Los Angeles Clippers 2010-11 Season Preview
Here it is, my entry in the Blogger NBA Preview series. This is the fifth time I've represented the Clippers, and I believe I was there for the very first one. I want to thank Jeff from CelticsBlog for putting it together again - it's like an institution at this point, or as close as you can get in blogland.
Team Name: Los Angeles Clippers
Last Year’s Record: 29-53
Key Losses: Marcus Camby, Steve Blake, Travis Outlaw, Drew Gooden, Head Coach Mike Dunleavy Sr.
Key Additions: Blake Griffin, LeBron James, Ryan Gomes, Randy Foye, Al-Farouq Aminu, Eric Bledsoe, Head Coach Vinnie Del Negro
1. What Significant Moves were made during the off-season?
The NBA off-season was dominated by mega-star free agents, in particular LeBron James. When the Clippers unloaded Al Thornton and Sebastian Telfair at the trade deadline, they assured themselves of having enough money under the salary cap to pursue James or any other big name. Indeed, they were one of six NBA teams invited to make a pitch to LeBron and his minions. But Neil Olshey and Andy Roeser probably never had a chance, their meeting lasted less than an hour, and LeBron eventually joined Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh in Miami.
Still sitting on a big pile of cash, the Clippers could turn their attentions to another free agent. Who would it be? Joe Johnson? Rudy Gay? How about Clips Nation favorite Josh Childress? Nope. Try Ryan Gomes, Randy Foye and Brian Cook.
Don't get me wrong. The fact is that Johnson and Gay were
(a) already off the market by the time LeBron took his talents to south beach and
(b) wildly overpaid in contracts that will surely be anchors to Atlanta and Memphis within two seasons at most.
Compared to Rudy Gay at 5/$82M, Ryan Gomes at 3/$12M is a definite value signing. But for a fanbase that watched their team and their front office give up on the season and execute trades for the sole purpose of signing free agents, Gomes and Foye and Cook are more than a little disappointing.
Disappointing, but not necessarily dumb. The Clippers have six players on their roster 22 or younger, including the top pick in the 2009 draft, Blake Griffin, who will be a rookie this season after missing all of last season with a fractured patella, and Eric Gordon, a key member of the Gold Medal winning US team from this summer's FIBA World Championships. Anything short of a home run in free agency this summer would likely have been counter productive - better to maintain some financial flexibility moving forward as let the young players develop and mature than to tie up loads of long term money on overrated or aging name players
Consequently, the Clippers will enter the 2010-11 season as they always do, with a lot of hope, and even more questions. One thing is very different though. This is the fifth Clippers preview I've written for this series, but it's the first time that Mike Dunleavy Sr. hasn't been in charge. Dunleavy stepped down as head coach last February 4th, and then was fired as General Manager a little over a month later on March 9th. Neil Olshey took over GM responsibilities in March, and former Bulls head coach Vinnie Del Negro was hired July 6th to take over the coaching duties.
Del Negro was a mixed bag in Chicago. He often looked overmatched on the bench, yet his teams played hard through the end of the season, and managed to make the playoffs both years he was there. Given that the talent in Chicago was less than overwhelming, that was certainly an accomplishment. Clipper fans had grown to dislike Dunleavy so much that many thought things would improve immediately upon his departure. However, an 8-25 conclusion to the season under interim coach Kim Hughes may have demonstrated that change is not always good. Del Negro will have a full training camp with these players starting next week, and then Clippers fans will get a chance to start a season without Dunleavy for the first time in 8 years.
The other major event of the off-season was the draft. The Clippers drafted Al-Farouq Aminu from Wake forest with the 8th overall pick, and then traded a future first round pick to Oklahoma City for the rights to Kentucky's Eric Bledsoe, the 18th overall pick. Aminu and Bledsoe play positions of need for the Clippers (small forward and point guard respectively), and Olshey wanted them from the beginning. But they're both 19 years old, and judging by their performance in Summer League in Las Vegas, they need a lot of work before they're going to be regular contributors. These could prove to be excellent first round picks for the Clippers in the long term, but I don't expect them to do much this season. In the second round, the Clippers picked up Blake Griffin's Oklahoma teammate Willie Warren, and they also signed undrafted free agent Marqus Blakely from Vermont. Of the four, Blakely looks closer to contributing this season than any of the others.
2. What are the Team's Biggest Strengths?
Believe it or not, on paper the Clippers have one of the most impressive starting lineups in the NBA. It may not compare with the lineup for that other LA team, or those guys down in Miami, but check out the resume lines for four of their starters -
- two time All Star Baron Davis at point guard;
- current member of Team USA and Gold Medalist Eric Gordon at shooting guard;
- 2009 first overall pick Blake Griffin at power forward;
- 2010 All Star Chris Kaman at center.
Not bad. If Gomes of Rasual Butler (or less likely but not impossible Aminu) can hold their own at small forward, it's an impressive group, at least on paper.
Of course, much depends on Davis. Yes, he's a two time all star, but those two times were 2002 and 2004 and he's now 31 years old. To be fair to Baron, he should have made the all star team again in 2007, when he had arguably his best season as a pro. But the simple fact is that he has not been that player since returning him to LA. His first season in LA was atrocious; last season was much better, though still not quite what fans were hoping for when he signed a 5/$65M contract in 2008. Surrounded by major scoring threats in Gordon, Griffin and Kaman, the real question for Davis is whether he can evolve into more of a Jason Kidd type point guard, managing the game, racking up assists, shooting less frequently. His floor vision is among the best in the NBA and he's an uncanny passer - he can be effective in the league for several more years, even as he loses some explosiveness. The other question for Davis of course is whether he can remain motivated for an 82 game season. More than most NBA players, the difference between a motivated Baron and a disinterested Baron is monumental. If Del Negro turns out to be a poor X's and O's coach, but a good motivator, he could be a very good fit for the Clippers. And we'll be able to tell pretty quickly in the play of Baron Davis.
Gordon is coming off a summer in which he surprised everyone with his play for Team USA. Widely assumed to be among the first cuts when the team first got together in Las Vegas back in July, he not only made the team but became a key member of the rotation. He played so well in the opening round that Chris Sheridan of ESPN at one point asked Coach Mike Krzyzewski if he should replace Chauncey Billups in the starting lineup. Gordon finished the tournament fourth on the team in scoring and seventh in minutes played. He was the team's designated three point specialist, making 18 of 41 triples, but also their defensive stopper. Clips Nation is hoping that his new found confidence will carry him to a breakout season in the NBA.
Kaman added a consistent 18 footer to his offensive arsenal in 09-10, and parlayed it into a career best 18.5 points per game, which led the team and was third best among NBA centers. With a face up jumper to go with a variety of post moves with either hand, Kaman is almost impossible to guard one-on-one. Unfortunately, he still needs to get much better against the double team. Having Blake Griffin starting next to him in the front court should help there. It's also worth noting that Kaman and Baron had started to develop some pretty decent chemistry on the court by midway through last season. As he became the focal point of the offense, Kaman's rebounding and shot blocking seemed to suffer some - which the Clippers can ill-afford with Marcus Camby now in Portland. Hopefully, as Gordon and Griffin take up more of the scoring load, Kaman can find more balance to his game this season.
Which leads us to Blake Griffin. Expectations for the Clippers hinge almost entirely on his belated rookie season. He's yet to play an NBA game, but he's probably the Clippers' best player. It's been almost 11 months since anyone's seen him play 5-on-5 basketball (save for the guys he's been schooling at the Clippers' training facility this summer). He's supposedly 100% healthy, and there's no reason to suspect that his particular injury and surgery would have any impact on his breathtaking athleticism. His work ethic is unquestioned. Will he be a leader on the Clippers? Will he be the rookie of the year in the NBA? Will he be a star? Will he 'just' be a solid player? If the Clippers hope to be a playoff team, now or even in the future, then Blake Griffin has to live up to his first pick status. I assume he will.
3. What are the Team's Biggest Weaknesses?
In a word, youth. Griffin and Gordon, two starters and the presumptive cornerstones for the future of the franchise, are 21 years old each, and Griffin has yet to play a regular season NBA game. First round draft picks Aminu and Bledsoe are 19 each. Backup center DeAndre Jordan is 22. Until Bledsoe is ready (which could be awhile, based on his turnover filled summer league performances), Randy Foye will have to hold down the backup point guard spot. Until Aminu can step in, it's journeymen Gomes and Butler manning the three.
This youth leads to another issue - depth. It's exciting and arguably smart to build the team around talented youngsters, and the future for the Clippers could be very bright indeed. If you froze all 30 NBA rosters, and then flashed forward 5 years, the Clippers' team of Bledsoe (24), Gordon (26), Aminu (24), Griffin (26) and Jordan (27) could be great. But of course, it doesn't work that way, and if those youngsters are taking up roster spots now, before they're ready to contribute, it's an issue in the present.
Assuming that the teenagers truly aren't ready for major NBA roles yet, the Clippers' nine man rotation figures to be Davis, Gordon and Foye at the guard spots, Gomes and Butler at small forward, Griffin and Craig Smith at power forward and Kaman and Jordan at center. And even that is assuming that Jordan is ready to assume a primary backup's role in this, his third NBA season. That's not a bad rotation, but with four rookies and Brian Cook rounding out the rest of the roster, any significant injuries could force Del Negro into playing someone who's just not ready.
4. What are the Goals for this Team?
Coach Vinnie Del Negro's goal is that they play the right way. (For those of you who are linking to this preview from outside, during VDN's initial press conference with the team, he used the phrase 'play the right way' about 30 times and it's become something of a joke around here.)
With such a young team, it's not unreasonable to set a goal of simply improving. There are however some more practical goals as well.
Last year's team was 17-19 when they found out that Blake Griffin was out for the season. The rest of the year was one white flag of surrender after another - Dunleavy stepped down as coach, Thornton and Telfair were traded, Marcus Camby was traded, Dunleavy was fired as GM. And frankly, the team started mailing in it in terms of effort. The result was a 12-34 record in their final 56 46 games.
In light of last year, a good goal would be for this team to play hard all season. With Blake Griffin as the emotional center of the club, this seems achievable. It's hard to imagine Griffin giving less than his all on a basketball court. One can only hope that his all out approach is contagious.
5. How Big a Difference Does Griffin Make?
This is the real question of the Clippers season. If you take the team from the start of the season, the one that went 17-19 in their first 36 games, the major difference is that they are replacing Marcus Camby with Blake Griffin. Griffin is pretty close to a can't miss prospect - but the simple fact of the matter is that he's yet to play an NBA game, and he's replacing a guy who was still wildly productive (second in the league in rebounding, fifth in blocked shots). Even if Griffin is terrific from the first month of the season, how much can he add over and above what Camby brought? Griffin should score more than Camby on sheer athleticism alone. He won't block as many shots, but his on ball defense stands to be better than Camby's. He should hold his own on the boards, where he was a monster in college.
But the most important element that Griffin could bring to the Clippers is his intensity. Camby was the consummate professional who gave a solid effort every night. But he was neither a cheerleader nor a vocal leader. Like Camby, Griffin is softspoken and prefers to lead by example. But his work ethic and energy are on a completely different level. It's just hard to imagine the Clippers allowing their focus and intensity to wane with Griffin on the court. I'd hate to be the guy who had to face Blake Griffin in practice the next day if he felt like I was dogging it in a game.
Four of the Clippers starters figure to be the same from last season (depending on who wins the starting small forward job, Butler or Gomes). The backup bigs are the same (Smith and Jordan). Ignoring the rookies not named Blake Griffin, who don't figure to be factors this season, you've got Gomes and Foye instead of Thornton and Telfair. There's just not a lot more wins in any of these changes. Will Gordon have that break out year? Maybe. But Davis is getting older, and Kaman just had a career year, so there doesn't seem to be a lot of room for improvement there. So any improvement in the team comes down to what Griffin can do, both on the court and in the culture of the team.
Don't underestimate him.
6. Can Chris Kaman Score 30?
On a slightly less serious note, Chris Kaman is currently the NBA leader in a very curious statistic. He has more career games scoring over 20 points without ever scoring over 30 points than any other player since per game data is available starting in 1986-87. He has scored over 20 73 times in his career, including 39 times last season alone, but has never reached the 30 point plateau. I like to call this stat the "20s without 30", or 20wo30 for short. Kaman was a remarkably consistent scorer last season, topping 20 points per game in over half the games in which he played, and failing to score in double figures only six times. But he's never had that monster game, despite at least one 20 point half last year.
Prediction
Assuming the team can stay relatively healthy (always a risky assumption, particularly where the Clippers are involved), I think they can play .500 ball. From a sheer talent standpoint, I think the near .500 basketball they played for the first 36 games was much more indicative than the .250 they played under Kim Hughes, after they'd given up. If the combination of Del Negro and Griffin can keep the team (most importantly veterans Davis and Kaman) playing hard through April, I think the talent is there to win more games than they lose.
Depth issues will probably keep them from being a playoff team. If one of the first round picks (Aminu or Bledsoe) or perhaps one of the new guys (Gomes or Foye) can far exceed expectations this season, that could change. Otherwise, I'd say the team is still a year or two away from the playoffs in the still very deep and competitive Western Conference.
42-40 (which, by the way, was my prediction for the team last October BEFORE Griffin was injured).
90 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice analysis.
Looking forward to the season.
good job, but
will the clippers work out an extension with Kaman, if possible? That is a serious question, since he can leave after this season.
"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"- Qui-Gon Jinn
After this season?
He’s signed for this season and next. If by “after this season” you mean one more season after this season, ok. Still, they have an entire season of basketball to watch before they have to worry about a Kaman extension at all. How much money they want to commit to a 30 year starting in 2012 remains very much to be seen. That is the same season they’ll have to pay Eric Gordon. If you’re building around a bunch of 23 year olds, tying up a bunch of money in a 30 year old Kaman may not be what they want to do. But again I say, they can watch another full season of basketball before they have to make any sort of decision on that.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Sep 20, 2010 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Nice preview Stevo
Pretty much agree with everything you’ve put there. I’d be very happy with a season of playing hard and a record slightly above .500 (oh and maybe Carmelo Anthony but that’s another story/post…….)
Bingo! Oh me oh my!
I pretty much agree with everything in the preview
I would put us at about 45 wins but that still probably is a little short of a playoffs spot, but if some teams in the west aren’t as good as they were last year it could be enough. One interesting dynamic on this team as opposed to last team is that while Dunleavy’s staff was made up of players coaches with Dunleavy as the chief X’s and O’s guy, Del Negro is a player coach surrounded by X’s and O’s assistants. It will be interesting to see how Del Negro uses his assistants and will probably be a big factor in the success (or failure) of the team this season.
"It's better to be an optimist who is sometimes wrong than a pessimist who is always right"unknown
Youth Factor
Pretty much agree with all the points, except I think the youth isn’t much of a drawback considering EJ’s already established as a solid starter who looks ready to do more, and Blake Griffin, with two years of college and a year on an NBA bench should be more than NBA ready. Tyreke Evans certainly didn’t have many issues being the Kings best player with just one year in school, so if Griffin is right physically I expect him to make a pretty good impression of what he’ll be able to do.
If we toss out the youngest rookies (aminu, bledsoe, & warren), who we admittedly need to hope have high learning curvers, here’s what our rotation could look like.
Baron/ Foye
EJ/ Butler/ Foye
Gomes/ Butler/ Blakely
Griffin/ Smith/ Blakely
Kaman/ DJ/ Griffin
It’s entirely possible that we wont really need the youngest guys to step up much at least in the early going with 10 solid rotation players, most who can play multiple positions. Our roster is a good mix of vets and up & coming players when you bring it in to focus, but there’s admittedly not much room for error.
Blakeley
KA (or DJF) did a nice profile on him a while back. Otherwise, I can’t imagine anybody has much to go on.
by citizen zhiv on Sep 20, 2010 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions
I saw him in Las Vegas
I liked him a lot…. but that was summer league. He’s incredibly athletic and active – but you’re talking about a guy who is 6’5" and played the 4 in college. He’s a wing in the NBA, and while he can defend and rebound and fill a lane, he’s got no perimeter offensive game to speak of. Still, as an ‘energy’ guy and defensive stopper, he has potential.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Sep 20, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions
"Disappointing, but not necessarily dumb."
I like that.
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
20wo30
This is a fun stat. And of course it’s very Kamanesque.
It makes me think, however, about a larger picture of Kaman and the Clippers heading into the training camp and the season. What are we supposed to make of Kaman and his season last year, and more importantly what does it mean for what might happen this year and what the team might be like?
One of the problems in trying to compare this year and last year is the shell game of comparing things to Kaman-Camby-Griffin, where the equation is thrown off because Griffin never played. There’s what we know, and what we don’t know. We know that Kaman-Camby worked pretty well, that Kaman-Camby-Butler worked better than Kaman-Camby-Thornton, etc., stuff like that.
Thinking about the absence of Camby isn’t going to get us very far. But Kaman is here, just as he’s always been. SP notes that his jump shot became very consistent, that his rebounding and blocked shots were down slightly, but Camby might have had something to do with that.
We have to remember that Kaman was a big surprise last season, even after the 50 games at 2.0 level in 0708. And he was as quirky as ever. Not only was his scoring and shooting rather unprecedented, it had that weird ceiling (20wo30), and we knew he wasn’t even playing his best, as SP pointed out repeatedly, because he wasn’t rebounding the same as in the past.
So what will Kaman show us this time? I think his confidence will be high after playing so well and becoming an all-star. And I think that playing with Griffin is going to be a big help, although again, there’s the pesky comparison against the Camby phantom. You just never know with Kaman. But it would be great if he could smash through the 30 barrier very early in season, and also put up some big rebounding games early. In short, for all of the questions about Baron and Griffin and Gordon, in some ways Kaman might have the best chance to be a beast, becoming a near-dominant player, very tough to stop, with only a few key improvements.
Worth Noting
Kaman reported to camp last year with his jump shot dialed in after working on his practice court in Michigan all summer. We think of Kaman as a doof who doesn’t spend as much time in the gym as the other guys, but that’s because (a) he’s not hanging in LA all summer and (b) he has other things he likes to do that we know about (like fishing and blowing shit up). At any rate, one wonders what Kaman has been working on this summer? Will he show up to camp with some new skill he’s been honing in Michigan? How much longer before Kaman adds a three pointer to his aresenal? (That would be weird – not sure I want that one.)
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Sep 20, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions
i love shooters
And Kaman is most definitely a shooter. While I’d be happy if he would just improve his poise in the double team, I’d LOVE to see him knock a three here and there. If he was smart about it (only using it against big men who would feel lost that far from the basket) I think it would also give BG some space down low. Having BG one on one about 3 feet from the basket would be pretty high % imo.
by indy818 on Sep 20, 2010 12:19 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Passing out of the double team. It’s the natural progression for players who become good enough in the post to command the double team.
by Michael White on Sep 20, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Agreed
Hard to work on in a gym by yourself though. I felt Kaman and Brand had good chemistry back in the day, and Kaman made some decent interior passes to Camby as well. It will be interesting to see if he can find Griffin slashing to the basket.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Sep 20, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Griffin to Kaman
Last pre-season, I noticed plenty of attention drawn to Blake and he was able to find Chris for some easy put backs. Chemistry seemed good as well, and if Blake can stay healthy Kaman will have a lot less pressure on him this year which is a great thing.
Griffin and Kaman
Totally agree guys. Really what we are saying is that Kaman gels with pretty much anyone. And there is a reason for that, especially with his new J. He has great center skills. Think about it, if you were to build the perfect center, Kaman pretty much has most of the skills:
7 footer? Check. Rebounder? Check. Shot blocker? Check. Post game? Check. Elbow J? Check!
BG is gonna LOVE playing with this guy. I agree that Kaman should improve at passing out of the double teams as he gets more used to them. He might get less of those with BG out there anyways. He will most def find BG for some cuts to the hoop which should be must see viewing. Both these guy should either have space to work or some open teammates.
The thing I don’t get is that the consensus seems to think THAT was Kaman’s career year and that it is all downhill for him now. He is only 28! Shoot, even if he just keeps last year’s numbers going the next few years, that is pretty good production. These two are going to be great together and I for one am excited to see it soon!
by Kevin Richards on Sep 20, 2010 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Kaman will keep it up
If his averages dip a little bit, that shouldn’t bother us at all. Efficiency is the key, not raw numbers. I have to admit that I’m looking forward to seeing our two bigs play together. As a Clip fan, I feel like I’m almost always waiting for our “two bigs” to finally get on the court together. I’m so used to further delays and severances, I’m half expecting the Melo trade to go through. I’d be filled with mixed emotions.
"i know huh........freakin clippers man.....its like a wild ride rooting for this team....gotta love em....(sometimes) lol" In GrIfFin We TrUsT
Adding a 3-pointer
It’d be like Okur with post moves. Freakishly awesome…
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
Not sure I want Kaman that far away from the post
if he gets a 3pt shot he might forget that his post moves are what made him great.
"It's better to be an optimist who is sometimes wrong than a pessimist who is always right"unknown
I kind of agree. I mean, if he had it, then great, but in terms of importance, I’d rather he get comfortable passing out of the double team. With the amount of range Kaman already has, he’ll give Griffin a ton of room to operate. No pressing need to expand that range further.
by Michael White on Sep 20, 2010 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh yeah
Passing out of the double team is paramount to his success as a player. And not dribbling like a caffeine-filled 10-year-old when the double team comes would be nice.
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
i think
As long as he is disciplined with it and his rebounding numbers don’t suffer (offensive boards), I’d be on board. It would just give opposing teams something else to worry about.
If we were playing the lakers for example, only odom could confidently follow kaman out to the 3, but that would leave gasol or bynum down low by himself with BG…I’d like our odds there (and this example uses a very versatile lakers team).
by indy818 on Sep 20, 2010 2:07 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Any time Odom is in the game
We NEED to have Craig Smith in the game too. It’s just funny how much the Rhino schools Odumb.
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
Just thought I would point out an error....
The Clippers finished the season 12-34 in the final 46 games.
Nice preview Steve. I too belive this team is no worse than a .500 team. We have too much talent to be less than that. As far as the playoffs go, 46-44 wins might be good enough. Last year every western conference team had 50 wins, but I doubt that happens this year. The West is down from the previous two seasons.
This is how I see the final standings.
1. Lakers
2. Thunder
3. Jazz
4. Mavericks
5. Spurs
6. Blazers
7. Rockets
8. Clippers
Hallway Series for Round One?
Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)
Yup...
Did I mention I’m getting my teaching credential to teach math? 12 + 34 = 56…. hmmm.
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. - Elwood P. Dowd
by Steve Perrin on Sep 20, 2010 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Hornets
if CP3 is healthy no way you can omit them
by The Blake Griffin Era on Sep 20, 2010 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions
I am not a huge CP3 fan..undersized, injury prone, and wants out of New Orleans.
I just don’t see the Hornets being players this year. They lack any depth and they are always injured.
Predictions...
Nuggets without Melo will likely miss the playoffs. I’d be surprised if Nash couldn’t get his Suns into it one more time though. Rockets will have some injury problems between Ming/Martin that will squash their playoff hopes. The final spot should be a showdown between the Hornets and Clips…
1. Lakers
2. Mavs
3. Jazz
4. Thunder
5. Spurs
6. Blazers
7. Suns
8. Clippers/Hornets
I agree with you on the Nuggets
I just don’t see the Hornets having more talent than the Clippers and that should put us in over them. I also don’t feel that the Suns will be a huge factor next year. I believe the Clippers can finish second in the Pacific.
I agree about the what you say about the Hornets and the Suns
but two things. Chris Paul and Steve Nash
those guys alone can most likely push their teams into the playoffs. If either are injured or have a poor season…their team will be out for sure
Good preview, but I think you left out one important thing
I think the schedule should have been mentioned a bit. The fact that there really isn’t a stretch of games that can be considered “friendly” will be a big factor. I just don’t see a spot in the schedule where the team can really pick up a lot of momentum. With so many key players that rely on confidence that is not a good thing.
What about the first 40 or so games of the season?
30 home games to 18 road games stretching from Oct 27 to Feb 2, 2011.
If we play plus .500 ball at home (19-11 Home record) and around .300 ball on the road (6-12) we could easily be a Plus .500 team (25- 23) in Feb of 2011. We won 19 out of our first 30 home games last year, and our 30th home game of the season wasn’y until March 1 last season. There is no reason why the 2010-11 Clippers can’t be a plus .500 team far into 2011.
not when you look at the teams involved
It’s not like the Clippers are one of those teams that can be feared when playing against them at home.
Fri 12 vs Detroit
Mon 15 vs New Jersey
Wed 17 @ Minnesota
Thu 18 @ Indiana
This is really the only stretch of games that can really be considered favorable. Still, the last game is a 2nd of a back to back with an improved Pacers team.
The 2nd half of the season is a very steep hill to climb with all those road dates. If the Clips can be around 5 games above 500 going into the yearly Grammy’s road trip (or whatever award show it is), then they have a shot at a 500 record.
I still, think this club is primed for a 35-40 win season. I don’t think Blake Griffin can really add much more than 5 wins. But Blake will make the team worth watching.
That being said, the final record will not necessarily be the proof if the team is improving. Like, OKC from two years ago, the final w-l record of the team did not really showcase just how good that team was turning into.
Well, if the Clippers can’t be feared playing at home, that means they are not good enough. NBAFan is correct, a lot of home games early is a good thing, and if the Clippers aren’t good enough to capitalize, it isn’t the schedule to blame, it’s the team.
by Michael White on Sep 20, 2010 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions
home games/ road games
They balance themselves out
But the fact that the Clips don’t have a stretch where they can feast on bad teams is what worries me.
Egos are fickle and it is much better for the like of Baron, Kaman, and EJ to have 4-5 games of great performances against bad teams than a good game followed up by a bad game against a really good team.
The Clips were what 1 game (2 games?) over 500 at home last year. This year most of the tough teams they face at home comes early in the schedule. Hardly a favorable first half
I really don't think there are many "really" good teams in the West
Who should we really fear other than the Lakers?
One team we’ve seemed to match up with pretty well has been the Thunder.
have you been paying attention?
8 teams won 50 games or more in the west last year
wait are you being sarcastic…
I don't think it's going to take 50 wins this upcoming season.
There were a lot of 50 win teams, but it helps when you have weak teams to feast on. Technically it only took 43 wins to get into the playoffs last season. If players like Paul and Yao can stay relatively healthy, then the West is going to be more competitive from top to bottom. That should result in a lower number of wins needed to make the playoffs.
Teams like Utah and Phoenix have lost key components to free-agency. They’ve retooled, will the chemistry be there. Phoenix picked up some nice players who could very well be playing out of position. Hill and Nash are each another year older. Utah lost 3 rotation guys and already have a couple of injury prone players. Will Okur be ready at the start of the season?
Yao is only going to play 24 mins or less per game, but that will be a much needed addition for them. They’ll have a better team than they did last year imo. I like their balance better. Adelman can do more with less, and will likely coach a strong team if they are healthy.
A healthy Paul makes a big difference for the Hornets and makes them a playoff contender if he is there. Adding Ariza should only help their chances of moving up.
Memphis has kept their core together and can very well climb the ranks. Sacramento and Golden State both improved their rosters and their young players will have another year’s experience heading into the season. If Portland’s big 3 can remain healthy, they are going to be a very strong team. Oden is very important to that team, and they could be truly dominant if he could stay on the court.
Getting into the playoffs is going to be an uphill battle, but things are shifting. Some playoff teams are declining due to loss of personnel, injury or age. Other teams are on the rise. I’d rather it be a dog fight for a playoff spot than it being 7 locks and a toss-up between 2 other teams.
"Chris Kaman IS Black Sikma" - swamigusto
by Lawler 4ever on Sep 21, 2010 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions
The Jazz are fine
Yes they lost some players but they also added Hayward (who can replace Korver), Raja Bell (who can replace Matthews) and Jefferson (who can replace Boozer). Sounds like a wash to me.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Jazz are fine
but not as good.
(in my opionion)
Boozer+Korver+Matthews >> Jefferson+Hayward+Bell
The thing about the Jazz is that everyone knows how the game will be played in Salt Lake. SL showed Hayward can do it, Bell knows Utah already…Sloan hasn’t changed since the last time he was there. So it all depends on how Jefferson adapts to Sloan’s system. Overall, thanks to Sloan and Williams….Utah will be fine, but not as good as last year (by only slightly)
I definitely think that they have made some nice additions.
Jefferson is a good replacement for Boozer when you consider the circumstances. Boozer is still a better player than Jefferson imo. A benefit with Boozer is that he already had the chemistry with Williams. Jefferson’s game is going to have do some maturing, but I think that it will greatly help him to have a point guard like Williams and a coach like Sloan. Hayward is a great fit for their system. Bell knows the system and is a nice veteran to have.
They also lost Ronnie Brewer and will be without Okur until sometime in December or January.
I’m not saying they are going to fall off, but the fact is that they still are going to be a different team, that has injury prone players and could easily slip down the standings as a result of these factors. I wouldn’t pencil them in for an automatic 50 wins.
"Chris Kaman IS Black Sikma" - swamigusto
by Lawler 4ever on Sep 21, 2010 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions
The Jazz are not fine
With Boozer, Korver, Matthews, Brewer, and AK47 (who is involved in the Melo trade) teh Jazz were a Western Conference Champion contender. With this group of players their future outside of D-Will and Big Al looks blah. I see D-Will wanting a trade if the Jazz struggle.
The Suns lost Amare
but they’ve played solidly without him in past years. Warrick and Childress are both underrated players who can mitigate the damages of Amare leaving. Hedo is a upgrade over Barbosa. I think they took a small step back this year but they are still well ahead of the Clippers.
The Clippers have 4 good players, a bunch of journeyman (Gomes, Butler, Rhino and Foye) and 4 rookies (and DJ often plays like one). Oh and Brian Cook.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Who's not a journeyman on the Suns?
Steve Nash? Hedo? Childress (arguably?)
Warrick has never gotten it done and is at best a journeyman. At best.
Reality – most teams have three or four core players and the rest are “journeymen.”
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Warrick
Warrick is a guy who can’t create for himself, but he hasn’t had a proper pass-first point guard in quite some time. Rose? Jennings? Conley? None fit the bill. Amare only learned how to create for himself in recent years. I think Warrick will surprise this year, and it will be partly because of the Suns’ offense, and party because of the ageless abilities of Steve Nash.
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
Maybe but Amare has always produced regardless of
who the PG is
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Oh yeah
I mean Amare’s definitely a lot better than Warrick, and he always finds ways to score. But I’m just saying I don’t think we’ve seen what Warrick’s like next to a good PG. If Nash’s effect on Warrick is enough, he may be able to mostly fill the Amare void.
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
I get what you're trying to say
basically, no matter how good or poor someone’s career has been……Steven Nash can almost always make it better.
Nash now is like Kidd when he was in NJ making K-Mart and them all look like legit stars in the league.
Like if the Clippers had Nash, Kaman would probably be a perennial all-star and would never have to worry about the dreaded 20wo30 stat
Right
The good players on every team are supposed to make the journeymen serviceable. That’s why they are good players.
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
I wouldn't exactly say it to that extent
Nash isn’t going to turn Kwame Brown into a 20-10 guy, but the tools that Warrick has, and has thus far been unable to control (athleticism, quick feet, good at moving away from the ball) have not been utilized properly. The guy they lost, Amare, had those exact same talents, which are partially replaced by Warrick’s.
All of the other stuff Amare brought (hustle, jumper, ability to score in ridiculous ways) are not coming back, of course. Warrick can only fill maybe 75% of the void, but it’s not going to be a total drop off.
So perhaps I’m giving Nash too much credit, but I’ve seen a lot of guys “find their game” playing with Steve Nash (Channing Frye, Robin Lopez, Shawn Marion), so I wouldn’t be surprised if Warrick followed the trend.
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
Difference between guys who have been core players
and guys who have been traded a few times as throw-ins to make the cap figure work. Butler we got for free, Rhino was part of a smaller deal. Gomes was another player who we got for free (heck the Blazers paid him to leave). Foye was so disappointing in Washington that they let him go after they traded Ricky Rubio for him and Mike Miller.
Nash left because of money reasons, same with Hedo. Both were coming off terrific years and were highly desirable. There previous teams couldn’t afford them due to financial constraints, far different than how the Clippers ended up with their true Journeymen. Throw in a solid young big in Lopez, the steady J Rich, Childress and the rejuvenated Grant Hill. And then you factor in their bench of Frye, Dragic, Warrick and Dudley and they are a much better team than the Clippers.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Um
Wash didn’t let Foye and Miller go – they became free agents and signed elsewhere.
Same with Gomes.
Rhino is who he is.
Butler was part of a deal – shrewd move by MDSr.
Hedo I think is probably no longer worth the money if you look at how he played last year (terribly). The Magic chose to sign VC instead of Hedo.
I agree that J Rich is not bad, but Lopez has not been a starter. G Hill is probably close to being done by now. They do have a pretty good bench.
But they are pretty much all journeymen except Nash and arguably Hedo and Childress. Not a dominating team by any stretch of the imagination.
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Pretty much have to do all the work for you as usual Jax
Foye is on his 3rd team in about 15 months. Isn’t it a bad sign that 2 dreadful teams didn’t feel you were worth bringing back for a short term contract for under the MLE? Heck, he should have had a terrific year last year in Washington once the team lost Arenas.
Gomes was traded to a team that paid him 500k to go away. That contract was paying him less (on a annual basis) this year than the Clippers will be paying him the next 3 years. The Blazers rather go with undrafted rookie Wesley Matthews for the full MLE than retain a player they had rights to and owed 500k to. Makes you think right?
Rhino even after another solid year had to come back to the Clippers for a one year deal. I actually like Rhino but that tells you how coveted he is around the league.
Butler is actually getting paid less this year than last year. So the Clippers got him for a protected 2nd round draft pick (which is probably worthless). Yet he took a pay cut this year from last year even though he had arguably his best year as a professional. Now it makes me feel like he was actually overpaid last year if we can get him cheaper this year right?
Hedo is still a solid player (see World Championships) who is overpaid but he is still legit starter. If he’s your 3rd or 4th best player you still have a very good team (see 2008-2009 Magic). Since you like pointing out the meaningless technicalities, the Magic actually traded for Vince Carter.
Lopez is solid, he’ll be a good center for the next decade or so. Hill is declining but they brought in a great heir in Childress to take over.
The only position the Clippers have a real advantage at right now is PF but they have much better SFs and a much better bench. Rookie Blake Griffin can’t cover up those holes by himself.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions
We understand you have an agenda
Players coming out of Minny can’t really be analyzed the same as players coming from solid organizations. Thus, Foye and Gomes haven’t really had a chance to shine yet. There are numerous articles on this. I would go over and read Keven, et al at Clipperblog if you’re really interested.
I’m not suggesting that they will be stars, but rather that they don’t deserve the type of depressed negativism that you continue to exhibit here.
In addition, Wesley Matthews is a good player. Gomes is not really needed on that team (his skill set). I think you will be surprised by him (although somehow I think you’ll find something to criticize).
We targeted both Foye and Gomes early . . . Jeez I am sounding like a broken record.
Rhino is a good player. You have no idea what kind of offers he got (or for that matter, any of them).
Yes, we got a backup in Butler. So? MDSr took advantage of a cap sit in NO to get him originally. He did a good job. No, I don’t think he was overpaid last year. This year he’s a backup. We are not talking about a lot of cash here so why criticize? Oh, I get it. You don’t like the Clippers.
We disagree on Hedo. You want to show he’s a good player because he did well for Turkey at the WC. I suggest that you can gauge him better by looking at his 82 game season last year. I think my position is the better one, but hey if you think he’s so much better than anyone on your supposed favorite team (other than BG), who am I to criticize.
Finally, who cares how the Magic got VC? The point (let’s not lose the forest for the trees again) is that they chose him over Hedo. Do you dispute that? If you do, I’ll put you in touch with a friend who works for the Magic and you can ask him yourself directly (you’re welcome).
You say Lopez will be a good center for the next decade. Ok scout CC. That’s possible but the jury is still out on him.
Childress has never started in the NBA. He’s a good role player but a borderline starter in my view who is not proven yet in that role.
You’re welcome.
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Simple Jax
Long post with little substance.
Regarding Minnesota stuff you wrote, lots of white noise, only shows Foye and Gomes are not good enough to turn around bad teams.
So the Clippers targeted Gomes and Foye early, so what? Is that suppose to be impressive? They signed Brian Cook early, what does that mean? Keep chugging the kool-aid.
We know Rhino didn’t get many good offers or he wouldn’t be back in LA playing for less money this year and on a one-year deal. Even without tapping his phones I can rest assure you he didn’t get the red carpet treatment by other teams.
Butler had one of his best years as a pro. He made over a million dollars more last year than this year. Hmm… if he takes a paycut… oh right. Not good. And we don’t know if he’s the backup or starter, we didn’t know last year if he was the back up or start to AT either. He could be the starter in a month.
Hedo had a bad year last year, he was unhappy, the Raptors were distracted by the Bosh drama and he was a poor fit. He fits into the Suns system a lot better as he needs to have the ball in his hands more often to shine. He’ll get that opportunity this year. Is he worth his contract? Not all of it but he is a above average player. The WC just shows what happens when he gets to be a play-maker instead of a spot up shooter.
I only brought up the VC trade because you were the one pointing out the little details on Foye, Gomes and Butler. The Magic thought VC would put them over the edge but in hindsight Hedo was the better fit.
Lopez is good, he got the invite for Team USA for a reason. He had a PER of 17.6 last year and his numbers off 36 minutes a game are a impress 16 pts, 9 rebounds and 2 blocks while shooting 60% from the field and a respect 70% from the line. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
The fact you continue to underestimate Childress shows you how little you know about basketball. A lot of people smarter than you recognize his talent, something you simply can’t appreciate.
And you are not welcome.
And stop spreading lies about a agenda, I like the Clippers, I hate the moves this off-season and I hate you. I don’t understand why you have such a hard time keeping track of this.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions
lol last sentences
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
I <3 u guyz
This is better than jersey shore
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
*fist pump*
Jax is probably needs to google this since he probably has no idea what you are referencing. Here’s a quick tutorial.

FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Your post is ridiculous
I can’t get past your statement that you “like the Clippers.” LOL
And keep on hatin – I feel sorry for you
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
You are such a jackass
its amazing. Its funny because you say things like “hatin” yet everyone knows you don’t even don’t how to use the slang correctly. Stop trying so hard to be cool, you aren’t. Just because your kids say it doesn’t mean you can. And just because I’m not a delusional homer doesn’t mean I’m not a fan.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions
"trying to be cool" lol
Dude you spend way too much time on this board
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Funny coming from the guy...
who somehow finds the time to respond to everything John R writes.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I think you're just bitter about losing your season tix
I’m truly sorry about that – but you will be able to get them back
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
As much as I hate getting in the middle of one of these battles, I have to ask: why would Phoenix be a better fit for Hedu? Him needing the ball in his hands would seem to be a bad thing for a team that has an all-world point guard. Nash is the guy who will have the ball in his hands and the ball in Turkoglu’s hands mean the Suns don’t have there best player doing what he does best.
by Michael White on Sep 21, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Because even Nash can't handle the ball 100% of the time
they will become a even more lethal fast break if Hedo pulls down a board and pushes it up the court. Hedo can be the Turkish Boris Diaw.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Truly, your basketball intellect is dizzying!!
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Thanks!
But you’re such a busy guy, shouldn’t you be using your precious free time on something other than stating the obvious?
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 21, 2010 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions
That worries me about the suns too
Nash makes the offense go. And they say they’ll utilize his shooting in a way they haven’ t been able to before? Sure he’s a great shooter, but to say Hedo can run the offense, while Nash can be a spot up shooter? I’m sorry, but that’s taking the ball out of the hands of the guy that made you a perennial playoff team. I assume it’ll be more like the case where Nash still has it the majority of the time, but if they think they’ll be successful making him play more off the ball, I think they’ll be disappointed.
Nash will still have the ball most of the time
but having a secondary play maker like Hedo is a fabulous option for the Suns. Look at the Clippers without Baron last year, the offense was terrible even at times when Steve Blake was in. Guys who can create better shots for other players are tough to find.
FA in 2010.
by ClipperChuck on Sep 22, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions
They Suns have certainly lessened the blow of the loss of Amar’e. Childress is a nice role player to come off the bench and occasionally start, Hedo needs to show that he can play better than he has the last 2 seasons, and Warrick is an alright addition who could look better than alright with the help of Nash. Defensively, Amar’e wasn’t much, so having Turkoglu play the 4 and Warrick play center won’t change much. They just aren’t as good as Amar’e. They are a team that will be interesting to watch just to see how they fit. They have a ton of SF’s will be play outside of their natural positions.
My post is addressing the point that I don’t believe that it will take 50 wins to make the postseason in the West. That doesn’t mean that the Clippers are in this season, but the competition has been softened up in various ways. It’s up to Clippers to play up to their potential, if not above. I would love to see us in the playoffs next April/May, but I just want to see some improvement. Things are looking up in the long run for the young and upcoming teams.
"Chris Kaman IS Black Sikma" - swamigusto
by Lawler 4ever on Sep 21, 2010 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions
It's not just Blake...
A new coach in Vinnie Del Negro, EJ’s play, Baron’s play, Kaman’s play, Gomes and Foye’s play, the play of the bench, and the developement of the youth will all be a factor. Last year’s team could have won 40+ games last year, and so can this team.
So we are just assuming a lot of things?
instead of going on what we have seen? This is almost the same exact team, but now it is even younger which is NOT a good thing.
Just like how last year I mentioned how the team was almost the same team that lost over 20 games by 20 points or more two years ago. People remained optimistic, and it is every fans right to be overly optimistic. Just trying to put a few points in perspective like the tough schedule
You are obviously Club O can’t knock you on that. Let me just say I hope I am wrong :)
Yeah
But last year we had a really unfortunate start to the season (4 playoff teams in a row) that just had us digging our way out of a hole from the start. So, if you forget about those first 4, we were over .500 (17-15) up until we found out about Blake. Now, of course you can’t just forget about games, but the point is, once we got a win on the board, we were better than we were worse.
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
Oh wow
I was looking at pre-season…
But at least the Warriors, Denver, Utah, and New Orleans are very beatable. Portland too. And although we never do well against the Spurs, we’re not talking about the same Spurs team that has dominated us for so long (though I think we got ‘em back last year). Last year’s Lakers-Phoenix-Utah-Dallas stretch was a lot worse, especially when you consider those were all 2nd round playoff teams last year. On the flip side, our tough game stretch goes on longer, this year, but we’ll have a (knock on wood) healthy Blake this time around.
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
I think the one part of Griffin's game that gets overlooked
is his playmaking ability. Averaging like 3 assist in summer league, and 2 in preseason, in limited minutes with players he’s never played with. I was always impressed with some of the passes he would make. Kaman not so much, as he rarely put guys in position to score, and his passes out of double teams seem to usually end up in a TO somehow.
As much as I like Camby, his stats always seemed a bit overrated to me. He was great at weak side blocks, and I guess tipping the ball around. He was able to rack up the stats, but his play rarely seemed to change the game the way I see Blake Griffin might be able to do.
I’m trying to keep my expectations low, but in the back of my mind, I always hope BG will change the culture of the team. But for now, as far as win totals, as long as they have more than last year, I’ll be happy. With a young team, I’m not looking for instant success, but just progress in the right direction. I know it’s always the future with the clippers, but you just have to hope they’ll get it right one of these ‘rebuilding/youth’ movements.
Overrated Camby
I agree he doesn’t seem to change the game as noticeably as say a Pau Gasol or Tim Duncan does. This is likely because of his offensive limitations, though, and we are all more hypnotized by a beautiful hook shot than a tapped-around rebound.
Even still, I didn’t see the Blazers winning many more games (as Camby’s surely a huge upgrade over Juwan Howard), or the Nuggets losing a ton more games (as much as Denver fans would like to think, Bird Man really isn’t the same thing as Camby) with Camby’s arrival/departure, respectively.
So yes, some of his stats could be inflated (he’s got to be cannibalizing a good chunk of those rebounds from his teammates), and his individual defense leaves much to be desired (this is not Chuck Hayes here). That said, he’s incredibly patient, a great passer, always hustles back down the floor on both ends, and looks to be an incredible teammate/roleplayer on a very good team (put Camby on the Spurs, and you’ve got a contender). He just isn’t the right fit, at all, for the current team we’re fielding. Blake Griffin is a much, much better fit, and definitely has a lot of skills that no one has gotten a proper look at yet (especially his passing).
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
especially when the whole team seems disinterested
Camby doesn’t seem like the guy to instill energy in the whole team. That might be unfair to say, because he was one of the few guys that seemed to still be giving it his all, but the other players just didn’t seem to feed off of it like I hope they can w/ Griffin.
When it just seemed like there was an overall lack of effort on the part of the clippers, no one seemed to be able to step up to get them out of the funk. They were tuning MDSr. out, and Lucas could only do so much. I would be curious what a true vocal presence like KG, Sammie, or maybe Kobe, would do to get the team out of it. I’m not expecting that out of BG, but I really hope his enthusiasm for the game rubs off on everyone.
Hopes
I just want to see smiling-Baron from the Warriors:
http://www.emptythebench.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/bdiddy.jpg
Not grumpy-Baron from the Clippers:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_H_SV8esh4dM/SvBpIL64FsI/AAAAAAAAABE/aBShS7eVoO0/s400/baron_davis-clippers.jpg
"Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
Well Done SP
I’m excited for the season, regardless of the outcome I just want to see Blake on the court and the new and improved EJ.
by The Blake Griffin Era on Sep 20, 2010 10:56 PM PDT reply actions
Weakness
let`s not forget the fact that Baron davis is more interested in making movies than winning games. Chris Kaman is notoriously inconsistent. Vinny will have his work cut out for him, but if he can get those two in toe, the Clips could pull off at least 35 to 40 wins. No playoffs though
by Jeffrey Thompson on Sep 28, 2010 7:59 PM PDT reply actions

by 













