Arbitrator Grants the Clippers Billups' Bird Rights: Why it Doesn't Matter

LOS ANGELES, CA - DECEMBER 19: Chris Paul #3 and Chauncey Billups #1 of the Los Angeles Clippers set up defense against the Los Angeles Lakers during a 114-95 Clipper win at Staples Center on December 19, 2011 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Harry How/Getty Images)

When the NBA Collective Bargaining Agreement expired at the end of the 2011 season, the NBPA and the NBA couldn't reach an agreement and there was a lockout. When the lockout was ended just in time for a shortened season, there were some significant changes (lower salaries, shorter contracts, etc.).

One of these changes was the Amnesty Clause. Under this clause, each team could relieve themselves of one contract on their roster without any penalty. While the player amnestied would still have to be paid, that money would not apply to the team's salary cap. Once a player is amnestied, he is placed on amnesty waivers where teams can place anonymous bids to try to sign the player. If a player clears waivers, he then becomes a free agent, free to sign wherever he pleases.

When Chauncey Billups was amnestied by the New York Knicks this December, the Clippers placed a $2,000,032 bid and won. That made them responsible to cover that portion of Billups 14.2 million dollar contract, and left the Knicks with the rest.

The whole dispute and arbitrator thing was over the following dilemma: should teams be allowed to go over the cap to sign players claimed off of amnesty waivers with bird rights?

Now, the arbitrator decided that bird rights would be allowed.

But, let's pretend he didn't. The Clippers enter the offseason, and Chauncey is coming off of his 14.2 million deal with one year of experience with the Clippers. As a 1-year Free Agent, the Clippers can now go over the cap to re-sign Billups for up to 120% of his previous salary. Since Chauncey made 14.2 million last year, he would be eligible for slightly more than 17 million next season. So, without his Bird Rights, the Clippers can offer him more than 17 million for next season.

Now, back to reality, where the Clippers have his Bird Rights. That means that the Clippers can sign him for the maximum salary for a veteran of 10+ seasons- that's 35% of the Salary Cap. With the cap expected to be around 60 million dollars, that qualifies Billups for 21 million next season.

So, let's review:

No Bird Rights, Clippers can offer Chauncey up to 17 million

With Bird Rights, Clippers can offer Chauncey up to 21 million

I think I speak for all of us when I say that I would be upset to learn that the Clippers had signed Billups for 17 million or 21 million. I would be shocked if Chauncey even got 5 million.

So, in the end, the arbitrator granted the Clippers Bird Rights. While it doesn't affect Los Angeles, it helps out the New York Knicks by giving them the Bird Rights to Jeremy Lin and Steve Novak.

In my opinion, this makes sense. The players claimed off of waivers did not negotiate a new contract with the team that claimed them. Since they are still under the same contract, it's just like they had been traded.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Clips Nation

You must be a member of Clips Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Clips Nation. You should read them.

Join Clips Nation

You must be a member of Clips Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Clips Nation. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.