Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys Projects: Aston Whiteside

Clippers at Houston - Game Preview

2009/2010 NBA Regular Season
Clippers_medium
vs.
8xe4813lzybfhfl14axgzzqeq_medium
26-45
36-34
Toyota Center
March 23th, 2010, 5:30 PM
Prime Ticket, 980 AM
Probable starters:
Baron Davis
PG Aaron Brooks
Eric Gordon
SG Kevin Martin
Rasual Butler
SF Trevor Ariza
Drew Gooden
PF Luis Scola
Chris Kaman
C Chuck Hayes

 

 

The Back Story:

The Big Picture:

The Clippers have not won a road game under Kim Hughes.  The last time they won on the road was in Chicago on February 2nd, in the penultimate game of MDsr's Clipper coaching career.  The Clippers have lost 11 straight since then, and Kim Hughes is 0-1o on the road as a head coach, and most of the losses have been blowouts.  And just so you know, those weren't all against great teams - they've lost at Golden State and at Sacramento in that stretch.  Tuesday night in Dallas, they turned a 16 point deficit into a 4 point lead in the third quarter after Dirk Nowizki was ejected - and then managed to give it all back and lose by 10.  Lately the big problem has been getting an entire team to show up on the same night.  In Sunday's loss to Sacramento, the starters were terrible and the reserves were very good.  In Dallas, the starters were solid, but the reserves were terrible.  I'm not saying that every player on the roster has to have a career night in the same game - but how about if everybody doesn't stink for a game?  Is that too much to ask?

Star-divide

The Antagonist:

When Yao Ming was lost for the season before it even started, and with Tracy McGrady recovering from knee surgery, few people gave the Rockets much chance of making the playoffs (I know I didn't).  With three weeks left in the season, it looks like the doubters were right - but not really.  I'll admit it - Houston is a lot closer to the playoffs (two games over .500 with 12 to go) than I ever thought they'd be, and I'm damned if I know how they're doing it.  They're basically smack dab in the middle of the league in both offensive (15th) and defensive (14th) efficiency.  The score 107.1 points per 100 possessions, and give up 106.9.  It's just enough to be a little over .500, which is where they are.  But how?  If you'd told me they were respectable, I would have assumed they were doing it with a top 5 defense perhaps.  How can they be a middle of the pack scoring team with no scorers?  Trevor Ariza is one of the least efficient scorers in the league (.387 shooting) and Aaron Brooks isn't much better (.423).  Of course, now they have Kevin Martin who fits the mold of the NBA scorer much better than anyone else on the team, but the team is only 8-9 with Speed Racer in the lineup.  At any rate, although the Rockets are unlikely to make the playoffs, 5.5 games out of 8th with 12 games left to play, it's been a noble experiment, and Rick Adelman has made a believer out of me.  

The Subplots:

  • Back to back.  For the second road game in a row, the Clippers catch a team on a back to back while they themselves are rested.  It didn't help a lot in Dallas on Tuesday, as the Mavs pulled away in the fourth, which is when they should have been feeling weary.  We'll see if it makes a difference in this one.
  • Injuries.  The Rockets are pretty beat up right now.  Last night in Oklahoma City they were without four backup forwards - Shane Battier, David Andersen, Jordan Hill and Jared Jeffries.  Seems like Hill could play tonight, but the others will all be out.  As a consequence, the Rockets signed a guy named Mike Harris from the D-League, who has now played for the Rockets, the Wizards and the Rockets again in the same season.  That must not happen a lot - the same team twice in one season with another team in between.  Harris' career high is 12, scored in March of 2008 with the Rockets.  I predict 30 tonight.
  • Last game.  The last time the Clippers played the Rockets, Luis Scola, Carl Landry and David Andersen destroyed them.  Well, Landry's in Sacramento, Andersen is hurt, so it's just Scola they have to deal with tonight of those three. 
  • No Landry, thank goodness.  The Clippers will probably end up playing against Landry six times this season.  He was a Rocket for the first two meetings, and then went to Sacramento at the trade deadline, and it just so happens that in a scheduling quirk, all four Clipper-Kings games this season are after the trade deadline.  Since he destroys the Clippers regularly, it's unfortunate that we have to see him six times in a single season.  But at least we don't have to deal with him tonight.
  • Kevin Martin.  In stark contrast to Landry, Kevin Martin has traditionally NOT played very well against the Clippers.  In 13 career games against the Clippers, he's averaging 12.6 points per game, compared to a career average of 17.4.  Of course, a lot of those sub-par games he was being defended by a guy named Quinton Ross, and he might have had something to do with it.
  • Gooden 26-20.  I was a bit confused at first when Drew Gooden didn't ask for a buyout from the Clippers.  Why would he want the buyout from the Wizards, but agree to stick around with the Clippers?  It's not as if the Clippers had any more chance of seeing the post-season than the Wizards.  I'm realizing now that it was about playing time.  The Clippers told him he would be the starting power forward, and he was looking for a chance to get some playing time and pad his resume some for yet another summer on the free agent market.  The Clippers have been true to their word and given him lots of minutes, and Gooden has responded with lots of production.  He's got a PER of 18.2 as a Clipper, and is averaging 14.7 points and 9.7 rebounds.  His 26-20 game against Dallas on Tuesday was the first 20-20 game of his career.  Then again, it was only the sixth time in his career he's taken as many as 21 field goals in a game.  So yeah, he's getting lots of opportunities with the Clippers.  Hopefully he can defend Scola.
  • Kaman career high last game.  In the last meeting of these two teams, Chris Kaman got his career of 29 points.  In inimitable Kaman fashion, he had 21 points at halftime and 25 points less than 4 minutes into the second half.  I distinctly remember Milph commenting that there was no way he wouldn't reach the 30 point plateau for the first time in his career, sitting at 25 with over 20 minutes of basketball yet to be played.  But he only made it to 29, preserving his record of 20wo30s, which stands at 68 after Tuesday game.  We thought Chris should destroy the 6'6" Chuck Hayes, but Hayes held him down in the first meeting.  In the second, Chris definitely won the battle, even if he finished shy of 30.  How will it turn out in this one?
  • Ariza.  If the Rockets have proven that a team can at least compete without a go to scorer, I'd say that their other experiment has been less successful.  That is, you can't turn a role player into a number one option.  Or at the very least, you shouldn't.  As the Lakers 5th option, Ariza was perfect.  He played defense, hit open threes, he slashed to the basket for monster dunks.  They never ran a play for him, and he took 10.7 shots per 36 minutes, making 46% of them.  As the first or second option for the Rockets most of the season, he's taking 13.9 shots per 36 minutes - and making 38.7% of them.  Of players with 500 field goal attempts this season, only Brandon Jennings has made a lower percentage.
  • TV Quote: 

    Let's cut to the chase, freak show. If you're a forty-four-year-old man wearing a jumpsuit and you are not climbing into the cockpit of a rocket ship, chances are you've made a lot of wrong turns along the way. Good talk.

    Dr. Kelso, Scrubs: My Mirror Image (2006). There was a point in my life somewhere that I just sort of stopped watching sitcoms.  I mean, I lived for Cheers back in the day, but some time after Friends and Seinfeld, I just couldn't much be bothered any more.  (I do still watch The Office now and again, but that hardly counts.)  There's an interesting thing happening now - my son is watching TV shows in syndication that I've never really watched - specifically, That 70s Show and Scrubs - and it turns out they don't suck.  Scrubs in particular has a very fun pop culture vibe going on that I quite enjoy.  Any show that includes an a capella version of the Underdog theme song has got some serious chops.
  • Get the Rockets perspective at The Dream Shake.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This will be another "L" closer to the Top Five pick in the 2010 NBA Lottery Draft.

Go Clippers.

Everything starts out New, Gets Old and Dies or is Destroyed.

by HVYDRT007 on Mar 25, 2010 9:54 AM PDT reply actions  

I enjoy Scrubs as well

Never watched it in primetime though. I don’t have any kids, but my awakening to new television shows has been through netflix. I caught up on Mad Men, The Office, The Wire, How I Met Your Mother, the Big Bang Theory and currently The Tudors via Netflix. I now watch all of the above shows (except the Wire obviously) as they air. In the time I’ve had Netflix, I’ve probably only rented five or six movies, but watched the entire series of that many television shows (including Scrubs.) I love me some TV on DVD.

by Michael White on Mar 25, 2010 10:03 AM PDT reply actions  

All good shows and Netflix is the best, nothing beats watching a sitcom on DVD and not having to wait a week to see the next episode.

How I met your mother is classic and the Barnacle rocks.

Everything starts out New, Gets Old and Dies or is Destroyed.

by HVYDRT007 on Mar 25, 2010 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Who knew?

How I Met Your Mother and Big Bang Theory, huh?

Speaking of TV on DVD and Jason Segel, three words…. Freaks – and – Geeks. Judd Apatow’s ill-fated one hour 80s high school show. Way too good for TV, which is why it was only on TV for 18 episodes. Check it out if you haven’t.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Mar 25, 2010 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

The only reason I haven't

is because I know its going to disappoint me in the end. I know the show was killed prematurely so it’s like a dark cloud hanging over the prospect of watching it. I felt the same way when I watched “Kings” last season, as I always had the feeling that I was the only person in America actually watching that show, therefore there was no chance I would be able to see how they wrapped up their year 1 cliffhanger. Same story with Cane, season 1 ends with the main antagonist getting shot and the protagonist being framed for the murder. And season 2 never came around to explain what exactly happened. Frustrating.

That’s why people don’t start watching these new shows anymore when they air. Why get invested in these shows if they are just going to get cancelled in a few weeks? That’s why my new model works, hear from others it is a good show, see that it has staying power, then use netflix to catch up.

by Michael White on Mar 25, 2010 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

On a related note

Is it me or is the show title “Lost” intended to refer to anyone who actually watches that show? I can’t figure it out.

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on Mar 25, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Haven't seen it

Though it might be the next show I plow through on DVD courtesy of netflix (I feel like a commercial for netflix today.)

by Michael White on Mar 25, 2010 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

LOST is a bummer so far this Final Season and F&G's is only To Cool,

The whole cast of Freaks & Geek’s are the best, from top to bottom.

LOST has produced more New Questions then Answers.

Everything starts out New, Gets Old and Dies or is Destroyed.

by HVYDRT007 on Mar 25, 2010 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lost

I LOVED the first season of Lost. But by the end of that season, I was getting a little pissed that the story just kept getting more incoherent. More loose ends kept getting introduced, and none were ever tied up. I figured they’d throw me a bone in the second season and answer at least a few questions. When they just introduced MORE loose ends (giving loose ends to the loose ends of the loose ends), I quit the show. I felt like they were just pulling things out of their asses. Having said that, when it’s all said and done and the final season is available on DVD, I’ll probably rent it and see if they had a plan all along.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Mar 25, 2010 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't watch a ton of scripted programs either

but I watch some of the ones you guys mentioned above (Scrubs, Lost, How I Met Your Mother, The Office). I also watch South Park, Family Guy and I liked Heroes though the budget cuts have been painful and they have a lot of unresolved story issues (the show might even get canceled now due to declining ratings).

Watching shows on DVD is great though, I didn’t watch the first season of Lost or Heroes until it was airing the second season but once you catch up it sucks to have to wait a week to watch the next one.

I’m told Always Sunny in Philadelphia is a great show, but I haven’t found the time to watch it yet.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Mar 25, 2010 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Netflix phenomenon

So is Netflix inadvertently responsible for the demise of some TV shows? Are there enough people, waiting to see if their hearts will be broken by a cancellation, that more cancellations are inevitable? That would be a little ironic.

Of course, the number of quality shows on cable (Mad Men, Breaking Bad, not too mention shows on HBO and Showtime) is a whole separate phenomenon. I find myself, between family and basketball, with no time to watch these shows. But how can they possibly generate enough revenue on dinky outlets like USA and AMC? I don’t get it.

Zhiv, you’re in the Biz. How do the economics of these shows in basic cable work?

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Mar 25, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

WOW, TV talk is better then BBall talk lately,

Breaking Bad was another disappointment last Sunday, I see your point about the shows struggling. AMC is not even in HD.

Everything starts out New, Gets Old and Dies or is Destroyed.

by HVYDRT007 on Mar 25, 2010 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good point

I also like the Burn Notice on TNT. I think they have done a lot of product placement that might help the show earn a few extra bucks.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on Mar 25, 2010 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm confident that we can lose this one

The team has shown no effort lately and there’s no reason to believe they’ll start caring tonight.

There’s also no need to screw up the good work that the Pacers and Sixers did last night.

by Hooch20 on Mar 25, 2010 10:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Lol, 30 points for Harris

I wonder how the reverse mojo will work on that one.

I can’t wait for Griffin to inflict some direct mojo upon Landry.

"i know huh........freakin clippers man.....its like a wild ride rooting for this team....gotta love em....(sometimes) lol" In GrIfFin We TrUsT

by SilverClip on Mar 25, 2010 10:57 AM PDT reply actions  

I clicked on Rick Adelman's name in the post

assuming you had ironically linked to the Wages of Wins blog’s predictions for Houston this year.

Coaches don't matter. - Bill Simmons, The Book of Basketball

by John R on Mar 25, 2010 12:57 PM PDT reply actions  

Yes, Morey and Adelman finally got the scorer they long coveted

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on Mar 25, 2010 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Changed my wording...

I originally wrote “Nobody gave them much chance” and changed it to “few people gave them much chance” because I knew you’d be ready with your handy-dandy WoW link.

In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd

by Steve Perrin on Mar 25, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have to admit

I did not think that Ariza would be able to shoulder the burden and I didn’t think Brooks would come along this quickly. I also had no idea Landry would prove to be as good as he has proven to be. It will be interesting to see what happens once KMart gets over his shoulder problem. I like what they’ve done.

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on Mar 25, 2010 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

TANK-O-RAMA

We’re only a few games out of a potential top 5 or 6 pick. Who needs a #9 or 10 pick? TANK! TANK! TANK!

by cueball123 on Mar 25, 2010 1:04 PM PDT reply actions  

According to Ralph

Battier and Martin are out

http://lasportsops.tumblr.com/

by Regulan on Mar 25, 2010 5:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Clips Nation!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Blake-griffin-wow_small
What's your favorite moment(s) from the Clippers 2011-2012 Season?
Clips_raiders_giants_trojans_small
Click here if you like the Clippers Thread 5/21/12 - 5/27/12
Small
Clipper Fans - Let's Keep it Classy
Small
CLIPPER NATION STAND UP
Small
We're the Clippers

Recent FanPosts

Los-angeles_small
Sports Illustrated on yesterday's game
Blake-griffin-dunk_small
Poll: Alternate to popular coaching choices.
Jimmy_small
Donald Sterling and the critics
Small
Trading Mo Williams
Small
4 Ways to Improve This Offseason
Small
Clipper Season Tickets question
N2331852243_1908_small
My magical season...
Small
That was a great run.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Clipsnation_small Steve Perrin

Editors

Joc_01_small John Raffo

Authors

Blake-griffin-dunk_small Lawler's Law