was the play "dangerous"...
I’m pretty sure Butler wouldn’t have committed the foul if he heard a whistle. But it all happened too quickly. Butler tried to stop AK from scoring by committing what the refs saw as a dangerous foul. To my mind it doesn’t matter if the ball’s in play or not.
I understand your point though, in a dead ball situation, if a player walks over and hits another player it would be a technical… and perhaps he would be thrown out of the game (is that a “double” T?). Though, if the victim is injured, there would certainly be a fine or suspension. So, if there was a whistle for a travel and then a dead ball technical the result would be a shot and the ball. So the difference is in the number of shots… and perhaps the level of the fine.
I freely admit I don’t know the right answer.
Terrible, game changing call
I am respectfully disagreeing with Steve’s praise of the refs. That play was a travel, and giving the Jazz three FTs and the ball absolutely destroyed any chance of the Clips winning. Way to turn an instant classic into the officials deciding/ruining the game. The continuing efforts of David Stern to remove any physicality from the game. LET THEM PLAY.
by Raining Buckets on Nov 8, 2010 10:10 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Gordon's 3 pt shooting
We tend to think that all of a player’s skills are independent of each other. For example, if a player improves his free throw shooting, why would it have an impact on any other part of his game? Perhaps an impact exists that is positive (e.g., better free throw shotting will yield better field goal shooting), but rarely is it is the case that we would imagine the reverse to be true, e.g., an improvement in one area leads to a setback in another area.
I certainly hope the following hypothesis is dead wrong, but I wonder if the fall off in Gordon’s three point shooting is directly attributable to his changed role in the offense elsewhere. All of the driving, dishing and dunking he is doing now is unbelievably physically taxing, much more so than what he was doing last year. Don’t get me wrong, he worked hard and exerted himself last year, but nothing like this year IMHO.
Three point shooting is also about rhythm and consistency. Is it possible that all of the energy he is using on his driving to the hoop is making it physically harder for him to find his three point stroke? I haven’t tracked it, but it seems like a lot of his three point shits are coming up short.
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted" – Albert Einstein
by Another son of Mike Smith on Nov 7, 2010 4:08 PM PST reply actions
Interesting
But, his shot is so smooth and fluid, so it’s hard to imagine it takes energy for him to shoot it.
http://antilakers.tumblr.com/
AAAAARRRRRRGGGGG!!!!!
My DVR didn’t record the game for some reason!!!!!!
oh wow! rough!
surely going to be one of the most entertaining Clipper games of the season.
That sucks
I think they have already stopped playing the replay on Prime Ticket as well. You really just need to watch the last few minutes of regulation and the two overtimes though.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
Yah
unless you want to see a young team learning how to play together. If you want to see that, watch the whole game.
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Nov 7, 2010 7:13 PM PST up reply actions
Um
if you watch the 3rd quarter you see a young team learning how to lose a big lead. If he wants to watch the most entertaining parts then follow my suggestion.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
Whatever dude
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Nov 7, 2010 9:25 PM PST up reply actions
You're welcome
Just doing what I can to help you see the light
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Nov 7, 2010 9:30 PM PST up reply actions
So sad
When the team is playing their asses off, shorthanded, harder thant hey ever played for the previous regime, and all you’ve got to say is “gee, I’m disappointed in Gomes.”
The team is improving. One day even you’ll admit it. I guess we’re not there yet.
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Nov 7, 2010 9:57 PM PST up reply actions
FS West, not Prime Ticket
My DVR didn’t get it either…. My season series is set up for Prime Ticket, but this game was on FS West. It happens from time to time… last night because of USC I suppose. As it happens, I was at my parents house, and watched it there… only dinner started early in the second quarter, and through a misunderstanding, neither I nor my dad actually hit ‘record’ when we left to go eat. I ended up missing the second and third quarter, but saw the end.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
aargh
First half of the 3rd quarter was a brutal as it gets. End of the second wasn’t great, as the Clips started a drought, but Utah wasn’t making plays yet.
And the officiating in the 2nd and 3rd was, let’s say, pretty good for Utah.
My experience was just the opposite of yours. I watched through the second quarter, had the DVR set, knew we were going out. Wife behind schedule, watched the horror of the 3rd quarter. Listened the first half of the 4th on the radio, and the last thing I heard was that the Clips were down by 7. It was obvious they were going to lose. Didn’t know it was a classic and went to two overtimes until looking at the newspaper in the morning. Watched up to Gordon’s dunk, but haven’t watched the overtimes yet, and I’m guessing that the end of the game is cut off because I only did the half hour extension.
by citizen zhiv on Nov 8, 2010 11:06 AM PST up reply actions
My half-hour extension cut off at the end of the 4th...
But it might be my crappy Dish system.
Ever vigilant, I managed to spot the machine’s bad behavior and recorded the game when they reran it at 1am. Got it all then.
Of course my kids deleted it the next morning (because that is the way they are) but they didn’t know that I got up early and had already seen it!
Children and machines trying to take over. Anyone else notice?
A really fun game to watch!
Eric Gordon did it all in the second half of this game. This type of game will only make the team better. I am sure they are excited to play the Hornets. After a close game like that you just want to get back out there and prove you can win.
One thing that I think needs to be mentioned is the fact that this game was a back to back and we played in Denver of all places the night before. This team has some fight in it that is for sure.
Nothing quite like being a Clipper fan at Northwestern
I drove nine hours to Happy Valley only to see my team blow a 21-0 lead by giving up 5 TDs on 5 consecutive possessions. I was checking the score to the Clipper game the entire way back, and it actually made me feel a lot better about the loss. Eric Gordon is a beast (I wear my EJ jersey all the time in Chi-Town to the confusion of many natives), and it’s good to see him develop that kind of killer instinct that we’ve been waiting for in Clipper Nation.
Hopefully, we can pick up a win soon. Go Clips.
I feel your pain
I’m guessing we’re the only 2 Wildcat/Clipper fans in the world (MSJ, ‘92), unless Penny Marshall roots for her brother’s alma mater or Adande likes the Clips more than he lets on.
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
I'm glad someone can empathize.
I’m a Medill freshman right now. I was actually in the press box for the game and got to go on the field after it, which I’m sure I’ll appreciate once this team gets another defensive stop (which I’m still not sure will happen).
by WestsideBrandon on Nov 7, 2010 7:15 PM PST up reply actions
Brutal game
But hey, they’re a heck of a lot better now than they were when I was there.
Always glad to meet a fellow Medilldo. Good luck.
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
great paragraph about the strides ego made in this game, steve
ive been a critic of eric in the clutch during his career, but my goodness, what a wonderful sight his last few minutes were.
im so excited for the rest of his career, hopefully he’ll spend all of it with the clips.
Epic Game
It’s a shame that we lost, but it’s hard to feel too bad after this game. Watching EJ, Bled and BG out there was a revelation. It’s just incredible watching 3 guys under 22 yrs old playing that way.
I’m flat out shocked to see EJ stepping up the way he was at the end of that game. I never thought he had that kind of ability. But what in the world is going on with his 3 PT shooting?
Griffin might be the best offensive rebounder in the league already.
As for Bled…his playmaking ability is far more advanced than anyone realized. I don’t even think Calipari knew what he had in Bled. But what I love the most is that he’s just fearless. Would have loved to see him take that last shot instead of Rhino.
People are right though, eventually moral victories will be useless if some wins don’t follow.
Calipari probably didn't care since he had Wall
Really bullish on Bled now and it is clear that you and Olshey were right about him.
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Bled's now at #4 in the rookie ranking...
BG is #1 now.
So the Clips have the top rookie and the fourth best rookie…
Might be a bad thing for BG
Bledsoe could siphon off some ROY votes from him teammate. Good problem to have though, lonely would the Beast’s trophy be in Clipper practice facility in Playa Vista hmmm
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Nov 8, 2010 12:16 PM PST up reply actions
Gotta start somewhere
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Nov 8, 2010 9:08 PM PST up reply actions
Bledsoe
has been pretty impressive. He’s cut down the turnovers to a more manageable amount and it appears he now has some idea what he’s planning to do before he does it. I didn’t think he could make this adjustment for another year or so (if ever) but now its looking probable that this kid gets it.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Nov 8, 2010 12:18 PM PST up reply actions
Agree with you that the FO did a good job trading for Bled
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Unless the Clippers win the lottery next year and OKC gets our #1 pick
Then its a bad trade.
Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)
I thought the pick was protected
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Nov 8, 2010 5:28 PM PST up reply actions
Sink or swim, trial by fire.
Tests people.
You either step up or die.
We found out what EBled is made of.
Sane with the FO
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Nov 8, 2010 5:28 PM PST up reply actions

by 

















