Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The End Of Sabanball: Details, Barbarians, And Precision

Dunleavy Gets His Extension

Coach Mike Dunleavy Sr.Continuing to break with their ignominious past, the Clippers have apparently reached a contract extension agreement with coach Mike Dunleavy for 4 years and $21M.  Of all the unprecedented moves the franchise has made in the last few years (locking up Brand and Maggette long term, signing free agents Mobley and Thomas, re-signing Cassell, extending Kaman), this is the one that tells me, "Wow, things really are different."  

Consider:  player salaries are usually a bidding war.  Brand and Maggette had offer sheets in hand, which the Clippers were allowed to match.  Mobley was a replacement for Bobby Simmons, who actually signed for more with the Bucks than the Clippers paid Cat.  Thomas signed for the mid-level, a de facto standard for quality free agents.  Cassell had an offer from the Hawks.  The fact that the players ACCEPTED these offers without being contractually compelled to do so speaks to the change in the culture, but the offers themselves, while unusual in Clipperland, were pretty mundane by NBA standards.

The Kaman extension was interesting in that it was the first time we've seen a Clipper extended, and it was a one-on-one negotiation, rather than an open bidding war.  Even so, overpaid players like Sam Dalembert and Tyson Chandler were used to establish the price.  There were even rumors of potential max offers in free agency.  So, while $50M is certainly a big extension, it doesn't put Chris in the stratosphere of salaries.  They paid him the going rate.

However, 4 years and $21M for a coach who is still under contract... well, this is hard to conceive of from Donald T. Sterling, the same man who fired coach Bill Fitch and then sued to try to keep from paying the salary he was owed.  There are 30 NBA head coaches.  This deal will make MDSr. the 6th highest paid coach in the league.  Of the 5 making more, 3 of them (Jackson, Riley and Popovich) have each won championships (with an 's').  A fourth (Jerry Sloan) is the longest tenured coach in the NBA, an institution and a great coach for good measure.  Only Nate McMillan's $6M per year contract in Portland seems out of place at the top of the list, but that number is certainly skewed by the fact that Paul Allen has more money than god.  

The deal is even more remarkable when you consider that Dunleavy himself was on the other side of the table.  In all of the player negotiations, MDSr was widely reported to be the one urging DTS, Baylor and Roeser to do the right thing.  "Re-sign Brand and Maggette if you want me to be your coach."  "Extend Kaman now, and then we'll discuss my extension."  He's been the one pushing, pulling, prodding... bringing the Clippers organization into the real NBA.  But in this case, the front office worked out an extension WITHOUT being told by MDSr that they had to do it.  It's remarkable.

So the next question is, is he worth it?  The short answer is, sure he is.  Of course, coaches salaries have no impact on the salary cap.  I'm an NBA blogger - it ain't my money, and unlike overpaying for a player, this doesn't negatively impact the team in any way.  So it's easy for me to say he's worth it.  But look at what the guy has done.  The Clippers have improved every year that he has been the coach.  As I've already pointed out, he's been the single biggest influence in changing the culture, in convincing the front office to pony up some money to re-sign players and bring in new free agents.  Kobe and Gilbert turned the money down - at least in part because they weren't convinced that things were really different.  So it took some time, but he has succeeded in making the Clippers legitimate, both on the court, and in the off-season.

Indicative of his impact, the Clippers have actually become a DEFENSIVE team during his regime.  With a collection of players who for the most part are not known as great individual defenders, the team has improved defensively every season, to the point where they ranked in the top five in several key categories last year.  That, my friends, is good coaching.  

And although I've made a big deal about it being the 6th most lucrative per year deal in the NBA, there are a bunch of deals (10 to be exact) in the $4M to $5M range.  It's a very nice contract, but over half the coaches in the league make at least $4M per, and it's pretty easy to argue that he deserves to be paid more than the median.

Coming as it does in the midst of a 4 game losing streak, while the team is a mere 6-6 and should really be worse than that, the news feels a little strange.  With the exception of Jerry Sloan and a few others, most coaches have a shelf life.  At some point, the buttons being pushed no longer work, and players tune the coach out.  This extension runs through the 2010-2011 season.  As of today, only Kaman is signed that long.  Believe it or not, Dunleavy is already the longest tenured coach in the franchise's California era, and will tie Jack Ramsay's all-time franchise record of 4 full seasons BEFORE the new 4 year extension kicks in.  Will he coach the team 8 consecutive seasons, through 2011?  Probably not - coaches move on mid-contract all the time, for lots of different reasons.  But for the time being, the question of who is in charge is not an issue, and despite the team's current funk, the players all still support and enthusiastically follow their coach.  

Another milestone for the former `worst franchise in sports.'

Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Like the Positive Attitude
Very refreshing to read your post.  I posted this earlier over on the ESPN board, so it helps to see a more balanced and postitive viewpoint:

 The Clips are certainly asking a lot from their longtime fans these days.  I don't know about guys like CA, 1121, Arnab and other message board veterans of the Gentry era, not to mention Trapp, but my head is spinning.  I'm confused.  I don't think I'm capable of a single clear thought about the Clippers right now.

At any given point over the last 3 years, I probably would have been very excited about giving Dunleavy a generous contract extension.  Part of that was because there was so much skepticism about DTS making deals, and the Clips have been in a consistent upswing during his entire tenure.  The tricky part was just maintaining the optimism that it actually could happen, not really whether it was a good idea or not.

There have been all sorts of little issues along the way, and also the major conflicts of Kaman-Wilcox and now Ross-Maggette (which should probably be called Ross-Maggette-Mobley).  But I gave MD the benefit of the doubt on Wilcox and liked the addition of Radmanovic.  Perhaps MD's strongest attribute was separating the wheat from the chaff out of the scrub pile, and bringing in/finding guys like Simmons, Rebraca, Ross, Singleton and even Rick Brunson really helped the Clips turn the corner.  They also seemed to become a truly professional team for the first time, with a vision for not just success but also preparation, a practice facility, marketing and fan development.  With Mobley, Rebraca, Kaman, Cassell, and Thomas, the Clips started making legitimate deals.  MD inspired Brand to find a new level in his game last year, and helped him get there.  Most impressive of all, perhaps, was bringing in "problem" players Cassell and Mobley, knowing exactly how to deal with them, making them responsible veteran leaders, and getting solid production and leadership out of them.

So now I've just reminded myself of a lot of positive accomplishments, and I'm not sure that impressive list is going to help at all.  Still confused.  On virtually every level, about everything Clipper.

--EB.  Nice to have a saint as your best player.  Give Dunleavy some credit for helping him reach true elite status last year, but you have give him an equal amount of criticism for foolishly allowing EB to play for Team USA.  The Clips already saw the negative effects of summer international play on Jaric; didn't anybody realize it would have the same effect on Brand?  Especially after a grueling post-season?  EB was so finely-tuned last year, didn't anybody realize that repeating that feat and level of excellence would require special care and measures?  I didn't, but it's not my job.

--Plain MD idiocy.  I can live with putting Ewing on Raja Bell, because it's the kind of thing that happens when you're trying to become a regular playoff team, it's all part of a process, and some things are just going to go wrong.  But looking back right now, the lowest point came this summer in Moscow.  I don't blame MD for drafting Korolev at all.  What's unforgivable, however, is going all the way to his hometown of Moscow and not playing him there, in a special preseason exhibition, and instead giving dozens of minutes to Lamond Murray and other scrubs who were never going to make the team.  As others have said, this is the guy who didn't play Jermaine O'Neal for 3 years.

--The Kaman deal.  Okay, back to benefit of the doubt land.  Like the fact that the deal was made at all, but the good things MD has done have gotten us beyond giving credit for simply making a deal, to where we have to scrutinize the quality of the deal in question.  This one's going to seem dicey for at least some time to come, and possibly a very long while.  Current status:  horrible horrible start, two okay games in losses, followed by a sprained ankle in practice and out for two weeks. with the standard slow progress getting back up to speed after that.  Good times.

--Livingston.  At least he doesn't have the deal yet.  Over the last five games, for the first time, I've been thinking that there's a decent chance that he might end up being awful.  I'm still a believer and card-carrying Club Optimism member, and I think that Cassell still casts a long shadow over him.  Cassell is out tonight against Sacramento, so maybe we'll see some positive signs.  The emergence of so many other good young PGs, many of whom aren't a lot older than LIv, has made this one more confusing.

--There's a long list of other current issues (Tim Thomas, Mobley, Singleton, Korolev), but the peak of the confusion is of course the handling of Maggette, the distribution of minutes around him, the failure to react to poor play and losses.  You can say that it's a long season and things will work themselves out, but you also have to make changes in your approach and acknowledge when your policy is just plain wrong.  Right now the chemistry and effort on the team is poor and sinking fast.  This is a new challenge for Clip fans, who expect bad chemistry and effort to be the result of substandard, mediocre talent and bad administration.  The fault at this point lies squarely on the coach and his decisions and approach.

But hey, any time a human being makes a deal to earn 21 million dollars, I give them a ton of credit.  It's never going to happen to me. Congratulations Coach.

by zhivclip on Nov 28, 2006 12:07 PM PST reply actions  

I'm confused too...
Are we talking about what's wrong with the team, or what's wrong with Dunleavy?  They're not necessarily one and the same.  Check out my new post, fyi, because it is on this very subject.  You should cut and paste some of these commments over there, because they are amazingly applicable.

As for the above... I don't think you can blame MDSr for Brand's summer or for Moscow.  Brand is a grown man, and I for one appreciate that he is proud to play for his country.  Is it a good thing for the Clippers?  No, of course not.  But that's more than a little selfish of us.  And look on the bright side - at least we're not Grizzlies fans, pissing away our season for the glory of Spain.  As for Moscow, clearly it was a mistake in hindsight.  But at the time the NBA asked, the Clippers were still a doormat.  It was probably a calculated risk to increase exposure for the team.  The fact that the hotel was 2 hours in city traffic from the practice facility is a logistical joke we can hang squarely on the shoulders of the league.  But I'm not going to blame MDSr for the mess (not much, anyway).

As for Kaman and Livingston, your Clipper fatalism is showing.  Believe me... I have to work hard to suppress mine, after these many years.  But the Kaman extension is not a mistake after 10 games, and the sprained ankle is just that - a sprained ankle.  As for Livingston, we all see what he can be, and so far he's only cost us a number 4 pick.  Who would you rather have from that draft?  Devin Harris?  Sebastian Telfair?  If Shaun Livingston doesn't end up being SIGNIFICANTLY better than those guys, I'll put the blame on Shaun Livingston and no one else.  The question of whether or not to extend him is for this summer, and we'll have more data points then.  We've got other problems right now.

MDSr's seeming aversion to athleticism is more troubling.  But the Wilcox situation was tough, simply because the Clippers were so loaded with back to the basket bigs.  I'm really, really hoping that he'll see the error of his ways with Corey, and get him more minutes.  After all, he played him over 36 minutes per game for 2 seasons, not very long ago.

The question of changing the culture, simply to send a message, is a tricky one.  If I had been in charge, I would not have extended Kaman.  It limits the team's options, plenty of bigs never really pan out, and you're paying a premium because of the limited supply.  Meanwhile, the league is going smaller, and we've got MBFGC sitting over in Athens.  So I would not have done it... no way.  BUT, the indisputably positive thing about it is the message that it's a new day in ClipperNation.  If I was Elgin, would I make decisions based on that alone?  Certainly not.  But it's a consideration.

by Steve Perrin on Nov 28, 2006 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Clips Nation!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Joc_01_small
Stats/Box/Game Log question?
Small
Clippers All Time Leaders in Wins Above (Below) Average
Small
Adjusted Point Differential and Pythagorean Wins
Small
A look at efficiency and point differential
Small
Anyone have a video of DJ's jumper?
Blake_griffin_cropped_small
It was a good day
Small
Poll: April 27th where do you see the Clippers?
Small
40-26 and getting there
Small
Are we showing Mo enough love?
Blake-griffin-dunk_small
JR Smith. Yay or Nay?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Clipsnation_small Steve Perrin

Editors

Joc_01_small John Raffo

Authors

Blake-griffin-dunk_small Lawler's Law