Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Camby for Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw and Cash - Really?

Unfortunately, I have no time to write a proper post on this, and probably won't until tomorrow.  Sorry about that.  But I'll dash off as much as I can before I have to run.

First of all, if you want to catch up on how the story evolved, you can do what I did and head over to Ben's late night post at Blazers Edge.  He includes the various updates from overnight in the on-again off-again trade.  Now that the trade is official, in the end the trade is pretty much exactly what it was originally reported to be, at least in terms of the bodies involved - Marcus Camby for Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw.

And three million dollars.

It has been reported that Marcus is not happy about the trade.  Basically, it would seem that Marcus doesn't like change a whole lot - he was settled in Denver, and wasn't happy when he was traded to LA.  Now that he's settled in LA, he doesn't want to go to Portland.  If you want to be wildly optimistic, I'll point out that this trade likely has little bearing, at least as far as contractual obligations, on whether Marcus Camby could be a Clipper next season.  In order to pursue a major free agent signing (which it would seem the Clippers are going to do), they would have had to renounce their Bird rights to Marcus this summer anyway.  You can't sign a free agent with cap space, and then use your Bird exception to go over the cap - it doesn't work that way.  So if the Clippers are going to be under the cap, they're in exactly the same situation regarding Camby and next season as they were before - if they want to sign him, they have to do it under their cap space.  So if Marcus really likes his house and his teammates, then he's only got to wait out the end of the season and a likely first round loss by the Blazers before he's right back in LA.  Of course, that's not likely to happen, but this trade didn't change much (unless he's pissed off at management about it).

Star-divide

 

Likewise, both Blake and Outlaw will likely be renounced this summer when their deals are up, and are therefore unlikely to be Clippers for more than two months.  So the idea that Steve Blake somehow makes Baron Davis expendable is pretty debatable.  He's a free agent, and the Clippers are angling to be under the cap - you don't get under the cap in order to re-sign your own free agents.

Outlaw is a nice player - arguably better than either Al Thornton or Rasual Butler.  Unfortunately, he hasn't played since November when he underwent foot surgery.  I don't have any information about his potential return, though as I understand it he is supposed to be back at some point this season.  When he was first hurt, it was estimated he'd be out anywhere from 3 months (that would be now) to 5 months (that would be after the season is over).  Obviously the Clippers expect him to play some this season, or they wouldn't have waived Ricky Davis to make room for him on the roster.  Here's an aside on Outlaw - this is his seventh season in the league, four more than Thornton, and he's almost a year younger than Al.

My issue with this trade is that it does nothing from a basketball standpoint for the team.  Camby's expiring for Blake/Outlaw expiring.  Maddeningly, Portland actually has some assets - I can only assume the Clippers were not interested in Petteri Kopenen or Joel Freeland.  Instead, the Clippers went for the cold, hard, Microsoft cash - the maximum $3M allowed in a trade.

The Clippers are very close to having enough cap space to make a full maximum offer to LeBron James or another free agent this summer.  The most straightforward way for them to get there would be for them to get rid of either Sebastian Telfair or Al Thornton, or possibly both.  They don't have to do that by the trade deadline of course - they could make a deal between the end of the season and the start of free agency in July.  But Camby was a terrific trade asset, and one might have thought that packaging him with another contract was the easiest way to accomplish the immediate goal of clearing more cap space.

is it possible that the extra Paul Allen case will help them accomplish the goal?  Maybe.  Telfair has an option for next season, and it is possible that they could work a buy out wherein he agrees to NOT exercise that option.  But you can't just pay Al Thornton to go away - the money still counts against the cap.  I'll try to get clarification on Telfair's situation, but I assume that he could be paid to opt out next year.  So that would help.

In the end though, there is no long term benefit for the fans.  Camby will be up the coast helping the Blazers make a playoff run, Outlaw will mostly be sitting next to Blake Griffin in street clothes, Steve Blake will be playing back up point for a couple of months before signing somewhere else.  No picks.  No prospects.  Just extra playing time for DeAndre Jordan and the number 23 jersey for Blake Griffin (sorry about that, all of you who bought 32). 

Call me greedy, but I wanted more.  It didn't see unreasonable at the time.

Comment 157 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I dunno...

Blake Griffin in a #23 jersey could be a deal breaker for LeBron.

9:21 LAC - Offensive foul on C. Smith

by LancasterGordon4Eva on Feb 16, 2010 12:12 PM PST reply actions  

good point

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Feb 16, 2010 12:13 PM PST up reply actions  

It'll be availble for sure

But the problem is that LeBron doesn’t want anybody in the NBA wearing it.

9:21 LAC - Offensive foul on C. Smith

by LancasterGordon4Eva on Feb 16, 2010 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

wayne winston and john hollinger like this trade

but their analysis is for NOW. Then again no one can really say how this effected next year if at all

by bacek on Feb 16, 2010 12:12 PM PST reply actions  

on another note I hope Blake keeps 32

no I do not have a jersey, but 32 is special to LA: Magic and Koufax

by bacek on Feb 16, 2010 12:15 PM PST reply actions  

Didn't Magic wear 32 because Kareem had 33?

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Feb 16, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Not just that…Magic also wore #32 in high school, and someone else at Michigan State (I wanna say Greg Kelser) #32 at the time Magic was there, and had to settle for #33. The greatest Clipper to wear #32 is, of course, the Big Redhead himself, Bill Walton.

by Shawn H on Feb 16, 2010 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

exactly my point

32 is a special number for LA. Blake should keep it

by bacek on Feb 16, 2010 2:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, this trade will definately help our draft position.

We’re going to lose a lot of games from here on out – just from the big minus on rebounds alone!

"Excellence...is not an act, but a habit" Aristotle

by Cliptomaniac on Feb 16, 2010 12:16 PM PST reply actions  

I was just going to say that!

Good to see Club optimism is not dead.

On another note. I recall the Clippers wanting both Joel Freeland and Kopponen (he of the Honka Playboys) in their respective drafts. The Clippers could have added MBFGC in the deal. Or do you suppose the clips will sign Sofo within the next few days (and say bye bye to Bobby Brown).

by eelcova on Feb 16, 2010 12:16 PM PST reply actions  

Oh no, I believe

that he wants all #23’s in the league retired out of respect for Michael Jordan…. yeah….

9:21 LAC - Offensive foul on C. Smith

by LancasterGordon4Eva on Feb 16, 2010 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

what would the reaction be like if

we won the #1 pick 2 years in a row and picked John Wall. Imagine this starting lineup
Pg:Wall
Sg:Gordon
Sf:Rudy Gay (signed as a restricted FA)
PF:Griffin
C:Kaman
now that would be fun to watch.

" Baron for the win, BINGO!!!! The Clipers Win, The Clippers win!!! "
Ralph Lawler

by bestclipfan on Feb 16, 2010 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Very very positive

borderline euphoria. Actually I bet this happens as I already said I won’t renew my season tickets barring an act of god… so this does seem like something the Clippers would do to my pocketbook.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

screw rudy gay

if we get wall, lebron would definetly come

by XXDC2XX on Feb 17, 2010 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

My question

Is whether the plan is to keep Outlaw and/or Blake after this year. Because clearly this year means nothing more than “John Wall Watch”.

So did we make this trade purely to put money in DTS’ pocket and save Dun’s job?

I actually like both Blake and Outlaw, I just think we could have done better (like getting a pick).

I think Blake is a smart PG who runs a team well, works really hard and shoots well from deep. Outlaw is a long and athletic 3 who hits clutch shots and is still young. But those two don’t make this team much better, and we still don’t have max cap space.

Seeing as how we have to renounce rights to both even to free up cap space, the team is in a difficult position here. They either have to renounce both and hope they sign someone with their less than max cap space, or keep both and hope Griffin and the other rook are enough of an improvement.

by madglove on Feb 16, 2010 12:18 PM PST reply actions  

I'm looking now at your option #2

Suppose, then, that we resign most of our guys, and somehow get rid of Telfair. Next year’s depth chart:

Center: Kaman and DJ
PF: Griffin and Smith
F: Outlaw and AT
SG: EJ and Butler
PG: BD and Blake

That’s pretty evenly spread, at least. And we’d have some flexibility, what with Griffin, Outlaw, and Butler able to play multiple positions.

Then, of course, we’d have a draft pick and an MLE. I’d want to get a SF with our pick, then some sort of combo guard with our MLE. Or maybe vice versa.

We also have that trade exception… A backup center?

Somewhere down the road, if our intention is to keep EJ and Griffin, then maybe there’s some advantage to not having an expensive wing. I’m just trying to see the logic.

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 12:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Yea

I’m not sure anyone knows what “the plan” is (does Dun?).

Most are simply assuming that the plan is to still have as much cap space as possible and go after a free agent. Which is strange because you’d think the biggest trade chip we had to induce someone to take Thornton/Telfair was Camby. But we couldn’t get Portland to even take Telfair (assuming we even tried).

I do agree that Blake and Outlaw add depth, which is similar to what we all said when we traded for Telfair and Rhino. Depth is important, but as I’ve said many times before in our convos, this team needs stars. Depth is a secondary concern.

But maybe the plan is to get the “stars” through the draft (Griffin and whoever we pick this year).

by madglove on Feb 16, 2010 12:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Thing is here

there aren’t a huge load of SF’s in the free agency. LBJ would be great but it’s probably a pipedream.
Joe Johnson – more of a SG than a SF. Deng would be nice but he’s not a FA so we have to give something up in a trade there.
I just don’t know what path this team is heading on. Dunny better have a masterplan.

Bingo! Oh me oh my!

by ClippersUK on Feb 16, 2010 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't forget Rudy Gay

" Baron for the win, BINGO!!!! The Clipers Win, The Clippers win!!! "
Ralph Lawler

by bestclipfan on Feb 16, 2010 2:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Good point

I had forgotten about him, decent player too.

Bingo! Oh me oh my!

by ClippersUK on Feb 16, 2010 2:57 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Hmm

I hope he suffers a severe paper cut while he’s counting it.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 5:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I like the trade,,,

realistically….they got a decent deal with the 2 expiring contracts and cash. I would have like to have dumped either AT or Bassy as well, but there is still time for that.
How about Kaman, Bassy and At (or the remainder of the trade exception) for either Bosh or Amare? They both work $$ wise.
I would love to see Lebron come to LA, but I think the Clips need to focus on that second level of FA’s this offseason…like Joe Johnson

Do or do not. There is no try.

by Clip Show on Feb 16, 2010 12:19 PM PST reply actions  

i really hate to see Camby go, he was great and will be missed

But the future is now for DJ. Its time for you Mr. Jordan to step into your new role for this team.

Bigolbad

by big0lbad on Feb 16, 2010 12:19 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Camby will be missed

Marcus led the team in consistent hustle and play. Considering our current line-up, it was a privilege to watch him play. Wish him well.

by ClipperLifer on Feb 16, 2010 1:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Anytime you can...

trade your starting PF for a backup PG and a player out for the year you have to do it. Oh yea… and 3 million in cash. I think we should restructure how the deal is described. It should be Marcus Camby for $3 million in unmarked bills, Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 12:37 PM PST reply actions  

LOL

I encourage you to find a creative outlet for your frustrations. I, for one, just took up the electric tuba.

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

You might be right

I better work harder and make a billion dollars so I can save the Clippers from this fate.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 12:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Isn't Outlaw coming back soon?

I don’t think he’s out for the year.

by madglove on Feb 16, 2010 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Blazers Fan here...

Travis began practice this week, and was targetting Februrary 28th as his return to action date.

(Insert something snappy)

by Jeremiah S on Feb 16, 2010 1:03 PM PST up reply actions  

A Couple of Thoughts

Missed all of this last night. Have to say that I don’t see any drama to it. It’s hard to understand why Camby would be unhappy—is it because he wanted to go to a stronger playoff contender? Because he wanted to go to Denver, which cast him aside? This trade actually helps Camby’s prospects for being a Clipper next season, if that’s what he wants to do. But who knows. Not so important.

What is important? I see a couple of things. ClipperBlog has a good breakdown of pros and cons, which is pretty helpful. I hadn’t thought about the DJordan factor until going over there, though SP catches it (and buries it a bit, down at the bottom) here.

-The DJordan factor. Does he start with Kaman now? Does Craig Smith? Call me crazy, but I would actually try starting-get ready for it—Brian Skinner, who is the best defender/rebounder at the PF that the Clips have on the current roster. But that’s just me. If you start DJordan, that makes Kaman the PF, sort of. Kaman is shooting his jumper enough that that’s not the worst idea, I suppose. Craig Smith has shown, I think, that he’s better coming off the bench.

DJordan is going to get a whole lot of Camby’s minutes, no matter how it works out. And that’s a problem for the Clippers. DJordan has his moments and can be fun to watch, but he’s still a project. He needs to get the minutes, however, in order to improve. It should be fairly entertaining, actually. But it’s worth remembering that Camby was really fun to watch, that you don’t see guys rebound and make plays like he did very often. I’ll miss that. We finally did get to see some quality Kaman-Camby, and it was pretty good stuff, but very short-lived.

-the Kim Hughes factor. As a big man coach and Kaman’s mentor and working to build DJordan from the ground up, over time, I have no doubt that Kim Hughes will know what to do with the big man rotation (Brian Skinner time!-it’s kind of like hoping for the best from Josh Powell, a couple years back.) Camby does all sorts of great things, but his offensive limitations arguably weren’t going to help the Clips in any dramatic way to change their style of play to score first, and ask questions later. As the Clips are trying to change their approach, one thing that has been mentioned is that you look at the roster and don’t see a whole lot of guys who can run, handle the ball, and hit shots. So the trade is plus two on that category. In Blake they have another guy who can shoot the three, and they have a new triumvirate of Outlaw, Thornton and Butler to go along with EGordon and BD.

—Ricky Davis waived? Mentioned as an aside? I haven’t seen that elsewhere. At one point waiving Davis2 was extremely high on my Clipper wish list. He just started to look decent, or semi-decent and a still a shadow of his former self. Somehow it’s not as satisfying to see him go as it seems like it should have been. He’ll always be the poster boy for 0809 futility as far as I’m concerned, although BDavis was obviously the primary culprit of the lost cause. Another classic Clipper career goes into the books.

by citizen zhiv on Feb 16, 2010 12:41 PM PST reply actions  

Oops

Should have known to stay away from those dashes. Please ignore. Lame.

by citizen zhiv on Feb 16, 2010 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

It doesn't make sense to play Skinner

This season is lost. It has been for a while. DJ should be force fed as many minutes as he can take.

I agree that DJ and Kaman are an odd combo as neither is a PF at all. I’d be curious to see some numbers with those two sharing the court.

Good write up zhiv.

by madglove on Feb 16, 2010 12:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Skinner

Thanks mg.

Yeah, I know the Skinner idea is crazy. But you can’t use the “season is lost” argument. Kim Hughes still has to put the best team he can out on the floor. I agree with force-feeding DJordan minutes, but DJ and Kaman as starters might be a bridge too far. Let Skinner be one of those 3 to 5 minute starters, let him take the best shot from Boozer or KG or Pau or whoever, and hit them in the mouth once or twice while he’s at it. As the crown prince of Clipper lost causes, I hereby nominate former Clipper first round draft pick Brian Skinner to join the distinguished ranks of Paul Davis, Nick Fazekas, Josh Powell and of course Big Z, with honorable mention status going to Chris Wilcox, Peja Drobnak, Walter McCarty, Zach Randolph, Tim Thomas and Ricky Davis. Proud Clippers all. Brian Skinner is a perfectly acceptable starting power forward in this league, just waiting for his chance to get a few minutes. He’s a subpar backup center, which makes him seem even more like a journeyman. This is the kind of thinking that would never make sense to MDSr, although giving big minutes to Walter McCarty was obvious to him.

The one thing that you want from a coaching change like this is a new way of thinking. With Camby leaving, Hughes is going to have to figure something out. Having Kaman start at PF is wacked but worth trying, but it shouldn’t be the only option. Starting Craig Smith doesn’t seem like the way to go—do you bring in DJordan for him and move Kaman to PF at that point, in the middle of the 1st quarter? Does Al Thornton start at PF and Outlaw or Butler is the starting SF? Maybe the rough tough PF defender/rebounder alongside Kaman is old school Dunleavy thinking, and the plan is to go with a certain amount of Kaman/Jordan, but a lot of Smith/Thornton PF small lineup play.

The big difference is to look at things through Kim Hughes’ eyes now.

by citizen zhiv on Feb 16, 2010 4:47 PM PST up reply actions  

we r too picky...

marcus is a great player, but he’s old, injury prone, a liability on offense, takes bad shots (like he wanted to get traded) and he needs to play for a contender. I’m a little shocked but not surprised or disappointed with the trade. Two positions we suck at, SF and PG just got an improvement and u guys are complaining. Blake is good enough to start at PG and Outlaw is instantly our best SF and hes young. u never know, marcus might want to come back next year. Let’s just hope the dummy is smart enough to let him know that this is strictly bussiness and we want u back. As 4 ricky…we should have waved brian skinner instead. imo

by clippa j on Feb 16, 2010 12:46 PM PST reply actions  

It might feel that way

But I doubt it. The trade market is pretty much as close as possible to a free market. Dunleavy could basically run an auction process for Camby and could have for the last 2 weeks as the season has been effectively over. Unless you think 1) Dunleavy is incompetent (you might, and he might be, I’m not really sure) or 2) he had a better offer and just felt like turning it down; I think the market for Camby has been adequately captured.

I don’t think Portland throws in much more anyway because I don’t think Camby does much for them anyway. He’s tall, but is he going to be playing center? How does he stop guys like Marc Gasol, Kaman, Bynum, et al? He’s not strong enough to be a competent 5. And they have another guy who’s not really strong at the 4 in Aldridge and neither of them can play in the paint. It makes sense for Portland now because they didn’t give up much, but I don’t see the Clips getting much more.

by Michael White on Feb 16, 2010 1:04 PM PST up reply actions  

He does well against them

Except for Bynum none of them is a real bruiser. Besides the Blazers were playing a 37 year old PF at Center, so this was a no brainer for them. I think they were more desperate than this and we could have made them take Bassy. Oh well, I’m hoping it is true and we can pay Telfair to not exercise his option (maybe that 3 million will come into play). I’m pretty confident we can move Thornton for nothing, after all we took Butler this year.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 1:30 PM PST up reply actions  

There's a couple of things everyone's overlooking...

- There’s been a lot of talk about Camby’s “Bird rights”… which seem meaningless for a 35 year old player… no one’s signing him for more than a couple of years anyway.
- The cash thrown in the deal is certainly meaningful to the Clippers, but perhaps more significant is the fact that Kevin Pritchard has already said the Blazers are fully on the hook for the incentives attached to Camby’s contract… that could be another serious reason to make this trade and make it now. (I have no idea what those incentive bonuses are, but if they’re attached to minutes and rebounds he’s almost certainly exceeded them) That could save DTS even more millions. So there’s two things we have to remember: first, trading MC might very well have been more difficult than we thought! Second, the cash saved and coming back to the Clips might be more like 4-5M rather than the reported 3. Not meaningful to the fans but very meaningful to the organization. It’s a business, right?
- Finally, why did the Clips waive Ricky Davis (this is also now on the Clips website)? Why not Bobby Brown or even Steve Novak? Isn’t Davis’ expiring deal worth some potential trade value? Does Brown have a future with the Clips? I don’t get it. Saves you no money and potentially robs you of a trade piece.
- Could this be a Bird rights acquisition of Blake and Outlaw? Does MDSr. see them as valuable pieces on the team next year? I think that’s very possible. But, given their playing positions it certainly seems like there might be another trade before Thursday perhaps involving AT or Telfair.

by John Raffo on Feb 16, 2010 1:08 PM PST reply actions  

This is a great point

“But, given their playing positions it certainly seems like there might be another trade before Thursday perhaps involving AT or Telfair.”

The whole Baron Davis thing was prefaced under Club Optimism, but if the plan is still to trade the backup 1 and 3, its nice to have these fine plan B’s. They are both clear upgrades as 7th and 8th (or so) men.

Coaches don't matter. - Bill Simmons, The Book of Basketball

by John R on Feb 16, 2010 1:11 PM PST up reply actions  

About the incentives in Camby's contract...

The top story on ESPN.com has Ric Bucher talking about the trade, and he mentions that the incentives were worth 2.5 mil. I’m a little skeptical about the numbers he uses (he says it was 1.5 mil in cash for the Clips, while everyone else is saying 3), but whatever the case, the amount for the incentives is probably significant. So you’re right, Camby’s contract might have been a little more difficult to move than it seems.

by Handsome_B._Wonderful on Feb 16, 2010 3:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Not to playoff contenders

Home teams take home upwards of a million per game in additional revenue. They are guaranteed $2 million back as a result since they have at minimum 2 home games.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Ramona says:
ramonashelburne
  
I’m told Clippers like both Blake and Outlaw and are curious how they play last part of the season
ramonashelburne
  
Clippers could’ve gotten a lot more for Camby, but would’ve had to take salary back for next year, which rules out max FA this summer
ramonashelburne
  
Look for Clippers to continue to be players before Thursday

by madglove on Feb 16, 2010 1:11 PM PST reply actions  

Sounds like

the plan is still to try to trade Telfair and Thornton and go after a max FA this summer.

by madglove on Feb 16, 2010 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

For the record I have always been against chasing FA's

But it is a coherent plan, in spite of your suspicions.

Coaches don't matter. - Bill Simmons, The Book of Basketball

by John R on Feb 16, 2010 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

My suspicions and the plan to chase FA's aren't mutually exclusive

And further, this trade didn’t put the team in a better position to execute “the plan”, which is why I’m suspicious.

If the team trades Thornton and/or Telfair before Thursday, they could have done so w/o trading Camby. If they can’t, they should have done a better job using the one chip they had to unload those contracts – Camby.

by madglove on Feb 16, 2010 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

You assume things that aren't true

You afford yourself the luxury of assuming anything is possible.

Anything isn’t possible, no matter what Garnett mumbles.

Finally, you appear to still be locked into the idea that Camby qua Camby matters.

Until you can demonstrate an opportunity cost, your suspicions are only paranoia.

Coaches don't matter. - Bill Simmons, The Book of Basketball

by John R on Feb 16, 2010 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

No

YOU assume that because you don’t agree, they aren’t true.

Which clearly isn’t based on anything other than an extremely inflated sense of self.

by madglove on Feb 16, 2010 1:37 PM PST up reply actions  

So show us these other trades that we need Camby around for

You are the one so certain other opportunities have been missed.

And I am the one with the inflated sense of self…

Coaches don't matter. - Bill Simmons, The Book of Basketball

by John R on Feb 16, 2010 1:42 PM PST up reply actions  

What about those SF's?

There aren’t that many SF’s in the FA market this summer. Couple of SF’s people have mentioned on the boards are Caron Butler and Luol Deng. Also, what about Igoudala.
Yep, these might have been tried and we may have been put off but going for a decent peice now and securing it, is a much better strategy in my opinion than hoping LeBron or Joe Johnson comes to us in the off season.
Even Dunny said he would rather move now and then used our decent peice for two less decent peices.

Bingo! Oh me oh my!

by ClippersUK on Feb 16, 2010 2:11 PM PST up reply actions  

If Dunny said that, then what makes you think he didn’t try to organize a trade like Camby and change for Iguadala and PHI said no?

by Michael White on Feb 16, 2010 2:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Sorry, maybe I didn't make my post clear enough.

Dunny said he’d rather move now and I think that would have been the best bet.

I also put that these trade ideas may have been tried and turned down (put off wasn’t a good turn of phrase!).

Bingo! Oh me oh my!

by ClippersUK on Feb 16, 2010 2:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Ha. I wasn’t sure what you meant by put off. I interpreted it differently. I think that was a trans-Atlantic misunderstanding.

by Michael White on Feb 16, 2010 2:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Ha Ha - my fault, sorry.

I’m just not comfortable us going into this FA hoping to fill that SF position with a top player. We don’t have any history managing to sign top players that have lots of options.

Bingo! Oh me oh my!

by ClippersUK on Feb 16, 2010 2:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Philly wanted more than just expiring for Iggy

they wanted some young talent and someone to take Dalembert. If they just want expiring deals they would trade for Tmac. The trade was possible for us (I’m guessing) if we sent all our expirings plus a lottery protected 1st rounder for Iggy and Dalembert.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

And that I would do

As it would mean we had a excellent SF and Dalembert as Camby-lite.

Bingo! Oh me oh my!

by ClippersUK on Feb 16, 2010 2:59 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Well I completely agree with that strategy

And you note that Dunleavy mentioned that too.

So why assume it wasn’t tried?

It looks like Iguodala came off the block at some point, and getting him would have required taking back Brand as the trade was being reported. Feels like a non-starter.

I don’t think CButler or Deng are the answer, and Butler is already off the market anyway.

There just isn’t anything to be upset about. I guess a little disappointment is reasonable, but in the end this trade doesn’t really mean anything.

Coaches don't matter. - Bill Simmons, The Book of Basketball

by John R on Feb 16, 2010 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Regardless of other trades...

…there was no reason to make the trade today, rather than wait for tomorrow and see what pops up.

by Erik O on Feb 16, 2010 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Or one of the players gets hurt tonight.

Odds are about the same as something popping up.

Coaches don't matter. - Bill Simmons, The Book of Basketball

by John R on Feb 16, 2010 4:53 PM PST up reply actions  

if that is the case this move makes perfect sense

get new backups at sf and pg, then trade away old backups at sf and pg, all of that with some extra cash…. I think we need to leave this trade as an incomplete until further notice.

by bacek on Feb 16, 2010 1:20 PM PST up reply actions  

From what I've seen of Outlaw

I kind of like him. That’s only been a few games here or there, so I’m interested to see what he can do for LAC.

by Michael White on Feb 16, 2010 1:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I like him too

But I doubt he’s a Clipper next year.

by madglove on Feb 16, 2010 1:26 PM PST up reply actions  

The fact that Camby wasn't used to move Telfair or AT

suggests (a little) that Dun doesn’t want to play the free agent market. So maybe Outlaw’s a keeper.

On the other hand, if the Clips really did turn down offers for Camby that involved non-expirings, then that suggests just the opposite.

I’m clinging doggedly to the notion that Dunleavy is rational. It’s a little difficult.

The other possibility is that another trade is in the works, but I’m with you (and against JohnR) that with Camby gone, it’ll be a lot harder to clear more cap space.

Now that it’s done, I hope we pay off Telfair and resign those who deserve it.

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 3:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Uh

“that with Camby gone, it’ll be a lot harder to clear more cap space.”

I don’t disagree with this and didn’t take a position on it. This makes logical sense as an outsider, but we aren’t in any of these meetings…

I guess I should be proud that you decided to take a stance against me on reputation alone.

Coaches don't matter. - Bill Simmons, The Book of Basketball

by John R on Feb 16, 2010 4:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Ooops

Did I misinterpret you? —“So show us these other trades that we need Camby around for…”

It doesn’t really matter. The trade is made and maybe something good will come of it. If I were looking really for an argument, I would have started praising the trade’s virtues to ClipperChuck.

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 7:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Wonder why he's arguing - oh right, defending MDSr

I think we could have gotten more for Camby. Very disappointing. Trading one expiring for two expirings and some cash. I guess if that was really MDSr he’s out there securing cash for DTS.

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on Feb 17, 2010 1:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Blake & Outlaw will help

The cynic in me says Sterling did it for $3 million. Blake and Outlaw will provide some additional flexibility for the Clips, and both can thrive in a fast break offense. If they want to run, they may go with a smaller lineup with Outlaw, Thornton or Smith at the 4. With Kaman and Camby in the lineup, the Clips were never going to be able to run. With just Kaman, perhaps they can run. This will pose a challenge to Kaman to see if he can truly hit the boards and protect the basket. Before, the excuse was that was Camby’s job. That excuse won’t fly anymore. Look for Kaman to play Camby’s position at the top of the key and DJ to play Kaman’s on offense. Kaman is a better jump shooter than Camby and will be in a postion to dish the ball to an open man. DJ can hit the offensive boards. For DJ the question for him to answer is whether he’s mentally ready to play every game, every minute versus the up and down routine that he’s shown thus far. Finally, it could position the Clips to make additional moves.

by Mike Wr on Feb 16, 2010 1:29 PM PST reply actions  

LMFAO

both can thrive in a fast break offense.

Steve Blake’s nickname with the Blazers was Steve “Brakes”. Blake is wonderful at steadying an offense and running set halfcourt plays, but he will NEVER run a fast break.

"B-Roy is the best shooting guard I have played against"

-Ron Artest

by premthegrem on Feb 16, 2010 10:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Who's going to pick up Camby's 10+ rebounds/game?

My only point of discontent is when you trade a “specialist” of sorts then someone else has to pick up the slack. Camby was sort of a rebounding “specialist” – that was kind of his role. So – who picks up the slack? Kaman won’t – he tires out too much during games. DJ won’t – although I like him getting a chance with more minutes at center (it’s funny how he’s always cursing under the basket and the TV microphone picks it up).

I understand the “business” of the trade ($$$), Camby’s age, his breakdown factor, etc. – but rebounding seemed to be an important part of the Clips game (when things were going well). The team is mid-pack in the league in rebounding – that stat ’s probably going to plummet.

by bones_boy on Feb 16, 2010 1:29 PM PST reply actions  

Look at the trade one year from now

Excellent point about the loss of rebounding. The Clips will not know if they made a good deal until next year at this time. BG will assume Camby’s position and minutes and rebounding duties.

by Mike Wr on Feb 16, 2010 1:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Some really good points...

Zhiv, madglove, & Michael White. Understandably, Camby is well loved by his teammates and fans. But if we look at this trade objectively, we probably got the most for him as you guys have pointed out. Yes, his expiring contract was valuable but is it valuable enough to fetch someone like Iggy? We would like to think so, but in reality, probably not.

Both Blake and Outlaw are good pieces, which we get a look at for next year. On paper, they will address our two weakest positions this season. It would make a little more sense if we can see how they perform on a team with the same coaches/system going into next year in order to properly assess their future on the squad and get a jump start on developing chemistry if they are retained.

Putting all your chips in the Lebron lottery is probably not a good strategy, particularly with Lebron’s biography and Cleveland’s move to land Amare.

(Krai)

by MichaelCage on Feb 16, 2010 1:42 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

the trade is fine

Gives us a look at two guys who COULD help next year and spares us from the mardy-bobby two-step at backup pg. It kinda submarines any kind of playoff hopes (lol?)and team chemistry (camby and ricky were well-liked and the veteran heart and soul of this team), but at this point, really, who cares? Neither one of those guys prevented the mess the team is in now and if the players wanted to keep the old vets around, they should have played a little better. Writing was on the wall that once the clips were out of it, camby would be gone. But locker room stuff aside, the deal is “okay”. It didn’t net us anything that rocked our socks off but we may have been overrating marcus’ value all along.

Personally I will miss camby’s hustle and all the little things he did on a nightly basis and I wish him well, but its not really the end of the world either.

by Joe Wolf's Mullet on Feb 16, 2010 2:27 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Being too nice

The Clips missed out on a chance to dump a bad contract. It was a simple money grab by DTS as we will be lucky to have Outlaw play 20 games for us this year.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

ok, please show me what was out there that we could have had

I might have missed all the obvious, cap-relieving offers coming our way. If there was legitimately something out there where we get instant relief from his contract, then show me.

by Joe Wolf's Mullet on Feb 16, 2010 2:46 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

The Clips could have included Bassy in the deal

The Blazers gave us 3 million, which is actually more than Bassy makes next year. Why not make the trade Cunningham, Mills, Howard, Outlaw and Blake for Bassy and Camby then? We’d end up cutting Skinner, Brown and Ricky to make room. All the deals except for Cunningham expire and Cunningham’s contract is probably unguaranteed since he’s a 2nd round rookie (Mike Taylor’s for instance wasn’t guaranteed).

Anyways its impossible for me to give you a legit offer after the trade already went through as there will be no other counter offers. If this trade happened on Thursday at the deadline then yea, I guess this was the best offer but I think we definitely sold low. That or Sterling really needed the 3 million because I heard he’s hurting financially…

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Good Trade - Feels Bad

I have to agree with most of CN here. It makes sense, but as a fan it hurts to see a favorite, hustle, locker room guy traded for seemingly so little.

A lot of good points in the comments here. I’d like to sum up in a post.

by moKi on Feb 16, 2010 2:45 PM PST reply actions  

More like it made cents

lots and lots of cents for DTS. Not too much for cap flexibility or even basketball. Trade machine predicts -6 wins over 82 games for us and +4 games for the Blazers.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Here's hoping for

DJ and Rhino to play their butts off. Personally I feel they benefited the most out of this trade with the extra playing time so they better make the most out of it.

by peterghost on Feb 16, 2010 2:52 PM PST reply actions  

I think DJ will do a solid job with the extra minutes he's going to be getting

I already really like his game. He can blocks shots just like Camby and always is battling for the rebounds on both ends. Not to mention when he gets that offensive rebound he’ll give you a finish to remember. This will be good for his development.

Hope Kim get rally the guys tonight. This is also an opportunity for him.

by dulciusEXasperis on Feb 16, 2010 2:52 PM PST reply actions  

well u can't blame dunleavy

this was the only choice he had without sacraficing cap space for next year, which currently seems to be the plan. From a basketball standpoint, I can see why this trade is somewhat appropriate, since craig smith has proven that he can start at power forward, and at the same time creates time for jordan, Will the clips be outrebounded by opposing teams? We’ll have to see

by highriser on Feb 16, 2010 2:53 PM PST reply actions  

i would have been more upset had they done something like what was originally rumored:

Such as camby for caron butler. Butler is a “nice” player but not great. To me that would have been settling…taking a decent player and also taking us out of the running for any of the stars that will be available. With this deal, we just kinda treaded water and still have “hope” for a big name. And “hope” is something that doesn’t grow on trees following this team, so I’m ok with this.

by Joe Wolf's Mullet on Feb 16, 2010 2:53 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

What big name?

Until we move both Telfair and Thornton we aren’t even settling. I can’t see how we move Telfair now and even though people are hoping he opts out because he’s now our 3rd string PG… I doubt he walks away from 2.7 million when his stock is so low.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Bassy might actually opt out.

If he’s not paid to do so by the Clippers, the FA Class of 2010 is exceedingly light on PG’s. I can’t think of a single quality point out there…

Secondly, the trade looks like we missed out on dumping a contract, but I am going to give MDSr. the benefit of the doubt. There has to be something else at play here, if Dunleavy is looking towards the future (which he clearly is by not going after Iggy or someone like that), then he won’t give up on moving Thornton and Telfair.

I’m waiting for the other shoe to drop.

"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's doing down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.

by Gordon for President on Feb 16, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions  

What teams need PGs?

Ramon Sessions, a much better PG, languished on the FA last summer. Do you seriously think someone is going to pay Bassy more than 2.7 million next year?

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:21 PM PST up reply actions  

There's a reason Ramon wasn't picked up.

Both us and NYK didn’t want it affect 2010 capspace. With that dream over, and many teams realizing there’s no point holding out for Bron, Wade, and Bosh teams will come back to their senses. Everyone needs a good PG, Bassy isn’t exactly radioactive.

Also, if there Clippers pay him to opt-out, Bassy won’t be looking to replace the full 2.7 million.

"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's doing down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.

by Gordon for President on Feb 16, 2010 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Telfair...

The idea of him choosing to opt out is definitely just that… an idea. I don’t feel comfortable waiting on him. There is far too much risk involved if indeed his contract needs to come off the books in order for us to go all in.

At least I'm also a Redskins fan... oh wait. My sports life sucks.

by Clipper T on Feb 16, 2010 3:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Well think about it

We’re having no luck giving him away right now and he only has one year left! Occasionally these players get misguided advice but I’ll give Bassy and his advisors enough credit to realize that when no one is willing to trade for your 2.7 expiring deal next year then you shouldn’t expect to see much of a demand on the FA market for your services if you choose to opt out.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Some one is missing the point...

Maybe it’s me.

All of this talk of upgrades at point and small forward. But those guys won’t be around next year. WILL. NOT.

The Clippers are hoarding cap space. Even if not for LeBron, it appears they will use their space on a free agent.

In order to do that, Blake and Outlaw will be renounced – no Bird right’s. Since neither was likely to re-sign in Portland and both would have been UFA’s that makes the difference to the Clippers… nothing. You could try to sign Blake and Outlaw next summer whether you trade for them or not.

If they swing another trade, today or tomorrow, and eat up the cap space, THEN maybe they can think about re-signing Blake and/or Outlaw, but even then they’re still UFA’s and there’s no guarantee they stay with the Clippers.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Feb 16, 2010 2:53 PM PST reply actions  

who missed that point?

Nobody thinks that these guys are building blocks (that I read, maybe I missed something). For the interim it spares us from any more mardy at point, gives us a look at two guys the team supposedly likes, and hey, if we get spurned by all the big dawgs this summer, maybe we go back and sign these two if they enjoyed their time here. Maybe we ink them both AND camby. Who said these guys were part of the master rebuilding plan? Its just treading water and bringing a couple guys in for a look with cash as the cherry on top.

by Joe Wolf's Mullet on Feb 16, 2010 3:00 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Did Sterling give you some cash for this post?

How is giving up our starting PF for a backup PG and a SF who is still a few weeks away going to help us? Not sure if this helps us tread water, if anything I think someone just tossed us a anchor. Camby isn’t coming back, judging from all the reports he was not happy about this trade, I think we permanently burned this bridge. We probably lost the most logical way for us to move Telfair and for what? So a billionaire could pocket a few million dollars while his club continues to burn.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I want Marcus back next year, no doubt.

Thinking more about it, where would he get any meaningful minutes? If we re-sign Rhino, which I seriously hope, I see the 5 covered by Kaman and DJ, and the 4 by Blake and Rhino. Camby would be the 5th big off the bunch, and I have to believe Marcus would be wasted in that role.

Bittersweet. Marcus kicks ass (and was my favorite Clipper aside from EJ), but we need to be realistic.

"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's doing down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.

by Gordon for President on Feb 16, 2010 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe I'm dense

but why would Portland or anyone want to take on Telfair contract? Cash is better for them, you seem to have this opinion that Camby was some golden apple that someone would only take a bite if it included a worm. I’m a little out of my league in the NBA sense but I just don’t get the outrage that you and a few others have with this deal. I’m still pissed about Korolev instead of Granger but this one doesn’t bother me at all.

by meercatjohn on Feb 16, 2010 3:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually it makes more sense for the Blazers to take his contract

they could buy Telfair out at a reduced sum. The Blazers don’t have cap room this year so having Telfair’s expiring contract actually becomes a trade chip for them. They aren’t over the luxury tax either so the cash difference seems pretty negligible. Trading Camby was almost a forgone conclusion after the Memphis game, but it seemed pretty clear we should clear Telfair and Thornton off the books so we could try to get a star in the offseason.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

you can assume what marcus camby is feeling, what dunleavy is thinking, what sterling's financial situation is, and play realgm all you want

I guess that’s “fun” for you but I’m trying to look at DEFINITES and REALITY and what’s in front of us. As the guy above said, the other shoe hasn’t dropped and the trading may not be over. Its true, the other shoe may NEVER drop and this was a botched move. Wouldn’t surprise me either, to be honest. But I wanna see how it plays out before I wail at the clippers wall and gnash my teeth. If that’s what you prefer, feel free.

by Joe Wolf's Mullet on Feb 16, 2010 3:19 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Ok, lets go line by line then

What’s the other shoe, we trade Thornton? Okay, that should be relatively easy.
Now we trade Telfair? Okay, this is hard and if we weren’t able to make the Blazers take him then what?

I’m thinking the team is avoiding having the cap room to make the max offer so the team has a inbuilt excuse as to why it was unable to sign a key free agent this offseason.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:26 PM PST up reply actions  

and im thinking...

That feb 16 wasn’t a hard deadline to have all our ducks in a row and just because we have some loose ends to be tied up doesn’t mean it’s doomsday. See, different trains of thought can be fun!

You may end up being right, I may end up being right. I just choose not to piss and moan JUST YET. Now if the team drops the ball in the off-season, I will be right there with you crying, and will absorb your “I told you so”s.

by Joe Wolf's Mullet on Feb 16, 2010 3:35 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Are you willing to GIVE Al Thornton away?

What I keep hearing is that Outlaw’s a better player than Thornton. Telfair’s value is very low but Thornton has at least minimal value. If worse comes to worse, you trade him for a second round pick (or less)… and you’ve cleared max money.
The one thing the trade seems to us is, like it or not, the Clips are all in on the free agent summer.

by John Raffo on Feb 16, 2010 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

We need to trade both

To have max money. Trading Thornton isn’t a problem, trading Telfair appears to be one, hence the outrage by many.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:29 PM PST up reply actions  

"the Clips are all in on the free agent summer"

Actually, I think the reason so many of us are so confounded, is that this trade doesn’t send ANY clear signal. Are we in on free agency or not? We might just as easily resign the guys we just took on.

Maybe we’ll buy out Telfair and his cooperation. Maybe we’ll managed to trade AT. I’d be surprised if either of those was at all easy.

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 3:35 PM PST up reply actions  

If we buy out Telfair

His buyout total counts against the cap.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:37 PM PST up reply actions  

"and his cooperation"

If he agrees to take the $ and not use his player option, then I don’t think his salary counts against this summer’s (i.e., next season’s) cap. His salary would only be a luxury tax consideration for this year (lol).

No?

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 3:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Or maybe you mean

whatever extra we pay him to not exercise his option counts against next year’s cap. That wouldn’t surprise me.

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 3:41 PM PST up reply actions  

It counts both times

I.E if we pay him $2million in buyout money (saving 700k) then the 2 million still counts against our cap. We’d have a little more but we need both these deals off the books to get into max offers.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 4:15 PM PST up reply actions  

My mistake on the cap total...

And that helps me understand why everyone’s so flipped out about this deal. So MD’s got to dump Thornton and Telfair together… or trade Baron.

by John Raffo on Feb 16, 2010 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes need to dump both

or trade EJ, Kaman, Baron or Blake. Doubt anyone wants Baron with his contract and we’d have a huge hole at center if we moved Kaman. Trading Thornton sounds easy enough, trading Telfair has to be the main concern.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

If anyone's missing the point, then I'm a prime candidate

You wrote in your post, SP: “Telfair has an option for next season, and it is possible that they could work a buy out wherein he agrees to NOT exercise that option… I’ll try to get clarification on Telfair’s situation, but I assume that he could be paid to opt out next year”

I’d love that clarification, from you or anyone. It would make the picture clearer.

You see, since the Clips didn’t clear any cap space, it’s a little awkward to conclude that they’re “hoarding cap space.” Does Dunleavy have a plan to clear space later? If not, then as things stand, we can’t afford Gay, much less Lebron. —Once we renounce all our free agents, then with AT and Telfair still here, we’ll have ~$14M to spend, but there’ll be a cap hold on much of that, since we’re required to have 12 men on the roster.

Who is there after Gay? That’s an earnest question. Someone that much better than Outlaw?

My hunch is that there is NOT another trade in the works, and I’m certainly not so sure about our any of our summer GM intentions.

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Not sure how the buyouts work

but I’m pretty sure the “bribe” we give him to opt out has to count against the cap.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Against which cap?

There’s this season and then there’s the next. If we give Telfair $3M (or whatever) to both “go away” and “not come back,” what that amounts to is some $ to satisfy this season’s contract, and some extra $ to not activate next season’s. What I’m thinking, if I made the rules, is that only this extra $ should count against next season’s cap. But I don’t see why this extra amount should come to $2M or anything so high. If we gave him $1M extra, he could then sign on with another team for $1.7M (very reasonable), and end up with the same promised salary.

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

On the other hand, if the buyout is for this year + an absent signature

then I’m not convinced ANY of it should go against next season’s cap. We effectively don’t have a 2010-2011 contract with him, at that point.

by SilverClip on Feb 16, 2010 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Reflection

After thinking about this trade, I’m still kinda bummed. Just don’t feel like we played our chips right… I supposed it could be worse (it always can be) but I’m disappointed we didn’t at least dump Telfair or Thornton.

In my mind, barring a significant move before Thursday, we are now heading into the FA Bonanza sans the necessary tools. (ie: enough cap space to offer a max deal)

I just can’t imagine that MDsr doesn’t have something else up his sleeve, otherwise this really doesn’t add up for me from a basketball perspective. Obviously the money might be the only real factor we’re dealing with. Sterling is pretty well known for this kind of thing, and maybe the newly neutered Dunleavy is under direct instructions to recoup a portion of his bloated contract to save face…?

I just feel as though Camby was worth more than what we received. As others have mentioned, maybe my emotions are skewed… maybe this was the absolute best offer we had. Either way, I hope we improve our cap situation, or make a move that makes us better NOW. And I hope it happens before it’s too late.

At least I'm also a Redskins fan... oh wait. My sports life sucks.

by Clipper T on Feb 16, 2010 3:17 PM PST reply actions  

PS

A big ‘thank you’ to Mr. Camby for being a great Clipper while he was here. He really busted his ass for us and earned my utmost respect. Cheers good sir. You will be missed.

At least I'm also a Redskins fan... oh wait. My sports life sucks.

by Clipper T on Feb 16, 2010 3:22 PM PST reply actions  

+1000

"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's doing down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.

by Gordon for President on Feb 16, 2010 3:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Who's this Cash guy

And can he play power forward?

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gil Meriken on Feb 16, 2010 3:36 PM PST reply actions  

Nope

but he can be used to buy nice houses, clothing and cars which can help a team score a lot….

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 3:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Scoring off the court

Seems to be a high priority

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gil Meriken on Feb 16, 2010 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Definitely is for Sterling

Who can forget his deposition on the naked gun. 3 million does buy a lot of sexual favors.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Oops

meant the smoking gun… must had been a freudian slip.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I read that as

“Who can forget his deposition on the Naked Gun 3”

"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson

by Gil Meriken on Feb 17, 2010 9:33 AM PST up reply actions  

I think so...

Don’t think you can let DJ and Kaman start together, but who knows. The other option (which I loathe) is starting Skinner.

I think you have to let Rhino start and then let DJ get all of the filler at the 4/5. We have to let DJ get log some good minutes and gain some experience now that Camby is gone. Who knows, maybe DJ will learn how to shoot!?!?

At least I'm also a Redskins fan... oh wait. My sports life sucks.

by Clipper T on Feb 16, 2010 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Id like to say that

Chris Kaman becomes a 20 and 10 guy now that this trade took place,,,,,,, with that in mind,,,, EJ is going to have to learn how to rebound

by big0lbad on Feb 16, 2010 5:05 PM PST reply actions  

are you inferring that

Kaman will increase his rebounding average by one? Might be a stretch but it seems possible.

At least I'm also a Redskins fan... oh wait. My sports life sucks.

by Clipper T on Feb 16, 2010 5:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I think he will

Rhino is not nearly the rebounder and DJ is a solid rebounder but still not as active as Camby. Not a stretch at all to think he’ll grab a extra board a game.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Feb 16, 2010 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Um...

Sarcasm.

At least I'm also a Redskins fan... oh wait. My sports life sucks.

by Clipper T on Feb 16, 2010 5:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Feedback from a Blazer fan

Both players have had ups and downs. There are those who love and hate either one.

Blake: At his best, a very good three-point shooter and a good decision-maker. Never flashy. Not a creative passer, but almost always makes the right pass without many turnovers. Our coach seemed to really have confidence in him, probably because he tended to just make the right play. This year, his shot was inconsistent, which means he proved his critics right. He’s pretty tough for a smaller guy. There’s a famous picture of him with blood dripping off his head.

Outlaw: Very controversial player with the fans. Has a basic one-dribble move where he gets around and then elevates above anybody any time — he’s known for coming in off the bench and getting bunches of shots in a row. He looks like he’s taking crazy shots (thus, the fan discontentment) but they usually go in. It’s like, “NO, TRAVIS, NO, NO … YAY!” I like him a lot. The negative about his offensive game — he rarely passes, which means he takes the game away from his teammates and he’s predictable. He has a rep for not playing hard defense, but I feel like that’s exaggerated. A TV announcer challenged him to get 10 rebounds in a game, and he started getting 8, 9, and finally 10. He can do it if he’s committed to it. He’s said to be Brandon Roy’s best friend on the team and well-liked generally by teammates.

I think the Blazers got the better of this deal, but if you hold on to Outlaw you might have a really good sixth man in future years.

by Kaboomm on Feb 16, 2010 5:18 PM PST reply actions  

One more thing about Outlaw

He has SF athleticism, but his numbers are better at the power-forward position — probably because he’s too quick for PFs to guard. However, he’s kind of small to guard big PFs, so it balances out.

by Kaboomm on Feb 16, 2010 5:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Outlaw sounds

like another version of AT..

by peterghost on Feb 16, 2010 5:38 PM PST up reply actions  

But better.

He has more range than Al, and before being injured was developing a clutch reputation. Not to forget, someone else mentioned, he has four more years of NBA experience then Thornton and is one year younger. In a toss up, I’d take Outlaw every time.

"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's doing down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.

by Gordon for President on Feb 16, 2010 5:44 PM PST up reply actions  

his nickname up here is, "Mr. 4th Quarter"

he has been very clutch and every year his jumpshot is sharper and sharper.

last year he added a spot-up three to his game, which has logged many miles in close games.

by Oggbog on Feb 16, 2010 6:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Last comment from this Blazer fan who has been darting around

I wish you all luck and thanks for being so classy towards an outsider. Some of the best fans in the league right here at Clips Nation

by Oggbog on Feb 16, 2010 6:09 PM PST reply actions  

The 3 Mil Is For Next Year's Coach

Since the Clips have to pay Dunleavy next season not to coach, the 3 mil they get here will go along way toward whatever they pay whoever is going to coach and save DTS from paying twice.

by Clipster Hipster on Feb 16, 2010 7:19 PM PST reply actions  

tax money

This trade put us more than 2 million under the salary cap.That means dts gets 4 million dollars back this season.So owning a basketball team that’s second rate that you paid 20 something million for that worth over 300 million now.Your lease on the staple center is one million dollars a season and you just made a quick 7 million dollars priceless.Mama didnt raise no fool, that’s not business sense it’s common sense.He just messed up the team but still made money.I hope mdsr had to do this so he can convince dts to pony up cash during fa.If not ,the money that was just made pays for mdsr and staple center leaving him with 1million dollars made.I guess he want be running on the court this year like we won the superbowl or something.

by clip shot on Feb 16, 2010 7:42 PM PST reply actions  

Outlaw

The biggest criticsm of Outlaw in Portland was that he’s not a good defender. He was showing some improbement in that regard early this season before his injury, hopefully he’ll be back on the court on schedule and you guys will get a chance to test him out the rest of the season.

by lsjogren on Feb 18, 2010 7:33 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Clips Nation!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Letter from Elton Brand to Clip Nation

Recent FanPosts

Blake_griffin_cropped_small
It was a good day
Small
Poll: April 27th where do you see the Clippers?
Small
40-26 and getting there
Small
Are we showing Mo enough love?
Blake-griffin-dunk_small
JR Smith. Yay or Nay?
Small
Moving past Feb 7, 2012
Small
New Member-Trade Suggestion
34008_1531733776948_1342861896_3019627_1265958_n_small
Who Else is Going to the 76ers Game?
Small
Farewell Note to King Solomon
Small
Should we go after Eremy Lin?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Clipsnation_small Steve Perrin

Editors

Joc_01_small John Raffo

Authors

Blake-griffin-dunk_small Lawler's Law