The Clippers, Rebounding and Reggie Evans
In the first six games of the season, the Los Angeles Clippers were outrebounded five times and never once outrebounded their opponent (they were even once). After two weeks, the Clippers were dead last in the NBA in rebounding, and being dismissed as a legitimate contender in the Western Conference in large part because of that anemic rebounding.
In 24 games since, they've outrebounded their opponents in 19 of them. Where they were once the worst rebounding team in the league, they're now among the best, tied for third in rebound differential and total rebound percentage.
Why the big turnaround? No doubt the coaching staff emphasized the need to box out and to hit the boards harder. The team has probably made a commitment to doing a better job on the boards. But all of that presumes that they were slacking in the first six games. We shouldn't ignore either that six games is a very small sample size. Maybe the Clippers worst rebounding games of the season just randomly fell towards the beginning of the schedule.
But there's another factor that must be considered. It happens, probably not coincidentally, that Reggie Evans missed the first five games of the season. After Evans became a fixture off the Clippers bench, the Clippers suddenly went from a terrible rebounding team to a great rebounding team.
It's no secret that Evans is a terrific rebounder. Last season with Toronto, he led the entire NBA in rebounding percentage (the percentage of available rebounds while the player is on the floor that the player actually gets) -- that's correct, there was actually a better rebounder in the NBA last season than Kevin Love.
This season Evans has dropped off a bit -- all the way back to fourth in total rebounding percentage. To give some context to the rebounding percentage number, there are 10 players on the court at all times. If all 10 of those players got an equal number of rebounds, each of them would have a rebounding percentage of 10%. Evans' rebounding percentage is more than double that average, 20.8%. There were only eight players who played at least 500 minutes last year that averaged better than 20% in rebounding percentage, and only eight this season as well. Evans is simply put an elite rebounder.
To further put this into perspective, Reggie Evans has grabbed 139 rebounds in 394 minutes on the season. That works out to better than one rebound every three minutes on the floor. It's almost 17 rebounds per 48 minutes.
Still, when you consider that Evans plays less than 16 minutes, less than a third of each game, it's surprising that he should single-handedly transform the Clippers from a bad rebouding team into a good rebounding team. I mean, Brian Cook is a terrible rebounder, but he would get a few here and there. When you do the math, Evans' rebounding margin over Cook whom he replaced in the rotation is fewer than 3 rebounds a game. Given that the Clippers are now outrebounding their opponents by a season average of more than 3 rebounds per game, clearly Reggie's actual rebounds don't account for the entire difference.
Evans' gets everything he gets on an NBA court through hustle and determination. He's not the biggest or strongest player, he doesn't jump the highest. He just works harder than other guys (oh yeah, and he also knows all the tricks). There was never a valid excuse for a team featuring Blake Griffin and DeAndre Jordan,arguably the most athletic big man tandem in the entire NBA, to be dead last in rebounding. Those guys might not have been working as hard on the glass early in the season as they should have been -- with Evans around, they'd be bound to work a bit harder.
Evans is not going to give you a lot on the offensive end, if anything. His offensive rebounding gets the team extra possessions, but beyond setting a screen, he's not going to be doing a lot to generate scores out of those possessions. He's got terrible hands (as we saw twice last night when Chris Paul passes bounced off him and out of bounds) and no discernible offensive skills. But his defense and rebounding nonetheless make him a valuable member of the rotation.
I'm the first to say that correlation doesn't equal causation. Reggie Evans may not be solely responsible for the Clippers rebounding turnaround -- but he's certainly a big part of it.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Dont comment much on here...
but for this I will! I love Reggie Evans. He’s actually my favorite bench player. Which I know is senseless and ridiculous…. but I love how hard he hustles and how he can’t dribble or make a basket more than 2 feet away. Even then, it’s not a sure thing. I also love his goofy smile and his sweat-band.
If they made a Evans jersey, you bet your bottom dollar I’d buy it.
#Hustla
"The Transplant" (So. Cal boy stuck in NYC)
by BryanHarvey'sMoustache on Feb 21, 2012 6:38 PM PST reply actions
+ I heart Reggie as well
"Success only comes before work inside of a dictionary!"
by Clipperoo on Feb 21, 2012 8:35 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Couldn't have said it better myself
Everyone loves em some Reggie!!! I love hearing the “Reggie” chants at Staples Center!!! #IAINTLYING
"Every existing thing is born without reason, prolongs itself out of weakness, and dies by chance" -Jean-Paul Sarte
I am like the only person who is not in love with reggie evans
I think VDN just needs to put him in lineups better.
That came out weird
Vinny needs to have better lineups and rotations period, but I think Reggie is featured in a lot of the weirdest ones.
I hate when Reggie and Kenyon are out there together
Kenyon’s jumpers are pretty flat and non-existent! They both bring hustle, but not much offense. I like Blake-Reggie and Kenyon-DJ playing together
"Every existing thing is born without reason, prolongs itself out of weakness, and dies by chance" -Jean-Paul Sarte
Yes!
Those are the best big combinations (aside from Dj Blake of course).
Of course, VDN hardly ever plays the good lineups.
The Blazers are just trashing San Antonio. They're up by 18 points.
by lovinglosangeles on Feb 21, 2012 7:47 PM PST reply actions
Not as bad as the start of the Blazers-Laker game.
I thought they made a mistake, I believe the score was somewhere around 13-39 or something.
The Blazers know they have to win this game. They've lost 6 games in a row.
by lovinglosangeles on Feb 21, 2012 8:08 PM PST up reply actions
I looked on YahooSports
What the hell happened to San Antonio’s lineup?
Tired or injured? Or took the Blazers for granted?
by lovinglosangeles on Feb 21, 2012 8:31 PM PST up reply actions
Not 100% sure.
But I believe Manu has an oblique injury, and for Duncan and Parker, I think they were just gassed.
About Tim and Tony, that makes sense... Now I remember reading that
Manu would be out for two weeks.
by lovinglosangeles on Feb 21, 2012 8:46 PM PST up reply actions
It's on NBA TV...
Duncan didn’t even dress. Official reason for Parker and Timay is REST. I was thinking about writing about this. Pop plays his A rotation for the Clips but runs his deep bench against the Blazers. Does that mean he doesn’t take Portland seriously?
Well, remember that the Blazers had lost 6 games in a row, so Pop
probably took the Blazers for granted. Final score Blazers 137 – San Antonio 97.
by lovinglosangeles on Feb 21, 2012 9:49 PM PST up reply actions
he didn't possibly expect to win this game
no NBA team is bad enough that you sit your best 3 and win (unless you are a balanced team like Denver)
he went for a schedule loss and rested his guys
#refsagainstLAC
FWIW
Some Clippers fan: do u think C’s will move Ray Allen
Eric Pincus: not expecting it but if so – Clippers interested
Reggie Evans is a guy who tells the truth.
Might happen
If Celtics don’t see much improvement, I can see them trading to have an early start to rebuild. Foye, Bledsoe, Gomes, trade exception for Jesus Shuttlesworth?
Why would they take Gomes?
he has another year on the his contract.
I think it would be Bledsoe, Foye, Cook and maybe the 2nd round rookies plus 2nd round picks.
Help us Altered Beast you're our only hope.
by ClipperChuck on Feb 21, 2012 8:53 PM PST up reply actions
Why would the Cs want a young, talented yet raw point guard?
They already have one in Avery Bradley, who BTW is already considered by many to be the best on-ball defender in the league.
Reg-gie, Reg-gie!!
He hustles, he grabs rebounds, occasionally leads fast breaks and lobs to Blake. Love him.
I wouldnt say Reggie has TERRIBLE hands
due to him mishandling those passes from Paul. I think the bigger reason for Reggie not being able to catch those passes was because he didn’t expect the pass. Afterall, how often do our players look to pass to Reggie for a scoring opportunity?
by Valdeezy on Feb 21, 2012 8:50 PM PST via mobile reply actions
hey Steve-o, you forgot to add that Reggie has been improving at the line
in the beginning of the season, he was terrible, (30%?) now he is consistantly making 1 out of 2! haha
if that's going to be your profile picture
you should change your name to big0ldonald
#refsagainstLAC
I just tweeted Eric Pincus if he has heard anything about a Clippers trade
He tweeted back saying Not yet.
Reggie Evans is a guy who tells the truth.
I created it like a couple days ago
Of course thats not my real name though :)
Reggie Evans is a guy who tells the truth.
by ClipperBEAST on Feb 21, 2012 9:46 PM PST up reply actions
Dang you!
I have a feeling you are actually, Mohammad Lee!
What??
The name I put is John Vaser… Where did you get Mohammad Lee??
Reggie Evans is a guy who tells the truth.
by ClipperBEAST on Feb 21, 2012 10:16 PM PST up reply actions
I am guessing The Big Bang Theory
Mohhamed is the most common first name in the world and Lee the most common surname so without any other help as to what your name is, he just took the best possible odds.
" He's not the biggest or strongest..."
He is one of the strongest in the league. Only a handful of guys are stronger than Reggie.
By the way, Blake Griffin does not play “strong”. He plays with explosion. He currently can not back anybody down. He is a strong guy but oddly does not play that way. Just wanted to being that up, seeing as how I always hear broadcastsers mentioning “how song he plays”.
Energy * Focus * No Excuses
"For [Griffin] getting in the way of Andre Miller’s 40 yard dash?" -S. Perrin
by Takebb909 on Feb 21, 2012 11:43 PM PST via mobile reply actions
he doesnt back players down?
he does play strong, just doesn’t play smart sometimes.
brijo1
by ThaFoX on Feb 22, 2012 11:43 AM PST via Android app up reply actions
Blake doesn't back people down
He will do an up and under. He does more rotations on pivot foots. Blake doesn’t play with strength, he plays with power. Reggie and Caron play with strength, even Kenyon does.
Energy * Focus * No Excuses
"For [Griffin] getting in the way of Andre Miller’s 40 yard dash?" -S. Perrin
by Takebb909 on Feb 22, 2012 11:53 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Blake backs people down all the time
he backs down to his spot, and then does his up-and-under or pivot. Without a post up and a back down, there is no move.
#refsagainstLAC
He gets punked a lot when he tries
He can’t move too many people like I would have suspected given his strength
Energy * Focus * No Excuses
"For [Griffin] getting in the way of Andre Miller’s 40 yard dash?" -S. Perrin
by Takebb909 on Feb 22, 2012 3:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Glad you posted this...
Reggie is a HUGE part of this team! He saves us, so many times, from our numerous bad offensive sets. I’m really happy to have him on our team!
"look, you can find any coach you want, bring him in here and run the situation. But I don't think they are going to do as good a job as I do." -Mike Dunleavy Sr.
by CLiPPz WeRD 12 on Feb 22, 2012 10:24 AM PST reply actions

by 














