The Clipper Roster: Are We There Yet?
The question's coming up repeatedly in the threads: Is the Clipper's roster set? Are there only minor tweaks remaining? Is there a bigger change necessary?
I don't have anything particularly insightful to say on the subject but I thought we should formalize the argument in a separate thread. (We've got around thirty hours until the next game, there isn't a lot of news, and we're gonna talk about it anyway). There are a number of significant questions regarding the roster on our brains right now.
I'll take it position by position after the jump.
A backup big:
- With the signing of Reggie Evans, are we happy with our bigs?
- Is Evans going to solve our woeful rebounding problems. It's unlikely he'll play more than ten or fifteen minutes a game? Will that be enough?
- I'll lay off the specifics but do we still need a specific back up center? Can that be Evan's role?
- Should the Clips front office be aggressively pursuing a back-up center if that player is not a seven footer or close to that statistic (I'm talking about you, Ike Diogu).
- Does anyone think Brian Cook (in combination with Evans) gives us enough depth behind Blake Griffin and DeAndre Jordan?
- Should Trey Thompkins get significant minutes (more than mop-up minutes)?
A backup small forward:
- Is Ryan Gomes an adequate backup.
- Should Thompkins get minutes in that role?
- What do you think of Vinny Del Negro's three-guard offense featuring Randy Foye as a small forward?
A backup (or starting two guard):
- Is Chauncey Billups adequate as a starter?
- Would Billups be adequate if there was a taller, stronger wing behind him or one who could swing between the two and three?
- Are the backups (Mo Williams, Randy Foye, and eventually Eric Bledsoe) adequate?
- Who among those three mentioned above would you consider a two guard?
If you'd like to trade, assuming you could trade any of these guys, who would you trade?
- Williams? Foye? Gomes? Cook? One of the rookies? Bledsoe?
- As has been suggested, is tinkering with the roster simply too much, are there are already too many changes? Should we simply stand pat (at least for a while)?
162 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
After some discussion on other threads
My ideal situation would be for a pickup of Bogans and Diogu/Pryzbilla. If we wanted to get all 3, then Cook could be waived, amnestied, or traded off for a 2nd rounder or something to make room.
A major trade is not necessary yet, but my desired trading chips would be the exception, Cook, and Foye. I would definitely include Bledsoe depending on the return- but I dont want to give him away for a crummy big man who can “play” Center.
As stated in fanpost, my ideal trading pickups would be Jordan Hill and Robin Lopez, but the Suns already went out and got Michael Redd, so they wouldnt take Foye probably.
In other words
No, we need a better defender at the wing positions off the bench, and Reggie Evans is not enough to bolster the 5 with Cook- we need a bigger body down there.
Only if God intervened
could we trade Cook for something of value like a 2nd rounder
Bogans and Pryzbilla
those two would solidify our bench. yes we would still have too much depth at pg or small sg, so if some team came asking for one of our bench guys in a trade for a solid wing defender that can shoot i’m for it. but if bogans and prybilla were signed then there would be no need to seek out a trade. mo williams is sensitive as is, don’t throw his name into trade talk or all confidence and usefulness will be shattered.
bogans can come in and play the 2 or 3 off the bench. is a solid defender and decent spot up 3 point shooter. will let billups get some rest or some time at back up pg, and still allow billups to start.
pryzbilla is a solid defender and rebounder. he isn’t a push over so will be an enforcer type along with reggie evans.
Tell me about Travis Leslie
Funny, because I was talking (at something like zhivian length) about this at the bottom of the last thread.
I think that the Clips have to react now to trading both Kaman and Eric Gordon. Those two players are significant pieces who can’t be completely replaced, but the specifics are Gordon’s role as primary wing defender (against elites like Ginobili, Kobe, and DWade) and Kaman as backup center (assuming that DJ was going to start; Kaman is coming off the bench at NOH). There are all sorts of different approaches.
Having Travis Leslie on the roster was a nice bit of potential when the guards were Gordon, Mo, Bledsoe and Foye, and even with Billups added. But as soon as Gordon was traded, and the team is being built to win right away, then I think you have to reevaluate Leslie’s spot and role. Maybe he’s the guy; I don’t know. But having a guy who just plays defense and has some size, to go against big guards, is an important option that the Clips are missing. They need it even more when Billups is the starter. In lots of circumstances, Mo is going to be the perfect guy coming off the bench, and Bledsoe is going to be a big help too. Randy Foye is a good and versatile roster guy, a good placeholder is someone gets hurt (like Bledsoe). But the Clips needs a defender now with Gordon gone. I daresay that QRoss and Mardy Collins are the template, and they would both do better in limited minutes on a team with CP3 and Billups and Griffin, than they did back in the day.
The backup big situation is probably worse, at least until Evans can play. He should be a good backup to Griffin, and okay coming off the bench for DJ, but the Clips still need a long body. I don’t think that Thompson’s spot is at all in question (the way that Leslie’s perhaps should be). When the Clips add guys he should actually start getting some minutes ahead of Cook, to show what he can do, but Cook can spread the floor and he’s not a bad piece to have imo.
Travis Leslie may be the answer
I think that he should start getting minutes over Foye until he starts playing better- Foye is honestly the worst player on the team right now.
I'd imagine Foye is only seeing minutes because of seniority
Might as well see what Travis has off the bench, unless he looks completely lost in practice.
Also surprised Trey isn’t seeing any minutes after the way he was playing in the preseason. I get that Trey and Cook are identical players but isn’t that more reason to give him some minutes? He’s a 21 year old who everyone has been extremly impressed with in practice and in the preseason. Why not throw him out there?
by dulciusXasperis on Dec 29, 2011 3:48 PM PST up reply actions
Cook is still better at this point
The Team is on a Win Now mode. It’s playoffs or bust.
"After the first six minutes I was heavily winded"-Andrew Bynum
dont think Cook is that much better
Thompkins needs to continue to hustle hard because its the only way he can beat cook out because Cook will work and hustle. A developed post game would help I still believe Thompkins will flourish better with a banger next to him with length. Reggie Evans goes well with a Cook type player because both can get a little physical but I could see a Thompkins and Pryziblla combo being a better long term tandem
by KillaClip on Dec 29, 2011 6:32 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
You, Zhiv, are not the first to bring up Quinton Ross...
(I think it was brother Bolts who brought him up) He’s thirty years old and out of the NBA not yet a full season. The question is, does he still have all that lateral ability and whiny, pesky nature?
Anybody
Calling for Mardy Collins yet? I actually thought that Collins was better in many ways than Q Ross.
by citizen zhiv on Dec 29, 2011 4:51 PM PST up reply actions
Not sure about that one, Zhiv
I’ll always remember the job Q did on Melo in the playoffs. Without him we don’t win that series. Strictly on the defensive end, Q >>>> Mardy. That jumpshot of his, on the other hand …
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Now living the good life in Lob City, CA.
2 Guard
I think that should be our priority above anything. There are not too many traditional centers on the league, so Evans can pretty much fill that back up role with the other bigs. Come playoffs it would be a problem. Even so, I see the 2 guard being a bigger problem. We thought that CB4 would be a mismatch for for other teams but he is too slow. I think the reason he has still been good at his age is because of his size advantage over other PG’s. Yesterday he looked slow against a mid 30s Ginobli. If that position is address, it can be a major set back for the team on both ends of the floor, CB4 would serve better as the 6th man of the team. I would try getting a couple young wing players like Chase Budinger & Terrence Williams for Ryan Gomes, Randy Foye, and Mo Will. Another wing that looks good is Jared Dudley or/and Josh Childress, but I don’t think the Suns would be interested in trading either of them to the Clips.
by Christian Vielman on Dec 29, 2011 3:32 PM PST via iPhone app reply actions
Rockets are not giving up Budinger, and they are very deep at guards anyway
They have Martin, Lowry, Dragic, Flynn, Lee as well as Budinger.
Jared Dudley is a beast- I doubt we are getting him. The only possible piece they might want is Bledsoe, but Dudley right now is a far better player.
Josh Childress sucks. We could try for him I suppose, but the Suns fans all hate him.
Last time I checked
the Sun fans wanted him to play (Free Chilly!). He had a good 1st game and nothing the other night. He’d be a big upgrade over Foye and Gomes.
A Foye Gomes Bledsoe for Childress Robin Lopez trade would be nice for the Clips.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 29, 2011 5:06 PM PST up reply actions
and the trade machine loves it
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=d477889
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 29, 2011 5:08 PM PST up reply actions
Lopez played great the other night with a career high 21 points
against the Hornets. Suns are high on him again as he had injuries last year that really limited his play.
"Who wants a free Sharpie?"
He's also a RFA next summer
and they have Gortat. I’d do a Foye and Gomes for Childress swap as well.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 29, 2011 5:40 PM PST up reply actions
Problem is Childress's contract.
He’s getting 7 million for 4 years and he’s definitely not worth it in my opinion, especially when we’re going to need money for a true SG next year.
Hey, any time you can blow $28M for a guy who can't get off Phoenix' bench,
ya just gotta do it!!
Amnesty candidate (if Sarver weren’t so cheap)
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Rather have him
than watch Foye and Gomes screw up repeatedly.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 29, 2011 9:37 PM PST up reply actions
Clips won't have cap space next year
They are already at 57 million next year with just 7 players and that’s not counting Billups resigning. So they will only have the mini mid level and trades to work with.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 29, 2011 9:39 PM PST up reply actions
if he does
that doesn’t necessarily create cap space for the Clips as they would use it to resign Chauncey. Besides its unlikely because Mo isn’t worth 8.5 million a year so unless he seems a 5 year/30 million dollar deal somewhere he’ll exercise it.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 29, 2011 10:03 PM PST up reply actions
Wait
Why don’t we get the full MLE next year if we’re going to finish this year and enter next year over the cap?
I thought the mini MLE was only for teams that go over the cap during the off-season (like the Clippers this off-season.)
by Michael White on Dec 30, 2011 7:56 AM PST up reply actions
to be fair,
ginobili is one of the most slimy, quick, just gets to where he needs to get guards in the league
Newbie here but a bigtime Clippers fan
The first big 3 was Odom, D Miles, and Brand. I hate Odom and I can never forgive him for what he did. Brand and D Miles are ok. Anyways, I still think we’re a couple pieces away from being a championship team. We need to address the back up 5 desperately. I like Cookie, but he’s not cutting it for me. Beg Pryzbilla to join us and then we’re set. Also, if we can trade Mo for 2 solid bench players, DO IT! Mo Williams for Marco Bellineli and Trevor Ariza would be amazing for us.
CP3/Bledsoe/Foye
Billups/Bellineli/Leslie
Butler/Ariza/Gomes
Griffin/Evans/Thompkins
Jordan/Pryzbilla
Championship!
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
Hornets would never do that deal
Maybe they would take Foye, Bledsoe, and Williams for Bellinelli and Ariza, but why would the Clippers do that?
We need depth
We have enough point guards..
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
by SavageClipper on Dec 29, 2011 3:40 PM PST up reply actions
You lose a lot of talent there
And then you would only have 2 pgs on the whole roster- Billups and Paul. Foye is a better player than Bellinelli, and Bledsoe has the potential to be better than all of them.
The Hornets would definitely not pull on your original deal, and the Clippers wouldnt go for my proposal. I think the Hornets are out as a trading partner.
I just wish Mo can accept his current role
He can be a major contributor for us this season…
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
by SavageClipper on Dec 29, 2011 3:53 PM PST up reply actions
+1
I hope that Mo would just enjoy his role. He can be the key for us to go far into the playoffs. However, if we did end up trading him, I would rather a package deal and try to ship off more of our bench. My other posts have shown, I would like a trade
Williams+Foye+Bledsoe for Jack+Ariza. However, this is ONLY if Williams asks for a trade. Why do I like this? Well we get a strong defensive three that we have wanted and we get a good back up point guard (although he is a downgrade from Mo). What do we lose? The guy who wants to leave (Mo), an inconsistent backup 2 (Foye), and a raw PG who can become good (Bledsoe). Many would not like to see Bledsoe leave, but we should look to win sooner rather than later.
Foye's better than Belinelli?
At what? Surely can’t be basketball.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 29, 2011 5:10 PM PST up reply actions
Why do you think everyone is Fat?
Do you have issue with Zach Randolph?
"After the first six minutes I was heavily winded"-Andrew Bynum
I think overall he is a better player
Or at least was. He has been awful this year.
Bellinelli is a great spot up shooter, but that is just about all he does.
Much rather have a guy who's a great spot up shooter
than a guy who thinks he’s a great scorer when he’s not chucking up long 2s. Know your role.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 29, 2011 6:51 PM PST up reply actions
"overall"
What, exactly, is Li’l Chucker good at? It’s not shooting, or ball-handling, or passing, or rebounding, or defense.
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Now living the good life in Lob City, CA.
Everything
DId you watch any of the games last yr? Foye was crucial. Many of the most memorable Blake dunks including dunk over Mozgov were from Foye passes. He can play multiple positions 1-3. He can guard 1-3. He is good at shooting, ball-handling, passing, defense. He’s the Jacob Hester of the team. Jack of all trades, master at none.
Even the lopsided Roy-Foye traded isn’t too lopsided now. Roy was more talented, but his knees caught up with him. Foye is healthy and continues on.
"After the first six minutes I was heavily winded"-Andrew Bynum
You're delusional
Foye is a ball-stopper, and a poor shooter for a 2 guard. A few highlights doesn’t change that. What I remember way more than the alley-oops to Blake were all the 1-6, 2-7 shooting nights. Foye is a very subpar NBA player.
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Now living the good life in Lob City, CA.
I would keep Mo and trade Foye and Gomes for a bag of chips!
Maybe Minnesota would trade us a future rd pick for those two and they
can have them back.
some sunchips would be nice
when you hear the Clippers, it’s not going to be a joke anymore. I can guarantee you that -BG32
Pretty
sure we’d have to give THEM a pick to take Gomes off our hands. Foye’s expiring at least so he makes good contract filler.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 29, 2011 5:14 PM PST up reply actions
My Answer to all these questions.
- I am not happy with our bigs. We need a taller guy who can bang with the other big men in the league. Evans is a rebounding machine, but it would still be hard for him to play with 7 footers.
- It really depends on his minutes. If we want better rebounding, we play him longer. Griffin seems to get rebounds… when he WANTS to. DeAndre is often out of place because of the ridiculous blocks he goes for (they are pretty sweet ot watch but a tad too high risk for me)
- I think a SPECIFIC center would do. Like Przybilla would be perfect, even Diogu.
- I could care less if he is 7 feet or not, as long as we get an ACTUAL center. Sorry, but Evans is a forward. I really liked the Rhino, but he is long gone.
- No, Brian Cook is just not good enough on the defense end and grabbing boards. I like that he can shoot, but other than his occasional jumper or three pointer, he is mediocre.
- Yes, Thompkins should get more minutes. Although he isn’t great defensively, we need to let him develop his game so he can become a threat.
- Gomes is adequate, but I would much rather prefer we don’t give him hefty minutes. I would much rather see Leslie or even Thompkins (assuming he is versatile) play at back up 3. Gomes has been given more than enough time to improve his shot, it just isn’t happening.
- If Thompkins can handle the 3 spot, he is an upgrade from Gomes. He can shoot better and it seems as if he doesn’t make as many dumb mistakes.
- Randy Foye at small forward is a joke. The whole point of a three guard offense in my book is to score, but he just doesn’t cut it. The fact is, he is a liability on the defensive end as a 3 and there is no guarantee he does what he is suppose to, score.
- Billups is adequate depending on who he has to guard. Manu is one tough person to guard for ANYONE in the league. I think Billups is fine for a starter, but you can’t give him rough minutes this year.
- I think Billups is fine with Butler. With CP3 dictating the game, he can always search for a nice pass to Butler or Billups. Even if he can blow by the defense, DeAndre won’t allow easy layups. However, we need to work on what happens AFTER DeAndre goes up high to swat the ball, because I often see a nice block followed by zero defense down low.
- I think Mo is more than adequate, he can be 6th man of the year if he accepts his role. Foye has been playing an extremely weak game. He hasn’t defended and his shooting has been atrocious. I like Bledsoe, but I wouldn’t want him running the game for more than 5 minutes. He just seems to play his college style basketball. He plays too fast and that often hurts the Clippers via his turn overs.
- Foye is the only one capable of being a two guard there. But I’m perfectly fine with playing two points like CP3 and Williams, as long as the other team’s SG isn’t someone capable of hurting the Clippers too badly (Like Manu)
- I think that Williams is extremely valuable and I would not like to trade him. But if he demanded a trade, I think there are several ways we can go. Whether we package him up or just go for a straight up deal. I think that I would be happy to see Foye, Gomes, Cook, or Bledsoe leave. As logn as we get the right deal. I’m sure if we make a deal around Bledsoe, we can get someone of some worth. The rookies on the other hand should be given time to play, because they obviously have potential.
- I think that if we plan to make anymore changes, do it now rather than later. We aren’t exactly playing as a team right now, but I still have confidence we will make the playoffs one way or another. Therefore, I would be fine with shipping off some people and tinkering with our team.
3 points
1.a backup big to help with rebounding is not the answer. we have 2 guys that are VERY capable of averaging 15 a piece but DJ just perfers to hang out in the high post instead. this can/should be fixed.
2.having gomes and thompkins at the 3 should suffice. having foye out there, would only lead to even bigger rebounding issues.
3. i genuinely feel foye should be getting more time at the 2. he’s EJ Foye when given the chance.
Interesting...
I probably agree with point one. I half agree with point two and I’d like to agree with point three but I’m sick of Foye’s inability to score off the bench. Can you back the Foye thing with stats?
Definitely agree with point 1.
D.Jordan getting blocks is nice, but seeing how it exposes B.Griffin more, the 2 should just focus on rebounding…
Why is Reggie Evans injured??
He hasn’t even played yet and he’s out for what… like a week? C’mon Man!! We need you out there!
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
I like the Clips as is:
Sure I’d love to get Przybilla (sp?) for a cheap one year contract. I’d love a back-up SG as well like Bogans for a veteran’s minmum 1 year deal. We have to keep in mind the new CBA and salary cap problems when we have to re-sign Paul & Griffin in a year or two. That’s why guys like Ariza are pretty much not an option, we won’t be able to pay a back-up 7 million a year for 3 years which is his contract.
Also, we need to keep Mo & Foye for now. When Bledsoe is healthy and can play again then we can move one of them. But they are 2 of the players who have actually played with some of the people on this team so hopefully they can gel quicker with the 2nd unit.
Our first unit hasn’t played together much. Let them play and then after 10 games (I’d say 15-20 but this shortened season doesn’t help) figure out what needs to be changed. Maybe Pryzbilla will have decided he wants to play by then and Bogans will still be available. They are hopefully cheap fixes for a year that could work (if we get both i say goodbye Leslie if we have to get rid of a contract).
As long as we get Carmelo back
Then sure, why not.
Carmelo would disrupt the flow in our offense.
That would make us so bad..
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
by SavageClipper on Dec 29, 2011 4:43 PM PST up reply actions
Meh
I think he would be fine. Our offense would be crazy though.
Williams
Billups/Butler
Carmelo
Griffin
DeAndre
So you weren't joking....
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be." - John Wooden
by Erik O on Dec 29, 2011 6:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Yeah I was
Just saying, Carmelo wouldn’t slow down our team.
If we're talking stuff that's "out there"
Let’s just trade D.Jordan, E.Bledsoe, and whatever number of first round picks it would take and aim for D.Howard. Then the team will have a guy who can rebound, block, and defend.
Orlando don't want young players and draft picks
they want establish players. In the east, they would still be a playoff team with the right players in return.
Yah trade him to the Lakers for Bynum and Gasol ;-)
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
No BG stays with LAC, he actualy cares about winning.
Action is Louder then Words.
"Your Hate Will Motivate"
Whatever you say, Kristi
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Now living the good life in Lob City, CA.
What needs to happen
Trey needs to get the minutes instead of Cook, Travis needs to get some burn at the 2. If Travis needs to start over Billups, thats fine, we were suppose to be Lob City. We are suppose to win by sheer athleticism. Chauncey is a great leader, but we can’t have all of these guys playing big minutes who suck at D, (Blake). Bring Mo and Chauncey off the bench. Reggie backs up Blake, Cookie is human victory cigar
oh, one more thing
Chris Paul needs to lose his pudge. DTS is going to be heckling him if he doesn’t.
No
No way we start Leslie, especially because it was cause a backlash with Billups. If anything, we just put him in instead of Foye. And we shouldn’t care about Lob City or how we win. A win is a win, and that is all I want. I could care less if we win by athleticism or by luck.
Billups is Billups
There is no way we start Leslie over him. Even if he may be better defensively.
i agree it would piss off Billups but the team should at least experiment with Leslie at the 2.
i’d play Travis over Foye since Foye has been stinkin up the joint since the season started.
Yeah I agree with Travis > Foye
But what good is it if we piss of Billups and Leslie doesn’t pan out?
I think we can all agree that Leslie should not start over Billups
But, he should get the minutes Foye is getting now.
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
by SavageClipper on Dec 29, 2011 4:55 PM PST up reply actions
if you need to appease the vets for the time being, do it
but we are lacking is good D and rebounding. Travis would bring tough D and rebounding (averaged 7 boards a game in college)
I'm not sure I understand all this love for the rookies?
They’ve shown nothing, even in the preseason games. Leslie hasn’t really played and Thompkins looks soft, like a smaller version of Cook with a lesser shot. To my mind, they’re roster filler.
because we know what we are getting with the vets
I’m curious with the rooks because of the potential.
Do we?
We’ve all acknowledged that they’ve had roughly two weeks together. How do you know that’s all we get? Or following that logic, we should be getting four all-stars + an up and coming big man if you want to talk potential. Much more than some rookie 2nd rounder who looks like he can play but we have no clue. Not willing to throw away the season because of a 1-1 start.
Remembers when you could buy a nosebleed ticket at the Sports Arena and end up courtside.
This
It’s been 2 games people…
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be." - John Wooden
by Erik O on Dec 29, 2011 6:08 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Winner, winner, chicken dinner!
Unfortunately, what you’ve “won” is the award for THE DUMBEST COMMENT I’VE EVER SEEN ON CLIPS NATION, which is really saying a lot.
Was this a joke? Were you being sarcastic? Or did you really just say that a rookie — not a lottery pick, but a mid-2nd-rounder, no less — who has yet to play a single minute of NBA action, not even in preseason or summer league, should start over a former Finals MVP who put up a PER of 18.7 and a TS% of 61.7% as recently as last season?
I guess it’s easy to mythologize a guy if you’ve never seen him play. And apparently it’s just as easy to overreact to one bad game, on the road, against the #1 seed in the West last season. But c’mon, dude. Take a frickin’ pill.
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Now living the good life in Lob City, CA.
by boltsfan21 on Dec 29, 2011 11:24 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
not sure why you would think a statement advocating playing a more athletic player would be deemed, "dumbest comment"
when the issue at the moment is not being able to defend the elite SGs of the league but you are entitled to your opinion. I know Chauncey’s history in the league, but those stats you site are stats he accumulated while playing PG. Personally, I dont care who starts, just as long as you have the best players getting most burn. It seems to be a trend where Clipper coaches play vets over rooks.
on what do you base this preference?
Travis hasn’t played a second for the Clips.
Your capslock is stuck, please buy a new keyboard
by BelgianClipper on Dec 30, 2011 12:19 AM PST up reply actions
Hmmmm
That’s “setting the record straight”? Because it sure seems like the record, just a tiny bit higher up on this page, shows the following 2 statements:
If Travis needs to start over Billups, thats fineand
Bring Mo and Chauncey off the bench.
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Now living the good life in Lob City, CA.
Travis has been injured in preseason
my guess would be he gets carved up by Ginobli just the same. The FO might be high on Travis and Trey, but they are still 2 round picks and there is a good chance they might not make in the NBA.
Anyway: the shortest route to success is to play the current line up. If the Clips can make this work it could be potentially a great team. Perhaps it doesn’t work but then I’m guess ing our rooks won’t really change that much, especially at the start of their first season.
Your capslock is stuck, please buy a new keyboard
by BelgianClipper on Dec 30, 2011 12:18 AM PST up reply actions
What on earth makes you think "Travis" is able to defend anyone in the NBA...
…let alone the elite SGs? I’m glad you’re on a first-name basis with the guy, but again, he’s a 2nd-round pick, and he hasn’t played a single minute of NBA basketball of any kind.
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Now living the good life in Lob City, CA.
To me, it does not matter how many more players we add or trade
as long as VDN stays as the coach. This year he has been given a gold mine. But will he be able to do anything that other teams will say the Clippers are truly dangerous?
by lovinglosangeles on Dec 29, 2011 4:53 PM PST reply actions
O.T. but, I always thought about this
Shaun Livingston was supposed to be our savior, our face-of-the-franchise type player. If he never had that horrific injury, and he indeed was our franchise saving player, would you rather have him or Blake Griffin?
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
That's a very hard question
What can we assume with Shaun? If he’s not injured, does he live up to the hype and develop into the PG we expected?
If so, then honestly, I would prefer S.Livingston. The team would never have had to go after B.Davis, they would have had the money to keep E.Brand. If E.Brand stays a Clipper, he might have stayed more effective (and not gotten more injured in Philly). Either way, the team would have a solid front court and a great point guard. That wouldn’t be a bad formula any day.
At that point you could try and guess what the Clippers would’ve drafted or signed from then on. Considering that the D.Sterling did try to sign B.Davis + E.Brand at the same time, one would expect that the front office would’ve been aggressive to pursue more players to make a difference. Who knows what interesting/cool things could have happened.
Brand leaving had nothing to do with money
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
Kind of like saying
What if Napoleon and Hitler had never invaded Russia.
by citizen zhiv on Dec 30, 2011 11:05 AM PST up reply actions
Mo Williams - 6th man??
I think the Clippers need to trade Mo because he’s too inconsistent in this new role. We were all worried about Mo when he was supposed to be the starting PG because he was essentialy an undersized 2 guard who couldn’t play D. Well he’s still the same player and now he’s being asked to shoot more because he’s supposed to be the scoring off the bench. This is just going to lead to more bad shots and misses. I’d rather have bench guys that are good defenders and rebounders who can score efficiently as long as their not asked to shoot too much. If the Clippers can package Mo and Gomes or Foye or Bledsoe and bring back a couple of decent bench players they need to do it.
But none of the guys on our bench now can score at all
Mo can be an efficient scorer, but he has missed tons of shots he normally makes the past couple games. Watch some of his Bucks and Cavs mixes and you will see how deadly of a shooter he is. Shooting also doesnt normally go away, especially when you are that good at it.
I would love to trade Foye right now while people around the league still think he is good. If we could get a solid 3 to backup Butler off the bench that would be great.
"Bench" scoring is where good rotations come in
If VDN has his substitutions down, there’s no reason two of our top 4 scorers shouldn’t always be in the game to help carry the reserves. Heck, even 1 of our scorers can carry the bench if they get just token support from Foye/Gomes/Evans.
Remembers when you could buy a nosebleed ticket at the Sports Arena and end up courtside.
Normally either Billups or Paul has been in with the bench
And they havent scored anyways, especially Foye.
I agree, however, seems like a limited market for him
He clearly wants to be a starter and considering all his skills and faults is an average starting PG. Looking around the league a vast majority of teams seem to have someone of equal or better quality at PG.
Atlanta seems like a logical choice. As much as they like Teague, he’s still young and relatively unproven on a team built to win now.
I say send Mo + Cook for Hinrich + Collins. On it’s surface not a slam dunk for us, but we get a dependable combo guard with an expiring contract (assuming he gets healthy soon) + a quality defensive center to handle the few true 5s like Howard. Evans can handle the hybrid 5s and Thompkins slides in as the stretch big.
Remembers when you could buy a nosebleed ticket at the Sports Arena and end up courtside.
Mo Will for Raja Bell and CJ Miles
Coming off the top of my head..
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
by SavageClipper on Dec 29, 2011 6:44 PM PST up reply actions
Mo Will for Reggie Williams and Desagana Diop
I know, it turrible..
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
by SavageClipper on Dec 29, 2011 6:48 PM PST up reply actions
the overrated chants kind of hurt from spurs fans
Im like damn we never bragged or said we were going to dominate every team like the heat did we just want to be better. The lob city thing was just a funny gimmick its like people hate the Clippers when we suck ans hate us when we try to get better.smh
by KillaClip on Dec 29, 2011 6:52 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Hasheem thabeet
Just finishe watching the rockets spurs game and trading for thabeet would be a great idea plus Houston has him at the end o their bench so we could probably get him on the cheap. He had like 6 pts in 5 mins and looked athletic an huge.
by javyg70 on Dec 29, 2011 7:17 PM PST via mobile reply actions
I'm fine
With giving up both of NO’s picks, Gomes, and Cook
problem is they have no need for what we'd offer
Remembers when you could buy a nosebleed ticket at the Sports Arena and end up courtside.
by ganima on Dec 29, 2011 7:53 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions
wow nets
w/ only marshon brooks scoring over 15 pts? Dwill the only other in double figures, but going 2-12 from the field?
D.Williams is having a horrid season
With no help, perhaps it will ironically turn out the Nets start rebuilding and ship him to Orlando…
wow, Durant in the clutch!
Remembers when you could buy a nosebleed ticket at the Sports Arena and end up courtside.
by ganima on Dec 29, 2011 7:53 PM PST via iPhone app reply actions
That was amazing!!
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
by SavageClipper on Dec 29, 2011 7:55 PM PST up reply actions
Wow... The Spurs got destroyed by the Rockets..
I Like the Clippers.. I also use clippers to cut my hair
So the Spurs lost apparently rather convincingly today
I’m guessing this is the byproduct of this weird season.
Teams will constantly be out of sync or too tired (which upon will throw rotations out of sync)
I am quite the believer in
The idea that a team can basically shoot out all of their luck. I know I did not describe that well, but I think Spurs basically made all of their shots then went completely cold.
I was watching the spur game and tonight they couldn't hit anything.
Last night against us anything they threw up would go in. So go figure how things
work out some nights.
+1
Richard Jefferson was the 2nd coming of Reggie Miller last night. Tonight, 2 for 10.
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Now living the good life in Lob City, CA.
This is definitely deja vu of the lockout season
I’m a bit too young to remember it, but wasn’t that a crazy season>
Hope not since we only won 9 games
Remembers when you could buy a nosebleed ticket at the Sports Arena and end up courtside.
If anyone's out there: the Hornets are on NBA TV tomorrow night, should I open a thread?
It’s before the Clipper game v Chicago. Might be interesting. Opinions?
I think if Gordon is playing, go for it!
I like to follow our past Clipper players. So it would be nice to keep up with them, but if Gordon isn’t playing, I wouldn’t really care to be quite honest.
Gordon is not playing tomorrow reportedly.
Plus, this is a Clippers blog, not a former Clippers blog.
Eh... It's a blog for Clipper fans... who are NBA fans... I don't think we should think so narrowly...
Last summer we had some pretty good FIBA threads. If you don’t like the thread, no harm, don’t contribute. That said, I’ve no interest in the Hornets if Gordon’s not playing.
Oh yeah... and it's a national game, the first half of the doubleheader on NBA-TV...
The second game… the Clips vs. Chicago. It’s a natural… .
I'm watching the Bulls against Kings and they look a bit sluggish.
Lets hope for overtime.
Playoff or bust
AND vdn is out if playoffs are missed…
"Blessed is the person who is too busy to worry in the daytime
and too sleepy to worry at night."
Author Unknown
by Lawler's Law on Dec 29, 2011 9:07 PM PST via mobile reply actions
The Knicks are a joke
They have absolutely NO chemistry. I know this seems pretty hypocritical coming from a Clipper fan. But this team has no defense and they have no offensive plays. They are trying to play a 1 on 1 game on offense and they can’t do anything right. Pull ups are better than the shots they are taking. On defense they seem more than lost. They are basically scrambling on EVERY play. This team is looking extremely poor.
Also a shout out, whoever the Clippers commentators are are extremely biased towards Bynum. They claim he is the 2nd best, but they would much rather take Howard+Pau+Kobe. Has this sense of entitlement really hit the commentators too?
When Bynum is healthy he is the 2nd best center in the league right now
No other center in the league has the amount of offensive skill in the post except for Dwight. He is also a beast defensively and on the glass. I cant stand Bynum, but he is a very good player. Of course, Howard is a GREAT player, and there is a large difference between the two of them.
Passing thought: Should we have kept Aminu instead of Bledsoe?
AFA would have given us an option over Gomes.
If the FO has such a high regard of Bledsoe, then to me that suggests that Mo is a trade chip. Bledsoe will come back and hopefully start earning some playing time. Some team or another will be looking for a PG as the trade deadline approaches. Maybe Baron will still have be having back problems…
"i know huh........freakin clippers man.....its like a wild ride rooting for this team....gotta love em....(sometimes) lol" In GrIfFin We TrUsT
Good points
I think the team is in a “wait and see” mode. Bledsoe out on injury for possibly another 2 months. MO is a good insurance policy in case Paul or Billups gets injured or get’s suspended, etc. If Bledsoe turns out to be fine afterward, then they can proceed with trading Mo next yr.
From a strictly position standpoint, AFA is a SF and Bledsoe is a PG. Clips are loaded at PG currently, so it would make sense to keep AFA. However, there were a few games Bledsoe went crazy yr, the front office probably was very impressed. Bledsoe might be the next Ty Lawson or Darren Collision. There’s always room and need for a ultra quick player like that, even with an established PG. Not unlike JJ Barea and Jason Kidd last yr.
AFA however, perhaps has a lower ceiling. As I’ve argued in the past, is AFA’s ceiling any higher than what Al Thornton was on the Clips? I think after all the missed shots AFA shot at the end of the yr, they just wanted change.
"After the first six minutes I was heavily winded"-Andrew Bynum
AFA is looking like a busted pick
and we handed him off to another team.
by mustang6944 on Dec 30, 2011 10:33 AM PST up reply actions
Hornets blog already complaining about AFA
with the same issues we had with him. Deer in headlights, losing the ball etc.
"Who wants a free Sharpie?"
i think we just need a new coach
by LAClippers1983 on Dec 29, 2011 11:49 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Presuming that is NOT possible
If there wasn’t enough chaos trying to gel players together..then throwing a new coach in.
Talk about lighting up a media firestorm….
As if the expectations and new tagline of “Los Angeles Eagles” wasn’t enough..
Chauncey and Mo
I think they’re too much the same kind of player. We could and should live up to just one them coming off the bench. CB could easily be the 6th man of the year playing a lot off the bench and most of all closing the games. With the actual roster Mo will be playing 20/25 min and NEVER ( look at @GS game) the clutch minutes. That’s not indeed a great 6th man!!!
What about back up bigs? Yeah we need some body but we especially need our starters to take care of our painted area. It won’t surely be Przy or Ike to change our life if GS grab 10 out of 11 rebs against BG&DJ. I copy and paste from above:
we need a new coach
This is
exactly why I am lukewarm on the CP3 trade. Getting him is awesome – but the team is now thin and lacking a true 2. I just don’t understand the logic of shoring up one position by giving up on another. As awesome as Chris Paul is, having a starting lineup of Chauncey, EJ, Butler, Griffin, and DJ with Mo and Kaman as our 6th and 7th would have arguably made an even better team and with flexibility to boot.
With that said, I don’t blame Olshey for pulling the trigger and I think the team just needs more time to gel. Chauncey, in particular, needs time to get adjusted to his shooting guard position. Let us relax a little, and lay off the panic button. The Heatles stumbled out of the gate, so I’m not surprised at all we got our butts kicked by the Spurs.
Yes in the short term you are right
after the season you would probably lose Kaman and Billups whilst the problems with Mo would still exist. Paul + Griffin trumps Gordon + Griffin and it will be easier to find the right pieces for the first combination then for the second.
Your capslock is stuck, please buy a new keyboard
by BelgianClipper on Dec 30, 2011 4:56 AM PST up reply actions
+1
Anytime you get a top-5 player by giving up a top-15 player, you do it.
Remembers when you could buy a nosebleed ticket at the Sports Arena and end up courtside.
EJ's not even top 15
he’s top 50. Not even really top 25 yet.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Dec 31, 2011 5:09 PM PST up reply actions
this
Proudly enduring the pain since the days of Bill Walton's foot.
Now living the good life in Lob City, CA.
I'm going to be a little nitpicky
and take exception to this quote:
Is Evans going to solve our woeful rebounding problems.
I’m going to call small sample size on this one especially since asking if Evans is the answer is asking if the rebounding “problem” (of only two games) is limited to the bench. GSW was just a fluky game against a team that shoots a lot of jumpers and there were a lot of long rebounds as a result that are just random. Throwing that game out (which I’m comfortable doing), there’s all of one game to analyze and that’s simply insufficient. I’ll say the starters will be fine because they were fine last season which is a much more meaningful sample size for analysis. So, yes, I think Reggie will help a ton because I think it’s a bench problem.
But yes, I would also look to sign Diogu.
Can't ignore the Laker games
especially given the abbreviated off-season. Putting the GSW game aside, Caron’s grabbed 1,2 and 1. Chauncey’s grabbed 1,0 and 1. Their career averages are around 7 rpg combined so logic dictates they’ll start grabbing a few but if the question is what does the team need now, then I definitely say rebounding in general. Now that doesn’t mean we automatically trade away Mo for an additional rebounder, but it is worth acknowledging and tracking.
Remembers when you could buy a nosebleed ticket at the Sports Arena and end up courtside.
Evans will help
But the team as a whole needs to put in more of an effort in rebounding. The team as a whole has shown inconsistencies in their rebounding. Theoretically, we should have a better rebounding line up than last year given that Butler, Billups and Paul are better rebounders that the incumbents at the position last year. Where we hurt is losing Kaman who was near a double double a night. Add in the fact that Blake rebounding numbers are down and that is the sum of our deficiencies.
by mustang6944 on Dec 30, 2011 10:47 AM PST up reply actions
DJ's per minute numbers are also down
We’re paying him to be a 10 and 10 guy and for all his luster the first two games, he needs to step it up on the boards.
Remembers when you could buy a nosebleed ticket at the Sports Arena and end up courtside.
The Big Man
The problem with Pryzbilla right now is… The Heat is also trying to sign him…. We all know that’s not good
Leave the team as is for now.........maybe add 1 more true Centre
We’ve had a minimal preseason and only played 2 games. No need to be calling for an overhaul like some are suggesting.
Give it time and reassess after 22 games.

by 















