Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

Clippers Coaching Update - Such as it is

A little more than hree weeks ago, I posted about the state of the Clippers head coach search (if in fact you can even call it that).  It's time for an update, though not really because the Clippers haven't done anything.

If I had a point back on May 5th (and I'll admit, it's not always easy to tell) it was simply to analyze the situation a little, examine a few candidates, talk about timing, that sort of thing.  I was assuming that the Clippers, who were clearly in a go slow mode at that point, would pick up the pace some time after the drat lottery.  Well, three weeks later, and a week after the lottery, the Clippers are still going slow.  That's not to say that nothing has changed, because in fact a lot has. 

As far as I know, the Clippers have yet to actually interview a coaching  candidate.  There are rumors here and there about names that may or may not be on their list of candidates, assistants for other teams the Clippers have asked for permission to interview, that sort of thing... but no interviews have actually taken place.

Star-divide

Of course, there's one school of thought that says this is part of a master plan that involves allowing LeBron James to have input on the coaching decision.  I never saw the logic in that strategy (and I use the terms 'plan' and 'logic' and 'strategy' loosely here) as I mentioned last time.  Of course, that was before the John Calipari rumors surfaced, so at least now there's some conceivable end game as opposed to before.  But it still seems like something between a crap shoot and a pipe dream.  Call it a crap dream.

To recap the Calipari situation, soon after Vinny Del Negro was fired, stories surfaced that had LeBron signing in Chicago with the Bulls and Calipari taking over as head coach.  What's the connection, you ask?  Well, apparently they are close friends through their mutual friend, William Wesley, aka Worldwide Wes

The logic behind this rumor, such as it is, is tenuous in the extreme.  Let's ignore for a moment the fact that Calipari has denied any interest in coaching in the NBA again, has a contract in Kentucky, and went so far as to Tweet his reassurances to his Wildcat constituency that he wasn't going anywhere.  The more immediate question, it seems to me, is why LeBron would feel strongly in the least about having Calipari as his next coach?  They know each other.  Great.  So what?  I understand why Wes wants Calipari to get a $10M NBA pay day, since he recently applied to be a coach's agent.  Why does LeBron want it to happen?  It would seem that there would be lots of factors in this decision that would come before "I've got this friend, ok really it's a friend of a friend, and I was thinking that maybe it would be kind of cool if we worked together."  Calipari was lackluster at best the last time he coached in the NBA.  His forte in the college game is recruiting - the first overall pick in 2008 and likely in 2010 (Derrick Rose and John Wall) and the rookies of the year in 2008 and 2009 (Derrick Rose and Tyreke Evans) were all recruited by Calipari (with connections supplied by Worldwide Wes, the story comes full circle).  And recruiting is, as we all know, a huge part of the NBA game.  Having a great recruiter as your NBA head coach is every bit as important as free throw defense. On the plus side, if Calipari returned to the NBA at least his new employer wouldn't have to worry so much about the inevitable NCAA investigation and sanctions.

And yet the rumor persists.  Of course, it's a beautiful rumor.  It involves the current MVP, every team with cap space and a head coaching vacancy, one of the most mysterious characters in all of basketball, and a lightning rod in his own right in Calipari.  And there seems to be enough smoke there that SOMEONE must be fanning the flames.  Is it just a coincidence that of the teams with coaching vacancies, the ones WITHOUT cap space are on the fast track to a decision (Philadelphia interviewed multiple candidates and has already hired Doug Collins, New Orleans is said to be ready to make an offer to Boston assistant Tom Thibodeau) while the coachless teams WITH cap space (the Clippers, Nets and Bulls) have done nothing.  It's as if they're saying, "I don't really believe that LeBron wants input on this process...  but holy crap, what if he does?  I guess it couldn't hurt to wait until July."

Aye, there's the rub.  It could hurt to wait.  Some names that may or may not be high on the alleged list of supposed candidates for the theoretical head coaching job in LA (oh wait, the job is real), are Thibodeau and Dallas assistant Duane Casey.  But as we've already said, Thibodeau is probably going to get a contract offer from the Hornets any day now, which he will probably accept, and Casey is said to be atop the list of candidates in Atlanta (the Hawks GM Rick Sund was GM in Seattle when Casey was an assistant coach for the Sonics).  One of the big problems with firing a head coach is the process of finding a replacement whose likely to be demonstrably better.  Allowing the other teams to hire the candidates on your short list before you've even started the interview process would not seem to be the best strategy to move forward.

My recommendation three weeks ago was that the Clippers should make the decision between the lottery and the draft, in order for the new coach to have input on draft day decisions.  Again, it seems like that's not going to happen, and again the team is suggesting that it's all part of "the plan".  Neil Olshey has said I have inferred from some things that Neil Olshey has said that he'd prefer to wait until AFTER the draft to hire a coach, because, you know, the new guy would just want some sort of voice in the process, and who wants that?  It's the "too many cooks spoil the broth" argument.  Olshey has expressed concern that a coach is going to feel compelled to draft for need under the pressure to win games - the nerve!  At any rate, Olshey is seems perfectly happy to be the one making the draft day decision - it's easier to reach a unanimous decision when only one person gets a vote, after all.  It seems more than a little shortsighted to me - it's not like we're talking about the eighth or ninth cook in this particular kitchen, and when you get right down to it, this is the head coach - he should have a say.

Be that as it may, the signs continue to point to the Clippers taking their time on this.  They've as much as said that they're waiting until after the draft.  And with free agency beginning only a week after that and the "LeBron picks the coach" scenario still in play no matter how ludicrous it seems, it seems pretty clear they'll wait into July as well. 

I guess the good news is that while some candidates are going off the market, others are coming onto it.  Mike Woodson, just fired by the Hawks, happens to be a former Clipper (he led the team in scoring a couple of seasons in the late 80s).  And then there is last season's NBA Coach of the Year Mike Brown - who certainly isn't going to be hired by the Nets or Bulls or Clippers until AFTER LeBron has made his decision, but who might be a decent choice when the dust settles. 

Finally, there continues to be intrigue regarding both Phil Jackson and Larry Brown.  The idea of PJ moving across the hall for a big contract from the Clippers (allowing him to stay in LA with his girlfriend) rather than taking a 60% pay cut from Jerry Buss (his girlfriend's dad - AWKWARD) seems plausible unti you remember a couple of things:  (1) Donald Sterling is NOT going to have the highest paid ANYTHING in the NBA - it just ain't gonna happen; and (2) Phil said some pretty nasty things about Sterling a couple of months ago, so the idea that they're now going to work together is a massive stretch.  As for Brown, a recent post by Ken Berger said that the Clippers were 'holding out hope' that Brown would be available and consider LA.  But as a wise man once said, hope is not a plan.

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Call it a crap dream.

So funny, it hurts.

For those keeping faint hope alive that MDSr was the primary culprit behind Clipper woes, it turns out that the team does a fine job of losing without him. - citizen zhiv

by OhMeOhMy on May 28, 2010 6:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Excellent post.

You matter-of-factly describe the Clippers disturbingly irrational lurch towards the nothingness of the post MDSr. era. Wait, why did we want him fired again?
 
Hire Mike Brown or Mike Woodson? Why? I think the best remaining guy out there is probably Elston Turner. Of course I’ve never met the man. Then again, apparently neither has Neil Olshey.

by John Raffo on May 28, 2010 6:52 AM PDT reply actions  

It’s business as usual in Clipper land. I wanted Dunleavy gone, because I’ve never thought he was a good coach in the 1st place. However, I had no illusions that his firing was going to usher in a new era of enlightenment in the Wonderful Wacky World of Sterling.

"You ever use smelling salts, every time you type a bad blog?" Brooks Laich

by Carl Putnam on May 28, 2010 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

I felt the same way

You can fire all the personnel in the clips org, but in the end, Sterling still owns the team

by Qlippers on May 28, 2010 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Patience, patience

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on May 28, 2010 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think the argument that coaches are critical to the draft may not be correct

As I understand it, the draft is the job of the GM. Of course, since under MDSr he was the de facto GM, he had a different role then most.

I’m not sure what to make of the current situation, but I think that it’s fair to give the new GM a little rope to hang hims . . . er make this decision. You can hardly blame them for going after LBJ as you’ve pointed out many times. In addition, we don’t really know what they might be doing behind the scenes.

We’ll know soon enough.

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on May 28, 2010 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think I might have said exactly that to you about a year ago.

Of course then I came to finally realize that Dunleavy was bad Ahab going around in circles, so I joined the mutinous rabble. Now, as we drift on a dead calm, sails slack, with no freshening breeze in sight, I think fondly of those days of yore.

by John Raffo on May 28, 2010 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think fondly of the days of sub .400 basketball

At least they are trying to put a better product out there.

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on May 28, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agree

Though the Dunleavy era was an improvement over the previous eras. (Clippers all-time winning % is around .365)

I hope we see a step forward.

Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)

by mikey p on May 28, 2010 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yea...

we haven’t seen the team do anything besides fire Kim Hughes and issue a poorly written press release and then high Hughes back for a month. So far I’ve been very underwhelmed by the front office… and it wasn’t as if I had high expectations on them to begin with.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on May 28, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Really?

They fired an unproductive coach/gm likely eating at least $5M. That’s step one.

Let’s see if they continue.

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on May 28, 2010 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well...

of course they then ruin that goodwill and make headlines with MDsr suing them for non-payment.

FA in 2010.

by ClipperChuck on May 28, 2010 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do you know anything about that claim?

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on May 28, 2010 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

great write-up steve

could this be a crap dream where the clippers end up crapping on themselves. i read where they might be interested in kelvin sampson e.j. connection.

by cars50 on May 28, 2010 8:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Doubtful that he commands respect

The Hawks gave up on him and tuned him out in the middle of the playoffs. You could see during timeouts that they weren’t listening to him at all.

Not saying he’s a bad coach…just saying I’m not sure there’s any proof he actually commands respect.

by madglove on May 28, 2010 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think the Hawks gave up...not just on their coach, but each other. JJ checked out. None of them seemed to believe they could beat Orlando.

But I like the way he carries himself. He’s a grown ass man.

And he’s got a great track record with taking a young team and molding them into a contender.

by banandy on May 28, 2010 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

What about the alien?

How come Sam Cassell’s name never comes up for this job? He was a star player for the Clippers, knows the organization, is popular with the fans and is paying his dues as an assistant if I am not mistaken (unlike Mark Jackson).

by sdclipp on May 28, 2010 9:51 AM PDT reply actions  

You know your franchise sucks when Sam Cassell is considered a star player in your history. Why, oh why, did I choose this team as a child?

"You ever use smelling salts, every time you type a bad blog?" Brooks Laich

by Carl Putnam on May 28, 2010 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Letting LBJ pick his coach

…won’t be anything to be “advantageous” considering NJ, Chicago, and Cleveland all need coaches themselves. Granted they’ll aim to hire sooner than later, but nevertheless, It impacted Cleveland’s choice to fire Brown, and if all the teams have picked up a coach by FA, what selection is left for LBJ to tell the Clippers to hire is a question worth asking

"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. " - Benjamin Franklin

by TheNewbster on May 28, 2010 10:33 AM PDT reply actions  

What has Neil Olshey even done?

I’m not sure if waiting to get a coach before or after the draft is the right move or not- who really knows? However, what has Olshey done in the past? Yes, you could say that he and Dunleavy worked to clear cap space of the lebron dream, but the other way to look at it is that they had no one of worth to keep around. I keep seeing other teams pick up players from places like the D league that actually are good and have futures in the nba. Say what you will about the dysfunctional warriors and larry riley, but in the past several seasons, which were full of injuries, they actually have some players that are pretty good whom they picked up out of nowhere. Kelenna Azubuike (yes he’s injured, but was/is a good SF), Morrow, CJ Watson, Reggie Williams; obviously each has their limitations, but they are tradeable assests that some team out there would find some value. You can trade them for picks etc. How about Wes Matthews from the Jazz? My point is, our bench has always been thin, stocked with guys that don’t stick, where we get “free looks” at them from some team trying to shed payroll or avoid paying some tax; Brunson, Cheik Samb, et al. yes Olshey played a role in DJ and perhaps I am being premature in my assessment of him, but it always seems like other teams have bench players who have some hope of developing into something.

by KeithClossrules on May 28, 2010 10:37 AM PDT reply actions  

hahaha "perhaps I am being premature"

how long has he been in charge?

He has only had one task given to him so far in his tenure as head honcho:

Get under the cap for LeBron, and Olshey has accomplished this.

He hasn’t drafted any players yet. He hasn’t been through a free agency period. You can talk about coaches all you want, but no coach other than Collins has signed, and there is still many good coaches out there.

Premature was the right word, but it should not be “perhaps I am being premature,” because you are being premature. But, you are not the only one, tons are dogging on Olshey on this site with no good reason.

by bacek on May 28, 2010 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes I understand he hasn't had the job to himself

however, Dunleavy spent most of his time coaching. Playing GM was secondary. As it has been reported before on this site, it was Olshey who has been doing the lion share of GM duties for the past several years and he was the point man for other GM’s to call. What I wrote in my post was that there have been plenty of pick-ups from places like the D league that result in a player having value and potential. Wouldn’t you like to have Morrow on this team or Reggie Williams? They are young players with good skills and have room to develop, not expensive, and didn’t cost any draft picks. My point is Olshey has had plenty of opportunities with all the injuries the clips have had to make simple moves like these. It’s not like these players weren’t doing well in the D-league. Usually, they were the best players at the time they were picked up. But what do we do? sign guys like ricky davis- no upside or trade value. I’m not saying Olshey isn’t competent. Just would have preferred some effort to interview candidates, go through an actual search. Bring in candidates like the guy from Denver (don’t remember his name), and if they do their due diligence and decide on Olshey, then fine, I can live with that. But his hiring really just sounded like a cost-containment move.

by KeithClossrules on May 28, 2010 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

is scouting the D-League Olshey's problem

or is it the money that is spent on scouting in the D-League?

If the Clips aren’t plucking the best players from the D-League to fill in for injuries, it is because scouts are failing.

There was the entire Mike Taylor experiment, maybe people just soured on D-League players

by bacek on May 28, 2010 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's not accurate

Olshey has only very recently been assuming some of teh GM duties. It was MDSr who was making most of the calls over teh past few years, not Olshey. You can thank EB’s agent for waking us all up to that fact.

"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

by Jax on May 28, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Give him a break. We're all anxious...

They know they’ve got a lot of work to do, and I believe they have every intention of doing a good job.

I honestly think that at least someone in the organization does check out this site from time to time to at least get a heat check on certain ideas or scenarios how the fans might receive it.

But my main hope is that Sterling doesn’t override any decision this summer because of $$$. That would very depressing.

by banandy on May 28, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Phil Jackson said some pretty nasty things about Kobe in that book a few years back...

And they seem to be pretty chummy now. Maybe the Clips have a chance at him, as completely insane as it sounds. I actually don’t mind waiting all that much. Thibodeau would be cool I guess, if he’s really the mastermind behind the Celtic’s D, but I’d rather wait for what LeBron has to say than bet the farm on that guy the T-Wolves fired last year or any of the other available options. If Red Auerbach was out there, I’d be down to hire him, but he’s not and the fact remains that none of the coaches out there are proven in any way, shape, or form (Doug Collins included).

Yay yay.

by KamanHomie on May 28, 2010 11:45 AM PDT reply actions  

Hiring Mike Woodson would be great ...

… but that’s exactly why it won’t happen. Just like it took forever to get rid of Dumleavy, who they promoted first, remember? Woodson was a great Clipper, and he showed in Atlanta that he could coach. Why not hire a proven winner at the NBA level, who just also happens to be one of the franchise’s classiest players (and human beings)?
Because they’re the Clippers, that’s why. Come on, Sterling, shock me for once (matching Brand only counts so long).

by OrioleSteelerz on May 28, 2010 7:31 PM PDT reply actions  

Lenny Wilkens!

I read a report (don’t recall where—but it was a legitimate and trusted source, that Lenny Wilkens does want to coach again. I’ve posted about this before, but wasn’t sure of Lenny Wilken’s interest in returning to coaching. However, he does want to coach—he would be perfect. The Clippers need to hire him. He’s won a championship which will impress Lebron and he has always had the respect of players during his coaching tenure. As I said before the Knicks was an impossible situation, so he shouldn’t be judged by his won-loss record there.

by Kind67 on May 29, 2010 7:09 AM PDT reply actions  

I think Wilkens' best years as coach are behind him

The man’s resume speaks for himself, and he’s clearly a winner. A lot of people don’t remember or know that he was a great player (he, John Wooden, and another gentleman whose name escapes me are the selected few that are in the Hall of Fame as both a player and a coach) during the same era as Russell, Wilt, Elgin, West, and the Big O.

I just think that he’ll have a hard time adjusting to the modern NBA player. That’s kinda what happened to him in New York City…that and the fact he didn’t have a lot to work with. I don’t see it ending pretty here, of course it never ends pretty here in Clipper Country.

by Shawn H on May 29, 2010 8:03 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Great Blog

How great this blog is, and how godawful the Clippers are. It’s statistically one of the worst teams in the history of sports, but the people that write here are so good at what they do. I’d seriously consider hiring a # of people who write here if I worked for the Clippers. The goofballs who have run the organization for as long as I can remember seem like they are either trying to lose or simply ‘guess’ solutions, people that write & post here are disproportionately intelligent compared to the people who steer the Clippers

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Jun 6, 2010 10:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Clips Nation!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Joc_01_small
Stats/Box/Game Log question?
Small
Clippers All Time Leaders in Wins Above (Below) Average
Small
Adjusted Point Differential and Pythagorean Wins
Small
A look at efficiency and point differential
Small
Anyone have a video of DJ's jumper?
Blake_griffin_cropped_small
It was a good day
Small
Poll: April 27th where do you see the Clippers?
Small
40-26 and getting there
Small
Are we showing Mo enough love?
Blake-griffin-dunk_small
JR Smith. Yay or Nay?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Clipsnation_small Steve Perrin

Editors

Joc_01_small John Raffo

Authors

Blake-griffin-dunk_small Lawler's Law