POR/LAC Trade Idea.
There's a glaring trade opportunity I see brewing here. Needless to say, Crash Wallace is lighting it up in POR. (Why didn't we get him again?) Besides Wallace making Batum expendable, the Blazers are lacking a true big man beyond Marcus Camby. While I love having a big man rotation of Blake, DJ, and Kaman there are 2 problems. 1) DJ needs to be starting. 2) Kaman is injury prone.
I'd love to see Kaman, and a pick if need be, traded for Camby and Batum.
Batum solves our woes at the three with a lock-down defender who can shoot the 3 and who is also young enough to join our core. Camby, already coming off the bench, should have no problem backing up DJ and is/was a fan favorite.
I just hope POR doesn't realize Kaman is now more pick and pop than he is a defensive big man, but he's still seven feet tall.
Neil seems savvy, and it's looking less and less likely we settle for a Prince or a Battier who, while effective, are too old to fit you EJ and Blake.
80 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
To add to this, LMA is currently the starting center. No way this lasts.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 11:07 AM PDT reply actions
I’d rather keep Kaman and then sign-and-trade Jordan this offseason if possible. Kaman fits what we need more out of our center position in order to create space for Blake.
Twitter: @FlyByKnite
Honestly.
On paper Kaman seems like a good fit. But in reality he is taking touches and rebounds away from Blake. DJ posted 9 and 8 off the bench. He should be starting.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
I hope he’s taking rebounds away from Blake. And touches too. Kaman should be getting those. If he wasn’t, then we’d have a problem. Kaman has a jumper, something Jordan does not. Kaman has the ability to finish around the rim without dunking, something Jordan does not. Kaman has the ability to keep opposing centers out of the lane, something Jordan does not. Have you ever realized how clogged the paint gets with Jordan in there? Kaman gets a ton of open looks around the free throw line for jumpers because of the spacing on the floor. That’s a great thing. We need more of that.
Twitter: @FlyByKnite
Touches
You probably don’t want Kaman taking shots away from Griffin. Kaman’s TS% < Griffin’s (though a lot of that was from the shit show we saw from Kaman before he got hurt.)
But I don’t get the rebouding complaint. What do we care who gets the rebounds? And why is Kaman getting reboudns a bad thing yet Jordan getting rebounds a good thing? Team rebounds are a good thing. Until those two start boxing each other out in an attempt to get a rebound and it goes out of bounds, I don’t see the problem.
by Michael White on Mar 31, 2011 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Kaman is shooting 45% on 10-to-23 foot jumpers. That’s good for a center. On the season, DeAndre Jordan has taken just 6 of those and missed all of them. I like the way Kaman spaces the floor with Blake. He allows Blake room to operate and get his points. On those same jumpers this season, Blake Griffin is shooting 33%. That’s not good. That’s pretty bad. Blake has to play primarily around the rim, which is why his TS% is better than Kaman’s. We need Kaman to stretch the floor with his jumper in order to give Blake room to do what he needs to do.
Twitter: @FlyByKnite
"Kaman has the ability to finish around the rim without dunking."
I chuckled at this.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions
I chuckle
when people say he has the ability to finish with either hand.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions
That's what she said.
But anyway, DJ and Blake have been a revelation with their style of play. I hate Kaman’s missed bunnies and he’s still doing it.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions
terrible for a center
An nba center is suppose to average over 50% fg percentage. Kaman’s shot is also unreliable he has always been a poor efficiency center and seems in games his shot goes away as the game goes on. Let’s not even get into the effort department with Kaman. Kaman opens the floor for himself because teams still double and triple Blake when they play together.
by KillaClip on Apr 1, 2011 11:19 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
"he has always been a poor efficiency center"
This statement is untrue.
Kaman is shooting 45% on jumpers. That’s a crazy mark for a center. Kaman has 164 attempts on 10-to-23 foot jumpers this season. There’s only one other qualified center with as many attempts as Kaman that’s shooting a higher percentage on those same jumpers this season. That guy is Al Horford. Horford is at 52%. In fact, the only reason Kaman’s field goal percentage isn’t above 50% is because he isn’t finishing in the 3-to-9 foot area. He’s shooting just 31% in that range. He’s at 62% around the rim, though. He’s just not finishing in that 3-to-9 foot area. He’ll improve there, though. He’s down 20% from last year’s mark in that range. It’s just a down year for him in that department.
As for Kaman being a poor efficiency rebounder, that’s just not true. Do you think DeAndre Jordan is a poor efficiency rebounder? The reason I ask is because Jordan’s TRR this season is 16.2 while Kaman’s is at 15.6. Neither of these guys will be mistaken for Dwight Howard, Tyson Chandler, Joakim Noah, Andrew Bynum, or Andrew Bogut. They’re also not Brook Lopez, Andrea Bargnani, Channing Frye, Marc Gasol, or Nene. They’re solid rebounders for their position.
I’ll admit, I wanted to trade Kaman a few months ago but he fits this team’s offensive mindset better than Jordan does. If a team is willing to sign-and-trade for Jordan then I’d do it. Especially if they offer a draft pick.
Twitter: @FlyByKnite
I should mention that Kaman is 23-of-74 in that 3-to-9 foot area. If he had made just 10 of the 51 baskets that he missed, Kaman would have been shooting 44.6% in that area. That would have raised his field goal percentage to 49.7% on the season. If he makes 15 of the 51 baskets that he missed, he moves up to 51.35% in that area and 51.14% on the season. So, it’s all a matter of him finishing in that part of the floor. That’s all it is. It’s not like he sucks.
Twitter: @FlyByKnite
" Until those two start boxing each other out in an attempt to get a rebound and it goes out of bounds, I don’t see the problem."
You haven’t seen this happening? Kaman routinely gets in Blake’s way, not to mention dude never boxes out when he’s in the lane.
I like Kaman, really I do. But not in the starting line-up.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions
What's our record since he replaced DJ in the lineup?
Of course, pneumonia might have something to do with it…
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be." - John Wooden
Off the top of my head, we have losses to PHX, PHI, DAL, and LAL with wins against TOR, CLE, and........?
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions
who cares if he takes rebounds away from blake
all that means is that we still get the ball. There has been times where Kaman has come off the bench to get a double-double so how does 9 and 8 off the bench trump that? I love DJ but he is still inconsistent. Blake may get less touches but they are quality touches around the rim rather than mid range jumpers.
"Fresh out the airport/ Fresh out the chair with the clippers/ Like Sean Livin' thinking, hmm/ I'm trying to get it like Sean get it" - Wale "Beautiful Bliss"
Sure, I'm down
POR wouldn’t do it though.
I do think Portland would take a look at a trade for Kaman, though and with Wallace in they have moved Batum to the bench, but this seems like far too much for Portland to pay. Also, Wallace expires next year as does Kaman. I’m not sure the contract of Batum, but this trade seems like it’s good for one year only. You’d probably have to throw in the Minny pick at least because I know the Portland fans are fanatical about Batum.
I don't think the L values Camby like they should, though
Portland certainly loves Batum, but their love for him may be dwindling out of the current excitement for Gerald Wallace. This isn’t an entirely unlikely scenario, I think.
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be." - John Wooden
I agree.
Wallace is electrifying that team right now. If they have some playoff success and Wallace shines, I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility that they cash in Batum for something they legitimately need: a starting center. Camby is 38, beyond him who do they have??
Like I said, maybe a first round pick sweetens the deal. We can send them our 2013 after the draft or something along those lines.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions
the battle of over-value
Batum still starts for Por while Wallace plays the 4 in starting the last 9 games after coming off the bench for his first 8 with Por. In playing both Wallace and L.A. out of position while having Camby come off the bench says they must think quite a bit of Batum or that camby is not at the level he was during his clipper tenure. I gotta think if Neal was willing to trade Kaman he would not see this as enough value, especially if the clips were asked to throw in any kind of 1st round draft pick.
by Chris O'Reilly on Mar 31, 2011 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Nate has specifically said Marcus has been benched because he is averaging about 5.8 PPG and the starting unit needs more offense.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I would like a Batum..but I think Kaman is still valuable to the team.
Kaman gives the team offense and some boards. I think he and Jordan are a good mix. Offense and defense. This is not the age of the centers like in the past…Kaman is a skilled big man..that is always valuable.
This trade
Even if this particular trade may not work, I think the idea is the right one. If you want to move Kaman, you need to realize that you need a starting SF and a backup center.
yes
but you dont need to acquire both in the same deal. The back up C would only need to provide 15-18 minutes of decent basketball. I would take a flier on Yao if the Clips traded Kaman for a SF.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Yao is finished. Why don't people get that? I'm not being jokey when I say he should be happy his foot hasn't fallen off.
300+ pounds riding on 30+ screws isn’t ideal.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Sure
or he could be the next Ilgauskas. At the right price he’d be worth the experiment.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Interesting...
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah I wouldn't do Yao
but I’m sure there is some veteran big man that come in for 15 minutes a game to sub in for DJ and start in a pinch. I like this trade as long as the additional pick isn’t the mini pick.
"It's better to be an optimist who is sometimes wrong than a pessimist who is always right"unknown
Hmmm how about a guy name Greg from Portland?
Man I got them buzzin' buzzin' buzzin' buzzin, Like da-da-da-da-da-da-da -Mann
I’ll take a guess, but I’ll say that somebody pays him starter money.
by Michael White on Apr 1, 2011 7:44 AM PDT up reply actions
BATTIER!
The Clippers need a defender and Ron Artest is taken. Shane is the only person in the league I can think of that can defend and fill our “Zombied” 3 spot. We dont need a scorer nor ball handler to take the ball away from Blake or EJ. Filling the 3 with a defender would be perfect. That would help us stop scorers like “the Black Dumba”, Lebron, Melo, etc.
I say Defender for our Clippers.
I would say
Battier is a lock to go to a elite contender on a discount deal. Little chance he spends the last few remaining years of his career playing for a team that would have to battle hard just to make the playoffs. And his age (33 on opening night) means the Clips will be looking for a replacement almost right away.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Either way...
the Clippers need someone of experience to help us get to that next level. Last nights game showed exactly why youth can be a problem. I know the refs were handing out some BS calls, but it wasnt helping when Blake and MO and EJ and everyone else complains about the calls. Blake and EJ need to earn the respect of these refs.
Having someone of age and experience can get us over that hump. As for having a defender like Shane,would be a plus. He’s probably got 3 years left in him but that would be all we need.
Like I said earlier, any 3 spot defender is what Im looking for and I believe the Clippers should too.
I don't think he has even 3 years left
and I’m not advocating they sign a 21 year old as the solution. A guy in the middle of his career (25-28 years old) with some solid playoff experience would suffice.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions
I dont know
any player in the league anymore with real playoff experience thats 25-28.
Batum would be nice but I’d rather keep Moon to fill my roster.
well last year
there was Childress, Wright and Brewer. This year there is a lot less on the market, AK at age 30 makes the most sense.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
All question marks though
Brewer – More of a shooting guard, and we were supposedly avoiding SG/SF tweeners
Childress – No one had seen him in an NBA uniform for a couple years
Wright – No reason to think he’d have a year like this
…question marks, with one exception…
RYAN GOMES – LeBron James 2: Return of the James
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be." - John Wooden
Hmm
Brewer is listed at 6ft 7in 220 lbs so he has the size to play either. So instead of a 2/3 tweener they go with a 3/4 tweener. Fantastic.
Childress probably became more well known for signing that net income contract. As a high draft pick he wasn’t some unknown Euro.
Wright had a pretty good year last year. His per minute stats this year are pretty consistent of what they were last year.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions
No one mentioned Brewer or Wright and JChill
wasn’t coming here, was overpaid and sucks.
Next
"[Fans are] not technically a lot of times savvy. They don't understand and they don't weigh issues the way that [I] weigh them."
Mike Dunleavy, Sr.
QRoss is on the Market
This is going to be my team, and we're going to rise together.
-Clipper Darrell
wrong as usual
go back to the archives, it was well discussed.
And Childress is good. You obviously haven’t been paying attention.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Apr 1, 2011 12:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Non
of those players fill the 3 spot more than Gomes does.
AK would be alright but he to needs the ball in his hands to produce… We dont need that, we need defense.
Huh?
All 3 of those guys are WAYYYYY better than Gomes. Brewer is considered by many to be the best defender on the Bulls (even better than Noah).
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Either way...
the Clippers need someone of experience to help us get to that next level. Last nights game showed exactly why youth can be a problem. I know the refs were handing out some BS calls, but it wasnt helping when Blake and MO and EJ and everyone else complains about the calls. Blake and EJ need to earn the respect of these refs.
Having someone of age and experience can get us over that hump. As for having a defender like Shane,would be a plus. He’s probably got 3 years left in him but that would be all we need.
Like I said earlier, any 3 spot defender is what Im looking for and I believe the Clippers should too.
SEriously?
ALl of your other points aside…. Camby being a fan favorite hardly helps your arguement. I would take derek fisher and jj barea if I thought it would help the team succeed
What's the use of a good young core if they never end up being winners for us?
by cueball123 on Mar 31, 2011 2:40 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
I loved Camby here and he actually LIKED being a Clipper. That's not worth mentioning?
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Totally Agree but No Way
Portland is not moving Batum for a paper only player in Kaman. DJ sets the tone, Kaman continually makes shots and rebounds when they are not necessary but continually takes bad shots and rebounds when the game doent matter. DJ needs to be starting
Great trade except
The Clips would love to get Batum to fill the SF role. And, Portland would be crazy to let him go. He’s under contract for two more seasons and he’s a bargain. The downside is that the Clips would find themselves in the position of having to offer big contracts to EJ and Batum at the same time. Both are on schedule to become unrestricted agents after the 2012-2013 season. It’s easier if a team doesn’t have to re-sign more than one key player per year.
Of course, the great unknown is what the new CBA looks like. I just have to think that it will be much more restrictive on exceeding cap.
They promised us that trading Baron allowed them to re-sign EJ and DJ. Accordingly, I’m expecting extension for both this off-season (EJ extension and DJ re-signed.)
by Michael White on Mar 31, 2011 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions
EJ extension would go a long way in establishing credibitlity...
But if we weren’t the damn Clippers we could pull a Westbrook, hold off on extending EJ, and then sign or trade for a legit FA. That way, EJ’s bigger deal wouldn’t count against the cap until next year, where we could then go over and sign him to his deal.
Growing pains. We go that route, we’re cheap. OKC does it and Presti is a genius.
Thanks, DTS.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Oof
An EJ extension at the right price is the minimum to maintain current levels of credibility.
An EJ extension at the wrong price will be a disaster.
This is true
problem is I can’t see the him taking less than a 5 year/60 million deal.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions
EJ's extension
does not effect the cap space of the Clippers. His new cap figure wouldn’t kick in until the 2012 season.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Mar 31, 2011 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Right.
I guess I jumped the gun. Then it is possible to lock EJ in and even acquire a D-Will without losing Kaman. Though Kaman is certainly not untouchable. Wonder if NJN would do MoWilly, Aminu, and the Minny pick if D-Will makes it known he’s a ghost. Really whatever it takes in that case.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions
i don't think jersey is trading Deron
it would take Deron, it would be really dumb and a real waste of assets. However if they are i would also throw Bled, basically anyone not named Gordon or Griffin.
Dream scenario.
I posted this link in a fanshot a couple months ago…
http://www.blazersedge.com/2011/1/25/1955058/batums-last-entry-on-his-blog
In Batum’s Blog, he mentions trading Kaman for a viable small forward.
I wish it could be him!
Batum
Everyone knows Portland (and practically the rest of the NBA) is really high on Batum, but I just cannot see why. I think his ceiling is a better version of Trevor Ariza – which is good, just not great. If I remember correctly, Portland was initially a potential trade partner in the Carmelo bonanza, but dropped out when they steadfastly refused to include Batum. He’s practically untouchable and I highly doubt Portland would even think of doing this trade. Perhaps someone can tell me what they think of Batum and how good he might be… cause I just don’t see it.
Personally, I think we already have our own version of Batum in Aminu. The kid is incredibly raw, but he’s shown glimpses (however rare it may be) of what he can do once he has more experience under his belt.
If we’re going to poach an SF from Memphis, it’s not Battier that I want.. it’s Tony Allen. He’s one of the best one-on-one defenders at the 3 position, strong enough to hold his own against the likes of Carmelo and Lebron, and also quick enough for a couple of steals a game. I just don’t know if Memphis would be willing to deal him.
I doubt Tony Allen would be available. He’s been the most sneaky great free agent acquisition of the year and he’s really shined since being in the starting lineup.
From Memphis (via trade) I believe the only guy available will be Mayo.
by Michael White on Mar 31, 2011 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Sneaky great..
indeed. I got ridiculed for dropping Ariza to pick up Allen in fantasy basketball. Now my team’s advancement in the playoffs depends heavily on his performance.
QFT
Tony Allen has learned to make layups (ahem Kaman) and has my vote for MIP. He is unequivocally the best wing defender in the league. Watching him chase around Durant is a real treat. And let’s not forget his Oakley-esque tough-guy persona (controlled nutjob).
Tony Allen’s defense seems to have rubbed off on Mayo too. Punched him awake, or something. Cuz suddenly Mayo’s defense has improved by a butt-load. If Mayo can accept a less offensive role, he’s a great target to buy low on.
I don't get it over. I think Batum is incredibily over-valued.
But he’d still be a perfect fit for the team. And it’s never bad to acquire a player everyone else wants.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions
If I remember correctly
Based on my memory and the eye test, he rebounds, scores efficiently, spreads the floor, plays great individual and help defense, and unselfish. Not unlike Tayshaun Prince, only much younger.
Now let’s look at it statistically. From basketball-reference.com, it looks like his reputation as an efficient scorer is based on the 09-10 season, not the 10-11 season. However, even in a “slump year,” he’s nearly as efficient as EJ. He’s an average rebounder, at best. He rarely gets assists, but he also rarely turns the ball over. PER seems average (was above last year, dipped below this year). Decent enough defender (statistically), but nothing to write home about. That being said, I still think he plays good defense and forces low percentage shots. His win-shares are above average no matter when you look at them.
If one assumes there’ll be development, he’s right around the level of Gordon (less scoring, more all-around), and both would be very solid pieces to a team built around Griffin. If we could somehow fleece NJ out of DWill, I think a lineup of DWill, Gordon, Batum, Griffin, Jordan goes to the WCF.
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be." - John Wooden
Gordon is a far better player than Batum
And he could be a real star if he got handles and some moves so that he could truly create off the dribble without turning it over every other time.
I agree that Gordon's potential surpasses Batum's
I have my doubts that Batum will really get any better than he is right now, while Gordon really has a few tweaks he needs to work out to become a truly dominant scorer. Many of those tweaks he seemed to have figured out earlier in the year, but with the wrist injury they seem to be back (which would make perfect sense with a wrist injury).
Statistically, though, Gordon’s only marginally better than Batum this year, and Batum was better than Gordon last year. Statistically.
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be." - John Wooden
With your analysis in mind,
would you take Batum over Gallinari?
Hmmm...
My gut would say no, since I really like what Gallinari brings to the table, based on what I’ve seen. But it also seems like Batum’s a better defender (though that may or may not be true, since I have seen only a handful of games from both players).
The stats say Gallo’s a more efficient scorer (because he gets to the line a lot more), but otherwise there’s not a whole lot different about them statistically.
So to answer your question, no, I’d go with Gallinari for size, to offset the smaller Gordon. (I wouldn’t ever give up Gordon for either of those guys, though, not that you asked.)
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be." - John Wooden
Oooh
With what NewCavsFan said below, I wonder which player would require a bigger paycheck in the future? That would make all the difference in the world. I’m thinking, based on hype, that Batum might be the more expensive guy.
Also, there’s the question of who is more expendable to their respective teams. Denver has a lot of talent… Between Felton, Lawson, Afflalo, JR Smith, Chandler, and Gallinari, they’re deep at all three of the PG, SG, and SF positions. Smith or Afflalo can both play SF (when size allows it), and Karl loves playing Felton and Lawson together. They’ve had health issues, so no one’s been the odd man out yet, but I wonder if by the end of the playoffs, any one of those guys will become tradeable?
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be." - John Wooden
I'm suspecting
that Gallinari will be the odd man out. Management wanted to trade him right away after the Carmelo bonanza, so that says a lot about how they feel regarding his potential.
Yes, I feel that way, too.
And what DEN DOESN’T need more of is offense. I bet we could pry Gallo away with a regular First Rounder…but so could anyone else in the league.
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Apr 1, 2011 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't get it either*
"Buckle your seat belts, folks. This one's going down to the wire." -The inimitable Ralph Lawler.
by Gordon for President on Mar 31, 2011 4:29 PM PDT reply actions
Batum isnt the 2nd coming of LBJ or any other random great SF
But he is exactly what this team needs. He makes his shots, especially 3s, is a decent rebounder, a VERY good defender, and is still quite young.
The only thing that Moon and Aminu have over him is athleticism, and Gomes is not better at anything.
The issue, of course, would be monetary in resigning him, but again, after the CBA, who knows?
Batum’s defense is overrated, especially this season.
Synergy’s top 5 worst defenders (min. 300 plays): J.R. Smith, Ramon Sessions, Daniel Gibson, Marco Belinelli, Nic Batum.
As of February 22nd, Batum was allowing 1.06 points per possession on defense. That was worst among qualified SF’s.
Twitter: @FlyByKnite
i do really like batum
not sure about for Kaman though. Sure camby can still be productive, but for how much longer? I’m curious what they’re going to do with Oden, will they give him an extension? Will he play for the QO? If Jasen Powell got his hands on Oden though, I’d be scared for his life.
Definitely seems like Batum might be expendable to PDX now that they have wallace. They might look ahead a few years, and realize that they probably can’t pay Batum his market value when they still have Wallace under contract. Maybe they’d let him go for just the Minny pick? Not sure I’d do that, but maybe I try and get at least Batum, Rudy, and their 1st rounder (since Clips technically can’t trade the Minny pick without getting a pick back) for the minny pick.

by 















