Free Agency War Games
In the summer of 2008, Elton Brand and Baron Davis were far and away the biggest prizes in free agency. Brand was a two time All-Star, and a one time second team All NBA selection. Baron also was a two time All-Star and had once been a third team All NBA selection.
When I first had the idea for this post, I thought that Brand and Davis were the poster kids for the "Just say no to free agents" public service announcements. Then I decided to do a little something extra; a little empirical research.
Following is the list of every free agent who signed a contract for more than $20M during the month of July 2008, in order of size of contract.
- Gilbert Arenas - 6/$111M
- Elton Brand - 5/$79.8M
- Emeka Okafor - 6/$72M
- Luol Deng - 6/$71M
- Baron Davis - 5/$65M
- Andris Biedrins - 6/$62M
- Corey Maggette - 5/$50M
- Jose Calderon - 5/$40M
- Beno Udrih - 5/$32M
- DeSagana Diop - 5/$32M
- Louis Williams - 5/$26M
- Mickael Pietrus - 4/$26M
- James Posey - 4/$25M
- James Jones - 5/$23M
- Ryan Gomes - 5/$22M
Ouch. That's 15 contracts, and I'd say perhaps three of them aren't regretted by the teams today (Pietrus, Williams and maybe Udrih). So what's that, a 20% chance of not having an epic fail? Even deals that looked like smart moves at the time (like Calderon) have turned out badly for teams (as Toronto is now stuck with a complementary player making big long term money on a team that missed the playoffs and is going to lose its cornerstone this summer). Two of the 15 names have been waived (Jones and Gomes). Four were so unappealing to their teams that they've since been traded. But those were the less bad deals in relative terms - at least those guys were tradeable. As many as six of the 15 would be considered untradeable at this point, and that's a top-heavy list with all of the big money signings. In a nice little twist on the subject, a couple of these names are entagled in the free agency madness of 2010 (Jones was waived by Miami to free more space, the Bulls would dearly love to move Deng to do the same).
Was 2008 a particularly disastrous year for free agent signings? Well, it was bad to be certain. But 2009 wasn't much better, with names like Hedo Turkoglu, Ben Gordon, Charlie Villanueva and Andrea Bargnani signing big contracts which their teams almost immediately rued. (Poor Toronto - three bad deals in two years.)
So why does anyone think that 2010 is going to be any different? Certainly LeBron James and Dwyane Wade are in a totally different category than any of the 2008 or 2009 names, and any team that manages to sign them will be lucky to have them and will not regret it, barring an injury or a gun incident. But ask yourself this question: where would Baron Davis and Elton Brand, circa 2008, slot into this free agency class?
Brand was coming off a serious injury, which certainly raised concerns, but consider that his career PER in 2008 was higher than Bosh's career PER today (22.7 versus 21.3); higher than those of Carlos Boozer and Amare Stoudemire also. Don't even bring up Rudy Gay (he doesn't even have the highest career PER of the free agent small forwards from the Grizzlies).
As for Baron Davis, what do you suppose happens when you compare him to Joe Johnson? Well, Baron's career PER as of two years ago far outstrips Johnson's career PER (18.5 versus 16.3). So you're probably assuming that Baron's last few seasons in Golden State were not as productive as Johnson has been in Atlanta, but you're wrong. Baron posted PERs of 21 and 19.8 in the two seasons prior to free agency, while Johnson has posted an 18.2 and a 19.3. So you're thinking, Baron was old when he signed with the Clippers so his decline was inevitable. Baron was 29 years and 77 days on July 1 2008; Joe Johnson turned 29 years two days ago. So yeah, if you think those two and a half extra months of youth are the difference, by all means, offer him a maximum contract.
As hard as it is to put yourself in the mindset of the 2008 GM, I think it's safe to say that Brand and Baron would slot right in with the big names of this historic free agency class, probably in the group right after Bosh (that's giving CB4 a nod on the age issue).
Based on recent history, it seems pretty clear that whoever signs any free agent not named LeBron or Dwyane will overpay. That's just how it works. Of course, there are two ways of looking at that. One would be that it's simply the cost of doing business. You have to overpay to get players, so in that sense it's not really overpaying - it's just what the market will bear. The other philosophy would be to avoid big contracts on anything other than absolute can't miss superstars. And I just don't consider most of these players to be in that category.
Happily, the Clippers will not be tempted by the likes of Bosh or Boozer or Stoudemire. But after LeBron rejects them, they may very well be drawn towards Johnson or (FSM forbid) Gay. The Hawks can do the rest of the league a HUGE favor if they really are offering Johnson a full max deal for 6 seasons (Joe Johnson making $30M at the age of 34? Really?) Hopefully the Clippers will stay away from Gay, if only to avoid tying up their cap space waiting for Memphis to match.
Interestingly, there is actually a wing in Memphis who I would like to see the Clippers sign. For some unknown reason, the Grizzlies decided NOT to extend a qualifying offer to Ronnie Brewer today. That may be a message that they are planning to retain Gay. The paradox is that Brewer may actually be the better player than Gay - he certainly would come cheaper.
In the end, NBA free agency may turn out to be like Global Thermonuclear War in the 1983 film War Games:
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
Now, how about a nice game of chess?
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Where's Kwame Brown gonna sign?
"Smart dudes that know the game of basketball." - Al-Farouq Aminu referring to his new teammates
Very cool write-up, Steve
Great empirical research, and persuasive too. It certainly gives me pause.
Ronnie Brewer, Hmmmmm…
I think the TV just said that Atlanta has indeed offered JJ the max.
"i know huh........freakin clippers man.....its like a wild ride rooting for this team....gotta love em....(sometimes) lol" In GrIfFin We TrUsT
I would love them to go after Brewer (if they don't get Lebron)
Brewer would just add more members to the youth movement. Combine that with some savvy veteran locker room leadership in a minimum contract signing Cat Mobley (we miss you Cat : ( .) And you have the starts of a very decent and fun to watch roster. And because we would have money left we would be able to sign some more mid level free agents to fill out the roster.
LeBron or Bust !!!!
totally agree
This should be plan b once lebron falls through. Would also love to have Cat back!
by KeithClossrules on Jun 30, 2010 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions
There's always a chance
Baron Davis was a guy no one would have dreamed the Clips could sign, completely out of their league. He and Gilbert were the two biggest stars in Free Agency. Lo and Behold, Baron came to the Clips, Elton and Corey left, the rest is history.
It will be an interesting few weeks.
Ronnie Brewer would be a nice catch when Plan D rolls around.
This is going to be my team, and we're going to rise together.
-Clipper Darrell
Baron was a last second addition to the free agency market
most people assumed he would stay because (like Richard Jefferson and Paul Pierce) he had one last year on his deal which was close to $20 million. But Baron saw a chance to sign a longer contract for more money (over the life of the deal).
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Jul 1, 2010 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions
The Clippers got him because they overpaid significantly for him
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Jul 1, 2010 6:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Significantly?
I certainly didn’t think they overpaid for him at the time. Baron had a $17M option year in Golden State, and the Clippers got him for $13M, which was the money that he and EB had agreed to split. In hindsight, it looks like the overpaid (as is invariably the case with free agents) – at the time, a lot of people thought it was a steal.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Jul 1, 2010 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Sorry - the length of the contract was too ling IMO
I don’t think anyone else would have paid him anywhere near the $85 M the Clippers offered
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
It was $65 million
You are right in that no other team could offer him a deal… the only other teams with cap room were the Grizzlies and 76ers (who used that cap space to sign FElton).
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3468448
Actually in a stroke of dumb luck, Baron saved the Clippers because Brand changed his mind and went for more money. If Baron was paid less then the Clippers could have paid Brand more and we would still have FElton.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Jul 2, 2010 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for the clarification - Here's the deal
The Clippers were in a bad spot. Some of us thought EB would not ultimately resign because of MDSr. In fact, I had met him on a few occasions and you could tell he didn’t like the guy. EB was too classy to actually express his displeasure but he just rolled his eyes.
MDSr just didn’t get it. He was pretending to us that he was just the coach but he was really the GM all along. As Falk pointed out.
MDSr thought that he had to sign BD at that very high price not only to get BD but also to get EB to re sign. He should have known EB was not likely to re sign and that BD was not a player we wanted to pay $65 M to given his playing style and age. I actually think that EB and BD may have set up MDSr to give BD that huge deal knowing that EB was bolting. I.e., they snookered him.
Regardless, MDSr signed a point guard whose free wheeling playing style was completely opposite to to MDSrs and paid him $65 M for five years when as you point out no one else was offering anywhere near that.
So yes, getting BD turned out to lessen the blow associated with MDSr not being able to resign the team’s foundation. But as we have seen BD’s skills have been declining and he was not someone who was able to interact well with the guy who signed him. We’ve all endured the results over the past couple of years. And MDSr desperately went for some other free agents that could have severely crippled us (I give him credit for moving ZBo later although maybe Olshey deserves that credit).
In any event, the Clippers have finally, finally decided to move on. They appear to have given the GM reigns to someone who knows what he’s doing. The draft went well. Let’s see what happens in free agency and with the coach hire. I’m cautiously optimistic.
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
by Jax on Jul 2, 2010 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Man
Talk about changing the subject when caught in some BS.
To use the parlance of the internet, “pwned”.
Coaches don't matter. - Bill Simmons, The Book of Basketball
LOL - naturally you've missed the forest for the trees
I think Clipper Chuck confirmed my point, not denied it.
Can’t you go waste your time attacking someone else for a while?
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
i would looove (sorry for the extra lovin there) to have brewer
Combine that with Childress and if no Childress, Brewer and Gomez. This is of course if a no go on the bigger names, a very palatable consolation prize
by Takebb909 on Jun 30, 2010 10:48 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Call me pathetic, but...
…after looking at that free agent list, there are a lot of guys who didn’t pan out. Yet, many will throw B. Davis into that category, but I really do believe he still has what it takes to push the Clippers in the right direction. This year has to be different though.
No more injures! No more 4th quarter collapses! And for Gawd sakes, No more losing to the two worst teams in the NBA!
That's a point I considered pursuing...
Baron had a disastrous first season in LA. But, with a decent second season, he’s essentially a shining star of the free agent class of 2008. He’s certainly not the disaster that Arenas, Brand and Biedrins are.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Jun 30, 2010 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions
the verdict on Baron shouldnt be written just yet
by banandy on Jun 30, 2010 11:56 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Yea
if he lures Lebron over here then he was a great signing. He’s still a respected and liked player in the league and tries to help change the image of the team around. He could do a lot worse, there are a ton of players who have gotten that big deal and just coasted the rest of their careers (most of them ended up on the Knicks).
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Jul 1, 2010 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Great article.
Interesting look at FA.
In Bayless I trust.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>

by 












