I'll admit as much as Wetzel attempted to balance out the article, the article was skewed in favor or Darrell Bailey. But me posting this isn't in an attempt to claim who's right and wrong again (we all know that the Clippers have the right to protect their franchise name and that the Clippers organization has done a terrible job in handling this), what I would like to bring up is the amount Bailey has claimed to have made ($7,500 in 18 years.) Now I'll admit that Bailey's word isn't the most honest, but nor is the Clippers. Somewhere in this article though, there has to be a middle ground though...right?