This was a topic I wanted to bring up a week or so ago and had not the opportunity, and with Chris Pauls' latest heroics, it has made this topic "meatier".

If for some mysterious reason our [Clipper] organization were left with the decision of having to decide to move the franchise ahead, going forward with only one of two players, who should they choose? Chris Paul or Blake Griffin?

For the sake of argument, let's just say that one of the two slept with the other guy's mother....or cat...or whatever. They just had to make this decision. Who is more important to the franchise future. Adding this, let's also say that this player will play their full and healthy career with the Clippers from here on.

I pose this question to gauge where fans Clipper hearts and minds lie.

Do you go with the 6-foot dynamo that commands the tempo of the game? Or do you select the dynamite of a player who seems to have been injected with the "super soldier" serum?

I say: say who you say and say why.